Skip to content

update regenerator-runtime in babel-polyfill#4966

Merged
hzoo merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
update-regenerator-runtime-in-babel-polyfill
Dec 8, 2016
Merged

update regenerator-runtime in babel-polyfill#4966
hzoo merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
update-regenerator-runtime-in-babel-polyfill

Conversation

@zloirock
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@zloirock zloirock commented Dec 8, 2016

Related #4877

@zloirock zloirock changed the title update regenerator-runtime in babel-polypill update regenerator-runtime in babel-polyfill Dec 8, 2016
@hzoo hzoo added the PR: Internal 🏠 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories label Dec 8, 2016
@hzoo hzoo merged commit 492e79f into master Dec 8, 2016
Jessidhia pushed a commit to Jessidhia/babel that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
* master:
  update `regenerator-runtime` in `babel-polypill` (babel#4966)
  Temp fix for make watch [skip ci] (babel#4967)
  Add (and fix) failing test of function parameter bindings in a catch block (babel#4880)
  Upgrade regenerator-runtime to version 0.10.0. (babel#4877)
  Add `/.test` and `/src` to `babel-plugin-transform-regenerator` `.npmignore`. (babel#4961) [skip ci]
  Only base async fn arity on non-default/non-rest params - fixes babel#4891 (babel#4901)
  Add generator support for Import (babel#4945)
@zloirock zloirock deleted the update-regenerator-runtime-in-babel-polyfill branch December 8, 2016 16:17
panagosg7 pushed a commit to panagosg7/babel that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2017
@lock lock bot added the outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue label Oct 6, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 6, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue PR: Internal 🏠 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants