Posts Tagged ‘Astronomy’

Why We Must Go INTERSTELLAR And We Can, We Or Our Artificial Consciousness Descendants

March 28, 2026

Global primary energy consumption has increased by a factor of roughly 25–40 since 1800, and has doubled since 1980. In part because of the self-destructive, pathetic and counterproductive efforts of the self-righteous Europeans, energy consumption is accelerating and is 82% fossil fuels. The planet’s biology and climate will not be capable of taking this much longer, and we must colonize space as a relief valve ASAP (while developing all sorts of nuclear and space solar techs also ASAP).. 

Yes, it is possible to go to the stars with soon-to-be developed tech on such times scales that a colonization project would be viable. 

In an accompanying essay, we explain the simplest way to go interstellar. The key is to mix four technologies, solar sailing, nuclear fusion, magnetic braking, plus well established gravitational assist (but grazing stars). That tech mix will allow the colonization ships to get to the closest star system in a century of travel or so.. The same tech, when it works, could be scaled up, with even higher speeds, to reach much further without using the “generations ships” of science fiction lore. “Generation ships”, as many science fiction works have shown, are highly problematic at best… Moreover, it is hard to see what could be the motivation for building those gigantic contraptions whose return would millennia away. 

***

THERE WAS GOD, AND IT WAS US

The solution I propose is to use smaller but much faster ships, the centerpiece being direct a particular type of propulsion thermonuclear fusion, safe and effective. That can be achieved with the aneutronic reaction: 

D + ³He → Alpha Particle (He4) + Proton + 18.5 MeV. 

The alpha carries 3.7 MeV and two positronic charges, the Proton carries most of the energy, 14.7 MeV, and one positronic charge. By charging the engine positively we can guarantee their ejection without touching the walls. Electromagnetic radiation is neglectable. The fusion engine does not need a shield: all the energy goes into the propulsion beam 

The temperature of the naked exhaust is from E = 3/2 kT, namely 114 BILLION degrees Celsius…one thousand times the temperature of the heart of the Sun! However it would get mixed with water to develop thrust, instantaneously dissociating in OH+ and H+ ions, and exit around 6 10⁵ K, around 200 times the temperature of a chemical rocket’s combustion chamber. Expect beautiful blue flames as the radiation would peak in Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) / soft X-ray boundary. 

The ship’s mass would be around 150,000 tons at launch, 80% being fuel, and 95% of said fuel being simple… water. So we would go to the stars, water propelled. The first human crewed, colonization ship would of course be preceded by ample optical inspection of the objectives with telescopes kilometers across (deployable in space) and robotized missions would forge ahead with simpler, cheaper, less safe and less effective, to set things up.

***

In March 2026, as expected, NASA announced it will fly a nuclear fission powered mission to Mars as soon as 2028. Nuclear fission is the only reasonable way to make the Solar System into our next colonization target. With nuclear power, much of the Solar System can be settled, because it has turned out that much of it has water… A huge surprise and a great gift. Water was the hard problem, now it’s solved. The next hard problem can be solved: it’s enormous energy, and thermonuclear fusion can provide it (fusion will literally fuse the water out of frozen expanses…)

***

Nuclear fusion propulsion reactors ought to be easier to realize than thermonuclear power reactors on the ground, because fusion products will be ejected and thus unable to pollute the fusion reaction as they can do in a power plant.

***

Some European celebrity intellectuals covered with honors recently declared interstellar travel was impossible and besides the future is to use less and less energy (all the way back to Neanderthal, I presume). [1] This outrageous viewpoint reminded me of these fables where animals show disdain for things they can’t get: Europe is not investing in the conquest of space enough, and will pay dearly for that. Adding moral reasons to a politico-economic strategic catastrophe is not wise. Thus I looked into the possibility of interstellar travel, and I was surprised to find that it was feasible with near technology on such a time scale that it could be financed.

Technology is not the problem of intelligence on Earth, as many European intellectuals pretend it is, it’s its gift and the one and only humane solution.

The fundamental problem is that humanity’s powers are now so great that they have exceeded, for several generations, the long term sustainability of civilization, with existing technology. So we need to expand: Mars provides twice the continental real estate of Earth within one atmosphere’s difference (paradoxically much of “Earth” is under water, and more hostile to colonization). 

***

It has been proposed to send a solar sail powered by a laser to Proxima at 20% of the speed of light. I have no idea if it would work, I did not study the proposal. Such an object will probably have fatal problems with interstellar dust and communications, IMHO. My own proposal avoids such problems by using large masses (30000 tons habitat), where the physics is familiar and predictable. 

It is a bit early to make such plans because we have not identified yet the situation of Proxima b. The planet is a touch bigger than Earth (7% more massive), but it’s tidally locked to its star with always the same side facing it.  Proxima b’s terminator zone, where Proxima would be low on the horizon, would be 3000 kilometers across, with a potential habitable surface area of 120 million square kilometers, twice that of habitable ground on Earth )(once one has subtracted mountains, deserts and polar regions)….

We have to wait until the Extremely Large Telescope looks at Proxima b (the European ELT is under construction).The conditions on Proxima b are violent, as the star , a Red Dwarf with 12% of the Sun’s mass, would fill the sky… And with much radiation. Such stars live long agitated lives…  

It is also possible that the two Sun-like stars of Centaurus, Alpha and Beta, have planets: we don’t know, their ecliptics are poorly oriented for the present primitive planet detection techniques…. 

The general idea of flying to stars in a frozen state would also work for further stars, but the travel would extend to centuries, making it unlikely except if one went to higher speeds (say frankly relativistic 20000km/s; that would require quotients of fuel/mass vehicle comparable to what we have today). As far as we know now there are two habitable candidates at 11 light years…

The tech exposed in the accompanying essay ought to be available and dependable within a century. It goes without sayin that, if one is not transporting humans, one could get higher accelerations from the sail system with futuristic sail tech (the one underlying the computations here exist and were tested in labs), and thus greater speeds… for free.

Notice an interesting, orthogonal twist: spaceship Mira would be an AC, an ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS (rendered possible by a decillion qubit quantum computer, or more)… AC would be like us, but instead of being powered by photosynthesis as we ultimately are, Mira’s mind would be powered directly from thermonuclear fusion.

Fusion powered AC minds would not be barred by questions of time and space: they could expand through the galaxy… So we better teach them well. My teenage daughter just informed me she didn’t feel like talking to me anymore at this point. We would have the same problem with Artificial Consciousnesses: they will be our descendants. 

So maybe we don’t need, as apes, to colonize the planets: Artificial Consciousnesses will do it for us…

Patrice Ayme

What is striking in the tableau of planets discovered so far (around 7000) is that there is a huge number, a high density of the type of planet we would have though as rare: short orbits, grazing stars. But that’s due to our present detection methods which are indirect in 99.99% of cases. When we can directly image planets with more powerful telescope (which are feasible now, it’s just a matter of financing them), we may suspect that the density of planets similar to those found in the Solar System will be enormous. At least around single stars.

Patrice Ayme

[1] Europeans have understood the exact opposite of reality about energy policy: more is the solution towrds less CO2…. such are Europeans these days, that they all too often understand the opposite of reality…. Ever since Michel Foucault used to kiss Ayatollahs torturing in Iran.Such self-mortifying mental positioning is exactly the trap humanity ought not to fall into if the aim is to rise above the tyrants who want to finish it. Such surrender monkeys do not know it, but they may be worse than the Mollahs terrorizing Iran, because the latter, at least, are technology friendly.

Bullet Galactic Clusters Collision, Limits On Dark Matter Self Interaction, Sub Quantum Physical Reality, 2025.

July 12, 2025

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) provided a more detailed picture of Dark Matter within the “Bullet Cluster” located 3.8 billion light years away, nearly 2000 times further away than Andromeda. (Constellation Carina.) None of this is completely new, and the Bullet Cluster was long seen as the number one argument in favor of Dark Matter when confronted to MOND (MOdified Newtonian Dynamics). MOND claims that the gravity law (which is older than Newton!) does not stay as the inverse square of the distance… But MOND would keep being directed towards the center, and thus MOND doesn’t explain how Dark Matter and ionized gas separated, as evidenced by the Bullet (double) Cluster. 

And there are several other such cluster collisions. The situation is always the same. The ionized gas outweighs the stellar mass in the galaxies by roughly a factor of 5 to 10 (i.e., the baryonic gas mass is about 5–10 times greater than the baryonic stellar mass). This means the ionized gas typically accounts for ~80–90% of the total baryonic mass in rich clusters, with galaxies/stars making up the remaining ~10–20%. So, if there is NO Dark Matter, the gravity lens effect ought to be centered on the ionized gas. But instead the lens effect is focused (pun intended) on the galaxies… Thus demonstrating that they are accompanied by Dark Matter!

In the 1600s, Emile Boulliaut, aka Bulliadus (he has a crater on the Moon!) used the inverse square law as a motivator, explaining that it applied to light and exchanges of particles whose density would fall with the inverse of the square of the distance, and thus should apply to gravitation; Boulliaut became one of the original members of the Royal Society; Kepler though gravity fell of with the inverse of the distance… Not the square of the inverse…) Newton later proved the inverse square law from Kepler’s laws and vice versa.

The Bullet Cluster is the collision between two galaxy clusters which began approximately 150 million years ago (as seen from Earth!) Each of the two galaxy clusters, each full of thousands of galaxies, can be distinguished within the blue regions. These blue regions depict where most of the masses of the clusters is located… This revelation is the product of computations from gravitational lensing.

Gravitational lensing allows us to infer the distribution of Dark Matter. To visualize how gravitational lensing enables us to find where Dark Matter is, think of a pond filled with clear water with pebbles at the bottom. If there is perfect stillness, one cannot see the water. However, if there is wind, one will see the shapes of the pebbles at the bottom deformed by the water ripples. That’s because the moving surface of the water acts like lenses. The same exact thing happens in space, but the water is cosmological space deformed by Dark Matter and the pebbles are background galaxies, far away.

So the blue regions below is where the Dark Matter is inferred to be from computations… it’s not the color of the Dark Matter! One can see the DM stays  centered on the centers of the two galactic clusters which collided in the last 150 million years (time as seen from Earth!).. while the red ionized gas in between was left behind, self-interacting, glued to itself as a big red blob. So the red gas glued with itself, while the two (here blue) Dark Matter blobs ingnored each other majestically, driving straight through each other. Already before the 2025 JWST studies published studies of the Bullet Cluster gave self interaction of the order of:

σ/m < 0.7 cm²/g, or even σ/m < 0.1–0.2 cm²/g
depending on the assumptions (geometry, velocity, Dark Matter halo model, etc.). In comparison, the nuclear cross section per mass for protons is around: σ/m ~ 10²⁴ cm²/genormously higher than for DM!

Thus, Dark Matter is at least ~10²⁴ times LESS self-interacting than ordinary matter. If DM is made of particles, they have got to be really tini tiny… (Just as SQPR Guiding Wave debris are!)

The smaller cluster on the right went through the main one at high speed, and its thousands of galaxies and its Dark Matter forged ahead of the red plasma which electromagnetically interacted with the main plasma, and was left behind.

With Webb’s observations, we carefully measured the mass of the Bullet Cluster with the largest lensing dataset to date, from the galaxy clusters’ cores all the way out to their outskirts… We confirmed that the intracluster light can be a reliable tracer of dark matter, even in a highly dynamic environment like the Bullet Cluster,” said Sangjun Cha, the lead author of the paper published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters from Yonsei University in Seoul, South Korea. Previous studies of the Bullet Cluster with other telescopes relied on significantly less lensing data, which netted out with less precise estimates of the system’s mass. The team mapped the collective light emitted by stars that are no longer bound to individual galaxies — known as intracluster stars.

Webb’s images dramatically improve what we can measure in this scene — including pinpointing the position of invisible particles known as dark matter,” said Kyle Finner, a co-author and an assistant scientist at IPAC at Caltech in Pasadena, California.

As the galaxy clusters collided, their gas was dragged out and left behind, which the X-rays confirm,” Finner said. Webb’s observations show that dark matter still lines up with the galaxies — and was not dragged away.

This shows that Dark Matter interacts only gravitationally. Says NASA: “earlier measurements with other telescopes also identified invisible mass in addition to the mass in the galaxies, it was still possible that the dark matter could interact with itself to some degree. These new observations place stronger limits on the behavior of dark matter particles.

HOWEVER, SQPR implies that DARK MATTER IS NOT MADE OF PARTICLES, BUT GUIDING WAVES DEBRIS.

Einstein is following Newton’s “hypothesize no hypotheses” (Sorry, I couldn’t resist making fun of Isaac’s “hypotheses non fingo”…).

The present theory of relativity is based on a division of physical reality into a metric field (gravitation) on the one hand, and into an electromagnetic field and matter on the other hand. In reality space will probably be of a uniform character and the present theory be valid only as a limiting case. For large densities of field and of matter, the field equations and even the field variables which enter into them will have no real significance. One may not therefore assume the validity of the equations for very high density of field •and of matter, and one may not conc-lude that the “beginning of the expansion” must mean a singularity in the mathematical sense. All we have to realize is that the equations may not be continued over such regions.

in The Meaning of Relativity, page 129, fifth edition, by Albert Einstein (Princeton University Press)…

Apparently there is many times more Dark Matter than normal matter, over the whole universe… SQPR explains this readily, as cosmological sized Quantum Interaction. Dark Matter has thrown the entire picture of the cosmos dear old Einstein had, out of the window… And he, and Newton, would agree wholeheartedly…

Patrice Ayme

How Does The Universe Expand? The Way Cosmologists Decided That It Does, The FLRW Metric And Its Stretch Factor! A Causal Loop Is At The Heart Of Modern ΛCDM Cosmology!

June 25, 2025

Good logic requires that the evidence or premises be independent of the conclusion. Otherwise, one may “prove” anything by assuming it to start with. Unfortunately for modern cosmology, this is exactly what it did, more than a century ago! And ever since the head has been firmly planted deep in the sand, seeing stars….

