Skip to content

[BC5] Use rc-ignore-offer instead of rc-ignore-befault-offer#889

Merged
joshdholtz merged 2 commits into
bc5-supportfrom
bc5-support-use-tag-rc-ignore-offer
Mar 21, 2023
Merged

[BC5] Use rc-ignore-offer instead of rc-ignore-befault-offer#889
joshdholtz merged 2 commits into
bc5-supportfrom
bc5-support-use-tag-rc-ignore-offer

Conversation

@joshdholtz

@joshdholtz joshdholtz commented Mar 21, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Motivation

CF-1291

Turns out that rc-ignore-default-offer is too long for Google Play to handle 🙈 Max 20 characters so now using rc-ignore-offer

Description

Giant find replace for rc-ignore-default-offer to rc-ignore-offer

@joshdholtz joshdholtz requested review from a team and jefago March 21, 2023 14:58
@joshdholtz joshdholtz changed the title Use rc-ignore-offer instead of rc-ignore-befault-offer [BC5] Use rc-ignore-offer instead of rc-ignore-befault-offer Mar 21, 2023
@joshdholtz joshdholtz added the pr:breaking Changes that are breaking label Mar 21, 2023
val validOffers = this
.filter { !it.isBasePlan }
.filter { !it.tags.contains("rc-ignore-default-offer") }
.filter { !it.tags.contains("rc-ignore-offer") }

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nitpick: should we extract this to a constant?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Prrooobbaaabbbbllllllyyyyyyy 😇

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 21, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #889 (53f3c8d) into bc5-support (017bb3e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head 53f3c8d differs from pull request most recent head 2c49350. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2c49350 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           bc5-support     #889   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        84.09%   84.09%           
============================================
  Files              155      155           
  Lines             5382     5382           
  Branches           763      763           
============================================
  Hits              4526     4526           
  Misses             565      565           
  Partials           291      291           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...revenuecat/purchases/models/SubscriptionOptions.kt 61.76% <0.00%> (ø)
.../kotlin/com/revenuecat/purchases/PurchaseParams.kt 92.10% <ø> (ø)
.../main/kotlin/com/revenuecat/purchases/Purchases.kt 85.20% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@joshdholtz joshdholtz merged commit 9fcd334 into bc5-support Mar 21, 2023
@joshdholtz joshdholtz deleted the bc5-support-use-tag-rc-ignore-offer branch March 21, 2023 15:22
@joshdholtz joshdholtz mentioned this pull request Mar 23, 2023
joshdholtz added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2023
### Breaking Changes
* Rename `introTrial` to `introOffer` on `SubscriptionOptions` (#890)
via Josh Holtz (@joshdholtz)
* Use `rc-ignore-offer` instead of `rc-ignore-befault-offer` (#889) via
Josh Holtz (@joshdholtz)
* AmazonStoreProduct updates (#881) via beylmk (@beylmk)
* Remove Parcelable implementation for classes with ProductDetails as a
member (#866) via beylmk (@beylmk)
* Make Activity first param in PurchaseParams (#882) via Josh Holtz
(@joshdholtz)
### New Features
* Re-enable `observerMode` and `syncPurchases()` (#878) via Josh Holtz
(@joshdholtz)
### Bugfixes
* Re-add `price_string` header on postReceipt (#879) via Josh Holtz
(@joshdholtz)
### Other Changes
* Cleaning up some TODOs in the code (#883) via Josh Holtz (@joshdholtz)
* Amazon Offering Parsing (#824) via beylmk (@beylmk)
* Merge main ->  bc5-support 2023-03-15 (#875) via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Fix purchase tester navigation (#871) via beylmk (@beylmk)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr:breaking Changes that are breaking

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants