Conversation
There was a bug for the case [a, 0] x [0, b] in addmm_cpu. We implement a short-cut for this case. [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 99008a3 (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
There was a bug for the case [a, 0] x [0, b] in addmm_cpu. We implement a short-cut for this case. [ghstack-poisoned]
There was a bug for the case [a, 0] x [0, b] in addmm_cpu. We implement a short-cut for this case. [ghstack-poisoned]
There was a bug for the case [a, 0] x [0, b] in addmm_cpu. We implement a short-cut for this case. [ghstack-poisoned]
There was a bug for the case [a, 0] x [0, b] in addmm_cpu. We implement a short-cut for this case. [ghstack-poisoned]
There was a bug for the case [a, 0] x [0, b] in addmm_cpu. We implement a short-cut for this case. [ghstack-poisoned]
|
Is this a fix for #71774? |
|
It is indeed! |
|
@pytorchbot merge this please |
|
Hey @lezcano. |
Summary: There was a bug for the case [a, 0] x [0, b] in addmm_cpu. We implement a short-cut for this case. Pull Request resolved: #75200 Approved by: https://github.com/ngimel Test Plan: contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/e0f9c69fcf9384a7d7e64ebacb219c11fc7ea928 Reviewed By: b0noI Differential Revision: D35469394 fbshipit-source-id: 6edb0c43b4d599ff7cd4423e660f439a16bd3cc6
Stack from ghstack:
There was a bug for the case [a, 0] x [0, b] in addmm_cpu. We implement
a short-cut for this case.
Fixes #71774