Authorizable comment action for proposals#6916
Merged
mrcasals merged 22 commits intodecidim:developfrom Apr 28, 2021
Merged
Conversation
decidim-comments/spec/cells/decidim/comments/comments_cell_spec.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
microstudi
reviewed
Nov 24, 2020
decidim-proposals/lib/decidim/proposals/commentable_proposal.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This was referenced Nov 24, 2020
This was referenced Nov 25, 2020
… comment questions in consultations
This was referenced Jan 8, 2021
Contributor
|
@microstudi @verarojman I now it's not ready for review, but just a heads-up: tests seem to be failing! |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks @mrcasals, we've frozen this PR until we finish other tasks with higher priorities ;) As soon as we can we'll make the necessary changes and make sure tests pass. |
Contributor
|
@verarojman oh, ok! Thanks for the explanation! 😄 |
1 task
Contributor
Author
mrcasals
approved these changes
Apr 28, 2021
entantoencuanto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2021
* develop: Remove creation date from meeting card (#7922) Use NPM instead of yarn on CI (#7919) Validate nickname using correct regexp (#7900) Make webpacker build available in production (#7915) New Crowdin updates (#7911) Open attachments in new tab (#7912) Fix JS errors in the admin panel (#7903) Fix editor: remove br tags from inside a tags (#7901) Authorizable comment action for proposals (#6916) NoMethodError raised when voting comments from threads (#7880) Fix not signed in needs permission redirect for internal links (#7890) Fix meeting registrations questionnaire free text choice answers export (#7892) Store election verifiable results data in election (#7882) New Crowdin updates (#7884)
microstudi
added a commit
to Platoniq/decidim
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2021
Co-authored-by: Ivan Vergés <ivan@platoniq.net> Co-authored-by: Aitor Lopez Beltran <aitorlopezbeltran@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🎩 What? Why?
By default, all registered users can create comments in a proposal (if comments are enabled). With this feature, admins will have the possibility to choose the verification method required for users to create comments in proposals.
This PR introduces the
commentandvote_commentauthorizable actions for proposals📌 Related Issues
Testing
📋 Checklist
voteandvote_commentactions for a Proposal.📷 Screenshots