Huge
The Royal Academy Summer Exhibition 2025 contains the usual overwhelming number of works of art plastered all over the walls of 12 rooms – small, medium and huge. This year’s total is 1,729 prints, paintings, photographs, drawings, sculptures, films and architecture models. Where to start and how to think about this annual jamboree except to abandon yourself to the bombardment.

‘On your marks – get set – go!’ – installation view of Gallery 2 at the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition 2025 (photo © Royal Academy of Arts / David Parry)
Go with someone
I went round once, pretty carefully, trying to look at everything, then went round a couple more times and noticed a load of items I simply hadn’t registered on a first pass. That’s why it’s best to go with friends or family, because there’s too much for one person to process and other people notice other types of things and bring them to your attention. Plus which, it’s always fun to listen to other people’s opinions: why did they love x, y or z?

Installation view of room 1 in the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition, aka the Wohl Central Hall, which is dominated by one of Ryan Gander’s big black balls (left) and a set of ostrich feather car wash wipers suspended from thick chains, ‘Body Shop’ by Alice Channer (£70,000) (photo © Royal Academy of Arts / David Parry)
Exhibition guide
The little pocket-sized exhibition guide they offer each year now costs £3.50, which is beginning to feel a bit pricey, but it is a vital piece of equipment. None of the 1,729 works have captions giving name of work or name of artist, there’s just a number on the wall next to each piece (from 1 to 1,729) so it’s absolutely vital to have the guide to hand in order to look up who the artist is, what the work is called and, because the great majority of works are for sale, the price.
It lists the works in numerical order but, since works by the same artist are sometimes scattered between different rooms, it also lists them by artist. So, for example, we learn from this index that Michael Craig-Martin has five works in the show, numbers 110, 490, 1087, 1205, 1206. Then you scan the main numerical index to discover these are hung in the Lecture Room, Gallery 7, Gallery 4, and Gallery 3.
So if you want to track down works by particular favourite artists (Norman Ackroyd, Tracey Emin, Yinka Shonibare) there’s an element of Where’s Wally or Sudoku sleuthing to find the numbers, find the gallery, and then the challenge of finding them on a wall absolutely plastered with pictures or surfaces crammed with little sculptures.

How many little sculptures can you fit onto one display table? at the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition 2025 (photo © Royal Academy of Arts / David Parry)
The digital version
One last point: most of the works are medium sized, many relatively small, and it is often difficult or even impossible to really see these because a) there are just so many of them and b) lots of them are hung high up on the walls.
This year, as every year, I discovered loads and loads of images on the RA exhibition website that I have no memory of seeing in the flesh. I think it’s reasonable to say that there are, in effect, two Royal Academy Summer exhibitions, the real life one, and the digital one.
The courtyard
As usual the exhibition starts with a big sculpture or installation in the main courtyard. This year it’s a set of huge black inflated balls by Ryan Gander RA. Each one has a gnomic question printed on it in big white letters. Apparently these were developed in collaboration with schoolkids and, well, to be a little harsh, it shows: How much is a lot? When do you know you’re right? Does abstraction have rules? Will time tell?

Courtyard of the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition 2025 showing some of Ryan Gander’s big balls (photo © Royal Academy of Arts / David Parry)
Light white walls
My immediate impression was that the show felt lighter and airier and more attractive than in the past few years, which gave me a positive feeling about the thing. After visiting several rooms it dawned on me that this is because the curators have left (most of) the walls white. Bright white walls respond well to the ambient light coming through skylights and make the place feel light and airy and happy. I was tired from the working week when I headed for the Tube but walking into the galleries was a refreshing and uplifting moment.
And if you turn left out of the Wohl Central Hall into the vast room 3, you are met by a welter of huge and impressive works, with summer light pouring through the skylight and reflected from the white walls. All very positive.

Installation view of the enormous Gallery 3, by far the best room at the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition 2025 (photo © Royal Academy of Arts / David Parry)
However, when I looked closer at the numbers I realised room 3 is pretty much the last room you’re meant to visit (if you care about doing it in order) and you’re in fact meant to turn right out of the Wohl Central Hall into the much smaller Lecture Room.
This room and the subsequent ones (galleries 9, 8, 7, 6 etc), nice and white-painted though they are, had what felt to me far fewer really standout works in them. Obviously lots and lots of goodish things, some very nice things but, as I continued round the overwhelmingly densely hung spaces, navigating the crowds of other visitors, slowly the suspicion grew on me that there were fewer really notable works than in previous years. Maybe. Possibly.
But that’s just one person’s point of view. The point is there’s such a glut of stuff to look at, consider, analyse and judge that everyone’s opinions are going to differ, at hundreds of points. I considered structuring this review by the RA’s own categories:
- Prints
- Painting
- Photography
- Drawing
- Sculpture
- Architecture
- Film prints
But quickly realised this doesn’t really work. The things you like tend to be random and clustered in certain mediums. In my case, I like paintings and sculptures. I rarely pay much attention to films which a) require a lot of time b) are rarely worth it c) not least because they’re displayed on tiny monitors (poor film-makers, they must be gutted) and d) I used to work in TV where I professionally reviewed films made for the magazine format TV shows I edited, so I am used to a very high standard of image and editing and art films are, on the whole, notable for their deliberately low-fi quality.
And don’t get me started on architecture and architectural models: I regard the entire subject as a colossal fail. While international starchitects devise evermore silly and absurd projects to build dream cities in China or on Mars, the rest of us have to live in the disastrously badly planned, badly designed, badly built houses inflicted on us by previous generations of shoddy planners and cheapskate builders:
‘England boasts the highest percentage of substandard housing in Europe, with 15% of existing homes failing to meet the Decent Homes Standard. This is a higher proportion than countries like Hungary, Poland, and Lithuania.’
(England’s Housing Crisis: Among the Worst in the Developed World?)
I appreciate that architects large and small, world famous or local, have very little to do with all this, with local planning, house design, building, new developments etc, they’re all vying to build the next gherkin or shard or designing ideal communities for Utopia or, as here, Lord Forster of South Bank’s design for the new Manchester United stadium.
But in which case… if most of them have little or no say about the built environment most of us live and move in, why are we bothering to register their fantasias?
Among the numerous architect models, I was struck by this one which appeared to be made almost entirely from corrugated cardboard.
Size matters
It sounds silly but faced with such an overwhelming number of artworks you quickly realise that size really does matter. To give a simple example, there are a number of portraits of dogs or cats which are obviously meant to be twee and sentimental and reassuring and they are nearly all small, deliberately small and intimate in scale.
A lot of them are prints which are designed to be run off in multiple editions and you often see their glass fronts festooned with little red dot stickers. This indicates how many people have bought a copy – so there’s another game you can play here, with friends or family, particularly small children, which is set them to find the most popular picture, by number of sales.
What caught my eye
Having abandoned the attempt to consider the works logically by format or size or price, I’m just going to share half a dozen of the works which really stood out for me.
Mummer
Number 177, Mummer (Irish border sculpture proposal) by Tim Shaw. Sculpture from carved and constructed wood. £150,000, standing in front of a ragged red curtain.
Rats
101 white rat pelts lined with 22 carat gold, by Zatorski + Zatorski. Number 1,713. £85,000
Dialogue with God
Dialogue with God by Jane Hewitt, catalogue number 1727, £1,000.
Day 3
Number 1592: Day 3 by Eleanor Lakelin – made from bleached horse chestnut burr. £78,600
Archive of Lost Memories I
Archive of Lost Memories I by Yinka Shonibare, catalogue number 105: £300,000. We’re familiar with Shonibare’s work from his solo exhibition at the Serpentine. Half of it is very post-colonial, with statues of imperial heroes decorated with colourful floral patterns, and this shelf display is a variation on that theme, with its terracotta versions of the Benin bronzes (still to be seen in the British Museum) juxtaposed with a flower-covered imperial bust. But another strand of his work is colourful portraits of African birds generally accompanied by a tribal mask, and there are three or four examples here as well.
Simorgh and Solent avocet
These could be in a local village craft fair, couldn’t they? But for some reason they caught my eye, made me smile.

Simorgh and Solent avocet by Emma Christmas, numbers 1106 and 1005, £695 and £625 (photo by the author)
Touchstone
The absence of real life
It’s amazing to me how unreal art is, how utterly unlike real, everyday life, how little of most people’s average experiences are captured by art. What do most of us do, what makes up our experience of life? Surely work and commuting to and from work and worrying about work takes up half or more of life, followed by shopping for food, cooking and eating. Vast amounts of time are spent watching telly, going to the movies, taking part in sports or health activities such as simply walking or, in my case, cycling and the gym. And, of course, more or less everybody now seems to have a mobile phone and pay an enormous amount of time looking at a tiny screen.
My point is that none of this is depicted anywhere in any of the 1,729 works of art on show here. When you see it from this perspective, it is absolutely staggering the extent to which ‘art’ – presumably derived from art school, art teaching, art courses and what you could call Art Ideology – suppresses and excludes the vast majority of everyday human experience.
To be more specific, most people’s work involves sitting in front of a computer screen and yet there was just one depiction of this universal activity in the show (At The Screen by David Tindle) plus a schematic Michael Craig-Martin silhouette of a laptop. That’s it.
Driving – how many people own a car, how many hours a week do people spend driving, drive busses coaches vans Deliveroo scooters: yet there were very few depictions of this extremely common activity: some photos of picturesquely derelict old cars, a few photos or paintings of the view through what appear to be wet windscreens. But of the apparatus surrounding driving, and the vast infrastructure of motorways, service stations, A roads, B roads and so on, almost nothing. (Actually there is one picturesque gas station, but it’s in America which is generally considered by the art world to be more picturesque than shabby England, obviously.)
Instead: lots of real life as most of us experience it, there are lots of still lifes of apples, or pears, or vases of flowers, of isolated birds, of landscapes and seascapes, plus hundreds and hundreds of images which aren’t identifiable as anything specific, abstracts and semi-abstracts, vivid, beautifully executed, and all strangely detached from the world we live in…

How many pictures can you fit on a wall? at the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition 2025 (photo © Royal Academy of Arts / David Parry)
All I’m really saying is that, when you assemble nearly 2,000 of the best contemporary artworks, paintings, prints, photos, sculptures and installations by artists famous and obscure, it is really quite striking how much of contemporary lived experience is not in it.
Mr Potato Head
New World Man by Robert Mach

New World Man by Robert Mach, catalogue number 1723, £1,400.
How you’ll feel by the end

Lulu in the Sky with Diamonds Catalogue by John Humphreys (number 1661) from £120,000 (photo by the author)
Related links
- The Royal Academy Summer exhibition 2025 continues at the Royal Academy until 17 August 2025
- Search every work in the exhibition
- Large print guide
































































