‘We love the 21st century. It’s our best century so far!’
Gilbert & George
The Morecambe and Wise of modern art are back with a blockbuster show of brand new works at the Hayward Gallery on London’s South Bank.
It’s not a retrospective (that would cover their entire career) but it includes 60 or so works from the past 25 years i.e. the entire twenty-first century so far, hence the exhibition title.

Installation view of Gilbert and George: 21ST CENTURY PICTURES at the Hayward Gallery showing the enormous works in the first gallery (photo by the author)
The works are enormous, filling entire massive gallery walls. They are done in the style the terrible twins perfected what seems like aeons ago, vast digitally generated images divided by black borders into frames, mocking the format of medieval stained glass windows, complete with our heroes in a variety of stylised poses, against backgrounds filled with the bric-a-brac of street life where they live (Brick Lane, in the East End of London) all done in lurid dayglo colours.

HETERODOXY by Gilbert & George (2005) © Gilbert & George. Courtesy of Gilbert & George and White Cube
The blurb says the show demonstrates how the dynamic duo have deployed ‘modern technology’ in their practice and what this means is that the works are not only enormous but the outlines of the random objects which form the backgrounds are rendered with digital precision and in even more strikingly vivid colours than before. Everything feels more precise and controlled.
Hackneyed themes
The wall labels announce half a dozen themes, confidently telling us that G&G tackle big taboo subjects such as Sex, Money, Race and Religion. But hang on. Those are hardly ‘taboo’ subjects, surely the exact opposite – these have been the favourite subjects of ‘radical’ artists since at least the 1960s. They are the clichés of modern art.
Also, these works don’t really tackle anything at all. In the biggest gallery are 4 monstrously large works showing our heroes’ stylised red faces against what seem to be floral patterns and a number of postal frank marks, but each one dominated by a text box bearing the key words SEX, MONEY, RACE, RELIGION.

Installation view of Gilbert & George: 21ST CENTURY PICTURES showing the enormous SEX MONEY RACE pictures (2016) (photo by Mark Blower) Courtesy of the Gilbert & George and the Hayward Gallery
But hang on – just writing big words on an art work doesn’t make the art work about that subject. I could title this review BREXIT – it wouldn’t make the review about Brexit, though, would it? Similarly, just writing words on works of art doesn’t mean the work addresses, analyses, investigates (or any of the other art curator buzz words) the topic mentioned.
In fact, in a funny way, it does the opposite. What’s always fascinated me about putting text into art words is the clash between two completely different modes of discourse – language and words with their denotations and connotations, which trigger instant meanings and associations in our minds – with images, colours and patterns, which trigger completely different neural networks, associations and meanings. Often these juxtapositions can be jarring and triggering. And yet here, the plastering of these great big abstract nouns into entirely irrelevant images has the opposite effect: is oddly neutralising, stripping them of meaning, bringing out how exhausted and empties of meaning these words have become.
Sex
As to sex, many of the works feature what (looking it up online) I discover are called tart cards, the kind of business cards you used to get in old telephone boxes offering sexual services of prostitutes, escort girls, rent boys and so on. These flourished in the 1980s and 1990s in phone boxes all across London but… who uses phone boxes nowadays? I spoke to one of the visitor attendants at the show and she didn’t know what a phone box is. She’d certainly never used one.
A couple of the works deploy the word HOMO across them, one dwelling on HOMO RIOT, a phrase repeated 40 times in smaller billboards lining the central image. Um, so what?

Installation view of Gilbert and George: 21ST CENTURY PICTURES at the Hayward Gallery showing the text HOMO RIOT against an old-fashioned phone box and letterbox (photo by the author)
Another one is made up entirely of mocked-up Evening Standard hoardings with headlines announcing this or that figure was outed as gay or denied being gay. What came across to me was how old all this was. One of the outed figures was Simon Hughes, remember him, the Liberal MP, from decades ago who I assumed was gay in the 1980s.
I suppose all this might be a gesture towards queer politics but the real message here is the medium – evening newspaper hoardings, as shown in the image below, which shows works collecting quite a few newspaper hoardings relating to bomb outrages? Fair enough but who reads evening papers any more? Are there any evening papers in London any more? Surely everyone gets their news on their phones? These images felt lovingly curated and wonderfully nostalgic.

Installation view of Gilbert and George: 21ST CENTURY PICTURES at the Hayward Gallery showing images using old-style newspaper hoardings (photo by the author)
Race
I recently went to the massive Kerry James Marshall exhibition at the Royal Academy which emphatically demonstrated a career spent putting Black people at the centre of the picture, at reworking themes and styles from across Western art and history, to put Black people, Black faces and Black bodies front and centre of every work.
Thus sensitised to the presence or absence of Black figures I was struck, dazzled and flabbergasted that there are no Black people anywhere in these 60 or so massive works about contemporary London. The dynamic duo live and work near Brick Lane, famous for its Asian community (and fabulous curry houses) and yet out of the 60 works I saw only one which depicted a couple of Asian youths.

SEX MONEY RACE RELIGION by Gilbert & George (2016) © Gilbert & George. Courtesy of Gilbert & George, Fondation Louis Vuitton, Paris and White Cube
Why this conspicuous omission? I’m not attributing any sinister motive, just saying that the absence of multiple ethnicities seemed gobsmacking in an exhibition of contemporary art about London.
Religion
When the wall labels explain that the pair mock and subvert RELIGION they are, of course, talking about one religion, the one it’s always been safe to mock and subvert, Christianity, in particular the feeble, bien-pensant Church of England. Hence ‘scandalous’ works with titles like ‘God loves fucking!’ with its even more ‘scandalous’ footnote, ‘Was Jesus heterosexual?’

Installation view of Gilbert and George: 21ST CENTURY PICTURES at the Hayward Gallery showing ‘scandalous’ and ‘blasphemous’ stuff about Christianity, yawn (photo by the author)
This hangs in the room devoted religion which houses half a dozen even vaster works than the Sex-Money-Race-Religion and on these works are written schoolboy slogans and public toilet-level graffiti.
- Ruffle the Religious
- Shag a Sacristan
- Prick Tease a Waitress
- Crosses Are Crass
- Spit in the Font
- Crap in a Crypt
- Dump on Dogma
These are sort of funny because they’re funny, and then funny all over again because they’re so crude and crass. The curators assure us this is a subversive undermining of religious bigotry or something, but it feels more like naughty 4th formers titillating each other with rude words.
And what about the other religions, the non-Christian ones? Do they take the piss out of Judaism? No. There are a few menorahs scattered among the bric-a-brac which litters the works but they don’t want to risk accusations of bigotry themselves. Similarly, there are two (I think) slogans which appear to mock Islam but which I am too cautious to reproduce here. And they live in a heavily Muslim area of London. What’s the Cockney expression, ‘Don’t shit on your own doorstep’? Wise advice.
In other words, Gilbert and George’s mockery of the Christian Establishment – like the so-called discussions of Race and Sex – seem charmingly old-fashioned, dated and risk-free – postcards from another, simpler time. They feel as if they hark back to the confrontational days of the 1980s and Mrs Thatcher’s racist, homophobic regime when this kind of sloganeering would have caused a genuine scandal. Now this kind of thing (‘God loves fucking!’ lol) causes barely a ripple, certainly won’t be splashed all over the tabloids with outraged calls for the show to be closed down, as would have happened back in the glory days of political art. The ideology of calling out, naming and shaming and cancelling, has moved on to other issues, ones they are careful to avoid.

Installation view of Gilbert and George: 21ST CENTURY PICTURES at the Hayward Gallery, one of the few works to show non-Christian religious symbolism (photo by the author)
Money
I couldn’t see anything about money as such, but then how do you visualise the staggering rise in inequality which has come to blight British society over the past 40 or so years? There were two works which appear to feature (white) tramps and down-and-outs. Not the most biting analysis of the impact of neoliberal economics.
In fact the most pertinent thing about standing in an art gallery talking about money is the way most contemporary art has been monetised, how art itself has become one more asset class to be bought up by international players such as Russian oligarchs, oil-rich Arabs, national wealth funds, bought for tens of millions and promptly stashed in Swiss bank vaults.
In fact one of the main reason for going to art exhibitions is to see works which are usually squirreled away in private collections or Swiss bank vaults given a rare public outing – as will no doubt be the eventual fate of most of the ‘subversive’ works on display here.

Installation view of Gilbert & George 21ST CENTURY PICTURES. Photo by Mark Blower. Courtesy of the Gilbert & George and the Hayward Gallery
Nostalgia
No, despite the use of the latest digital technology etc, this felt like a deeply nostalgic art, art from and about a bygone era. The 1980s was forty long years ago and much, much has changed since then. But the iconography and the mindsets and the ‘targets’ of Gilbert and George’s art have not changed at all. SEX, MONEY, RACE, RELIGION, good grief, what hackneyed old themes!
The whole things took me back to the 1980s of red phone boxes smelling of pee and festooned with tart cards, with Evening Standard sellers outside every Tube station shouting out the headline of the evening.
Something else which took me back the olden days was that alongside the images of red phone boxes were massive images of pillar boxes, the red metal columns in which you used to post letters. Sweet. My kids don’t post letters. Everything is done by text and email, TikTok and Instagram.

Installation view of Gilbert and George: 21ST CENTURY PICTURES at the Hayward Gallery showing a work featuring an old-style phone box and letter box (photo by the author)
In much the same way the huge SEX, MONEY, RACE, RELIGION works in the big room, which I show above, are covered with postmarks, indicating the regional location of the post office which stamped it. I’ve no idea but, like the rest of the show, it felt quaint, sweet, from another age.
Tourist images
In fact the more I looked the more I felt that images like these – old-style red phone boxes, old-style red pillar boxes, the old-style red London buses depicted in a few of them – these could all come from tourists brochures and ads for Swinging London, certainly from tourist ads created in the 1980s and ’90s. Britpop. Oasis. New Labour. Some of the details may be unnerving if you bother to look up close, but the overall impression is of a slightly delirious and arty patriotism.
London
So I didn’t buy the idea that any of these images were ‘about’ anything. They’re certainly useless as ‘investigations’ of Sex-Money-Race-Religion, what a ridiculous idea.
If they’re about anything, what they’re about is London, and above all the bric-a-brac, the detritus found in London streets. So there are several works made up entirely of images of street signs from East London. There’s a recurring motif of small metal lockets bearing images stamped into the metal such as you sometimes find lost in the street. One had a couple of bracelets arranged in patterns roughly approximating human form, a kind of proxy for the two ageing subversives. There are old champagne corks and the wire frames they come with, such as you sometimes see lying around.
There are several featuring (for some reason) huge glow-ups of date stones and, in one notable work, a bunch of large slugs. Take these along with the series featuring dayglo swatches of leaves, or the couple depicting what look like tramps, the ones depicting newspapers hoardings, knackered-looking phone boxes, graffiti-covered pillar boxes… and you realise they’re not really about the ostensible themes or topics: what they’re really all about is London.
The show is a kind of glorying in the junk and detritus you find or see stumbling around London’s filthy, polluted streets. But transmogrified, transformed, elevated and turned into brilliantly coloured and luridly outlined talismans and icons, immediately recognisable and strangely warming, in these overwhelming, larger-than-life images.
Summary
So Gilbert and George present us with 60 enormous, bold, bright and brassy works, presenting the detritus of the capital’s gutter in an astonishingly hi-res digital finish. The attempts to ‘tackle contemporary subjects’ side of them are – in my view – laughably inadequate, nostalgic gestures back to the confrontational politics of the 1980s and 90s, but that’s part of the fun, too.
The works are maybe best seen as updated versions of medieval stained glass windows, replacing the saints and symbols of medieval Christianity with avatars of the dynamic duo themselves adrift amongst the endless junk of the city, street-worn detritus and out-of-date old attitudes alike preserved in digital aspic for future generations to puzzle over.
Related links
- Gilbert and George: 21ST CENTURY PICTURES continues at the Hayward Gallery until 11 January 2026




















