user avatar
kathy fletcher
@fletcherkathy8
useless at this stuff. 2nd wave. No probs giving Trans people all the respect they need/want. Sex = immutable & matters.
Joined June 2015
  • user avatar
    Hi, @warwickpride. I am a female, traditionally known as a woman. Since you have declared that “woman” no longer refers solely to females & that the word “female” = transphobic, is there any word by which the oppressed sex class to which I belong is allowed to refer to itself?
  • user avatar
    Forced pregnancy & abortion. FGM. Child marriage. Period huts. Menstruation taboos. Childbirth taboos. Suttee. Honour killings. Female Infanticide. Anything that only happens to female bodies. We are also oppressed socially/legally because we have F bodies. Didn’t you know this?
  • user avatar
    Replying to @MatthewPHoh
    So you consider 50% of the world’s population to have no material existence? OK
  • user avatar
    Replying to @MuuPuklip and @SVPhillimore
    All men are not an equal threat but there is no way to tell the difference until it is too late. We have to be wary of all male strangers.
  • user avatar
    Replying to @xberniceeee and @SussexUni
    Try arguing with her position, not actively inciting violence against her person. If you don’t know the difference, you really shouldn’t be at an institution of learning.
  • user avatar
    Replying to @AlasdairMcIntyr @Fabien_UX and @andybudd
    Enlightened self-interest: who will find me lying on the floor, aged 90, having fallen downstairs, if not the milkman?
  • user avatar
    Replying to @KodaScott1 @brunskellevans and @amnesty
    I have read the letter several times @AmnestyUK. I cannot find any way to interpret it which does not call for the removal of political rights from females. Please clarify what you meant to say. Your response to complaints “there is no such thing as a female body” would appear1/3
  • user avatar
    Replying to @wynnefox
    Medically speaking, no. It becomes my business when you expose it in the presence of non consenting women & children.
  • user avatar
    Replying to @ThomasWillett9
    You seem not to understand the need for accurate data in policy making & safeguarding. The intent seems to be to pretend that M & F are identical & therefore there is no need for safeguarding measures. It also prevents proper research into criminality, benefitting only criminals.
  • user avatar
    Replying to @Downtuned123123 @billybragg and @jk_rowling
    She is a woman. She has more reason to speak on women’s rights than any man does. We live the reality of women’s lives & will not be silenced by men.
  • user avatar
    Replying to @CarilynJohnson
    “Disabled”? You mean compared to a man. That says everything about your hatred of women. Women have F bodies & must have the sports that work for those bodies. You want all girls disabled by the side effects that come with PBs without the “benefits”of a male puberty.
  • user avatar
    Replying to @neoaisac @hollypringle and 6 others
    But statistically accurate. No, not all men. How are we supposed to know which men? We can’t, so we exclude them all. Have done for as long as I can remember & all of a sudden we are expected to increase our risk X 49. Why so keen to enter female spaces?
  • user avatar
    Replying to @trippingjupiter and @jk_rowling
    Has it occurred to you that the reason there are no problems is because those women who cannot share intimate space with males, for whatever reason, are self-excluding? If there are no services solely for females, those who need female only care won’t turn to them.
  • user avatar
    Replying to @KaysWing and @eva_kurilova
    There isn’t anything else. You either have the sort of body that can get pregnant or the sort that can make somebody pregnant, regardless of whether everything works or you choose to use it. Sex is bodies: their needs, capabilities, diseases etc. Why so desperate to abolish it?