Skip to content

Super tiny fix confusing slash_command_handler hint#14976

Merged
fzyzcjy merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fzyzcjy-patch-5
Dec 13, 2025
Merged

Super tiny fix confusing slash_command_handler hint#14976
fzyzcjy merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fzyzcjy-patch-5

Conversation

@fzyzcjy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@fzyzcjy fzyzcjy commented Dec 12, 2025

Motivation

Modifications

Accuracy Tests

Benchmarking and Profiling

Checklist

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @fzyzcjy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a minor but important clarification to the feedback message provided when a CI stage is rerun independently. The change adds a sentence to explicitly inform users that the progress of the triggered stage will not be visible on the current page, directing them to the GitHub Actions tab for updates. This enhancement aims to prevent potential confusion and improve the user experience by setting clear expectations about where to monitor the CI run.

Highlights

  • CI Message Clarity: Improved the clarity of the success message displayed when a CI stage is triggered independently, specifically for the slash_command_handler.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request improves the user experience by clarifying the confirmation message for the /rerun-stage slash command. The added text, 'It will not be shown in this page.', correctly informs the user that the triggered workflow's progress is not displayed on the pull request page and directs them to the Actions tab. The change is a clear and correct improvement.

@fzyzcjy fzyzcjy merged commit 6d2b332 into main Dec 13, 2025
50 of 56 checks passed
@fzyzcjy fzyzcjy deleted the fzyzcjy-patch-5 branch December 13, 2025 01:42
Liwansi added a commit to iforgetmyname/sglang that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
…n_eagle3_npu

* 'main' of https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang: (121 commits)
  Super tiny add gsp-fast-prepare (sgl-project#14992)
  Super tiny fix confusing slash_command_handler hint (sgl-project#14976)
  Super tiny remove unused argument (sgl-project#14966)
  [registry] Add a strict mode to model registration (sgl-project#14933)
  Feature/Fix multi lora scheduler blocking issue and evict LoRA None lastly (sgl-project#14795)
  Tune triton fused moe for the case of glm-4.6-fp8 b200 tp4 (sgl-project#15020)
  [model-gateway] refactor: unify worker management into modular workflow structure (sgl-project#15010)
  Update ci permission (sgl-project#15014)
  Refactor of http and engine entrypoints to allow custom override  (sgl-project#14869)
  Add KV4-capable backend flashmla and update server args (sgl-project#14989)
  Revert several PRs (sgl-project#14958)
  Super tiny extract route_typed_request_once (sgl-project#14951)
  Fix CI by reverting incorrect metric check logic (sgl-project#15004)
  [model-gateway] refactor: workflow engine cleanup and minor optimization (sgl-project#15001)
  [model-gateway] fix: handle workflow deadlock and optimize cycle detection (sgl-project#15000)
  [model-gateway] feat: add DAG parallel execution support and workflow optimization (sgl-project#14999)
  [model-gateway] refactor: extract workflow engine to src/workflow module (sgl-project#14996)
  Update CODEOWNERS for multimodal_gen (sgl-project#14995)
  [diffusion] docker: Tiny fix Docker Hub link in installation documentation (sgl-project#14987)
  [PD] Add decode PP event loop for PD disaggregation (sgl-project#14945)
  ...

# Conflicts:
#	python/sglang/srt/model_executor/piecewise_cuda_graph_runner.py
Prozac614 pushed a commit to Prozac614/sglang that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2025
YChange01 pushed a commit to YChange01/sglang that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants