I thought that I’d heard a lot about Gilgamesh. Turns out that I’ve just heard about Gilgamesh, a lot.
The book comes up often in debates between Christians and non-believers, because it is clearly fiction, but contains an account of The Flood, 1500 years before the guys who wrote the Bible, plagiarized it. I thought that I should know more about it
The book: Gilgamesh
The author: Stephen Mitchell
The review: Another disappointment. As Gertrude Stein said, “There’s no there, there!” 😮
I listed Mitchell as the author, but no-one knows who the original author was. To even use the term author is somewhat misleading. This was an oral-tradition, told-around-the-fire saga, related by village story-tellers for centuries, beginning more than 5000 years ago, before one of them thought to put it down in cuneiform, the oldest form of writing, so that it would not be lost.
Over more centuries, other storytellers added to it, modified it, and deleted parts of it. It got written in Akkadian, Sumerian, and then in Persian. No complete version of it exists in any of the original languages. An historian will spend years attempting to restore and translate one version of it. Pottery breaks. Vellum rots, and papyrus crumbles to dust.
Mitchell didn’t even translate one of them. He took the work of five other translators, and shuffled their work together. In spots where every version had common blank sections, he did what early authors did. He added, edited, and embellished, to say what he thought it should say.
This touted Epic Saga would not hold the interest or attention of many people today, especially teenagers. Lines are repeated. Three-line verses which open chapters are repeated, to close them, to embed the account in its listeners. It’s the story of a powerful bull of a man who is the king of a great idyllic city. Mention is made of its mighty, six-mile-long, magnificent rampart wall. I am not particularly impressed. The boundaries of my tiny home-town of 2000, would be six miles – 1-1/2 miles per side of a square.
The city is joyous, with much music, singing, dancing, poetry, food and drink, and lots of free sex – yet this beloved king somehow oppresses it. He insists on droit de seigneur, having sex with every bride on her wedding day, as well as other random females at will. A naïve country lad, as big and strong as him is found. He is ‘civilized’ with free sex, and brought to the king as a friend and limiting agent.
After some party time, their first adventure is to kill a Monster, whose only crime is to protect the trees of a cedar forest – the original eco-warrior. This causes the friend to sicken and die, not only causing the anti-hero the anguish of loss, but presenting the specter of his own eventual death. He then sets out on a voyage to the edge of the world, to find the secret of immortality. Spoiler Alert: He doesn’t find it, only the grudging acceptance of reality.
The final chapter is an apparent addition, having nothing to do with the original. For no reason given, a couple of gods decide to wipe out mankind by drowning it. A trickster god (Like later Loki) warns some elite of the city. They build a square boat, (?) as long on each side as the later Ark. They and their animals survive the caprice of the gods, and repopulate the Earth. Netflix coulda done it better. 😳







