
I regard the preservation of my constitutional rights to be far more important than someone else’s vague, undefined “upset.”
I occasionally watch YouTube videos posted by Civil Rights Auditors. These are people who try to ensure honesty and transparency in interactions between civilians and all levels of Government, by recording and posting videos of politicians, civil servants, and police.
There is something about the presence of a video camera that drives some people crazy. You can wander up to, or into, city halls, DMV offices, even police stations, wander around, staring at stuff, and no-one questions your presence. Bring along a camcorder, or set your cell phone to record, and all Hell breaks loose.
In a recent video, a young man with a camera walked behind a police station, and wandered around the parking area. Almost immediately, three young, white, male officers coalesced out of the ether – and the harassment, intimidation, and lies began.
What are you doing here?
Performing a Constitutionally-protected activity.
You can’t be here. You can’t record our vehicles!
The First Amendment says I can.
You’re trespassing!
I can’t be trespassed from public property unless I’ve committed a crime.
You’re acting suspicious!
The US Supreme Court has ruled that “suspicion” is not a crime.
This is private property!
This is County property, and obviously public.
This is a secure facility!
No fence, no gate, no signs.
Finally, it came – Give us your ID!
I don’t have to provide identification unless I’ve been lawfully detained. Please give a reasonable, articulable suspicion of a specific crime.
The debate raged for about ten minutes, until an older Captain was called out, and reluctantly admitted that all the claims and demands were false. As the cammer was exiting the parking lot, he was passed by another officer in a cruiser. He yelled at the officer, “You’re not wearing a seatbelt. Obey the law! Put on your seatbelt.”
I know what he was doing, and why, and I commend him for it. He was trying to ensure that Police Officers obey the same laws that the rest of us have to obey.
Here is where I insert my usual –HOWEVER!
Almost every jurisdiction I am aware of – US States, Canadian Provinces – have ‘exception clauses’ in their seatbelt legislation, to cover certain class(es) of vehicles. “Any vehicle where there is a requirement for rapid and/or repetitive exits. The list shall include, but not be limited to: garbage trucks, fire trucks, police, ambulances, taxis, delivery vehicles, and public transit.
No subway riders, or bus riders, wear seatbelts, although the bus drivers usually, wisely, do. For no obvious reason, about a year ago, there was a local, public kerfuffle. If we have to wear seatbelts in our cars, shouldn’t children wear seatbelts in their school buses? Shouldn’t our kids be safe?? It finally died away, after an automotive engineer published an article.
School buses are designed and built with what engineers call “Egg Crating.” The backs of the seats are high enough, strong enough, and flexible enough, to control and dissipate forward momentum. They also slope backward, to further absorb and deflect the energy of ejected students, downward. In the event of a real emergency, like a fire after a collision, there is not enough time or space to unlatch or cut off seatbelts from 30 panicked youngsters.
I’m gonna stop here for now, and go have a belt. See you in a couple of days.