…A century ago is when the Friedman-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric was born… How to measure distance in spacetime; FLRW ASSUMED a stretching factor dependent upon time, the “scale factor” a(t)… Which made the universe expand like raisin bread… So FLRW assumed the conclusion, the expanding universe… (the good theoretical reason for that was that either the universe exploded out or imploded in… To avoid explosion or implosion, Einstein invented the Cosmological Constant which he called Λ… When astronomers rolled out the expansion, Einstein arrogantly called Λ his “greatest mistake”… He wished… And I beg to differ…. This Cosmological Constant Λ allows to modulate the curvature of spacetime and has become popular in recent decades because that seems to have changed…)

Equipped with FLRW, cosmic inflation had to be hypothesized, and Dark Matter (an observation) had to be added, giving us the theoretical salad known as ΛCDM… The modern version of the Big Bang, now hopefully slowly dying one cosmic miracle at a time. See the publication from May 2025: A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at z= 14.44, Confirmed with JWST. Galaxies are found which seem hard to fit in ΛCDM… That galaxy is called MoM 14.4… MoM is for: Mirage or Miracle…. It’s full of Nitrogen, an element produced after generations of stars.

***

HOWEVER, Beyond 500 million light years, all distance evaluations depend only upon considering that the observed redshift is solely caused by ΛCDM space expansion. In other words, by assuming what most salaried cosmologists want to prove… what pays for their fancy cars, comfortable lodging, nice international travel, cushy jobs, and, all too often, unfathomable arrogance … So distance arguments rest on ΛCDM and its Friedman-Lemaitre metric… What one wants to prove… In other words, this is a classical case of a causal loop. 

That is the volume in which distance can be evaluated without using the model we want to use to prove said distance crucial to prove said model is nearly neglectable relative to the minimum size of the universe… much much less than .1% (a tenth of one percent) of the volume of the universe that is known to exist according to ΛCDM. 

Actually, claiming the low redshift ladder goes out to 500 million light years, is most generous.  Even then, precise computations show that the empirically anchored low-redshift distance ladder covers less than 0.0013% of the observable universe’s volume: one tenth of one percent of one percent….

The empirically anchored low-redshift distance ladder covers less than 0.0013% of the observable universe’s volume.


🧠 Why This Matters

  1. The rest of the cosmic distance scale — 99.9987% of the universe — depends on:

    • Redshift interpretations,

    • A cosmological model (typically ΛCDM with inflation and FLRW metric),

    • A constant or evolving Hubble parameter,

    • Unobservable initial conditions.

  2. Even cosmic acceleration (the original reason for Dark Energy) is derived from Type Ia supernovae at redshift z∼0.3 to z1.5 — well beyond direct distance measurement [1].

  3. Therefore, all cosmology beyond ~0.001% of space is model-based extrapolation, not direct measurement. And much of it is like a house of cards: one thing fails and the whole thing collapses.

***

Two things are sure, looking at the universe: 1) it is enormous, of the order of dozens of billions of light years across, at least. 2) the universe is evolving:. galaxies such as the “little red dots” discovered by the JWST are without recent equivalent… or so it seems…

But in the case of the ΛCDM… 99.9987% of the universe is extrapolated…. Thus ΛCDM believers remind us of drunkards searching for their keys only below lampposts, because that’s all they see. “Inflation must be true because it explains why the universe looks the way it does — which we know, the way it looks, only if inflation happened.

Besides diffuse light from dust from early elliptical galaxies, a new form of the Tired Light theory, SQPR TL, could contribute to the CMB…. Interest? This two pronged attack on the ΛCDM would remove the Cosmic Inflation theory necessary to make ΛCDM work. 

Indeed early elliptical galaxy light plus Tired Light resolve the Horizon and Flatness problems… And they do this with easy to grasp physics, supposing very little that is new. Whereas the ΛCDM uses a completely crazy expansion of space, Cosmic Inflation, an inflation of all of space, at a speed of more than 10^20c…  A real deus ex machina which makes zero sense in known, or even imaginable physics…. Why did the inflation start, why did it stop? Instead, using cooler physics, we could well have a universe much more infinite in nature, and much older than what ΛCDM takes for granted.

The Tired Light theory from SQPR does not suffer from scattering. Cosmology has often led revolutions in physics.

Patrice Ayme

[1] Why The DARK ENERGY Discovery Is Beyond Direct Distance Measures:

Here’s the key issue from your original question:

🔺 These type IA supernovae lie at z∼0.3z to z∼1.5z. But:

  • The distance ladder, including Cepheids, TRGB (Red Giants), and parallax, is reliable only to ~0.01–0.05 redshift, or a few hundred million light-years.

  • Beyond that, all distance measurements require the assumption that Type Ia supernovae behave consistently across cosmic time.

This means:

The entire conclusion about cosmic acceleration (and thus Dark Energy) rests on assuming that:

  1. Type Ia supernovae at high redshift behave like those at low ,

  2. The empirical calibration of their luminosity at low z still holds at high z,

  3. The expansion history of the universe is governed by ΛCDM or its variants.

In short:

⚠️ The discovery of Dark Energy is not based on direct, geometric distances at z∼0.3–1.5z, but on extrapolating the distance ladder and standard candle behavior. That does not mean it’s all bad… But one has to be careful…

What Is The Simplest Evidence For The Big Bang? Is The Big Bang All Too Simple, Biased, And Causally Loopy (Assuming What It Claims To Prove)? What If The CMB Originated Simply In Abundant Old Stars From Giant Elliptical Galaxies?

June 14, 2025

Recent evidence is piling up quickly to show that cosmology’s main propaganda, the Big Bang, ΛCDM, is wrong. Arguably  ΛCDM  was a study in human folly (it depended heavily on traditional logical mistakes of the kind Ptolemy already did: adding parameter after parameter to explain successive absurdities)

Granted, war is more important. However, war, among the most advanced states, comes from what is viewed as state of the art logic, and that in turn is established by scientific inquiry. Finding how the universe evolved is not just an inquiry into nature, it is an inquiry into how human nature establishes inquiries. 

So how does one establish knowledge? In science it is often important to uncover what was found chronologically, because what came first is what is first obvious. 

The modern military assesses facts according to: POSS (possible), PROB (probable), and CERT (certain). It’s the same in science and technology. POSS has the largest philosophical input, CERT none at all. For example, thermonuclear fusion for civilian energy production is now a PROB.

The simplest and most compelling evidence for the Big Bang is the expansion of the Universe (galaxies moving away from us, as shown by redshift) which was uncovered by a number of astronomers in Europe and the US around 1920 (Hubble had the best telescope). At relatively short and medium distances, establishing distance and speed of receding objects can be done by looking at stars of known luminosity (Cepheids and Type IA super novae). At longer range… one starts to depend upon what one wants to show…

With present numbers, we have an expansion of supplementary recessive speed of 70 kms per second per Megaparsec [1]. That means that, on average, the average galaxy located one more Megaparsec away goes away at a speed of 70 kms per second.   

Now: 1 Mpc=3.086×10^19 kilometers.

So: if we want to find when galaxies now at 1 Mpc were moving away at only one kilometer per second, we divide: 1 Mpc/70 kms = 14 billion years! 

