[Merged by Bors] - refactor: generalize Mul of Submodule and SMul of Ideal on Submodule to noncommutative setting#17708
[Merged by Bors] - refactor: generalize Mul of Submodule and SMul of Ideal on Submodule to noncommutative setting#17708alreadydone wants to merge 30 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
PR summary 3c5a448021Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
a830e87 to
2af93ae
Compare
|
I might have get the situation completely wrong. |
It's true that My definition when specialized to the situation |
Please record these observations/todos in the module docstring un Otherwise, LGTM |
|
I've implemented |
|
I worry that creates diamonds, so would prefer that commit to be reviewed separately |
Okay, opened #18419 for that. |
…to noncommutative setting (#17708) Instead of using `Submodule.map₂` (which doesn't apply in the noncommutative setting), redefine the `Mul` and `SMul` to be defeq to `AddSubmonoid.mul`. In general, if a semiring A is a module over a semiring R such that `IsScalarTower R A A` is true, then the product of a `Submodule R A` with a `Set A` will be a `Submodule R A`, but we do not need this heterogeneous multiplication yet. We mainly intend to apply this to the case A = R.
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
…to noncommutative setting (#17708) Instead of using `Submodule.map₂` (which doesn't apply in the noncommutative setting), redefine the `Mul` and `SMul` to be defeq to `AddSubmonoid.mul`. In general, if a semiring A is a module over a semiring R such that `IsScalarTower R A A` is true, then the product of a `Submodule R A` with a `Set A` will be a `Submodule R A`, but we do not need this heterogeneous multiplication yet. We mainly intend to apply this to the case A = R.
Instead of using
Submodule.map₂(which doesn't apply in the noncommutative setting), redefine theMulandSMulto be defeq toAddSubmonoid.mul. In general, if a semiring A is a module over a semiring R such thatIsScalarTower R A Ais true, then the product of aSubmodule R Awith aSet Awill be aSubmodule R A, but we do not need this heterogeneous multiplication yet. We mainly intend to apply this to the case A = R.Preparation for the Hopkins–Levitzki theorem #17908. E.g. this is necessary to state that the Jacobson radical of an Artinian ring is nilpotent.
1 : Submodule R Ato the range of(· • 1)#18092Module.annihilatorusingRingHom.ker#18094