Skip to content

abicheck.sh: zlib-ng configure is a bash script, not a sh script#1227

Merged
Dead2 merged 1 commit intozlib-ng:developfrom
dankegel:dkegel-abicheck-configure-not-sh
Apr 4, 2022
Merged

abicheck.sh: zlib-ng configure is a bash script, not a sh script#1227
Dead2 merged 1 commit intozlib-ng:developfrom
dankegel:dkegel-abicheck-configure-not-sh

Conversation

@dankegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dankegel dankegel commented Apr 2, 2022

So don't hardcode shell when running configure, it might fail if sh is not bash.

This assumes 'configure' gets checked out with executable permissions, but that
seems to be the case as far back as I checked in git.

@dankegel dankegel changed the title abicheck.sh: zlib-ng is a bash script, not a sh script abicheck.sh: zlib-ng configure is a bash script, not a sh script Apr 2, 2022
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1227 (f67ca06) into develop (e43e0b2) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1227      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    88.02%   87.97%   -0.05%     
===========================================
  Files          114      114              
  Lines        10192    10192              
  Branches      2550     2550              
===========================================
- Hits          8971     8966       -5     
- Misses         970      975       +5     
  Partials       251      251              
Flag Coverage Δ
macos_clang 30.95% <ø> (ø)
macos_gcc 75.02% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang 87.30% <ø> (+0.80%) ⬆️
ubuntu_clang_debug 86.89% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_inflate_allow_invalid_dist 87.02% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_inflate_strict 86.46% <ø> (-0.80%) ⬇️
ubuntu_clang_mmap 86.55% <ø> (-0.80%) ⬇️
ubuntu_clang_pigz 40.99% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_pigz_no_optim 41.19% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_pigz_no_threads 40.56% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_clang_reduced_mem 87.68% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc 77.08% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64 77.38% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64_compat_no_opt 75.48% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64_no_acle 76.31% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_aarch64_no_neon 76.20% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armhf 77.40% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armhf_compat_no_opt 75.39% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armhf_no_acle 77.41% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armhf_no_neon 77.17% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armsf 77.26% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_armsf_compat_no_opt 75.06% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_benchmark 75.01% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_compat_no_opt 76.59% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_compat_sprefix 75.11% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_m32 74.85% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_mingw_i686 0.00% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_mingw_x86_64 0.00% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_no_avx2 75.95% <ø> (-0.82%) ⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_no_ctz 74.78% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_no_ctzll 74.81% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_no_pclmulqdq 74.75% <ø> (-0.80%) ⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_no_sse2 76.05% <ø> (-0.77%) ⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_no_sse4 76.35% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_o1 76.07% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_osb ∅ <ø> (∅)
ubuntu_gcc_pigz 38.86% <ø> (-0.09%) ⬇️
ubuntu_gcc_pigz_aarch64 39.46% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
ubuntu_gcc_ppc 73.82% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_ppc64 74.57% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_ppc64le 74.55% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_ppc_no_power8 74.75% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_s390x 74.74% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_s390x_dfltcc 72.06% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_s390x_dfltcc_compat 73.67% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_s390x_no_crc32 74.50% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_sparc64 74.63% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu_gcc_sprefix 74.90% <ø> (ø)
win64_gcc 73.96% <ø> (+0.48%) ⬆️
win64_gcc_compat_no_opt 74.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
arch/x86/adler32_avx512.c 87.80% <0.00%> (-12.20%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e43e0b2...f67ca06. Read the comment docs.

@nmoinvaz nmoinvaz added the Compatibility API/ABI Compatibility issue label Apr 3, 2022
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mtl1979 mtl1979 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM... CodeFactor notice can be fixed in another pull request.

@dkegel-fastly
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks! See #1222 for the fix for the codefactor notice.

@Dead2 Dead2 merged commit 03a44f9 into zlib-ng:develop Apr 4, 2022
@Dead2 Dead2 mentioned this pull request Dec 27, 2022
Dead2 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2023
Changes since 2.0.6:
- Fix CVE-2022-37434 #1328
- Fix chunkmemset #1196
- Fix deflateBound too small #1236
- Fix Z_SOLO #1263
- Fix ACLE variant of crc32 #1274
- Fix inflateBack #1311
- Fix deflate_quick windowsize #1431
- Fix DFLTCC bugs related to adler32 #1349 and #1390
- Fix warnings #1194 #1312 #1362
- MacOS build fix #1198
- Add invalid windowBits handling #1293
- Support for Force TZCNT #1186
- Support for aligned_alloc() #1360
- Minideflate improvements #1175 #1238
- Dont use unaligned access for memcpy #1309
- Build system #1209 #1233 #1267 #1273 #1278 #1292 #1316 #1318 #1365
- Test improvements #1208 #1227 #1241 #1353
- Cleanup #1266
- Documentation #1205 #1359
- Misc improvements #1294 #1297 #1306 #1344 #1348
- Backported zlib fixes
- Backported CI workflows from Develop branch
Dead2 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2023
Changes since 2.0.6:
- Fix CVE-2022-37434 #1328
- Fix chunkmemset #1196
- Fix deflateBound too small #1236
- Fix Z_SOLO #1263
- Fix ACLE variant of crc32 #1274
- Fix inflateBack #1311
- Fix deflate_quick windowsize #1431
- Fix DFLTCC bugs related to adler32 #1349 and #1390
- Fix warnings #1194 #1312 #1362
- MacOS build fix #1198
- Add invalid windowBits handling #1293
- Support for Force TZCNT #1186
- Support for aligned_alloc() #1360
- Minideflate improvements #1175 #1238
- Dont use unaligned access for memcpy #1309
- Build system #1209 #1233 #1267 #1273 #1278 #1292 #1316 #1318 #1365
- Test improvements #1208 #1227 #1241 #1353
- Cleanup #1266
- Documentation #1205 #1359
- Misc improvements #1294 #1297 #1306 #1344 #1348
- Backported zlib fixes
- Backported CI workflows from Develop branch
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Compatibility API/ABI Compatibility issue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants