Skip to content

Conversation

@Dhruwang
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?

Fixes FOR-1460

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Chore (refactoring code, technical debt, workflow improvements)
  • Enhancement (small improvements)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change adds a new database migration
  • This change requires a documentation update

How should this be tested?

Go to Actions
Try to change description of a Code action

Checklist

Required

  • Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
  • Read How we Code at Formbricks
  • Self-reviewed my own code
  • Commented on my code in hard-to-understand bits
  • Ran pnpm build
  • Checked for warnings, there are none
  • Removed all console.logs
  • Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
  • My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues
  • First PR at Formbricks? Please sign the CLA! Without it we wont be able to merge it 🙏

Appreciated

  • If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
  • Updated the Formbricks Docs if changes were necessary

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 30, 2023

@Dhruwang is attempting to deploy a commit to the formbricks Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 30, 2023

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

@review-agent-prime
Copy link
Contributor

The changes in this PR seem to be well implemented. The addition of the isCodeAction variable to handle different action types is a good approach. However, there are a few suggestions to improve the code:

  1. The isCodeAction variable is used multiple times in the code. It would be better to use useMemo to avoid unnecessary re-computations.
const isCodeAction = useMemo(() => actionClass.type === "code", [actionClass.type]);
  1. The onSubmit function is quite large and does a lot of things. It would be better to split it into smaller functions for better readability and maintainability. For example, you could create a separate function to handle the validation logic.

  2. The error messages thrown in the onSubmit function could be more specific. For example, instead of "Please select at least one selector", you could specify which selectors are required.

  3. The filterNoCodeConfig function could be simplified by using a map of the state variables and the corresponding keys in the noCodeConfig object. This would make the function more scalable if more selectors are added in the future.

const filterNoCodeConfig = (noCodeConfig: TActionClassNoCodeConfig): TActionClassNoCodeConfig => {
  const selectors = { isPageUrl: 'pageUrl', isInnerHtml: 'innerHtml', isCssSelector: 'cssSelector' };
  const filteredNoCodeConfig: TActionClassNoCodeConfig = {};

  Object.entries(selectors).forEach(([stateVar, key]) => {
    if (this[stateVar] && noCodeConfig[key]?.value) {
      filteredNoCodeConfig[key] = { value: noCodeConfig[key].value };
    }
  });

  return filteredNoCodeConfig;
};
  1. The onSubmit function could be simplified by using a ternary operator to set the type property of the updatedData object.
const updatedData: TActionClassInput = {
  ...data,
  environmentId,
  noCodeConfig: filteredNoCodeConfig,
  type: isCodeAction ? "code" : "noCode",
} as TActionClassInput;
  1. The handleDeleteAction function could be improved by adding a specific error message in the catch block. This would help with debugging if an error occurs.
catch (error) {
  toast.error(`Failed to delete action: ${error.message}`);
}

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 30, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
formbricks-cloud ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 30, 2023 0:46am
formbricks-com ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 30, 2023 0:46am

Copy link
Member

@mattinannt mattinannt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you 🙏💪

@mattinannt mattinannt added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 30, 2023
Merged via the queue into formbricks:main with commit 840e161 Oct 30, 2023
kevinkong91 added a commit to kevinkong91/formbricks that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
* main: (28 commits)
  chore: Add Table of Contents to README (formbricks#1427)
  fix: account deletion failing issue (formbricks#1509)
  fix: remove welcome card from email preview (formbricks#1495)
  fix(bug): default role implemented (formbricks#1524)
  fix: changing description of Code Action (formbricks#1522)
  refactor: Migrate activity service (formbricks#1471)
  fix: Error in Docs navigation formbricks#1518 (formbricks#1521)
  feat: dynamic title and description (formbricks#1459)
  fix: Spelling Errors (formbricks#1517)
  fix: added scrollbar whenever overflowed in the settings/profile page (formbricks#1498)
  fix: long url not getting reset after closing modal (formbricks#1502)
  fix: Unexpected Behavior when Toggling Italics in Text Editor and improve clarity of formatting status (formbricks#1506)
  fix: zod pin validation failing (formbricks#1507)
  fix: Error message on Login not shown  (formbricks#1508)
  fix: downgrade nextjs to fix error with react email (formbricks#1516)
  chore: downgrade next version in formbricks-com (formbricks#1513)
  feat: picture selection question (formbricks#1388)
  feat: formtribe leaderboard update as per today (formbricks#1505)
  fix: Added if statement for preventing use of reserved word in question ID (formbricks#1435)
  fix: Disabling Welcome Card leads buggy preview (formbricks#1320)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants