fix(linter/no-accumulating-spread): use loop as primary span#22800
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Changes the oxc/no-accumulating-spread loop diagnostics so the loop keyword is the primary span instead of the accumulator declaration, making reports point at the loop that causes the repeated spread work.
Changes:
- Replace
loop_span.label(...)withloop_span.primary_label(...)in both array and object loop diagnostic builders. - Update existing snapshots to reflect the new primary report location (
1:15instead of1:5).
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/oxc/no_accumulating_spread.rs | Mark loop keyword span as primary label in both loop diagnostics |
| crates/oxc_linter/src/snapshots/oxc_no_accumulating_spread.snap | Snapshot updates with new primary report column |
Contributor
Author
Merge activity
|
Merging this PR will not alter performance
Comparing 
Footnotes
|
The loop diagnostics for `oxc/no-accumulating-spread` were using the accumulator label as the primary span. This made reports on loop-based accumulating spreads point at the variable declaration instead of the loop that introduces the repeated spread work. This changes the array and object loop diagnostics to make the loop label primary while keeping the accumulator and spread labels as secondary context. The existing snapshot coverage is updated to assert that loop cases now report from the loop keyword. fixes #18988
4f158ca to
db32ec9
Compare
camc314
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2026
# Oxlint ### 🚀 Features - e4b1f46 linter/typescript: Implement `method-signature-style` rule (#22679) (Mikhail Baev) - bc462ca linter/vue: Implement no-reserved-component-names rule (#22741) (bab) - ef9e751 linter/vue: Implement component-definition-name-casing rule (#22818) (bab) - d67f51a linter/vue: Implement require-prop-type-constructor rule (#22708) (bab) - 1444f82 linter/promise/spec-only: Add `Promise.try` to `Promise` static methods (#22812) (Ben Saufley) - 8422e8b linter/jsdoc: Implement `require-yields-description` rule (#22805) (Mikhail Baev) - fe93f97 linter/eslint: Implement `prefer-named-capture-group` rule (#22759) (Sebastian Poxhofer) - 1a7798b linter: Add suggestion for `unicorn/no-new-array` (#22682) (Sysix) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes - 760a9f9 linter: Report errors when writing to the filesystem (#22881) (camc314) - e5a2748 linter: Avoid no-unreachable false positive after conditional loop (#22869) (camc314) - 39d92d6 linter/arrow-body-style: Preserve comments within function (#22854) (Sysix) - 3d13e29 parser: Reject `declare` in an already-ambient context (TS1038) (#22850) (Boshen) - 5152854 parser: Reject statements in ambient contexts (TS1036) (#22849) (Boshen) - 2eafea6 parser: Reject function implementations in ambient contexts (TS1183) (#22845) (Boshen) - c645615 parser: Reject incompatible class member modifiers (#22843) (Boshen) - 4a1ca4a linter/export: Detect duplicate explicit exports (#22798) (camc314) - 0a9a735 linter/no-loop-func: Allow safe let closures (#22811) (camc314) - 1599f11 linter: Align lsp extends default plugins (#22788) (camc314) - db32ec9 linter/no-accumulating-spread: Use loop as primary span (#22800) (camc314) - 33ec6b4 linter/consistent-test-it: Avoid adjacent describe leakage (#22796) (camc314) - 2606069 linter/no-array-sort: Unwrap parenthesized sort args (#22794) (camc314) - 9f2f709 linter/no-array-sort: Skip non compare fn sort arguments (#22752) (Gaurav Dubey) - 27268a0 linter/no-else-return: Preserve statement boundary in fixer (#22687) (camc314) - d9cb6d8 linter/no-empty-function: Allow functions callbacks with `allow: functions` (#22764) (camc314) - a40a314 linter/no-shadow-restricted-names: Ignore enum members (#22762) (camc314) - 82366d9 linter/no-cond-assign: Align ternary handling (#22761) (camc314) ### 📚 Documentation - 5e113ba linter: Add license notices for ported ESLint plugins (#22768) (Boshen) # Oxfmt ### 🚀 Features - d75cbbf oxfmt: Format `parser:json` files by `oxc_formatter_json` (#22709) (leaysgur) - 49db054 formatter_json: Implement `oxc_formatter_json` (json variant only) (#22641) (leaysgur) - 9c71f2e ast, codegen, formatter: Add `WithClauseKeyword::as_str` helper and use it (#22791) (camc314) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes - d3cdd62 oxfmt: Skip formatting for whitespace-only file (#22780) (leaysgur) - 23f0cc8 formatter: Don't move comments inside variable declaration in for in loop (#22776) (leaysgur) - f200c40 formatter: Don't move comments inside variable declaration in for of loop (#22773) (Leonabcd123) ### 📚 Documentation - 845f393 oxfmt,formatter,formatter_json,formatter_core: Add/update AGENTS.md (#22873) (leaysgur)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The loop diagnostics for
oxc/no-accumulating-spreadwere using the accumulator label as the primary span. This made reports on loop-based accumulating spreads point at the variable declaration instead of the loop that introduces the repeated spread work.This changes the array and object loop diagnostics to make the loop label primary while keeping the accumulator and spread labels as secondary context. The existing snapshot coverage is updated to assert that loop cases now report from the loop keyword.
fixes #18988