Was Obama Proud Of His Own Corruption?
Abstract: Thorbjørn Jagland, head of the Nobel committee, said Obama got the prize for “resetting” with Putin. Jagland, intermediary between Putin and Epstein, was arrested in 2026 for “gross corruption” in that matter. Must Obama return his ill-earned prize?
***
[We helped enormously, sacrificing much, and I bitterly resent it, to get Obama president. We had a ringside seat to the abysmal Obama presidency and its corruption (remember the “dreamers”, the “affordable care”, the “reset” with Putin, followed by invasion of Ukraine in 2014?). But then what we saw and experienced was so unexpected that we would have behaved very differently, had we known (long story). I cannot be accused to be anti-Obama, and I still feel very friendly towards him, from a friendship preceding his presidency by decades… I actually wish he could represent himself to the presidency to do it right this time. However…]
When Obama got his ill-deserved Nobel Prize I was struck by his asinine pride. Nominations for the 2009 Nobel, which was attributed to Obama, closed eleven days after he took office: there was no time to evaluate Obama’s performance in office. Moreover, as it turned out, the first major war in Europe since 1945 started when Obama was in office, and it is remarkably easy to show that Obama could have prevented this major war, and its millions of casualties, if, simply, he had acted with common sense instead of corrupt sense. However, Obama expressed fervently corrupt sense of his first day in office, by shutting down hydrogen research in the USA: that was going to help the fosil fuel industry (but the Nobel com., in a gross lie, congratulated for having done much for the climate!) Two hundred eight other candidates for the Nobel had been nominated for 2009.
Socialist Left, Conservative and Progress Party members of the five member Nobel committee opposed Obama’s election!!… Until they were strongly persuaded by Jagland! (Did he propose offshore accounts? The mind reels with the possibilities… How European policy would unfold was at stake…
How could one be so proud from so much injustice? Did not Obama know that thousands of other individuals and organizations justly deserved a Nobel Peace Prize, and that he, Obama, absolutely did not deserve one? So Obama was stealing a prize from those who truly deserved it? Or was it a cognitive problem? Was Obama so ignorant he did not know what the Nobel Peace Prize was about?
Obama had done strictly NOTHING to get a Nobel Peace Prize. Just as with his presidency, he just happened to be there. I had various symbiotic theories to explain the Nobel.
Why was Obama so proud? Someone who also knows the Obama crowd and never entered the power circles, confided in me today:”Over Christmass, I was struck by this: “they despise us”. Why do they despise us? Because we kept ourselves pure and didn’t enter the corruption and exploitation bubble? No, simply because we did not make it. Obama was proud because he made it. That is was just or not, appropriate or not was irrelevant.
As fate has it, Jagland, the president of the Nobel Committee who gave Obama the Nobel Prize, has just been indicted for “GROSS CORRUPTION”. That such individuals who spent so much times among emirates and other tax evasion schemes are not indicted more readily is tantamount to a proof of how corrupt the Empire of the West has got.
As well as serving as Norwegian prime minister from 1996 to 1997, Jagland spent a decade as secretary general of the Council of Europe. No less. So the creep was in charge of human rights, democracy and the rule of law in Europe.
Jagland had diplomatic immunity from heading the Council, Europe’s watchdog for democracy and human rights, during the duration of his 2009 to 2019 tenure. How convenient.
Økokrim, the police unit and a prosecution authority in Norway requested the Council revoke his immunity after it launched an investigation earlier this month into allegations of gross corruption made against Jagland between 2011 and 2018. Jagland is just one face among a sea of corruption higher up in Norway, all the way to ambassadors, the queen, one of Epstein’s pals, etc. To become an Obama ambassador was pretty similar and simple: you gave big money and the plutocrats pulling the strings of Obama had to like you. And hop, here you become ambassador. For some reason, that ain’t corruption. For some reason, the plutocrats steering Obama didn’t like me. .
So what was Obama thinking about, when he got this Nobel, beaming with pride, a Nobel which, like the rest of his short political career, was directed towards him like a water jet? What’s next? Was he going to be proclaimed the new Jesus?
Instead he was told to further the healthcare industry’s profits and “reset” with Putin. Putin was crucial for the corrupt Europeans, to get fossil fuels. People who half know things will tell you Norway is a big fossil fuel producer, so the idea that Obama got the Nobel for “resetting” with Putin, does not work. Right, that’s the danger of knowing only half of what ought to be known and having little imagination.
But precisely because Norway is a big fossil fuel producer, making it twice wealthier per capita than the rest of Scandinavians, Norway wanted Europe to go on with the fossil fuel addiction… So no nuclear power, and thus no wish for nuclear power, no nuclear power research, etc…. But Norway didn’t produce enough fossil fuels for Europe, hence the need for Putin’s gas. Thus, to get the addiction going, Norway needed to make Putin presentable as a civilized collaborator, in spite of being a genocidal (Chechnya) invader (Georgia), poisoner of foreign presidents (Ukraine), who made no mystery that Russia should militarily “protect” Europe (or so Putin said).
Jagland was repeatedly told in email to arrange various services and meetings with Putin, Lavrov and associates. Jagland worked to restore Russia’s voting rights in the Council of Europe (after sanctions following the 2014 Crimea annexation)… some called that giving in to Russian “blackmail.” Jagland was generally perceived to be servile with the Kremlin in his various presidential roles.
Jagland explicitly referenced to the reset with Russia while defending the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Barack Obama…which he, as chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, announced and justified:
Jagland wrote in the Guardian December 6, 2010: “I was puzzled by the reactions to the Obama prize at the time, and have been even more puzzled since… All Europe has benefited from Obama’s work, with Dmitry Medvedev, the Russian president, speaking of a new era at a recent Nato summit in Lisbon. Without Russia’s wise decision to play Obama’s game, these benefits could not have come about, and nor could recent developments in Russian relations with Nato and individual European powers. It needed someone to initiate the change. Obama has – as summed up in a recent comment in the International Herald Tribune – “reset” relations with Russia.
Change, indeed! Russia would invade Ukraine 38 months later, and Obama, who knew that was coming, did nothing about it.
So there you have it: from the horse’s mouth, the Epstein-Putin intermediary Jagland told you why Obama got the Nobel: please reset. Thank you. Obama will be indicted. In the court of history.
***
Accepting enormous gifts one does not deserve, blatantly is more than a serious moral failure. What was the elite trying to tell us? The elite was trying to tell us Obama was an angel Gabriel of peace, and thus, by contamination Putin, and the Europe-Putin marriage made in plutocratic heavens. Not realizing that the gift was to influence Obama in order to enable Russia to keep on stealing its own people blind, transferring the money to Western plutocrats, and encouraging a very dangerous, nuclear armed killer was, of course, to be expected from Obama: he was put where he was precisely because of his pride in his own lack of judgment and the incapacity for him to see beyond the next gift he was going to receive from the gift givers.
Patrice Ayme .
Obama’s Nobel: old explanation: got it because of brownish skin. Silly, even for racist Europe. true reason: incitement to “reset” with Putin
P/S: Shortly after writing the preceding, it was learned that Kathy Ruemmler, top lawyer at the famous financial-plutocratic organization Goldman-Sachs (which steered the W Bush and early Obama administration) resigned. Ms Ruemmler was Obama’s White House Councel. She used to call Epstein “Uncle Jeffrey” and accept many gifts of all sorts form him: or so it appeared from the last batch of Epstein documents. Another angle for Obama and Epstein….
P/S 2: The day after the essay above was written, it turns out that it was revealed that Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem from Dubai sent torture videos to Epstein. Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem gave 1.3 million dollars to Prince William, the would-be King, pluticrat in chief, of Britain. In the last two years. Epstein congratulates Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem in an email toSultan Ahmed bin Sulayem: “loved the torture video“. (Such tortures, often to death, have been known to occur, but somehow the plutocratically owned media doesn’t find them instructive for the Plebs).
It goes without saying that the monarchies ought to be abolished, in Britain and anywhere else, because they symbolise the arrogance of the plutocractic principle: we rule because God has chosen us, and will do whatever it takes to keep on ruling over you, cockrioaches..
Plutocracy is one. When Obama acceeded to the presidency, he acceeded to the plutocracy. His transition was headed and decided by a multibillionaire, who, with his fellows, considered whether yours truly could still be in touch with Obama. Their spokesman informed yours truly that would not be possible because”We are never sure of what you are going to say.”
Patrice Ayme's Thoughts 