@andreslucena , @Crashillo have a look on this PR, if you agree with the approach, i will go and extract all the svg icons in their own modules ( some modules may have custom icons like the ones from;

"Decidim::Proposals::CollaborativeDraft" => { icon: "draft-line", description: "Collaborative draft", category: "activity" },
"Decidim::Proposals::Proposal" => { icon: "chat-new-line", description: "Proposal", category: "activity" },
"Decidim::Amendment" => { icon: "git-branch-line", description: "Amendment", category: "activity" },
"Decidim::ParticipatoryProcess" => { icon: "treasure-map-line", description: "Participatory Process", category: "activity" },
"Decidim::Budgets::Budget" => { icon: "coin-line", description: "Budget", category: "activity" },
"Decidim::Budgets::Project" => { icon: "coin-line", description: "Project (Budgets)", category: "activity" },

@andreslucena , @Crashillo have a look on this PR, if you agree with the approach, i will go and extract all the svg icons in their own modules ( some modules may have custom icons like the ones from;

So, this would also fix #11137, right?

I will mention @entantoencuanto to discuss about the approach, since the Ruby/Rails is not my strong point 😅

@andreslucena , @Crashillo have a look on this PR, if you agree with the approach, i will go and extract all the svg icons in their own modules ( some modules may have custom icons like the ones from;

So, this would also fix #11137, right?

I think it would as, it would enable us to call it from whatever place we would like.

Hi, I think that this approach is a great improvement! My only doubt is if you are considering to provide a method to be used by the design application to get all the icons and group them by category. Currently this is done accessing directly to the icons hash in the helper and grouping. But the IconRegistry class does not provide a public method returning this hash or a structure grouped by category

But the IconRegistry class does not provide a public method

This will be added ... I just wanted to validate the approach on the matter.

I've updated the issues that'll be closed when we merge this one 😄