Putin Watch

Hello, fellow patriots!  It’s time once again to look out for Vladimir Putin!  He’s the sneaky, all-powerful no-goodnick behind all of America’s woes, and the real reason that we have his lackey Donald Trump as our President!  Remember: don’t listen to those people calling for arcane things like “evidence” — they’re all Putin stooges!  Here’s the latest in nefarious Putin news… Continue reading

Looking back at looking forward

I was chatting with a friend recently when I recalled a prediction that I’d made many, many years ago.  It’s useful to look back at such things in order to differentiate one’s self from the huge mass of agitprop-spewing talking heads in today’s Mainstream Media.  The current standard for punditry requires no adherence to fact or reality at all, and this in turn makes it pretty entertaining.  (Take John Derbyshire’s recent swan dive into the shallow end – so breathtakingly free of sense that his brothers-in-pomposity at the National Review have been spinning like tops in their efforts to pretend he never actually wrote for them.)  Alas, I like to look at the facts of the situation in as sober a way as possible, and change what I think when it doesn’t conform.  Nowhere near as much fun to read, I’ll grant, but I never claimed to be anything but stodgy. Continue reading

Quick update: 2012 Maryland Green Primary election

Results from the Maryland Green Primary election (which I suppose should be considered unofficial, even though I was one of the guys that counted the votes…)
Jill Stein: 79%
Roseanne Barr: 14%
Kent Mesplay: 2%
scattering: 5%

As a result, Jill Stein will receive five of Maryland’s six delegates to the Green National Convention; Roseanne Barr will receive the remaining one.

Add it up

love-that-demWrote this a week or two ago, but never finished it.  May as well post what I have while it’s relevant and finish it later…or perhaps even provoke some commenters into doing it for me.

…nah, that’ll never happen.

Was reading yesterday in Rolling Stone about the state of the Republican Party post-2008.  It’s a lovely bit of schadenfreude, but I was tinged with a bit of sadness and frustration about the whole thing – and not because a bunch of guys who I think should dry up and blow away politically elicit any sympathy from me.

Briefly, in case you’ve been hiding under a rock, the GOP is in a grand clash right now between the ideologically pure segment (Cheney, Limbaugh, Sanford, Gingrich, Grover Norquist, et al.) and the old-time politicos (Lindsey Graham, Charlie Crist, Colin Powell, et al.) over the future direction of the party.  The moderates, for what appear to be mostly practical reasons, want to back off on some of the more strident bits of ideology and try to appeal to the former “Reagan Democrats” (who may or may not be a fictional construct; more on that a different time).  The purists want to keep dragging the party to the right, as they’ve done with the entire country since Reagan, and, earlier, Goldwater.

The sad part about this is that never has there been a better, more apt, more shining example of a need for electoral reform than this intra-party ideological struggle, and yet no one is looking at – sorry, but I have to use it – the elephant in the room.  In any sane democratic system, this battle wouldn’t be fought out in the wonkish margins of the Times’ editorial pages (be it the NY or DC) – the two sides would simply break off, post different candidates, and decide at the ballot box.  But because of the two-party system, that obvious solution can’t be done. Continue reading

Political analysis with a side of salsa

heisenbergSome of you folks may have been waiting for my comments on the recently concluded election.  (Well, let’s be fair – no, you weren’t.  But that’s not going to stop me from saying something.)  Anyway, I’ve given it a great deal of thought, and here’s what I came up with:

Go to 19th and Q, NW, in the District – that’s in the Dupont Circle area – and head into the café in back of Kramerbooks.  Once seated, order one of their better bheers and get the “nachitos”.  Don’t ask me why they call them that – they’re nachos…but boy howdy, those are the best nachos you will have anywhere.  They are insanely good. Continue reading

The pepperoni poll

ballotboxAnyone else seen this? If you order a pizza through Domino’s Web site, while you are waiting for delivery, you can take a poll. Yes, America’s pizza voters now have a voice!

It’s a cute three-question thing, and it provides the results (I would assume of all voters nationwide who purchase pizzas through the Web site) after your vote. So without further ado, and with the recognition that this is already a week or two old… Continue reading

The State of the Union, abridged

alexAnd now, a quick summary of where we are, courtesy of your friends at the Hidden Message.

  • We’re broke. No, I mean really. Really, really, no dough, all skint. As in out-of-doors, hand-to-mouth, ramen-is-lookin’-good broke. Wall Street is advising clients to invest in canned goods and ammunition.* And those in charge – the ones who nominally have to fix all this – are the idiots whose belief that everything is best when it’s auctioned off for a profit on the way to the golf course caused about 95% of this mess in the first place. This means that not only are we broke, we’re also screwed. And so is the next President.
  • Speaking of which, the nominal “opposition” “party” is lining up to drink the Kool-Aid proffered by these same idiots. Doing the dispensing is the current Presidential candidate, who is just happy that his base thinks he walks on water and everyone else is distracted by the wailing and gnashing of teeth on Wall Street – otherwise they might realize that caving in when the chips are down is really nothing new for this guy (FISA, war funding, etc.)
  • The Great Reformer, John McCain – a “maverick” in the same sense that Obama is “opposition” – is “suspending his campaign” and heading back to Washington so he can strap on his Superman cape and save the country. This apparently means…um, we’re not sure. He’s still collecting money, doing interviews (except on Letterman), running ads, and the like; he knows as much about the economy as he does about taming mountain lions in the Kalahari; and he really can’t strap on a cape without his wife’s help. But he won’t debate, given that this is so all-fired important, and especially he won’t allow have Sarah Palin debate. She should be seen and not heard, after all…meanwhile, the “maverick” is cozying up to the current Pres Resident on his recovery plan (*ack ack ack*) and desperately hoping no one brought along a camera, or otherwise makes the connection that this walking disaster incumbent of the 30%-and-falling approval rating is actually, y’know, in his party.
  • While McCain drops the Cone of Silence on his cartoon-character running mate, Cynthia McKinney has offered to debate Obama in McCain’s absence on Friday. This will of course happen, right after Sen. Obama removes his own appendix with a bottle of Scotch and a rusty chainsaw.
  • The Libbies believe that the reason all of this happened is that there was just too much regg-uh-lay-shun, durn it!…which is the best reason I can think of to not allow the LP to run a luncheon, much less the country. Or, rather, they would be saying this if they weren’t currently having an ego-fueled bitchfest between Bob Barr and Ron Paul that makes Ralph Nader look like Mr. Rogers (more forthcoming from the HM on that score).
  • In a related topic, Chuck Baldwin of the John Birch Soci Constitution Party, the noted pastor who believes that America was founded solely as a Christian nation, is the current crush object and donation recipient of the Ron Paul Blimp of Luuuvvv. In further related news, Verne Troyer has signed as a center by the Los Angeles Lakers, and a spokesman for the sun has revealed that it will be rising in the west tomorrow, “just for a change of pace”.

Yeah, I’m watching this election. The problem is, I’m not watching it from far enough away.

* Yeah, I nicked this line. Couldn’t help it.

The way forward, part 1

Publishing this now, as is; there’s much more to say, but I’ve been sitting on this for long enough.  More to come.

As we all know by now, Cynthia McKinney won the Presidential nomination of the Green Party on the first ballot last weekend in Chicago, and chose Rosa Clemente, a hip-hop activist from New York, as her running mate.  Most are reporting that the atmosphere was very positive and congenial.

I was unable for financial reasons to make the trip to Chicago and participate as a member of the Maryland delegation, but as most out there also know, I was actively involved in the campaign and my candidate didn’t win.

Now some would be interested in hearing what I have to say about this.  After all, I’m a former co-Chair of the Party, I was actively involved, as I said, and I have a blog and a podcast dedicated to, in part, news of the Green Party.  And I’ve been weighing this carefully, because there’s a lot to say.  I don’t want it to seem like sour grapes because my guy didn’t win – that’s really not the case – and I want to make sure that the GP itself isn’t getting damaged.  Not being a “major” party, we can’t really afford to have a lot of people forming caucuses and such that work at cross-purposes. Continue reading

Paintin’ the White House Green

One of the pleasant things about being a Green is not having to feel too sorry about supporting a candidate.  All four of the candidates left for the Presidential nomination are good, at least in that they offer the chance to vote for someone rather than against McCain as the Dems do, but I do believe I’m clearly behind the best one.  Jesse Johnson has that ability to take the Greens to the next level because he works so well against the “type” that we’re put into.  The MSM loves to write the book on Green candidates: far-leftist extremists from the Democratic Auxiliary Club or whatever, who wear tie-dye and hug trees.  Cynthia McKinney clearly plays into that, at least the first part.  I’ve seen Jesse with reporters who clearly are rewriting their stories in their head as soon as they see him: a slow-talkin’ country boy with a grey suit and cowboy boots, and an aw-shucks demeanor from West Virginia.  Combine that with the fact that he comes at many of his stances from the right (he’s a former Republican, never was a Democrat) and suddenly the whole thing shifts.  The Green message becomes something that anyone can get behind.

McKinney’s main selling point is bringing the Green message to “different communities”.  Sure, McKinney can bring in the black vote, at least some of the more radicalized portions – and yes, they have reason to be – but how much from the most solid bloc the Democrats have, in a race where Barack Obama is running?  Jesse Johnson can campaign among truck drivers, Union workers…the small-towns of flyover America that McKinney can’t touch.  Frankly, that’s a much larger bloc of voters – one that the Democrats have ceded completely to the Republicans (though Howard Dean has made some strides in reversing that trend).  What should we go after: a Democrat in the midst of a “historic moment”, or a weak Republican consensus candidate with little grasp of the issues, whose base we could easily erode with the proper image?  Johnson would do well against Obama, but he’d skewer McCain.  And in the process, we’d rewrite the book on the Greens – from a niche, far-leftist group into a values-based party that unapologetically stands for the majority of America.

Is there a name recognition factor?  Certainly among Greens, but not in the general populace.  McKinney’s best known overall for a scuffle with a police officer – a screw job by the MSM, to be sure, but it’s an uphill climb to reverse that – a climb that Johnson wouldn’t have to make.

As for Kat Swift and Kent Mesplay, the other candidates, they’re friends, and they’re very smart folks…but they aren’t really Presidential material, I’m afraid.  I can’t imagine either of them actually running the country.  Jesse Johnson could.  He’d be able to not only exercise the intelligence and wisdom necessary for the job, but he’d be able to reach out to Republicans, Democrats, and others to build the coalitions necessary to do so – another thing that McKinney simply couldn’t do well.

It seems to me at this point what we need is a party that says the things the Democrats say (end the war, universal health care, etc.), but backs it with a strong commitment to core values, as Republicans do (which, frankly, gets them elected).  The Greens are about a hairsbreadth away from that now, and Jesse Johnson could get us the rest of the way.

Some truth, mostly rant

I think a combination of having my lunch interrupted and some other unfortunate events led to my channeling of Hunter S. Thompson, which I occasionally do.  Anyway, I wrote this yesterday under such influence, and while I’m in a marginally better mood today, I figured it would be good to post this for the sake of posterity.  I think the Zen Buddhists may be onto something: voluntary self-denial – say, a lack of food – does seem to lead to the discovery of truth.

1. If you have in your possession an electronic device that does not work when plugged into five different network ports, at least consider the possibility that your device doesn’t work, rather than calling me the guy who enabled those ports.

2. Particularly if it’s lunchtime, you dumb schmuck.

3. There are no intellectual requirements for public office. This does not mean that there shouldn’t be. Voters should act as if there are…or at the very least, have the decency to shut up when you elect a moron as a consequence of ignoring this.

4. Speaking of which, a great many Democrats are currently off the Greens-are-spoilers argument because, for the most part, they’re slinging this epithet at their own candidates. There are, nominally, a couple of reasons for this: they are too stupid to realize that there’s no difference between the two, they are too stupid to just ignore the MSM and let the votes decide the matter, they are too stupid to realize that the whole “spoiler” argument is a logical fallacy, and they are too stupid in the area of mathematics to realize that their method of voting is fundamentally flawed and that they should choose a different one. The first four words of each of these reasons are sufficient to describe the problem.

5. And while we’re on it, those opposed to alternative voting methods who bring up Stalin by the third graf should be given a nice, juicy hamburger, tied up out back behind the woodshed far away from real people, and never paid any attention to ever again for any reason. Continue reading

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started