Jerry Nadler: ‘ Taking babies to the hospital who survive the abortion procedure “endangers” the baby’

 

The Dems voted 210 against a bill to save the life of an aborted baby. Democrats said the bill would interfere with families’ medical decisions. UPDATE ADDED AT BOTTOM OF PAGE.

The respect for life is diminishing and can be seen in the latest House vote taken on saving the life of an aborted baby. No one speaks more eloquently for the evil than Representative Jerry Nadler. The U.S. birth rate has fallen by 20% since 2007. No one knows the reason. One thing is for sure, there is a lack of respect for life.

The bill does not ban abortions. It just makes sure that babies who survive abortions receive proper medical care. Dozens, perhaps hundreds, of babies survive abortions every year in the United States, but protections for these infants are limited. We know babies survive. Reports from other countries prove that babies survive abortions, too, and legal protections for them are needed. In Canada, the Canadian Institute of Health Information recorded 766 late-term, live-birth abortions over a five-year period in published in 2018.

The Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would require that babies who survive abortions receive the same medical attention that would be given to any other baby born at the same gestational age. The bill also would punish doctors who allow newborns to die or intentionally kill them after a failed abortion.

 

Nearly every House Democrat on Wednesday voted against legislation that would require immediate medical attention for babies who are born alive after an attempt was made to abort them.

The House passed the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which says any infant born alive after an attempted abortion is a “legal person for all purposes under the laws of the United States.” Doctors would be required to care for those infants as a “reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to any other child born alive.”

The bill passed 220-210, and all 210 of the “no” votes came from Democrats. Only one Democrat voted for the bill — Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas — and one other Democrat, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, voted “present.” (Source)

 

This video was produced ten years ago. It is as telling today as it was then.

But we are not done yet. The FDA on Monday chimes in with an approval method of an abortion pill that can attempt to kill off babies up to ten weeks and in the process may kill the mother as well. No Doctor needed to determine the true gestation age, but what the heck. (Skip the ad)

The very worst of the swamp this week.

Update added

House Democrats tell Supremes they are preparing for a new impeachment

 

A small matter apparently that the Dems plan new articles of impeachment. I didn’t see that on breaking news. Ho hum I guess. If I were to connect a dot or two I might say that perhaps Judge Sullivan who is presiding over the Flynn matter may have had a heads up on this one. As stated in the brief to the Supremes:

the possible exercise of improper political influence over recent decisions made in the Roger Stone and Michael Flynn prosecutions, both of which were initiated by the special counsel.

No one much apparently thinks that Sullivan will get anywhere with his acceptance of Amicus briefs due in July, but we have been fooled before haven’t we. Nancy Pelosi was so anxious to get the last impeachment off the ground let’s see how this one goes. At least Nadler is at the helm with this one. I am not sure I could stand to see much more of Bug Eye.

This from Jonathan Turley:

Jerry Nadler

On Monday, the House Democrats filed a brief that with the Supreme Court that the House was actively pursuing new articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump including “the possible exercise of improper political influence over recent decisions made in the Roger Stone and Michael Flynn prosecutions, both of which were initiated by the special counsel.

The argument is meant to justify the continued demand for redacted grand-jury material from the now closed Special Counsel investigation into the Russian collusion investigation.

Thus, the House is arguing that

“The [House Judiciary] Committee’s investigation did not cease with the conclusion of the impeachment trial. … The withheld material remains central to the Committee’s ongoing investigation into the President’s conduct. If this material reveals new evidence supporting the conclusion that President Trump committed impeachable offenses that are not covered by the articles adopted by the House, the committee will proceed accordingly — including, if necessary, by considering whether to recommend new articles of impeachment.”

The House specified its continuing impeachment inquiry:

“The Committee’s investigation continues today and has further developed in light of recent events. For example, the Committee is investigating the possible exercise of improper political influence over recent decisions made in the RogerStone and Michael Flynn prosecutions, both of which were initiated by the SpecialCounsel.

See Letter from Jerrold Nadler, Chairman, H. Comm. on the Judiciary, et al. to Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector General, U.S. Dep’t of Justice (May 8, 2020),https://perma.cc/799D-2PNY. The Committee has announced its intention to hold a hearing with the Attorney General—who has failed to appear before the Committee at any point on any topic during his tenure—on these issues as soon as possible.”

Here is the House filing to the Supreme Court…

 

More at  Zero Hedge

All is going exceptionally well in the swamp today.

Chairman Nadler preview of another absurd hearing – video

 

The Democrats might want to review just how Nadler and his henchmen did last time around with this impeachment thing. Lest we forget how bizarre it was how about a warm up before tomorrow? Recall back in May – hard to believe – it was Russia Russia Russia. Now we really don’t know the “crime” but one thing we know is the Dems did not fare well. Hard to believe it has been that long ago we went through the Nadler extravaganza. Like the ghosts of Christmas past, why not trot out John Dean as an example how badly this went?

A great example is the attempt to conjure the old war horses of the Nixon impeachment.

Chairman Jerry Nadler Running The House Judiciary Committee Chaos Breaks Out!

It got so bad, even the audience laughed. Of course what CNN found of merit in the short clip was titled:

“Nadler Shuts down Jordan during hearing: “I’m speaking.”

 

Jim Jordan

 

Next best was this takedown of John Dean by Congressman Gaetz

“Gaetz and John Dean Spar Over Mueller Report”

 

 

All is well in the swamp. The Democrats are in for a treatment.

Welcome readers from whatfinger news.

For the best in conservative news push the button.

 

Dem Rep Norma Torres is sick of all the ‘sex-starved males’ in the House of Rep

 

Classy! Dem Rep. Norma Torres is sick of all the ‘sex-starved males’ in the House who have the wrong opinion on abortion!

Norma Torres
Representatives for California’s 35th congressional district.

 

Quote of the day and that is for sure.

As I recall, members cannot personally impugn their colleagues on the floor. Are they not suppose to be censored? But of course not. The House of Representatives descending into chaos.

Torres, is one of the newest members of the House Rules Committee.Rules? What Rules. I would say she broke House Rules.

 

 

 

 

 

Still wondering if I am right about Rules being followed? Let’s take a look at a Nadler clip back in May and how he runs his shop. This is how it goes when there is no hearing promotion and just a few are watching C-Span 3.

If there is any question about the functioning of the Committee of Nadler’s Judiciary, take a few seconds out to observe the chaos. The Democrats are opining that Trump is becoming a Dictator?

Chairman Jerry Nadler Running The House Judiciary Committee Chaos Breaks Out – Published May 20, 2019,

Caught by us bloggers who have way to much time watching C-Span!

 

 

Other than that, all is well in the swamp.

Jim Jordan & Gaetz decimate John Dean during Nadler’s Judiciary hearing

 

 

It got so bad, even the audience laughed. The GOP held it’s own with the absurd “hearing.” The purpose was clearly to shore up Maddow and the rest of MSNBC. Surprisingly I found this clip from CNN. Of course what they found of merit in the short clip was titled:

“Nadler Shuts down Jordan during hearing: “I’m speaking.”

“Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) clashed during the committee’s hearing on the Mueller report.”

Yes, this stalwart blogger endured the hearing. I spun over to C-Span 3.

The talking point for one Democrat operative on Fox:  “The helicopter crash unfortunately took away the audience.” A thankful waste of time for many was averted.

 

 

Next best was this takedown of John Dean by Congressman Gaetz

“Gaetz and John Dean Spar Over Mueller Report”

 

Enjoy!

 

Other than this, all is well in the swamp.

 

Thanks WhatFingerNews for the coverage! A great site for all the news.

Chaos breaks out during Nadler’s House Judiciary hearing

 

If there is any question about the functioning Committee of Nadler’s Judiciary, take a few seconds out to observe the chaos. The Democrats are opining that Trump is becoming a Dictator? Check out Nadler.

You can bet that Mueller will not be testifying in a public hearing.

 

Jerry Nadler’s son works for firm suing Trump – Big conflict

 

Looks like we can add Nadler’s kids that feed at the trough. We have Biden’s son, Kerry’s daughter and Bernie Sander’s daughter for a start – leaving out his wife for now.

We have Cortez and whatever her Chief of staff was about, Clinton? I wouldn’t even know where to start. No doubt dozens more who enjoy the “fruits” of their political position via family members.

Democrat congressman Jerry Nadler, leading the investigative charge against President Donald Trump, has a son whose firm is trying to get access to Trump documents for their clients in numerous lawsuits against President Trump.

“Congressman Jerry Nadler has a big conflict,” our source tells Big League Politics in Washington, D.C.

“His son (Michael Nadler) got a job with Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP in 2018.  That’s convenient because Jerry Nadler and the Democrats just won control of the House in 2018.  Gibson Dunn & Crutcher hire Jerry’s son and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher are the main Nemesis against Trump and the Trump Administration on numerous lawsuits.  Now the Nadler family will gain access to thousands of Trump documents via Jerry’s subpoenas!,” our insider stated. More at Big League Politics

Lets take a look a couple of Bunkerville’s past posts:

Hunter Biden inked a billion-dollar deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China just 10 days after the father and son flew to China in 2013.

 

The best way to money launder kick-backs apparently is to have the payments go through the children. If this story had been about one of Trump’s kids the howls out of the media would have been enormous. Look how far we got with Sander’s daughter? Chelsea? I won’t even attempt at that example. This isn’t the first we reported on dear Hunter: 

Bernie and Jane Sanders College corruption? Funneled daughter $500,000

Then we have this little number:

Investigators Probing Scheme Funneling Money From State To Kerry’s Muslim loving Daughter

Other than that, everything A-OK in the swamp.