Hi, @warwickpride. I am a female, traditionally known as a woman. Since you have declared that “woman” no longer refers solely to females & that the word “female” = transphobic, is there any word by which the oppressed sex class to which I belong is allowed to refer to itself?
kathy fletcher
86.8K posts
useless at this stuff. 2nd wave. No probs giving Trans people all the respect they need/want. Sex = immutable & matters.
Joined June 2015
- Forced pregnancy & abortion. FGM. Child marriage. Period huts. Menstruation taboos. Childbirth taboos. Suttee. Honour killings. Female Infanticide. Anything that only happens to female bodies. We are also oppressed socially/legally because we have F bodies. Didn’t you know this?
- Replying to @MatthewPHohSo you consider 50% of the world’s population to have no material existence? OK
- Replying to @MuuPuklip and @SVPhillimoreAll men are not an equal threat but there is no way to tell the difference until it is too late. We have to be wary of all male strangers.
- Replying to @xberniceeee and @SussexUniTry arguing with her position, not actively inciting violence against her person. If you don’t know the difference, you really shouldn’t be at an institution of learning.
- Replying to @AlasdairMcIntyr @Fabien_UX and @andybuddEnlightened self-interest: who will find me lying on the floor, aged 90, having fallen downstairs, if not the milkman?
- Replying to @KodaScott1 @brunskellevans and @amnestyI have read the letter several times @AmnestyUK. I cannot find any way to interpret it which does not call for the removal of political rights from females. Please clarify what you meant to say. Your response to complaints “there is no such thing as a female body” would appear1/3
- Replying to @wynnefoxMedically speaking, no. It becomes my business when you expose it in the presence of non consenting women & children.
- Replying to @ThomasWillett9You seem not to understand the need for accurate data in policy making & safeguarding. The intent seems to be to pretend that M & F are identical & therefore there is no need for safeguarding measures. It also prevents proper research into criminality, benefitting only criminals.
- Replying to @Downtuned123123 @billybragg and @jk_rowlingShe is a woman. She has more reason to speak on women’s rights than any man does. We live the reality of women’s lives & will not be silenced by men.
- Replying to @CarilynJohnson“Disabled”? You mean compared to a man. That says everything about your hatred of women. Women have F bodies & must have the sports that work for those bodies. You want all girls disabled by the side effects that come with PBs without the “benefits”of a male puberty.
- Replying to @neoaisac @hollypringle and 6 othersBut statistically accurate. No, not all men. How are we supposed to know which men? We can’t, so we exclude them all. Have done for as long as I can remember & all of a sudden we are expected to increase our risk X 49. Why so keen to enter female spaces?
- Replying to @trippingjupiter and @jk_rowlingHas it occurred to you that the reason there are no problems is because those women who cannot share intimate space with males, for whatever reason, are self-excluding? If there are no services solely for females, those who need female only care won’t turn to them.
- Replying to @KaysWing and @eva_kurilovaThere isn’t anything else. You either have the sort of body that can get pregnant or the sort that can make somebody pregnant, regardless of whether everything works or you choose to use it. Sex is bodies: their needs, capabilities, diseases etc. Why so desperate to abolish it?

