Fragile Beauty: Photographs from the Sir Elton John and David Furnish Collection @ the Victoria and Albert Museum

Introduction

Sir Elton John began collecting photographs in 1991 and his collection is now regarded as one of the leading private photography collections in the world, distinguished by its exceptional quality and remarkable range and depth. It contains over 7,000 fine art photographs and its full formal title is The Sir Elton John and David Furnish Photography Collection.

This exhibition showcases a selection from the collection of over 300 rare prints from 140 photographers. As such, it is the Victoria and Albert Museum’s largest ever photography exhibition.

This exhibition complements the 2016 exhibition, The Radical Eye: Modernist Photography from the Sir Elton John Collection staged at Tate Modern. Roughly speaking that exhibition covered the pre-war, Modernist aspects of their huge collection, whereas this exhibition covers the period from 1950 to the present day.

The show includes an impressive roster of leading photographers to tell the story of postwar and contemporary photography, and includes celebrated works by Robert Mapplethorpe, Nan Goldin, Cindy Sherman, William Eggleston, Diane Arbus, Sally Mann, Zanele Muholi, Ai Weiwei, Carrie Mae Weems and many, many others.

Exhibition structure

The exhibition is arranged in the following themes. I’m cutting and pasting the curators’ wall labels (and highlighting them in italics) to give you a good feel for the show and the themes it covers. Then I list some of the most striking images, ones which have stayed with me for the few days since I visited, but only some – there were plenty more in each section.

At the end of this review is a gallery showing all the images we’re allowed to show to promote the exhibition.

1. Fashion

This section charts the evolution of fashion photography from the glamour of post-war Parisian couture to the globalism of contemporary clothing. During the 1950s, a fresh dynamism took over the magazines. Studio backdrops were swapped for city skylines, as in the work of Frances McLaughlin-Gill or Frank Horvat. Following the Swinging Sixties, revolutionary designers stepped onto the scene with daring looks prompting more provocative fashion imagery. Today’s photographers document the ever-changing culture of streetwear, celebrating self-made garments and individual expression.

I’m not very sympathetic to fashion but this small room contained some absolutely iconic images.

  • Richard Avedon – Dovima with Elephants, 1955
  • Helmut Newton – Elsa Peretti as Bunny, New York (on terrace of her apartment, costume by Halston), 1975
  • Richard Avedon’s shot of Nastassja Kinski draped with a huge snake, 1981
  • Herb Ritts – Versace Dress, 1990
  • Tina Barney – The Limo, 2006

Versace Dress (Back View), El Mirage, 1990 by Herb Ritts © Herb Ritts Foundation. Courtesy of Fahey Klein Gallery, Los Angeles

2. Stars of Stage, Screen and Studio

From giants of the silver screen to celebrated musicians and artists, iconic figures have long intrigued Elton John and David Furnish. Passionate about cinema, they have acquired images of actors such as Marlon Brando and Elizabeth Taylor whose glamour and showmanship epitomised Hollywood’s Golden Age. Frank Sinatra and Doris Day, who both succeeded in musical and movie careers, are pictured here at the height of their fame.

Portraits of rock, folk, jazz and blues performers, on stage and behind the scenes, honour the artistry
of musicians who revolutionised their industry. They include the Queen of Soul, Aretha Franklin, and the King of Rock ‘n’ Roll, Elvis Presley. John is particularly fascinated by those who suffered for their art and the collection contains multiple images of jazz trumpeter Chet Baker and Hollywood star Marilyn Monroe. In other pictures, we see portraits of painters and photographers whose life and work continue to inspire John and Furnish today.

  • Bob Willoughby – Billie Holiday, Singing at the Tiffany Club, Los Angeles, 1951
  • John Florea – Doris Day, 1952
  • Sid Avery:
    • James Dean, Close-Up with a Bolex Camera on the Set of Giant, 1955
    • Elizabeth Taylor Sunning Herself on the Set of Giant, Marfa, Texas, 1955
    • Marlon Brando with Bongo Drums in the Den of his Beverly Hills Home, 1955
  • Lew Allen – Elvis Presley Kiss, Cleveland Arena Concert, 23 November 1956
  • William Claxton:
    • Dinah Washington, Los Angeles, 1959
    • Mahalia Jackson, Chicago, 1960
    • Ray Charles with a Raelette, Hollywood, 1959
    • Duke Ellington, Hollywood, 1959
  • Herman Leonard – Chet Baker, New York City, 1956

Chet Baker, New York City, 1956 by Herman Leonard © Herman Leonard Photography, LLC

  • Richard Avedon – Bob Dylan, 132nd Street and FDR Drive, Harlem, New York City, 4 November 1963
  • Robert Freeman – The Beatles’ Boots, 1964
  • Richard Avedon – the Beatles, 1967
  • Lee Friedlander – Aretha Franklin, 1968
  • Terry O’Neill – Frank Sinatra in Miami Beach, 1968
  • Norman Seeff – Joni Mitchell, Los Angeles, 1976
  • Michael Halsband – Andy Warhol and Jean-Michel Basquiat #143, New York City, 10 July 1985
  • Irving Penn – The Hand of Miles Davis, 1986

To be honest, the exhibition could have stopped here because this blitz of famous musicians, movie stars and artists triggered a flood of memories of music and films and emotions. Impossible not to love the iconic images of, say, Mitchell and Monroe, the iconic shot of a very young Dylan etc. The boxing photo of Warhol and Basquiat is fabulous. But my standout piece in the room was Irving Penn’s three shots of Miles Davis’s hand. Four fingers which produced 40 years of unbelievably varied and powerful music.

3. Desire

Fabulous photos of gorgeous hunky beautiful young men in various states of dress and undress, so young and full of life and male beauty. So nice to see the male willy shot candidly and overtly, as just another part of the human body, sometimes a detail of a larger portrait, sometimes singled out for close-up scrutiny as by Mapplethorpe.

The photographs in this section reveal a desire for the male form, from subtle studio portraiture of the
1950s to more explicit exposure in contemporary works. As a celebration of the collection’s numerous
homoerotic pictures, once viewed as provocative or even scandalous, they elevate to the public realm
what previously remained hidden. Some photographers take an autobiographical approach to documenting their communities.

For artists such as Robert Mapplethorpe and Peter Hujar, who came to prominence in the early years of the gay rights movement, their intention was to shatter oppressive stereotypes and revel in their queerness. From the mid-1980s, the AIDS epidemic fuelled an urgency to visualise a community that had long been forced into the shadows. The statuesque male body in the pictures of Herb Ritts and Pierre et Gilles became a camp counterpoint to the relentless hostility of mainstream media.

  • Herbert List – Young men under Reed Roof, Torremolinos, Andalucía, Spain, 1951
  • Tamotsu Yatō – From the series Young Samurai: Bodybuilders of Japan, mid-1960s
  • Sunil Gupta – Untitled #21, from the series Christopher Street, 1976
  • Robert Mapplethorpe:
    • Patrice, 1977
    • Jack Walls, 1982
  • Tom Bianchi: his Fire island series [a series of photographs celebrating gay joy at a time when homosexuality was under attack in Reagan’s America]:
    • Untitled, 368, Fire Island Pines, 1975–83
    • Untitled, 780, Fire Island Pines, 1975–83

Untitled, 368, Fire Island Pines, 1975 to 1983 by Tom Bianchi © Tom Bianchi, courtesy of Fahey Klein Gallery, Los Angeles

  • Andy Warhol:
    • Self-Portrait, 1980
    • Self-Portrait in Drag, 1981
  • Herb Ritts – Fred with Tires, Hollywood, 1984
  • Gilbert & George – Naked Body, 1991
  • Pierre et Gilles – Life Saver, Shane, Sydney, 1995

4. Reportage

Elton John and David Furnish have a passion for photojournalism, actively searching out many famous examples of the genre. This selection begins with photographs from the Civil Rights era of the 1960s, a formative period for John. The images depict a heroic battle against discrimination as American youth mobilised to end racial segregation in the South. The freedom struggle took many forms and, against the background of the US bombing of Vietnam, it became more militant as the decade wore on. This was also an era of political assassinations, as seen in the portraits of leaders whose time was cut violently short.

Two other areas of reportage have a deep personal and public resonance for John and Furnish: the AIDS activism of the late 1980s and the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. The couple continue to collect photojournalism today, drawing connections between past and present.

America again. And the 1960s again.

Black Americans. New York City. 1962 by Bruce Davidson © Bruce Davidson Magnum Photos

It’s the decade curators and pop culture fans are drawn back to again and again and again like a dog to its sick. Martin Luther King, Civil Rights, the Freedom March, Malcolm X, Black Power, Vietnam protests, JFK, Bobby Kennedy being assassinated – all your old favourites are here. We’re only lacking Woodstock, Altamont and Jim Morrison poncing around on stage and we’d have the complete I-Spy Book of 60s clichés. Nothing from anywhere else in the world. The 1960s only happened in America.

Malcolm X, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 1962 by Eve Arnold © Eve Arnold/Magnum Photos

As did the Reagan 1980s and AIDS activism, the first Gulf War, 9/11, blah blah blah. America America America. There is a little flurry of abroad in the next section, with one photo from the endless civil war in Syria, another from the current conflict in Ukraine, and the bizarre assassination of the Russiabn ambassador to Turkey. But these rare exceptions only foreground the rule that this is a exhibition of (almost entirely) images from America.

  • Garry Winogrand – John F. Kennedy, Democratic National Convention, Los Angeles, 1960
  • Eve Arnold – Malcolm X, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 1962
  • René Burri – Che Guevara, Havana, Cuba, 1963
  • Danny Lyon:
    • Segregated Drinking Fountains in the County Courthouse, Albany, Georgia, USA, August 1963
    • Demonstration at an ‘All-white’ Swimming Pool, Cairo, Illinois, USA, 1962
  • Stephen Somerstein – Coretta Scott King and Husband Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., on Platform in front of Alabama State House, Smiling at the Crowd of 25,000 Marchers at Conclusion of 1965 Selma to Montgomery, Alabama Civil Rights March, 25 March 1965
  • John Dominis – American Track and Field Athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos, First and Third Place Winners in the 200 Meter Race, Protest with the Black Power Salute, Mexico City, 1968
  • Boris Yaro – The Shooting of Robert F. Kennedy, Los Angeles, 1968
  • John Filo – The Grieving Student at Kent State University, 4 May 1970
  • Pirkle Jones:
    • Black Panther demonstration in front of the Alameda County Court House, Oakland, California, during Huey Newton’s trial, 30 July 1968
    • Black Panthers from Sacramento, Free Huey Rally, Bobby Hutton Memorial Park, Oakland, CA, 25 August 1968

The caption to the Black Panther photos made me smile. The curators write:

The Panthers consciously projected a militant ethos and relied on supportive photographers and filmmakers to promote this image. The strategy proved highly successful, terrifying mainstream America and resulting in extensive harassment and criminalisation of the Party by the FBI.

You can feel their righteous identification with these fearless activists for Black rights. And then you turn the corner and are confronted by a wall of photos of 9/11 and instantly reflect, ‘Well, I can think of another organisation which “projected a militant ethos” and “relied on supportive photographers and filmmakers” (and social media experts) for its impact, which “terrified mainstream America and resulted in criminalisation by the FBI” – al-Qaeda. Black Panthers – the right kind of terrifying mainstream America; al-Qaeda, not so much.

Let me be absolutely clear that I am in no way mocking what happened on 9/11, I am as appalled as anyone at what happened, and am awed by the bravery of the New York emergency services. I am  gently mocking art gallery curators who, here as everywhere, like to flirt with radical chic and sympathise with ‘revolutionary’ movements, as long as are from long ago and no longer present the slightest threat to the current state of bourgeois society, one of whose typical embodiments is…the art gallery.

There are half a dozen or so heart-wrenching photos of 9/11 which really bring home the dazed horror of the day.

  • Richard Drew – The Falling Man, 11 September 2001
  • Jeff Mermelstein from the series Ground Zero, 11 September 2001
    • Fireman with Tears, 2001
    • Statue, 2001
    • Tree and Skeleton of Tower Two, 2001
    • Red Cube, 2001
  • Ryan McGinley – Sam (Ground Zero), 11 September 2001

5. The American Scene

I laughed out loud when, after being dazzled by American music, movie and art stars, then bombarded with a comprehensive recap of the 1960s in America, you walk round the corner into the next section  to discover that it is all about…America!

American photography resonates strongly in the collection, including images by many of the most influential artists of the post-war period. Robert Frank, Diane Arbus, William Eggleston and Lewis Baltz feature prominently, all iconoclasts who broke with established practice to produce a less than idealised vision of the country. Subjects range from the anonymity of the urban environment to historically charged landscapes in the rural South. The road trip, the haphazard expansion of the American West, and the extraordinary glimpsed within the everyday are potent recurring themes.

Having lived in Atlanta for three decades, Elton John has collected many important works from the American South, including photographs by Henry Clay Anderson, Alec Soth and Sally Mann. Uncomfortable histories are not ignored. The USA is pictured unsparingly through the camera lens.

  • Roy DeCarava – Catsup bottles, table and coat, 1952
  • Saul Leiter:
    • Canopy, 1958
    • Snow, 1970
  • Lee Friedlander:
    • Newark, New Jersey, 1962
    • Florida, 1963
    • New Orleans, 1968
  • William Eggleston:
    • Near Minter City and Glendora, Mississippi, about 1972
    • Greenwood, Mississippi, about 1973
    • Memphis, Tennessee, 1971
    • Untitled (Coca-Cola and Peaches! Sign), 1973
    • Sumner, Mississippi, Cassidy Bayou in Background, 1971
  • Stephen Shore, from Uncommon Places:
    • Holden Street, North Adams, Massachusetts, 13 July 1974
    • Graig Nettles, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 1 March 1978
    • US 10, Post Falls, Idaho, 25 August 1974
    • El Paso Street, El Paso, Texas, 5 July 1975
  • Alec Soth – The Farm, Angola State Prison, Angola, LA, 2002

The Farm, Angola State Prison, Angola, LA 2002 by Alec Soth © Alec Soth and Weinstein Hammons Gallery

There is a small sequence devoted to the great Diane Arbus, great, excellent, if rather predictable but, yet again, here we are, back in the 1960s, in New York. Where we were in the previous section. And the section before that. And the section before that.

  • Identical twins, Roselle, N.J. 1966
  • Transvestite couple at a dance, N.Y.C. 1961
  • Exasperated boy with a toy hand grenade, N.Y.C. 1963

6. Fragile Beauty

Two photographers are of immense significance to Elton John and David Furnish: Nan Goldin and Robert Mapplethorpe. Both escaped the strictures of their suburban upbringing for the bohemian subcultures of New York City during the 1970s. For both Goldin and Mapplethorpe, photography was intensely personal, a way to keep things real. They strove to create an intimate portrait of their generation, representing the lives of alternative and queer-identified communities that had long been stigmatised by mainstream America. Other images speak to human vulnerability and the creativity of transgression. Mary Ellen Mark, Larry Clark and Ryan McGinley are drawn to young people on the fringes of society, presenting classic images of rebellion. Transgender star, Candy Darling, lies dying in her hospital bed. Philip-Lorca diCorcia stages portraits of male prostitutes on the streets of Los Angeles. For John and Furnish, these and similar photographs suggest the fragility that lies at the heart of the human condition.

‘The human condition’? Or the American condition? Or, even more limited, just the New York condition?

Self Portrait, 1985 by Robert Mapplethorpe © Robert Mapplethorpe Foundation. Used by permission

  • Richard Avedon – Andy Warhol and Members of the Factory, 30 October 1969
  • Peter Hujar – transgender actress Candy Darling [an Andy Warhol superstar and a muse of The Velvet Underground] on her Deathbed, 1974
  • Larry Clark – from the series Tulsa, 1963 to 1971
  • Ryan McGinley:
    • Raina (Falling Bridge), 2005
    • Dakota Hair, 2004
    • Drive in, 2005
    • Self Portrait (Lip Tattoo), 2005
  • Alec Soth – Nan’s Bed, Brooklyn, New York, 2018

Robert Mapplethorpe features in most of the other sections but this section contains the biggest sample of his work. The curators explain why:

The collection includes many photographs by Robert Mapplethorpe, relished by John and Furnish for their masculine beauty. This selection reveals the artist’s embrace of neoclassicism, as seen in the images of marble busts or chillingly beautiful flower arrangements. But the transgressive Mapplethorpe is also present, including his haunting last self-portrait holding a death’s-head cane. Aged just 42, wheelchair-bound and succumbing to AIDS-related illnesses, Mapplethorpe nonetheless created an enduring statement of human vitality.

  • Self Portrait, 1985
  • Italian Devil, 1988
  • Calla Lily, 1988
  • Double Jack in The Pulpit, 1988
  • Poppy, 1988
  • Self Portrait, 1988
  • Apollo, 1988

Poppy, 1988 by Robert Mapplethorpe © Robert Mapplethorpe Foundation. Used by permission

Nan Goldin – ‘Thanksgiving’

As the curators write:

Nan Goldin’s photography holds a very special place in the collection. Thanksgiving spans a quarter of a century from Goldin’s youth in Boston to intimate snapshots of her bohemian circle in New York City. The installation acts as a shrine to friends and lovers – some now deceased – and as a memorial of their love for one another. For John and Furnish, seeing Thanksgiving was a revelation and they immediately identified with the shared joy and vulnerability the artwork conveys.

And:

A 149-image series, shown in its entirety in the exhibition, ‘Thanksgiving’ documents events from 1973 to 1999 and depicts some of the most intimate and emotional moments in Goldin and her community’s lives, from the euphoric to the sensual to the distressing. Displayed floor to ceiling, the photographs become an intense homage both to the friendships that survived those twenty-six years, and to those friends she has lost.

Exhibitions often talk about immersive experiences but this genuinely is one. They’ve created a space (not really a room since the walls don’t reach to the floor, more a square space created by four walls suspended from the ceiling) which are absolutely covered with scrappy, spontaneous-feeling photos of Goldin’s extended circle of friends over many years. Suffice to say that these people lived in amazing squalor, mess and degradation in what look like a series of squats, skinny half-dressed, in all kinds of casual poses, at parties, at home, in unmade beds. I found it fascinating to enter and completely surrounded by so many powerful images of Bohemian poverty and squalor. The woman I visited with felt so desperately sad for these woeful looking waifs and strays that the total immersion in their squalid lifestyle made her want to cry and she had to exit the rather claustrophobic space. Either way, it’s a powerful experience.

Nan Goldin, Jimmy Paulette and Taboo! In the Bathroom, 1991 Nan Goldin © Nan Goldin. Courtesy of Nan Goldin and Gagosian

7. Constructed Images

Since the late 1970s, advances in printing technology have enabled photographs to become bigger, bolder and more closely integrated with the worlds of fashion, film and advertising. The theatricality and playfulness of these works resonate with Elton John and David Furnish who understand the skill required to create visual spectacle.

Constructed images allow photographers to articulate different identities and more challenging narratives. Whether grappling with politics, presenting personal histories or investigating the nature of photography, these pictures often invite us to question our perceptions. Artists such as Mickalene Thomas and Lalla Essaydi stage scenes to explore the performative nature of femininity, sometimes even casting themselves in the lead role as in the work of Cindy Sherman. Others in this section create physical interventions, collaging, cropping, smashing and manipulating the picture surface. These experimental works offer endless possibilities for telling stories through the lens.

By this point of the exhibition we had been exposed to maybe 200 striking, vivid, moving, historic, glamorous and evocative photographs by a wide range of modern masters. I’d have been quite happy for it to have ended with Robert and Nan’s New York mementoes. But there’s still a lot more still to process.

I don’t know whether the quality fell off or I was just exhausted. There seemed to be fewer striking images in this section, and the notion of constructed images justified some very contrived pieces such as Yasumasa Morimura’s jokey recreation of the famous portrait of Albert Einstein sticking his tongue out, but redone as pastiche. In a similar vein – pastiche and parody – is Cindy Sherman’s famous sequence of herself posing as various Hollywood stereotypes. America. New York. Hollywood.

Sherman was the subject of an exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery.

Untitled Film Still #17, 1978 by Cindy Sherman © Cindy Sherman, courtesy of the artist and Hauser & Wirth Gallery

There are more non-Americans in this section, including works by Japanese and German photographers.

  • Hiro (Yasuhiro Wakabayashi) – Shinjuku Station, Tokyo, Japan, 1962
  • Andreas Gursky – Pyongyang II, 2007, a vast panorama capturing the Arirang Mass Games in
    Pyongyang: I’ve been staggered by Gursky’s huge images of vast scenes in other settings, notably at the Hayward Galley exhibition devoted to him, but here this one-off image felt cramped and failed to impact

But America still dominates, typified by a big work by Alex Prager (Crowd #1 (Stan Douglas) from 2010). The Prager was a good example of the approach thoroughly covered in the exhibition devoted to her at the Photographers’ Gallery.

There are three big colour photos by David LaChapelle, depictions of rather laboured visual jokes:

  • Leonardo DiCaprio: Illusion of Levitation, Hollywood, 1995
  • Tupac Shakur: Becoming Clean, Los Angeles, 1996
  • Elton John: Egg On His Face, New York, 1999

Elton John: Egg On His Face, New York, 1999 by David LaChapelle © David LaChapelle

Crying men by Sam Taylor-Johnson

Another sequence, to set beside Mapplethorpe’s flowers and the powerful Nan Goldin installation, was a series by film-maker Sam Taylor-Johnson called ‘Crying Men‘ (2004). Now it would have been something if she had asked ordinary men to express their feelings, just regular guys, especially from Taylor-Johnson’s own country, England (she was born in Croydon). But that would be to mistake the entire ethos of John and Furnish’s collection and of this exhibition, which, as I’ve mentioned, is characterised by – indeed stricken by – glamour and stardust.

And so Sam Taylor-Johnson asked ‘some of Hollywood’s greatest male talents’, including Hayden Christensen, Benicio del Toro, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Laurence Fishburne, Michael Gambon, Robin Williams and Daniel Craig, to act tearful, and snapped the results.

The seven big colour photos cover a wall and you can play the game of who is the most convincing cryer. For me it was Daniel Craig, who looked genuinely distraught, followed by Robin Williams, our reading of the latter influenced by knowledge of his sad end.

Crying Men (Laurence Fishburne), 2002 by Sam Taylor-Johnson © Sam Taylor-Johnson

The photos in this section were big in a way nothing up to his point had been. New digital technology and print capacity has allowed photographs to become ever-larger, with mixed results. There was a big striking image of an orange fabric forming an abstract sculpture in a landscape – K9 (2018) by Eamonn Doyle – which is, the label tells us, part of a series keening for his dead mother. But in the midst of so much parody, pastiche, burlesque and play-acting, it was hard to take it seriously. I mean it was difficult to switch gear from admiring artifice and contrivance to registering something which actually seemed to be serious.

It was also noticeable that for the first time many of the photos in this section are not from America. Photographers from China, Japan, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Ireland, Germany and Morocco are featured.

8. Towards Abstraction

Drawn to the challenge of pushing at the boundaries of image-making, Elton John and David Furnish have built a significant collection of abstract photography. Abstraction enables artists to exploit the malleability of their medium, offering a way of propelling the image beyond ordinary appearances. It provides a means of exploring the creative scope of camera processes, expanding our understanding of what a photograph might be.

John and Furnish collect works that move along a continuum of form, hovering between the delineation of objects and pure abstraction. The selection here investigates a range of techniques, including colour photograms by Adam Fuss, and black and white cameraless photographs by James Welling and Alison Rossiter. Other images reveal the sublime architecture of New York City or extend an artistic obsession with the body as a site of visual experiment.

  • Richard Caldicott:
    • Untitled #59, 1998
    • Untitled #169, 2000
    • Untitled #63, 1998
  • Thomas Ruff – Nudes vo18, 2002
  • Alison Rossiter – Gevaert Gevarto 48K, exact expiration date unknown, ca. 1960s, processed 2013 (#17), 2013
  • Ray K. Metzker – Nude Composite, 1966
  • Wolfgang Tillmans – Super Collider #3, 2001

Tillmans was the subject of a big exhibition at Tate Modern.

There’s a work by Hiroshi Sugimoto who was the focus of a wonderful exhibition at the Hayward Gallery. Niko Luoma makes abstract versions of well-known artworks, in this case a well-known painting by David Hockney – ‘Self-Titled Adaptation of A Bigger Splash (1967), 2019’, which was interesting but not compelling.

Most striking, for simple biographical reasons, was the big photogram portraits of John and Furnish’s children, taken by Adam Fuss:

To create his photograms, Adam Fuss lays a piece of unexposed photographic paper at the bottom of a shallow pool of warm water. A parent briefly places their baby in the pool, and a burst of flashlight captures its shape on the paper. The result is a unique portrait silhouetted against a golden light. Here, John and Furnish’s two children, Zachary and Elijah, have been immortalised in a baptism by  photography.

Zachary, 2011 by Adam Fuss © Adam Fuss. Courtesy of the artist and Fraenkel Gallery San Francisco

9. Collecting Now

Elton John and David Furnish continue to acquire photography, adding regularly to their holdings. New purchases keep collectors sharp, incrementally shifting the shape and meaning of the whole collection. The latest acquisitions featured here embody themes that resonate throughout the exhibition, of the intense vulnerability that underpins creativity, of the essential fragility of existence. The couple continue to explore multiple, complex sensibilities in their passion for photography. Fragile beauty is the filament that binds it all together.

The last space is brief, with only half a dozen bang up-to-date works:

  • Thomas Struth – X-ray Telescope, CAST, CERN, Ferney-Voltaire, 2021
  • Zanele Muholi – Labo I, Torino, Italy, 2019
  • Trevor Paglen – Bloom (#a5808a), 2020
  • An-My Lê – Fragment IX: Jefferson Davis Monument, Homeland Security Storage, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2017, from the series Silent General, 2015–present
  • Wardell Milan – Here the mysterious host – raised in the South, now based in the North curates a
    gathering of friends seeking sanctuary, 2020
  • Tyler Mitchell – Simply Fragile, 2022

Simply Fragile, 2022 by Tyler Mitchell © Tyler Mitchell. Courtesy of the artist

The last image, and the one which gives the show its title, is, of course, of an American in America shot by an American. Right to the very end this is a huge, dazzling exhibition of American people, American settings, American issues.

In praise of Elton John

I have nothing but respect for Elton John. I first saw him live in Hyde Park in 1976 where he performed his hit single with Kiki Dee, ‘Don’t Go Breaking My Heart’. He’s a brilliant performer and has had an astonishing career, turning out evergreen pop hits decade after decade.

I also admire the tremendous resilience John showed in the face of the vicious British tabloid press, which hounded him in the 70s and 80s, meretriciously attacking every aspect of his private life, his homosexuality, his substance addictions, his ill-fated first marriage and so on. He is a hero for facing down and surviving the jackals of the British media, and all the other attacks he’s had to endure, not just surviving but triumphing, as recorded in his defiant song ‘I’m still standing’.

Also I admire and respect the work he’s done for charity, especially AIDS charities, as well as the way he’s carried the torch for gay and queer identity through really hard years of persecution in the 1970s and 80s. I think he is an immensely admirable man and I wish him, his husband David, and their two children (I mention them because they feature in the show) nothing but the best.

Criticisms

American cultural imperialism

But oh America, America, and yet again America. More Americana, more American history, more American singers and performers, more Hollywood stars, American glamour and American squalor, American landscapes and American cities, yet another exhibition in London by Americans about America. Yet another example of London art curators’ shameless obeisance to American cultural imperialism.

And the 1960s, again! Dylan and the Beatles and Andy Warhol and Black Power and Robert Kennedy and Vietnam, good grief, yet again these tired, hackneyed images.

I’m afraid the famous photo of the woman wailing over the body of one of the students shot in the infamous Kent State massacre (‘The Grieving Student at Kent State University, 4 May 1970 by John Filo) didn’t trigger distress at the event so much as distress at being caught in the same tired loop of news footage from the 1960s.

By the time I got to the reportage room I was becoming sick of America and all its over-publicised travails. It’s the exhibition equivalent of Groundhog Day, trapped in endless corridors of American art by American artists agonising about bloody America.

I love Elton John and everything he stands for, and he and Furnish have obviously amassed a mind-boggling collection of photographs – but the combination of his stage-struck obsession with music and movie stars, with the New York art and fashion world, and a very New York-centred view of gay and queer identity, dominate the show’s aesthetic from start to finish and ultimately came to feel so very narrow, so very limited.

By contrast, I recommend you visit the Photographers’ Gallery in Soho, where you pay just £8 to see the exhibitions (currently, Ernest Cole from South Africa and Graciela Iturbide from Mexico) or can pop downstairs to the Print Sales Room for FREE, and soak up a continually changing roster of photographers from all round the world, whose work is often strange and unsettling and funny and genuinely original in ways most of the works on display here, in my view, rarely are. I’m just too over-familiar with American culture and, to most intents and purposes, heartily sick of it.

Ryan McGinley

This is the photo, by Ryan McGinley, which has been used for the exhibition webpage, poster, and merchandise.

Dakota Hair, 2004 by Ryan McGinley © Ryan McGinley Studios

McGinley crops up in several of the sections:

Ryan McGinley caught the attention of New York’s art scene with his raw documentation of himself and his friends on the City’s Lower East Side. From 1999, he photographed every visitor to his apartment, resulting in more than 10,000 Polaroids, each labelled with a date and name. The Polaroids covered his bedroom walls, acting as a backdrop for this intimate sex scene.

And:

Ryan McGinley garnered attention as a photographer of street culture, hanging out with skateboarders, graffiti artists and indie musicians. [In Sam (Ground Zero), 11 September 2001] his friend Sam cycles through the ash and debris at Ground Zero on the day of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. It suggests the desire to investigate an event that would come to define the experience of a generation.

And, regarding this Dakota Hair image:

In the summers of 2004 and 2005, Ryan McGinley left New York City for a series of road trips, driving with teams of models and assistants across the USA. Although carefully planned and produced, the resulting photographs maintain the sense of youthful freedom and spontaneity for which McGinley became  famous. As he put it in 2007, his images envisage, ‘a world that doesn’t exist. A fantasy. Freedom is real. There are no rules. The life I wish I was living’.

American photographers taking American photographs of American people in American cities or American landscapes living out American dreams of glamour, adventure or squalor, trapped inside American culture and the American mindset. It was a relief to exit the exhibition into a gallery full of wonderful works from other countries, times and places, because countries other than America do, in fact, exist.


Related links

  • Fragile Beauty continues at the Victoria and Albert Museum until 5 January 2025

More V&A reviews

Performing for the Camera @ Tate Modern

Performing for the Camera examines the relationship between photography and performance, from the invention of photography in the 19th century to the selfie culture of today. Bringing together over 500 images spanning 150 years, the exhibition engages with the serious business of art and performance, as well as the humour and improvisation of posing for the camera.
(Press release)

This is a good exhibition to visit if you like arty photographs or bare boobs. Several points emerged:

Saturation

500 images across 14 rooms is too many to take in: either you begin skipping whole walls of images in search of something, anything, novel and distracting, or you’d have to give each image and each set of photos a really thorough scientific scrutiny, but be prepared to come back on several visits.

Pre-internet

This links into the broader thought that almost all these images come from the golden era before the internet. Nowadays, we are bombarded, saturated, awash in countless billions of images, as well as being able to take limitless selfies with our phones and tablets, to crop and treat them an infinite number of ways, to post them in a million places or send them to anyone, anywhere. The images on show here come from Before The Fall, from when taking photographs was an achievement, a distinction, and they carry a certain aura of privilege and authenticity.

Boris Mikhailov, Crimean Snobbism (1982) Courtesy of the artist and Sprovieri Gallery, London. © Boris Mikhailov

Boris Mikhailov, Crimean Snobbism (1982) Courtesy of the artist and Sprovieri Gallery, London. © Boris Mikhailov

People

It’s fairly obvious but took a while to sink in that the exhibition’s focus on photography and performance dictates that the images are overwhelmingly of the human body, clothed or unclothed. No buildings, trees, landscapes, cars, architecture, nature, seas or forests. 500 photos, almost all of them black and white, of people people people. You can get a bit bored of photos of people.

Performance

Also, strikingly, there were relatively few photos of what most people might first think of when they hear the word ‘performance’ – almost no photos of actual theatrical or film performances, no famous actors or performers.

Art stars, yes – Warhol, Koons, Beuys, Man Ray, Duchamp. But this is ‘performance’ defined in quite a narrow, art-school kind of way to mean 1960s ‘happenings’, Man Ray or Marcel Duchamp-style posing, and scores of ‘art performances’.

Take, for example, the African photographer who takes self-portraits of himself dressed as iconic black figures; the Japanese photographer who took a series of images of himself in the bath; another Japanese photographer who took a series of a young man almost naked who, in each successive photo, has an additional playing card stuck to his body until he is completely covered in cards; the women photographers who take shots of themselves naked with various props.

Performance in that sense. Performing for the camera.

Jimmy De Sana, Marker Cones (1982) © Courtesy of Wilkinson Gallery, London and The Estate of Jimmy De Sana

Jimmy De Sana, Marker Cones (1982) © Courtesy of Wilkinson Gallery, London and The Estate of Jimmy De Sana

Series

And a bit more reflection made me realise the sheer number of images follows naturally from the way the photos come in series and sets. The photos recording performances and ‘happenings’ – a bunch of young people strip naked and are painted with psychedelic swirls and circles in some 1960s happening; Japanese art students carry placards across a road junction in Tokyo then trample them to the ground; some other Japanese students drop objects with small parachutes from a tall building – naturally require quite a few shots to convey the full action events, so it is not unusual to come across series of 20 or more photos, whole walls covered with images recording one ‘event’.

Naked women

1. There were quite a few images of naked women. Less than half the total, probably less than a quarter of the images, but still a steady stream of boobs and loins and shapely female bodies, which prompted a few thoughts.

2. Without exception these were young white women, ablebodied, in their 20s and 30s. There are shots of two or three happenings taken by male photographers – notably the team of Harry Shunk and János Kender who became well-known for photographing avant-garde and counter-cultural performances. But most of these images of naked women are self-portraits of the photographer by herself.

3. The wall labels go to some lengths to explain that these naked ladies set out to ‘subvert’ conventions, raise issues of gender identity, and the other half dozen or so phrases used on these occasions. But what you actually saw was a lot of images of scantily-clad young women. In the first three rooms I counted 43 photos of naked women. Later highlights included:

Hannah Wilke made a number of 1970s ‘performative works’ of herself in which ‘she used her own body to challenge ideas of spectatorship and desire’. In the series, Super-T-Art (1974), we see 20 b&w images of her wearing a toga which, oops, slips off her shoulders and exposes first her breasts, then all of her. With the best will in the world I don’t see how this is challenging anything: it looks to me like it is wholeheartedly taking part in the opposite of challenge, in the marketing and distribution of images of naked women and, worse, of images of a perfect, very American, healthy young female form, precisely the kind of image which helps to create the general social environment in which most women feel some measure of guilt and anxiety at failing to live up to this kind of idealised image of femininity and sexuality.

Adrian Piper took 14 self portraits of herself – Food For The Spirit – some in a dress, some in panties, some butt naked – the twist is they are very underexposed so at first sight appeared to be completely black. Only on by peering quite close to the print could you start to make out the image of the artist – and suddenly realise you are looking at a skinny young naked woman.

In 1999 and 2000 artist Jemima Stehli asked male art critics to sit in her studio while she stripped naked in front of them. The critics had control of a camera which was placed behind her as she stripped, an angle which catches the critics full face, squirming with embarrassment or grinning with enjoyment and captures her slowly declothed body from the rear. Strip consists of 56 big colour images of Stehli taking off her jeans and bra and panties until she is standing splendidly naked, apart from black high heels which make her look exactly a Bond girl from a movie poster. Apparently this work ‘explores themes of voyeurism, spectacle and control.’ I admire the phrasing and the art school rhetoric of this explanation, but Stehli is also a stunningly shapely woman, and she chose to strip off, photograph herself and hang scores of images of herself naked on gallery walls. As my son pointed out, so she’s making a career out of selling naked photos of herself? Er, yes. In case you were disappointed at the way all these shots are of her rear, Stehli has thoughtfully published numerous photos of herself naked from the front as well.

Carolee Schneemann: Eye Body: 36 Transformative Actions (1963). The artist naked adorned with various props and paints found in the studio. The density and clutteredness and the abandonment of the poses (and the density of her pubic hair, something not seen so much these days) dates the images to an era when graphic full-frontal nudity still had the power to shock.

Naked and clothed

There were some naked young men in the 1960s ‘happenings’ photos, and some scattered elsewhere throughout (particularly young Japanese men). But it was a room dedicated to the way art superstars of the 70s and 80s used photos to dominate press and PR, in the form of posters and magazine covers featuring Andy Warhol, Jeff Koons and Joseph Beuys, that brought home to me the contrast between the naked women and the clothed men.

Contrary to all the claims in the wall labels that women artists taking their clothes off somehow ‘subverts’ convention, it in fact screamingly asserts and confirms society’s worst sexist assumption, which is that women, asked to be creative, to do or say something, can only start with their bodies, use their bodies, think of their bodies first. Whereas men asked to do something creative have ideas, insights, make things external to them, come up with gags or performances or plays or art works – and remain fully clothed throughout.

Warhol, Koons, Beuys, photographers Martin Parr and Lee Friedlander – all fully dressed, having creative, insightful, novel ideas.

Amalia Ulman, Jemima Strehli, Hannah Wilke – when prompted to do art – take their clothes off, resulting in the same tired old images of lovely, young naked women. Just a few score more naked women to add to the tens of millions of naked women who overflow the internet, newspapers, magazines, adverts, TV, film, everywhere.

I’m not saying this is true of these women artists actual practices and achievements. I am saying this is the unfortunate impression which this selection and this hang and this exhibition gave this viewer on this particular visit.

Fully clothed women

It was a relief to see the work of women photographers who had not got their kit off, such as the wonderful sequence Seven Twists by Dora Maurer, one of the standout pieces of the Adventures of the Black Square show at the Whitehall Art Gallery.

There was just one photo of/by Sarah Lucas, Fighting fire with fire, enough to convey her wonderful ‘fuck you’ attitude. Could have happily seen some more.

Cindy Sherman was represented by a number of photos she took of herself mocked up as stereotypical characters from fictitious movies; and a different series of her with no make-up shrouded in a dressing gown which was constantly threatening to fall off her naked body. Looking her up online I got a sense of Sherman as much more interesting than the selection here made out.

Some of the naked exhibits

Twenty two b&w photos of Yves Klein’s 1960 art event, Anthropometries of the Blue Period, in which several gorgeous women stripped naked in front of a po-faced audience wearing formal evening dress, and then painted their naked bodies and pressed themselves against canvases to create art.

Man Ray – Erotique Voilee. There were a few other tiny Man Rays later, one of his portrait of Marcel Duchamp dressing up as a woman. You’d have thought Man Ray’s entire oeuvre consisted of stunning ‘performances’ and so justified hundreds of entries here, but no – two was your lot 😦

The Anatomic Explosion i.e. 20 or so black and white photos of naked young men and women on Brooklyn Bridge in the heady 1960s, along with another sequence of young people getting naked at a party in a studio, both shot by the cool, avant-garde team of Harry Shunk and János Kender.

Jimmy de Sana’s sequence of stylised art photos of male and female nudes in odd poses from the 1980s.

A whole room was devoted to Francesca Woodman who started taking photos as a child and took reams of photos of herself as a young woman, clothed, half clothed or bare naked, often posing in derelict, empty rooms. To her, personally, this may have been a brave voyage of self-exploration – and I am sensitive to the eerie, disconnected atmosphere in many of the photos, which are genuinely haunting.

But to the viewer who has already seen several hundred bare boobs by this stage, Woodman risks, in a photo like Untitled, just falling into line with all the other nubile young women in our culture who seem so keen to get their kit off. Half of them do it for the Sun and ‘glamour’ mags and are looked down on; the other half do it for ‘performance’ and ‘art’ and have respectful feminist monographs written about them. The vibe I got off these photos of unhealthy self-obsession was joltingly confirmed when I read that she committed suicide aged 22. The more I looked at her photos, the more powerful I found them…

Orphée by Tokyo Rumando, a sequence of black and white photos of the artist standing in front of a mirror which ‘explore Anxiety and fear, dark desire and pleasure, decadence and madness, and then death and the void’ – but for which it’s important that she is often topless.

Whatever else they are meant to be ‘questioning’, ‘subverting’ and ‘interrogating’, absolutely none of these photos question the fundamental axiom that the best kind of body is young, white and female, a whole, taut, streamlined, slender female body with brown-tipped nipples and prominent pubic hair. The old, the fat and ugly, the disabled, the disfigured, women with mastectomies or C section scars or the countless other marks of time and disease – are 100% absent from this large selection.

The most contemporary work seemed to be Amalia Ulman‘s series including Excellencies and Perfections (below). Once more a woman photographer is ‘exploring’ something or other by taking countless photographs of herself and her body in all manner of costumes and poses, often very scantily clad. Probably this does reflect contemporary selfie culture which, more than ever before in human history, foregrounds and values and sells perfect young, smoothly unlined women’s bodies in unprecedented numbers – except the ones doing the posing, packaging, commodifying and distribution are no longer the male publishers of porn mags, but the young women themselves. Maybe that’s progress…

Amalia Ulman, Excellences & Perfections (Instagram Update, 8th July 2014),(#itsjustdifferent) 2015. Courtesy the Artist & Arcadia Missa

Amalia Ulman, Excellences & Perfections (Instagram Update, 8th July 2014),(#itsjustdifferent) 2015. Courtesy the Artist & Arcadia Missa

Exhibits with their clothes on

Eikoh Hosoe‘s b&w pictures of rehearsals for plays or films stood out because of their exotic setting and the foreign dress and faces of the performers. Also featured is his Kamataichi, a collaboration with the choreographer and founder of the Butoh movement Tatsumi Hijikata, from 1969. There are extraordinary shots of a male performer running wild in the rice fields, leaping in front of traditional houses, grimacing and leering into the camera. Incomprehensible but tremendously dynamic. What is the meaning of the man in make-up with a parasol on a wooden bridge?

Nadar, the most famous 19th century French photographer, active in the 1850s and 1860s. Stage performers came and posed in his studio, in an era when performance meant putting interesting costumes on instead of taking all your clothes off. The 20 or so photos here include shots of Charles Deburau acting out poses as the character ‘Pierrot’ and Sarah Bernhardt as Lady Macbeth.

A sequence of photos showing how Yves Klein’s over-familiar leap into the void photo was prepared, staged and manufactured.

Many of the performance sequences were shot by the team of Harry Shunk and János Kender, two of the most important photographers to have worked with performance artists. Their photos of various ‘happenings’ in the New York of the 1960s show how sweetly and naively young people from that time thought that taking all their clothes off said something or changed anything.

Chinese art superstar Ai Weiwei (beneficiary of a recent massive retrospective at the Royal Academy) is represented by the iconic trio of photos of him dropping and smashing a supposedly valuable Chinese vase. The prints are vast, over 6 foot tall, maybe 5 wide, as merits Ai’s outsize reputation. The only other images as large were those of Warhol and Koons and Beuys in the PR and marketing room, making you realise that Ai is the contemporary equivalent of those masters of press and marketing.

I liked Erwin Wurm‘s photos of instant sculptures, people imaginatively using household props to create unlikely poses e.g. lady on oranges. Tate invited Wurm to give two events explaining and showing visitors how to create one-minute sculptures.

Two of Wurm’s pics here were from a separate sequence using the supermodel Claudia Schiffer. They’re fun and creative and the best thing about them is the way she keeps her clothes on, so that she comes over as a person and not as a body. I like the orange motif. Who suspected that oranges could open up a whole new world of performance art?

Samuel Fosso’s African Spirits 2008, in which the artist photographs himself in the guise of iconic figures like Malcolm X and Miles Davis. The hang affects your perception of the images. These prints were a) very big, 203 foot tall b) hung as a regular grid (as opposed to a row of pics or an irregular patterning, as some others are). The effect was to give them a pleasing sense of order and symmetry before you even considered the subject matter.

British photographer Martin Parr (who also has an exhibition of photos, Unseen City, at the Guildhall Art Gallery) was represented by Autoportraits, a series of images where he’s superimposed his very English, slightly gormless-looking face onto a variety of the trite, kitsch backdrops found in photographers studios around the world. Charmingly eccentric. Note the way comedy or surrealness comes over better in colour.

In a break from the overwhelming majority of black and white photos, there was a series of sepia prints by Boris Mikhailov, Crimean Snobbism. The wall label was a bit difficult to follow, but I think these are simply photos of himself, wife and friends on holiday in the Crimea, during which they amused themselves by ‘posing’ as people on holiday, playing up to stereotypes of tourists and holidaymakers, performing for the camera. If anyone who plays up for the camera in their holiday snaps is an artist then the world is over-run with them.

I liked Keith Arnatt’s series of gardeners in their gardens but I wondered what they had to do with the theme of ‘performance’. If you call gardening a ‘performance’ then almost any kind of activity can turn out to be a performance and the word ceases to have much meaning.

A wall of unsmiling self portraits by veteran American photographer Lee Friedlander. He captures himself in different poses, as anybody who takes a selfie does. Whether these qualify as ‘performances’ I couldn’t quite decide. Certainly he has an ‘eye’ for an arresting composition…

Japanese photographer Masahisa Fukase is represented by a series of images of his wife in various clothes on various days seen from the window of their apartment – From Window (1974). I’d like to add something clever and intellectual but it did seem to just be a series of photos of his wife going off to work wearing a different outfit each day.

Masahisa Fukase, From Window (1974) © Masahisa Fukase Archives. Courtesy Michael Hoppen Gallery.

Masahisa Fukase, From Window (1974) © Masahisa Fukase Archives. Courtesy Michael Hoppen Gallery.

He is also has a separate series of b&w pics of himself in a bath – Bukubuku (Bubbling) from 1991. Very tight close-ups of his face, above the water, under the water blowing bubbles, half-submerged, and so on. I particularly like the one of him wearing a dapper hat, shades and smoking a fag in the bath. With art school pompousness his Wikipedia article describes these as ‘Fukase’s last great work, a whimsical if somewhat morbid game of solitaire that charts new territory for the photographic self-portrait.’

Niki de Saint Phalle appeared in the Global Pop Art exhibition in these very rooms a few months ago, represented by her shooting art works where she filled sacks with poster paints, tied them to canvases and covered the lot in whitewash. She then invited friends and fellow artists round to the shooting gallery at the rear of her studios, where they were given guns and told to shoot the canvases. The Pop Art show included some of the resulting whitewashed canvases covered with spurts of colour paint. Here we have a sequence of b&w photos of her making the canvases, shooting the guns, organising her pals into firing squads and so on. Everyone is wearing clothes. Odd, really, that these works were all about chaotic spurts of colour and yet all the records of it are dully monochrome.

Favourites

  • Charles Ray’s Plank Pieces I and II. Simple, clean, elegant and powerful.
  • Harry Shunk and János Kender’s sequence of 27 photos of Merce Cunningham’s dance troupe rehearsing and performing. Here the blurred or somehow treated outlines of the human form assume a science fiction otherness. Can’t find any of them on the internet.
  • David Wojnarowicz’s sequence Arthur Rimbaud in New York. Wojnarowicz printed out the French poet’s face from the iconic Étienne Carjat 1871 portrait of him, cut it out and attached elastic to make it a strap-on mask, and got various native New Yorkers to wear it in their everyday settings. Simple, funny, stylish.

Conclusions

The press release claims the exhibition ‘shows not only that photography has always been performative, but that much performance art is inherently photographic.’ OK.

It was possible to look at all the photos, read all the wall labels, read the programme and press release and assimilate all the information, insights, opinions and interpretations and still emerge with your understanding of the basic axioms of photography completely unchanged: Naked or scantily clad young women are artistic. Black and white is artistic. (Colour pics are less forgiving, more tacky, better suited to irony.) Men doing wacky things is artistic (jumping out windows, dropping vases, playing bubbles in the bath). The rule seems to be: Men do, women strip.

Oh, and the 1960s and 70s overflowed with avant-garde art most of which is now, frankly, embarrassing.


Related links

More photography reviews

More Tate Modern reviews