Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
I think a test would be to add a localization file in specs and verify that the translated name comes through. Also, could you remove the merge branch and rebase this whole branch onto master? Then you can just squash your two commits. |
Contributor
Author
|
@kbrock Thank you for your feedback. I have addressed your feedback. |
kbrock
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2024
kbrock
added a commit
to kbrock/active_hash
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2025
- Add i18n support active-hash#230 @ryu-sato - Add `column_names` method active-hash#311 @hatsu38 - Support Active Record 7.2 active-hash#317 @ashleyHutton - Support ruby 3.4 active-hash#328 @flavorjones - Add `:alias` to `has_many :through` active-hash#329 @alexgriff - Add Active Record 8.0 active-hash#324 @flavorjones - Fix Do not suppress load errors#309 @andreynering - Ensure `field_names` are all strings active-hash#312 @flavorjones - Hide private `add_default_value` active-hash#314 @kbrock - Fix `exists?(nil)` active-hash#320 @y-yagi - Enance Enum support active-hash#321 @hatsu38 - Updated docs active-hash#326 @y-yagi - Drop Active Record < 6.1. Ruby < 3.0 active-hash#324 @flavorjones
kbrock
added a commit
to kbrock/active_hash
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2025
Added ===== - Add i18n support active-hash#230 @ryu-sato - Add `column_names` method active-hash#311 @hatsu38 - Support Active Record 7.2 active-hash#317 @ashleyHutton - Support ruby 3.4 active-hash#328 @flavorjones - Add `:alias` to `has_many :through` active-hash#329 @alexgriff - Add Active Record 8.0 active-hash#324 @flavorjones Fixed ===== - Fix Do not suppress load errors#309 @andreynering - Ensure `field_names` are all strings active-hash#312 @flavorjones - Hide private `add_default_value` active-hash#314 @kbrock - Fix `exists?(nil)` active-hash#320 @y-yagi - Enance Enum support active-hash#321 @hatsu38 - Updated docs active-hash#326 @y-yagi Removed ======= - Drop Active Record < 6.1. Ruby < 3.0 active-hash#324 @flavorjones
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I am hoping that ActiveHash will support i18n.
Since the reason why #170 does not merge for a long time is that it needs tests, I created a new PR that adds tests based on #170.
bundle exec rspecpassed