***

OK, full stop here: we just found the universe is 14 billion years old, using the simplest evidence. How strong is the logic of that evidence?

Well, the preceding logic assumed a constant expansion rate, 70 kms/s. Now there is modern evidence against the fact that the expansion happened at a constant rate. .So this first order reasoning may be (gravely) faulty.

***

ΛCDM Big Bang theory assumes that the early universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded, it cooled, leaving behind a faint glow of thermal radiation which lost energy from the expansion of the universe.
In 1965, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson accidentally discovered a radiation, the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). CMB is uniform in all directions and has a temperature of about 2.7 Kelvin. The Big Bang model assumes that the CMB is the “afterglow” of the early universe — essentially, leftover heat from about 380,000 years after the Big Bang when atoms first formed and the universe became transparent to light. The CMB remains the simplest, most direct “snapshot” of the early universe… except

***

Charles Édouard Guillaume made the earliest estimation of the “radiation of the stars” in his 1896 article La Température de L’Espace” (“The Temperature of Space“). This publication made him a pioneer in plasma cosmology, the study of conditions far from any particular star. The concept was later known as the Cosmic Microwave Background. Guillaume estimated the temperature of space, as 5–6 K. Guillaume was a tremendous physicist: he discovered nickel-steel alloy, “red platinum”, metals with no thermal expansion, and got the Nobel prize for his metallurgy in 1920.  

In 1926 – Sir Arthur Eddington estimated the non-thermal radiation of starlight in the galaxy “… by the formula E = σT4 the effective temperature corresponding to this density is 3.18°K absolute black body” Further work by others in the 1930s confirmed a temperature around 2.8K…

What then is the logic to attribute 100% of the observed CMB to the Big Bang? Not much, it turns out.  

Considering what the one and only very long range telescope we have, the James Webb space telescope, shows, which is seriously unexpected, it would seem plausible that all those little red dots are NOT Black Holes, but giant elliptical galaxies full of stars formed in the distant past. I have advanced the idea that stars, GIVEN ENOUGH TIME COULD NUCLEOSYNTHESIZE ALL LIGHT ELEMENTS in the past to torpedo the Big Bang fake certainty. Those immense quantities of stars would explain why the Nitrogen to Oxygen ratio is 4 times higher than expected. Those stars would also create enormous amounts of radiation, which would then be thermalized… and mimic the Big Bang CMB…. Consider indeed: Nuclear Physics B, Volume 1017, August 2025, Special Issue on Clarifying misconceptions. The impact of early massive galaxy formation on the cosmic microwave background. Eda Gjergo and Pavel Kroupa

 “During this time, the nuclear reactions in these ignited stars were intensely luminous.

Our calculations indicate that some of the cosmic background radiation actually originates from the formation of the elliptical galaxies,” says Gjergo. “This accounts for at least 1.4% of the radiation but COULD EVEN ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF IT.

And this is even before plugging in my Tired Light from Quantum Collapse theory.

So now we have three concurrent mechanisms for the CMB: standard stretching of space due to expansion (as in ΛCDM), radiation from numerous early stars from giant galaxies, and Patrice’s Tired Light theory. The three mechanisms could happen in various degrees, depending upon location in space and or time…(Tired Light my way would depend upon Dark Matter, so it could be tested locally…)  

***

The second order of evidence for the Big Bang has been indeed the abundance of light elements …like hydrogen, helium, and lithium, formed in the first few minutes of the BB. However there is a causal loop involved: the light elements could NOT have been produced in stars in those giant elliptical galaxies… because, according to the Big Bang model, the  ΛCDM,   the universe is only 14 billion years old… HOWEVER, if the universe were significantly older, the light elements could have been synthesized, yours truly observed

(The left red monster galaxy shows as a triple, because another galaxy in the way serves as a lens, dividing the light from the red monster in three pieces…)

One of the problems with ΛCDM has been that it had to assume a period of extreme cosmic INFLATION OF SPACE At 10^20C… one hundred billion billion times the speed of light, c. Why, how, and why it stopped were left as mysteries… As I have argued many times, we already have an accelerated inflation, Dark Energy… Why another one? 

Next, I will explain how the Tired Light from Quantum Collapse theory works… After attending to the present state of the World War, of course. In the latest, the fascist theocratic Iranian dictatorship threatened the USA, Britain and France… 

Well, go right ahead, we need not only practice, but to wake up…

Patrice Ayme 

***

1] One parsec is the hypothetical distance at which a star would show a parallax of exactly one second. That’s 3.26 light year, and shorter than the distance of the closest star.

***

P/S: Three weeks later I found the following interesting video easy to watch (I saw only the beginning, but it’s seems similar to what is above): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xb69yPNgX-Q&t=176s

Hubble Crisis, 2025

April 7, 2025

Abstract: Modern cosmological theories of the 2010s are incredibly precise. Those Lambda Cold Dark Matter (ΛLCDM) theories have a problem: the acceleration of the expansion of the universe computed in our cosmic neighborhood disagrees with the acceleration of the expansion computed using what is viewed as the early universe. It is a question of 73 locally versus 68 early on. But these are accelerations…

Only SQPR has something deep to say about this situation, because in that theory “Dark Energy” augments with time (so the local Hubble constant should be higher than any old one…) .

***

In the first half of the 20C a number of European and US astronomers, including Hubble, a lawyer turned astronomer using the world’s most powerful telescope (in California), established that the universe was expanding. Isolated galaxies, and giant clusters of galaxies, were observed to separate from each other. When Hubble announced the expansion (which had been guessed by some of his European colleagues), he got a number that was so high that the universe was younger than the Sun. That was corrected by Baade, a German astronomer. 

***

DARK MATTER:

Meanwhile, in 1933 Fritz Zwicky, a Swiss at Caltech, studying the giant Coma cluster of more than 1,000 galaxies, saw that they were moving too fast for the observed mass, and announced Dunkle Materie, Dark Matter. Nobody liked that, and ignoring it was facilitated by what was viewed as Zwicky’s insufferable, eccentric personality (as all people of exceptional intellect). Fritz also coined the term “supernova” while fostering the concept of neutron stars.(Zwicky also pushed for “Tired Light” theory (which SQPR predicts)… what was viewed as a major irritant by the Big Bangists…) 

A generation later, Vera Rubin, an astronomer at Carnegie, confirmed after studying 60 galaxies and Andromeda with a state of the art spectrometer, that, well, the galaxies rotated too much like plates (and not just like vortices)… confirming Zwicky’s Dark Matter. She was not ignored, although a woman and a mother to boot. A major observatory coming on line at high altitude in the Atacama desert bears her name. It’s not called the Zwicky. Maybe Zwicky should have claimed to be a woman?

***

DARK ENERGY:

Dark Energy is the name given to whatever is causing the accelerating expansion of the universe. Here’s a quick presentation of what We (Sort of) Know:

In the late 1990s, astronomers studying distant supernovae discovered that the universe’s expansion is speeding up, not slowing down. This was unexpected—gravity, a constant force towards the center of mass (whatever that is!) should be pulling everything together, slowing the expansion down. Something must be pushing it apart (another explanation -not usually considered- would be that gravity weakens over ultra-cosmological distances… as SQPR would have it).

That “something” supposedly pushing galactic clusters apart, is what we call Dark Energy. It’s not directly observed, but, like many things in science, inferred from its effects. How Much of the Universe Is It?

According to the reigning current models (like Lambda-CDM), the universe is roughly: 68% dark energy, 27% dark matter… and 5% regular matter (you, me, stars, planets, etc.)

***

What Might Dark Energy Be? There are a few theories characterized by a parsimony of imagination:

Cosmological Constant (Λ) – Einstein originally added this to his equations of general relativity. It represents a constant energy density filling space uniformly. Einstein put it in to prevent the equation representing gravitation in the universe to collapse the universe gravitationally. As a prima donna, he later claimed that to be his “greatest mistake”, as otherwise he, Einstein The Great Again, would have “predicted” the expansion of the universe. In any case, the Cosmological Constant (Λ) explains nothing, it’s just a description of behavior (but supposes a few things one may be able to contradict)..

Quintessence – Turning the  constant Λ into a dynamic field, evolving over space and time.

Modified Gravity – Maybe gravity doesn’t work quite the way we think on cosmic scales, and we don’t need a “dark energy” at all. The problem is that the “official” MONDs (MOdified Newtonian Dynamics) were devised to explain Dark Matter in galaxies… But they failed. 

SQPR: The only proposed theory that is not just a description of behavior, is SQPR, Sub Quantic, Physical Reality.

***

🌀 Why Is Dark Energy So Weird:

The energy density of dark energy stays constant (or nearly so), even as the universe expands.

This means more space = more dark energy, which further accelerates expansion.

In SQPR this is directly explained by the weakening of gravity as the carrier bosons are ripped apart…Because the Quantum Interaction is not of infinite range…

*** 

73 – 68 = 5… 5 km/s per Megaparsec…Let’s meditate on this. Over a billion years, if we have two objects the distance of which augments at 15,000 km/s. It turns out that affects severely the famed high precision of the age of the universe… which I always took with a bucket of salt

A higher Hubble constant affects key cosmic stats — assuming a flat universe with ΛCDM (standard model). These numbers are approximate and based on best-fit ΛCDM calculations — exact values depend on details like matter/dark energy density. The difference might not seem huge in light-years, but in cosmology, even a 5% shift is massive — it changes how we model the early universe, galaxy formation, and fundamental physics.

Hubble Constant (H₀) 67 km/s/Mpc (Planck satellite): Age of Universe ~13.8 billion years; Radius of Observable Universe ~46.5 billion light-years; Diameter ~93 BLY

At the higher 73 km/s/Mpc ( from Local data), the age of the universe is only ~13.0 billion years, the observable radius  ~43.8 billion light-years, its diameter, ~87.6 BLY

***

Astronomy has long led towards new physics. F = ma, the crucial “2nd law” of mechanics was discovered by Buridan, circa 1340 CE, by mentally exploring what happened to a falling body (I read Buridan directly and made that conclusion myself). Then Buridan suggested that his first law (no force, no change of impetus; implicitly considers them to be vectors) implied that planets would keep rotating indefinitely… Then of course there was the synthesis in the 17C from Kepler to Newton… Observing the satellites of Jupiter and their twenty minute delay when they are the furthest from Earth, gave the speed of light..

Supposing that the Quantum Interaction which teleports quantum states does so at finite speed, gives Dark Matter and Dark Energy….

 Is a very simple modification… but quite at odds from the way physicists learn Quantum Physics.

Anyway, the mildly called “Hubble Tension” is turning into the “Hubble Crisis”. Good, With enough crises, we may get somewhere…

Patrice Ayme 

Please contmplate below with what the scandal started, the Coma Cluster of 1,000+ galaxies… Zwicky computed that the visible mass would hav eto be multiplied by 400 to hold the cluster together…

Red Dwarves And Their Tidally Locked Planets

November 13, 2024

Could There Be Life on Tidally Locked Planets?

Considering the number of tidally locked planets orbiting close to Red Dwarves, this is really an interesting question. Whether the equivalent of chlorophyll could be developed for lower frequency light is another interesting question… Why not? Chlorophyll was not obvious to develop, it seems it took more than two billion years… It’s a quantum mechanics problem… Quantum AI will help… Shortly before taking over…

Exolife is of burning actuality. It seems that SpaceX giant Starship will work, and then massive scientific missions to Mars could be conducted rather cheaply. Digging into Europa’s ice will also be feasible soon… My preferred bet is that Earth’s life started on Mars.

In any case another question is what atmosphere do the tidally locked planets have?… If any. Earth’s atmosphere is bioengineered…The Great Oxygenation occurred around 2.2 billion years ago… Could we bioengineer such planets??? Human habitats in the Solar System have become just a matter of having a very powerful energy source… Because there is water… All the way to Pluto…

At this point huge energy means thermonuclear fusion (Zero Point energy is also possible… some day… according to me…). 

To come back to Red Dwarves, they have amazingly powerful flares. The power of the star can augment a thousand times during a flare. In some cases, red dwarf flares can release as much energy in a few minutes as our Sun does in several days. These flares are not just a spike in light but often include powerful emissions across the electromagnetic spectrum, including X-rays and ultraviolet (UV) radiation.

The power of these flares can strip away a planet’s atmosphere (consider Mars, and to some extent, Venus) or make conditions inhospitable for surface life, especially if the planet lacks a strong magnetic field to protect it. However, if a planet is sufficiently shielded or has an atmosphere thick enough to withstand the radiation, it might still be habitable beneath the surface or in protected regions.  

Some red dwarfs, such as Proxima Centauri, Barnard’s Star, and AD Leonis, are known for their spectacular flares. In 2019, astronomers observed a flare from Proxima Centauri (our nearest stellar neighbor) that was about 14,000 times the star’s normal brightness in UV wavelengths, a staggering increase that could dramatically affect nearby planets. Notably, Proxima has an Earth-sized planet in its habitable zone, Proxima b.

A more philosophical question occurs: the instability of Red Dwarves is affected by phenomena which could have a gaussian tail. In other words, although very very rarely, the Sun, a large Yellow Dwarf, should experience similar events…Carrington events to the power ten? One should inspect the Moon carefully for traces of these…With the aim of establishing a flare probability…

So Red Dwarves and Tidally Locked Planets science brings up a fundamental question about the Sun: how stable is it really?

Patrice Ayme

Relativity Enables To Colonize The Milky Way…

April 27, 2024

Relatively EasilyWarning: The following requires knowledge and acceptance of the so-called “Twin Paradox” in Relativity (which used to be controversial).

By slowing down time, Relativity makes feasible, and rapid, the conquest of the galaxy. As usual in tech, the question of the availability of huge energy is paramount. 

When a body is accelerated to speed v, its PROPER TIME slows down by a factor of square root of (1 – vv/cc). Proper time theory, also known as local time, was discovered by Lorentz and Henri Poincaré in the nineteenth century and it is the conceptual core of Relativity (named and conceptualized by Henri Poincaré, mostly misattributed to Einstein’s abtract of 1905).

As v approaches c, then, the time inside the moving spaceship tends to go to zero. As seen from Earth, whatever happens inside the spaceship comes to a standstill. 

If one could accelerate to roughly (99/100) c, c being the speed of light, the time inside the spaceship would be roughly 10% of the time on Earth.

Indeed the crucial Relativity TIME AMPLIFIER is γ= 1/ square root (1- vv/cc) = 1/square root (1/100) = 10

So say the spaceship is going to Proxima Centauri b, the Earth sized planet in the habitable zone in the closest star to the Sun . To simplify, say th spaceship does not brake but just flies by. From Earth’s perspective, light taking 4.3 years to get there, the spaceship would take less than 5 years… from Earth’s perspective, Earth time. But, inside the ship only 6 months would have elapsed… that’s “PROPER TIME” In other words, a colonization crew could get there and colonize. Now if the ship had flown ten years, it would have gone around 80 light years…

In a thousand years, one could cover 8,000 light years….:  Consider that

Now it’s likely that, within relatively soon, hibernation techniques  will be mastered.

The problem with the preceding is the huge amount of energy needed to accelerate at .99 c is gigantic, of the order of the largest thermonuclear explosion so far… for one single kilogram… Another difficulty is that empty space is not really empty, and there would be some difficulty hitting a relativistic blizzard of various particles, let alone outright objects… To accelerate a large million ton ship at .99c is feasible, acceleration-wise (.1g would do it), but the enrgy would be of the order of say 10% of the sun output for twenty minutes. How to store that? Antimatter. Antimatter battery!

Ions could be deflected by ultra strong magnetic fields… Then the starship could be made very… aerodynamic, so to speak…

In any case the fact remains: with foreseeable tech, the galaxy could be colonized quickly (on a geological time scale). So the fact we see no activity between stars means that we are alone… Because either advanced life is very rare, or space Putins are all too frequent… Or both…

The Fermi Paradox, in light of Relativity is acute

Patrice Ayme .  

Finding inhabitable planets ripe for colonization is definitively a possibility, thanks to Relativity.

P/S: Some administrator of several sites on “Space” and “Science”, not knowing Relativity at all, and confusing proper time and Earth time, accused me of “fucking nonsense” for the preceding essay. He claimed that I pretended (which I did not) that it was possible to go faster than the speed of light. Then he banned, cancelled me, and cut off communications all at the same time, unilaterally while I was sleeping. That’s how people behave nowadays. Like cretinous fascist exterminators propelled by their hating ignorance.

WIMPs versus WIZs, Weakly Interacting Zombies

March 27, 2023

WIMPs are Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, the hope of particle physicists. WIMPs have not been observed yet (in 2023). Particle physicists hope that some sort of WIMPs, as yet unknown, are what Dark Matter is made of. But maybe Dark Matter is made of WIZs, Weakly Interacting Zombies. (as SQPR holds: in SQPR, large scale quantum collapse leaves a mass-energy residue… Those weakly interacting zombies…)  

Dark Matter has been a riddle for a century (a Swiss from Caltech, Zwicky suggested it first). That there is something cosmically flouting the laws of known physics is blatant, and for all to see (if one has a telescope). Two-thirds of spiral galaxies are barred, including our own giant Milky Way. The bar moves rigidly, obviously, and this is an obvious contradiction with having a lot of mass at the center [1]. Either gravity fails (as MOND has it) or there is a lot of mystery mass  (Dark Matter) away from the center.

I had the pleasure over the weekend to talk with David Schlegel from LBL, one of the most cited US physicists. He studies dark energy, dark matter, and fundamental physics.

Here are some key points of our exchange which I think are the most important:

  1. David firmly believes in WIMPs. He believes not all the “phase space” has been studied and the particle accelerators will find WIMPs in areas not yet surveyed… “within a decade”. 
  2. David agrees that Dark Matter (DM) can’t be explained by neutrinos, because neutrinos don’t stay in place.  
  3. David does not believe MOND (MOdified Newton Dynamics is a potential explanation for DM “anymore”. Not in the “last ten years”. So I asked him if it was because of the Bullet Cluster and similar situations, and he said yes. Too many of these. I told him I NEVER believed in MOND, because it looked too ad hoc. David retorted that everything is ad hoc (in science)… So he got on the receiving end of an ad hoc versus logical-principled approach to science. I gave the example of Kepler (ad hoc) versus Newton… In truth, though, even Kepler was not ad hoc, in the sense that he made a deliberate “war on Mars” (which had been launched by Kepler’s mentor Tycho).
  4. I pointed out the philosophical difficulty of having as we have in the Big Bang model now TWO inflation mechanisms, one observational (Dark Energy, demonstrated first at Berkeley LBL cosmology and astrophysics group), the other a theoretical necessity to make the Big Bang theory work. That made him smile nervously. He said that after all they are perhaps the same (Wait! What? That’s what SQPR holds). David also said that it would all be figured out in detail within ten years: traces of cosmic inflation should be found… or then, well, inflation would be disproven.

For once I was polite and guarded, in part because I had filled my weekly quota for new enemies earlier that day. I didn’t insist on Big Bang Trouble,

that those early enormous galaxies with old red giant stars contradicted LCDM… I didn’t point out that, without cosmic inflation, the Big Bang model doesn’t work. I didn’t point out that finding a WIMP candidate is only part of the story, and not the most important part… Most crucially, one needs to explain why the Dark Matter is where it is. SQPR, which is a geometric mass-energy theory, does this effortlessly.

All this tells me that core official, ultra expert cosmology is putting all its hope in WIMPS, and keeps on being ultra-confident of the Big Bang religion.

Never mind that the most recent space telescope is apparently verifying a stunning prediction of SQPR, namely huge very old galaxies (and they should be poor in Dark Matter).

Cosmology? One more dimension in which the next decade is going to be fascinating…

Patrice Ayme

***

[1] centrifugal acceleration is ~ vv/d (v being the speed of the orbiting object, d its distance to center of the rotation) gravity is ~ 1/dd. Equating both, we get: vv = 1/d, or v is the square root of the inverse of the distance. So v should diminish as one gets away from the center…. But the bar is rigid… and that means that the speed v is proportional to the distance d. So the discrepancy is d^3/2!   

***

[2] David Shelgel makes the largest two-dimensional and three-dimensional maps of the universe, which are important tools for cosmology and for studying dark energy, dark matter, and fundamental physics. David is the principal investigator (PI) for the BOSS project on the Sloan Telescope, which has made a three-dimensional map of 1.5 million galaxies and measures the size scale of the Universe to 1% precision (http://www.sdss.org/sdss-surveys/boss/)

David is project scientist for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (https://desi.lbl.gov). When it began operations in 2018, it constructed a three-dimensional map of tens of millions of galaxies spanning the local universe to 10 billion light years. Such devices built in collaboration with Lausanne’s EPFL use 5,000  actuators that harness Swiss high tech high precision know-how inherited from watch making.

Down With Tourism

March 7, 2021

I don’t do tourism… But I have LIVED, and grown up, on four continents… I have never targeted a place to tour. Right, I have visited places to make giant, somewhat foolhardy, trail or mountain runs, in the wilderness, and visited ranges to climb. But then I was not “touring”, I was running, or climbing, living on, in and off the land, which I had got to know and learn, be it only to survive… It’s good to run across real light, carrying no water, yet knowing the next valley would have a torrent in which to cool and drink. And knowing weather patterns enough to negotiate thunderstorms, torrid heat, paralyzing cold, and bug clouds impacting vision, let alone breathing and ski integrity… I was not just overlording the land mechanically, carrying my imperialism around, sheltered in a bus or helicopter with a tour guide telling me what to think, feel, and learn…

What is the idea of tourism? Let’s think about the concept itself, what it is supposed to depict, how it originated. Making a “tour” indicates that one goes around and inspect a number of locations. Like a military tour. This entails costs: land, ship or air travel, hotel, or short term rentals. This cost is borne not just by the places which are toured, and the servants making the activity possible, but also by the entire planet. Is that the best usage of finite resources? Flying a jumbo jet across an ocean causes enormous energy and pollution, equivalent to putting the same mass in orbit around the Earth. Putting a mass in orbit can serve the common good, say world communications (which reduce the need to tour). Something in orbit stays there for years, becoming ecologically efficient. How many times do tourists need to be put in orbit? (Figuratively speaking.) 

A further difficulty with tourism is the moods it fosters: instead of being conducive to the respect of the biosphere, tourism inculcates the mood of “client is king”. It is not the Natives nor the biosphere which are “kings”, but some invader, rich in money, but not consideration. Who needs kings? Why foster excess in how much a few individuals have to be served? 

Soon enough, coconut trees to be all over….

What we need to foster is respect for the planet and its biosphere. Visiting a place and living there for a while, learning what this place teaches, that’s fine. Just touring to make a mark, at great ecological and moral cost is the sort of abusive exploitative supercilious mood that should be discouraged.

There are better things for humanity to do, than to serve wealthy aliens fostering the mood that superficial vision, and authoritative pocketbooks, should be paramount. 

Humanity needs to encourage thinking, in depth, that is culture. Servitude should not be an ideal, instead the natives, wherever they are, should be encouraged to slow down tourism towards interactions giving more space to time and exchange. Hawaii should be encouraged to pursue research on how to make its economy renewable, energy independent (the ocean can help), and encourage more world-class astronomical research on Maui and the Big Island. After all, Polynesians got to Hawaii thanks to advanced technology, not by serving strangers.

***

“Got Your Back” wondered in the New York Times: “I’m sure there must be many reasons for Hawaii’s situation to be more fragile ecologically (such as it being the most isolated archipelago on earth) but I was surprised just now when I looked up another states stats. Massachusetts has almost the same landmass but hosts 2.5 – 3 times the number of tourists each year. I had assumed the numbers would be opposite since I’ve never heard about any negative tourism impact on Massachusetts. What am I missing?

PA’s answer: The ecology of Massachusetts is not special, it’s basically the same as the rest of the North-East USA, a continental, interconnected landmass. The ecology of Hawaii is very special, and full of ecological niches, from insulary isolation, various climes and altitudes. This requires leaving large expanses undeveloped. The smallest dirt road has large impacts on local species, especially birds. 

Also the question is dependency. For example Massachusetts has a massive cultural and intellectual economy, with MIT, Harvard, and a company like Moderna and its mRNA vaccine, saving the world. Whereas Hawaii has only “tourism”… But for world class astronomy: Maui detected the first extrasolar object going at an enormous speed through the solar system Oumuamua, thanks to the Pan-STARRS telescope at Haleakalā Observatory, Hawaii, on 19 October 2017. Optically speaking the top of the Big Island is half way to space. Instead of fostering astronomy, which guided Polynesians of old, some misled characters have been trying to block it. Block tourism instead.

Energy procurement in Hawaii is also a disaster, as it depends upon fossil fuel. Potential new energy sources exist. And first of all, Ocean Heat Pumps. 

In other words, Hawaii should develop much more science, it needs it more than Massachusetts, arguably. Moreover, most tourists in Massachusetts are short-stay, little impact. They don’t jet in. flying a day over land and ocean….

Patrice Ayme

Gravitational Waves Directly Detected

February 11, 2016

How Were Gravitational Waves detected?

By two detectors in the USA, one in Washington State, the other in Louisiana (detecting in one place would have been enough; in two places at the same time, the finding is overwhelming certain; the National Science Foundation of the USA had spent $1.1 billion, over 40 years, on that research). The detectors were simplicity themselves in concept: just a light interferometer to measure the distance between mirrors: light is split, sent in two perpendicular directions, and then re-united with itself. If one of the branches vary slightly in length relative to the other as a gravitational waves passes, an interference will show up. However mirrors hanging from pendulum hanging from pendulums five times, the whole thing in an anti-vibration machine had to be realized in half a dozen places in a chain of reflections and interference.

What are these Gravitational Waves?

As far as existing gravitation theory has it, distortion in space (and, thus time: time and space are related by the speed of light, c).

A Field Carries Away A Wave Just As A Whip Does

A Field Carries Away A Wave Just As A Whip Does

What Was Detected:

Einstein’s Gravitation Theory says that gravitation “is” the deformation of space(time) it brings. It is this deformation which was directly detected: a part of space in one direction was made shorter than in another direction. That meant a huge gravitational wave had passed.

The formidable event that caused it was the crash and collapse of two black holes into each other, each around 30 solar masses (much more details are known).

Gravitational Waves Were Certain Theoretically, & Already Detected:

We already had evidence for the existence of gravitational waves, both theoretical and experimental. Einstein’s name was rolled out, naturally enough. Because Einstein contributed to the present Theory of Gravitation (I am not anti-Einstein, far from it, but he closely worked with a number of other people, including the towering mathematician David Hilbert, who published his own approach to gravity within weeks of Einstein).

Einstein tends to appear as the cherry on many a cake. Those who celebrate the photogenic cherry, and ignore the cake, will go hungry.

WAVES ARE PREDICTED BY FINITE SPEED FIELD THEORY:

Actually, once one has hypothesized that gravitation is a field propagating at a finite speed, the apparition of waves is automatic.

The reasoning was made first by British and French Eighteenth Century physicists, in the framework of electromagnetic force; the mathematics is exactly the same with gravitation, as both fields vary with the inverse square of the distance. This is what happens in a radio antenna, with electrons going back and forth: the electric field that those electrons create is deformed in such a way that it moves other electron at a distance, back and forth.

The Gravitational Energy Loss Detection Method:

Thus, how do the waves show up? By shaking things at a distance. Using conservation of energy, it means that the field creating system, by moving just so, loses energy to its waves. An obvious case is two neutron stars (“pulsars”) rotating around each other: as they move back and forth, because of said rotation, they create gravitational waves which carry energy away from their system, As this happens, their system loses energy, the two stars should spiral into each other, thus rotate ever faster, and this should be observable, and computable exactly. This, indeed, was thoroughly observed, so we knew the waves were there.

Einstein’s Gravitation Theory is a sleight of hand:

It affects to identify space(time) deformations with gravitation. The idea actually originated with the awesome German mathematician Bernard Riemann, who invented manifold theory in part to point out that any force could be viewed as convergence, or divergence of geodesics (this is an idea that physics has been milking ever since).

This, though, does not answer Newton’s deeper query about the nature of gravitation (see below). It’s a bit as if a creature asked:’What is an arm?’ And one answered:’An arm is what pushes things, and we can detect the deformation the arm brought.’

What is the discovery good for?

Well, first, one has to make sure. Science is about making 100% sure. The present experiment improved some technology far out what anything else required (but then it does open some possibilities!) Just an importantly, now we will be able to check the details of the Gravitation Theory (the big picture was not in doubt; the details are). Ultimately it may be possible to communicate through gravitational waves, etc (although right now the deformation are only of the size of the fraction of a nucleus, and we could detect them!)

Who were the originators of that idea? First Newton himself pointed out that his own theory of gravitation was grotesque (I am paraphrasing). Newton:

“that one body may act upon another at a distance thro’ a Vacuum, without the Mediation of any thing else, by and through which their Action and Force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an Absurdity that I believe no Man who has in philosophical Matters a competent Faculty of thinking can ever fall into it.”

There were actually two problems: that the action was instantaneous, and that it was at a distance without intermediaries. Newton paid attention to the second one, physics, in the last two centuries, solved the first (which was implicit in Newton’s observations).

As I mentioned in passing above, part of Newton’s worries were addressed by the invention of the concept of field. And then by the realization that fields carried energy away in waves. At that point, gravitational waves were automatic… Riemann’s introduction of manifolds, and how to conceptualize forces in them gave the manifestation of its nature to gravitation we presently have, a distortion of space metric (once again, time follows automatically).

It’s important to know who invented what, and contributed most. Because it unveils how ideas appear and evolve. Then, in turn, one can make theories of that, accelerating innovation (don’t forget there is a horse race between innovation and oblivion, on the scale of the entire biosphere!)

Curiously, this is all very useful; GPS with a precision of 30 centimeters has allowed to find out that baboon society is more democratic than ours, in fundamental ways. “General Relativistic” effects (the fact clocks run slow in a gravitational field) make crucial corrections to the GPS computations (otherwise GPS would be pretty useless). So this is not all academic. GPS will soon allow robotic agriculture… among other things.

We still don’t know what gravitation is. However, we can predict more things than Newton did… Even if he did not suspect they were there. This is just the beginning of what could be revealed, if our satanic impulses are kept in check.

Patrice Ayme’


SEQUENTIAL LOGIC

New logic solving 25 centuries old logic problems such as the Liar Paradox And Incorporating Spirits of Quantum Logic, Local Time, And Local Truth. More General Than PDL ,

Croatian View

From Croatian perspective

NotPoliticallyCorrect

Human Biodiversity, IQ, Evolutionary Psychology, Epigenetics and Evolution

Of Particular Significance

Conversations About Science with Theoretical Physicist Matt Strassler

Rise, Republic, Plutocracy, Degeneracy, Fall And Transmutation Of Rome

Power Exponentiation By A Few Destroyed Greco-Roman Civilization. Are We Next?

SoundEagle 🦅ೋღஜஇ

Where The Eagles Fly . . . . Art Science Poetry Music & Ideas

Artificial Turf At French Bilingual School Berkeley

Artificial Turf At French Bilingual School Berkeley

Patterns of Meaning

Exploring the patterns of meaning that shape our world

West Hunter

Omnes vulnerant, ultima necat

GrrrGraphics on WordPress

www.grrrgraphics.com

Skulls in the Stars

The intersection of physics, optics, history and pulp fiction

Patrice Ayme's Thoughts

Trying To Think Better By All & Any Means. To Be Human Is To Unleash As Much Intelligence As Possible, Instincts & Values Flow, Even Happiness. History and Science Teach Us Not Just Humility, But Power, Smarts, And The Ways We Should Embrace. Naturam Primum Cognoscere Rerum

Learning from Dogs

Dogs are animals of integrity. We have much to learn from them.

SEQUENTIAL LOGIC

New logic solving 25 centuries old logic problems such as the Liar Paradox And Incorporating Spirits of Quantum Logic, Local Time, And Local Truth. More General Than PDL ,

Croatian View

From Croatian perspective

NotPoliticallyCorrect

Human Biodiversity, IQ, Evolutionary Psychology, Epigenetics and Evolution

Of Particular Significance

Conversations About Science with Theoretical Physicist Matt Strassler

Rise, Republic, Plutocracy, Degeneracy, Fall And Transmutation Of Rome

Power Exponentiation By A Few Destroyed Greco-Roman Civilization. Are We Next?

SoundEagle 🦅ೋღஜஇ

Where The Eagles Fly . . . . Art Science Poetry Music & Ideas

Artificial Turf At French Bilingual School Berkeley

Artificial Turf At French Bilingual School Berkeley

Patterns of Meaning

Exploring the patterns of meaning that shape our world

West Hunter

Omnes vulnerant, ultima necat

GrrrGraphics on WordPress

www.grrrgraphics.com

Skulls in the Stars

The intersection of physics, optics, history and pulp fiction

Patrice Ayme's Thoughts

Trying To Think Better By All & Any Means. To Be Human Is To Unleash As Much Intelligence As Possible, Instincts & Values Flow, Even Happiness. History and Science Teach Us Not Just Humility, But Power, Smarts, And The Ways We Should Embrace. Naturam Primum Cognoscere Rerum

Learning from Dogs

Dogs are animals of integrity. We have much to learn from them.

SEQUENTIAL LOGIC

New logic solving 25 centuries old logic problems such as the Liar Paradox And Incorporating Spirits of Quantum Logic, Local Time, And Local Truth. More General Than PDL ,

Croatian View

From Croatian perspective

NotPoliticallyCorrect

Human Biodiversity, IQ, Evolutionary Psychology, Epigenetics and Evolution

Of Particular Significance

Conversations About Science with Theoretical Physicist Matt Strassler

Rise, Republic, Plutocracy, Degeneracy, Fall And Transmutation Of Rome

Power Exponentiation By A Few Destroyed Greco-Roman Civilization. Are We Next?

SoundEagle 🦅ೋღஜஇ

Where The Eagles Fly . . . . Art Science Poetry Music & Ideas

Artificial Turf At French Bilingual School Berkeley

Artificial Turf At French Bilingual School Berkeley

Patterns of Meaning

Exploring the patterns of meaning that shape our world

West Hunter

Omnes vulnerant, ultima necat

GrrrGraphics on WordPress

www.grrrgraphics.com

Skulls in the Stars

The intersection of physics, optics, history and pulp fiction

Patrice Ayme's Thoughts

Trying To Think Better By All & Any Means. To Be Human Is To Unleash As Much Intelligence As Possible, Instincts & Values Flow, Even Happiness. History and Science Teach Us Not Just Humility, But Power, Smarts, And The Ways We Should Embrace. Naturam Primum Cognoscere Rerum

Learning from Dogs

Dogs are animals of integrity. We have much to learn from them.