Skip to content

MINOR: typing ProcessorDef#289

Closed
ymatsuda wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:trunkfrom
ymatsuda:typing_ProcessorDef
Closed

MINOR: typing ProcessorDef#289
ymatsuda wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:trunkfrom
ymatsuda:typing_ProcessorDef

Conversation

@ymatsuda

@ymatsuda ymatsuda commented Oct 8, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@guozhangwang
This code change properly types ProcessorDef. This also makes KStream.process() typesafe.

@guozhangwang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lgtm.

@ijuma

ijuma commented Oct 8, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 5a921a3 Oct 9, 2015
@ymatsuda ymatsuda deleted the typing_ProcessorDef branch October 26, 2015 21:14
efeg added a commit to efeg/kafka that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2020
omkreddy added a commit to omkreddy/kafka that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2020
Reviewers: Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>
wyuka pushed a commit to wyuka/kafka that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
…he listTopics() API (apache#289)

This is a squash of 2 commits:
* [LI-HOTFIX] Exclude the partitions info in the MetadataResponse for the listTopics() API (apache#183)
* [LI-HOTFIX] Making the ExcludePartitions field in MetadataRequest an optional field (apache#193)

Compared to the original implementation, which uses the topic names directly during `excludePartitions = true`, this new implementation will still visit the metadata cache in order to obtain the topic Id info.

==1st commit message==

[LI-HOTFIX] Exclude the partitions info in the MetadataResponse for the listTopics() API (apache#183)

TICKET = LIKAFKA-37320
LI_DESCRIPTION = Making the listTopics() API more light-weight so that a kafka broker would only return the topic names in the MetadataResponse. The partitions and replicas info would not be included in the MetadataResponse for the listTopics() API.

EXIT_CRITERIA = When this change is merged in upstream and the corresponding change is pulled into a future release.

==2nd commit message==

[LI-HOTFIX] Making the ExcludePartitions field in MetadataRequest an optional field (apache#193)

TICKET = LIKAFKA-37320
LI_DESCRIPTION =
After the change made in b28666d,
an old client version sending a MetadataRequest without the "ExcludePartitions"
field to a new kafka server version expecting the field will result in the exception below.
This PR turns the "ExcludePartitions" field into an optional one introduced in KIP-482.

org.apache.kafka.common.errors.InvalidRequestException: Error getting request for apiKey: METADATA, apiVersion: 9, connectionId: 10.154.165.183:16637-10.154.87.109:44876-2848, listenerName: ListenerName(SSL), principal: User:likafka-cruise-control:None:prod-ltx1
        at org.apache.kafka.common.requests.RequestContext.parseRequest(RequestContext.java:70) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.RequestChannel$Request.<init>(RequestChannel.scala:89) ~[kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.$anonfun$processCompletedReceives$1(SocketServer.scala:928) ~[kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.$anonfun$processCompletedReceives$1$adapted(SocketServer.scala:909) ~[kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:941) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach$(Iterator.scala:941) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1429) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach(IterableLike.scala:74) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach$(IterableLike.scala:73) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.AbstractIterable.foreach(Iterable.scala:56) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.processCompletedReceives(SocketServer.scala:909) [kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.run(SocketServer.scala:799) [kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834) [?:?]
Caused by: org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.types.SchemaException: Error reading field '_tagged_fields': java.nio.BufferUnderflowException
        at org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.types.Schema.read(Schema.java:118) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.ApiKeys.parseRequest(ApiKeys.java:327) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at org.apache.kafka.common.requests.RequestContext.parseRequest(RequestContext.java:65) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        ... 12 more

EXIT_CRITERIA = When this change is merged in upstream and the corresponding change is pulled into a future release.

Co-authored-by: Lucas Wang <luwang@linkedin.com>
wyuka pushed a commit to wyuka/kafka that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2022
wyuka pushed a commit to wyuka/kafka that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2022
…he listTopics() API (apache#289)

This is a squash of 2 commits:
* [LI-HOTFIX] Exclude the partitions info in the MetadataResponse for the listTopics() API (apache#183)
* [LI-HOTFIX] Making the ExcludePartitions field in MetadataRequest an optional field (apache#193)

Compared to the original implementation, which uses the topic names directly during `excludePartitions = true`, this new implementation will still visit the metadata cache in order to obtain the topic Id info.

==1st commit message==

[LI-HOTFIX] Exclude the partitions info in the MetadataResponse for the listTopics() API (apache#183)

TICKET = LIKAFKA-37320
LI_DESCRIPTION = Making the listTopics() API more light-weight so that a kafka broker would only return the topic names in the MetadataResponse. The partitions and replicas info would not be included in the MetadataResponse for the listTopics() API.

EXIT_CRITERIA = When this change is merged in upstream and the corresponding change is pulled into a future release.

==2nd commit message==

[LI-HOTFIX] Making the ExcludePartitions field in MetadataRequest an optional field (apache#193)

TICKET = LIKAFKA-37320
LI_DESCRIPTION =
After the change made in b28666d,
an old client version sending a MetadataRequest without the "ExcludePartitions"
field to a new kafka server version expecting the field will result in the exception below.
This PR turns the "ExcludePartitions" field into an optional one introduced in KIP-482.

org.apache.kafka.common.errors.InvalidRequestException: Error getting request for apiKey: METADATA, apiVersion: 9, connectionId: 10.154.165.183:16637-10.154.87.109:44876-2848, listenerName: ListenerName(SSL), principal: User:likafka-cruise-control:None:prod-ltx1
        at org.apache.kafka.common.requests.RequestContext.parseRequest(RequestContext.java:70) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.RequestChannel$Request.<init>(RequestChannel.scala:89) ~[kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.$anonfun$processCompletedReceives$1(SocketServer.scala:928) ~[kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.$anonfun$processCompletedReceives$1$adapted(SocketServer.scala:909) ~[kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:941) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach$(Iterator.scala:941) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1429) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach(IterableLike.scala:74) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach$(IterableLike.scala:73) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.AbstractIterable.foreach(Iterable.scala:56) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.processCompletedReceives(SocketServer.scala:909) [kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.run(SocketServer.scala:799) [kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834) [?:?]
Caused by: org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.types.SchemaException: Error reading field '_tagged_fields': java.nio.BufferUnderflowException
        at org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.types.Schema.read(Schema.java:118) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.ApiKeys.parseRequest(ApiKeys.java:327) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at org.apache.kafka.common.requests.RequestContext.parseRequest(RequestContext.java:65) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        ... 12 more

EXIT_CRITERIA = When this change is merged in upstream and the corresponding change is pulled into a future release.

Co-authored-by: Lucas Wang <luwang@linkedin.com>
wyuka pushed a commit to wyuka/kafka that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2022
…he listTopics() API (apache#289)

This is a squash of 2 commits:
* [LI-HOTFIX] Exclude the partitions info in the MetadataResponse for the listTopics() API (apache#183)
* [LI-HOTFIX] Making the ExcludePartitions field in MetadataRequest an optional field (apache#193)

Compared to the original implementation, which uses the topic names directly during `excludePartitions = true`, this new implementation will still visit the metadata cache in order to obtain the topic Id info.

==1st commit message==

[LI-HOTFIX] Exclude the partitions info in the MetadataResponse for the listTopics() API (apache#183)

TICKET = LIKAFKA-37320
LI_DESCRIPTION = Making the listTopics() API more light-weight so that a kafka broker would only return the topic names in the MetadataResponse. The partitions and replicas info would not be included in the MetadataResponse for the listTopics() API.

EXIT_CRITERIA = When this change is merged in upstream and the corresponding change is pulled into a future release.

==2nd commit message==

[LI-HOTFIX] Making the ExcludePartitions field in MetadataRequest an optional field (apache#193)

TICKET = LIKAFKA-37320
LI_DESCRIPTION =
After the change made in b28666d,
an old client version sending a MetadataRequest without the "ExcludePartitions"
field to a new kafka server version expecting the field will result in the exception below.
This PR turns the "ExcludePartitions" field into an optional one introduced in KIP-482.

org.apache.kafka.common.errors.InvalidRequestException: Error getting request for apiKey: METADATA, apiVersion: 9, connectionId: 10.154.165.183:16637-10.154.87.109:44876-2848, listenerName: ListenerName(SSL), principal: User:likafka-cruise-control:None:prod-ltx1
        at org.apache.kafka.common.requests.RequestContext.parseRequest(RequestContext.java:70) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.RequestChannel$Request.<init>(RequestChannel.scala:89) ~[kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.$anonfun$processCompletedReceives$1(SocketServer.scala:928) ~[kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.$anonfun$processCompletedReceives$1$adapted(SocketServer.scala:909) ~[kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:941) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.Iterator.foreach$(Iterator.scala:941) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1429) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach(IterableLike.scala:74) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.IterableLike.foreach$(IterableLike.scala:73) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at scala.collection.AbstractIterable.foreach(Iterable.scala:56) [scala-library-2.12.10.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.processCompletedReceives(SocketServer.scala:909) [kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at kafka.network.Processor.run(SocketServer.scala:799) [kafka_2.12-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834) [?:?]
Caused by: org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.types.SchemaException: Error reading field '_tagged_fields': java.nio.BufferUnderflowException
        at org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.types.Schema.read(Schema.java:118) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.ApiKeys.parseRequest(ApiKeys.java:327) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        at org.apache.kafka.common.requests.RequestContext.parseRequest(RequestContext.java:65) ~[kafka-clients-2.4.1.26.jar:?]
        ... 12 more

EXIT_CRITERIA = When this change is merged in upstream and the corresponding change is pulled into a future release.

Co-authored-by: Lucas Wang <luwang@linkedin.com>
davide-armand pushed a commit to aiven/kafka that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2025
traceyyoshima added a commit to traceyyoshima/kafka that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
Single bulk apply of the Language Engine's IntelliJ-style format
profile across the kafka source tree. Pairs with the IntelliJ-real
control branch `intellij-formatting` for side-by-side comparison.

Engine state at apply time includes the following format fixes
landed against the language-engine repo:

  Pre-PR #11:
  - PR apache#275 multi-line // comment indent group
  - PR apache#276 BLANK_LINES_AROUND_CLASS + sibling no-op repair
  - PR apache#277 string-concat chain anchor preservation
  - PR apache#279 forward style through apply routes
  - PR apache#281 Result-tab line-number alignment
  - PR apache#282 spaces after return / throw / yield / instanceof
  - PR apache#283 chain-dot postfix preservation
  - PR apache#284 BlankLines sibling minimum.* conversion
  - PR apache#285 chain-dot single-anchor (N=1) preservation
  - PR apache#286 string-concat chain partial-cascade fix
  - PR apache#287 method-decl param re-align for misaligned source
  - PR apache#288 annotation-in-array-init indent

  Post-original-PR #11 (new in this re-apply):
  - PR apache#289 partial-cascade post-rewrite-anchor (4 shape fixes:
    chain-dot postfix follow-on, MI/NewClass close-paren cascade,
    ternary continuation, lambda body continuation)

Stats: 3101 files written, 0 failures, 2678 already-idempotent
files skipped (no_change). Corpus byte delta vs trunk: -510 bytes
(106275 insertions / 106785 deletions).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants