Skip to content

refactor(spec)!: Remove redundant final field from TaskStatusUpdateEvent#1308

Merged
amye merged 15 commits intoa2aproject:mainfrom
madankumarpichamuthu:fix/1232-remove-final-field
Jan 27, 2026
Merged

refactor(spec)!: Remove redundant final field from TaskStatusUpdateEvent#1308
amye merged 15 commits intoa2aproject:mainfrom
madankumarpichamuthu:fix/1232-remove-final-field

Conversation

@madankumarpichamuthu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Terminal states (COMPLETED, FAILED, CANCELLED, REJECTED) already indicate task completion, making the final field redundant. This creates consistency across streaming, polling, and push notification communication patterns.

Changes:

  • Removed final field (field 4) from TaskStatusUpdateEvent in proto
  • Updated examples to remove final: true references
  • Clarified that streams close upon terminal states
  • Added migration guidance in Appendix A.2.2

Fixes #1232

Terminal states (COMPLETED, FAILED, CANCELLED, REJECTED) already indicate
task completion, making the final field redundant. This creates consistency
across streaming, polling, and push notification communication patterns.

Changes:
- Removed final field (field 4) from TaskStatusUpdateEvent in proto
- Updated examples to remove final: true references
- Clarified that streams close upon terminal states
- Added migration guidance in Appendix A.2.2

Fixes a2aproject#1232

Author: Madan Kumar Pichamuthu
@madankumarpichamuthu madankumarpichamuthu requested review from a team as code owners December 11, 2025 21:38
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @madankumarpichamuthu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the TaskStatusUpdateEvent by removing the redundant final field. This change simplifies the protocol by relying on terminal task states (COMPLETED, FAILED, CANCELLED, REJECTED) to signal completion and stream termination, ensuring consistency across various communication patterns. The update includes comprehensive documentation changes and migration guidance for affected clients and agents, addressing issue #1232.

Highlights

  • Removal of Redundant Field: The final boolean field has been removed from the TaskStatusUpdateEvent in the a2a.proto specification, as terminal states (COMPLETED, FAILED, CANCELLED, REJECTED) inherently indicate task completion.
  • Stream Termination Logic: Stream termination is now solely determined by a task reaching any terminal state, simplifying the protocol and removing the need for an explicit final flag.
  • Documentation and Examples Updated: All relevant documentation, including specification examples, streaming topics, and Python tutorials, have been updated to reflect this change and remove references to the final field.
  • Migration Guidance Provided: New documentation explicitly outlines migration steps for both agents and clients to adapt to the removal of the final field, ensuring a smooth transition.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively removes the redundant final field from TaskStatusUpdateEvent and updates the associated documentation and examples. The addition of a migration guide is particularly helpful for a breaking change like this. I have a few suggestions to enhance the changes. Firstly, in the protobuf definition, it's a good practice to reserve the field number of the removed field to prevent future compatibility issues. Secondly, I noticed an inconsistency in the documentation regarding when a stream closes. Some sections mention only terminal states, while others correctly include interrupted states like INPUT_REQUIRED. I've left comments to help align the documentation for consistency.

madankumarpichamuthu and others added 4 commits December 11, 2025 13:42
Fix MD032 markdown linting errors - lists must be surrounded by blank lines.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Prevent future reuse of field number 4 to maintain wire compatibility.

Author: Madan Kumar Pichamuthu
madankumarpichamuthu added a commit to madankumarpichamuthu/A2A that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2026
Addresses review feedback from @Tehsmash and @darrelmiller to remove the breaking change note from the specification document. Breaking changes should be tracked in issues, git history, and release notes rather than in the spec itself.

Changes:
- Removed "Behavior Change" section from docs/specification.md (lines 3491-3493)
- Maintains all other changes from PR a2aproject#1308

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Addresses review feedback from @Tehsmash and @darrelmiller to remove the breaking change note from the specification document. Breaking changes should be tracked in issues, git history, and release notes rather than in the spec itself.

Changes:
- Removed "Behavior Change" section from docs/specification.md (lines 3491-3493)
- Maintains all other changes from PR a2aproject#1308
@madankumarpichamuthu madankumarpichamuthu force-pushed the fix/1232-remove-final-field branch from e593650 to 08cad2f Compare January 13, 2026 17:08
@darrelmiller
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/vote

@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Vote created

@darrelmiller has called for a vote on fix(spec): refactor: Remove redundant final field from TaskStatusUpdateEvent (#1308).

The members of the following teams have binding votes:

Team
@a2aproject/a2a-tsc

Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support!

How to vote

You can cast your vote by reacting to this comment. The following reactions are supported:

In favor Against Abstain
👍 👎 👀

Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted.

The vote will be open for 11months 29days 3h 50m 24s. It will pass if at least 51% of the users with binding votes vote In favor 👍. Once it's closed, results will be published here as a new comment.

@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Vote status

So far 0.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
0 0 0 8

Binding votes (0)

User Vote Timestamp
@muscariello Pending
@darrelmiller Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@ToddSegal Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending
@spetschulatSFDC Pending

@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Vote status

So far 12.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
1 0 0 7

Binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@muscariello Pending
@darrelmiller Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@ToddSegal Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

3 similar comments
@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 17, 2026

Vote status

So far 12.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
1 0 0 7

Binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@muscariello Pending
@darrelmiller Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@ToddSegal Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 18, 2026

Vote status

So far 12.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
1 0 0 7

Binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@muscariello Pending
@darrelmiller Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@ToddSegal Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 19, 2026

Vote status

So far 12.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
1 0 0 7

Binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@muscariello Pending
@darrelmiller Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@ToddSegal Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

As requested by maintainers, breaking changes should be documented in
issues, git history, and release notes rather than in the specification
itself. This removes the A.2.2 section about the final field removal.
@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 20, 2026

Vote status

So far 12.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
1 0 0 7

Binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@muscariello Pending
@darrelmiller Pending
@geneknit Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@ToddSegal Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

Non-binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
Tehsmash In favor 2026-01-20 9:37:52.0 +00:00:00

@holtskinner holtskinner changed the title fix(spec): refactor: Remove redundant final field from TaskStatusUpdateEvent fix(spec)!: refactor: Remove redundant final field from TaskStatusUpdateEvent Jan 20, 2026
@holtskinner holtskinner changed the title fix(spec)!: refactor: Remove redundant final field from TaskStatusUpdateEvent refactor(spec)!: Remove redundant final field from TaskStatusUpdateEvent Jan 20, 2026
@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 21, 2026

Vote status

So far 37.50% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
3 0 0 5

Binding votes (3)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2026-01-20 17:12:22.0 +00:00:00
geneknit In favor 2026-01-20 19:55:38.0 +00:00:00
spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@muscariello Pending
@darrelmiller Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

Non-binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
Tehsmash In favor 2026-01-20 9:37:52.0 +00:00:00

@muscariello muscariello added this to the 1.0 milestone Jan 22, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Backlog in TSC Review Jan 22, 2026
@muscariello muscariello moved this from Backlog to In progress in TSC Review Jan 22, 2026
@muscariello muscariello removed this from the 1.0 milestone Jan 22, 2026
@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 22, 2026

Vote status

So far 50.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
4 0 0 4

Binding votes (4)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2026-01-20 17:12:22.0 +00:00:00
geneknit In favor 2026-01-20 19:55:38.0 +00:00:00
muscariello In favor 2026-01-22 10:45:47.0 +00:00:00
spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

Non-binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
Tehsmash In favor 2026-01-20 9:37:52.0 +00:00:00

3 similar comments
@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Vote status

So far 50.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
4 0 0 4

Binding votes (4)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2026-01-20 17:12:22.0 +00:00:00
geneknit In favor 2026-01-20 19:55:38.0 +00:00:00
muscariello In favor 2026-01-22 10:45:47.0 +00:00:00
spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

Non-binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
Tehsmash In favor 2026-01-20 9:37:52.0 +00:00:00

@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Vote status

So far 50.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
4 0 0 4

Binding votes (4)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2026-01-20 17:12:22.0 +00:00:00
geneknit In favor 2026-01-20 19:55:38.0 +00:00:00
muscariello In favor 2026-01-22 10:45:47.0 +00:00:00
spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

Non-binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
Tehsmash In favor 2026-01-20 9:37:52.0 +00:00:00

@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 25, 2026

Vote status

So far 50.00% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
4 0 0 4

Binding votes (4)

User Vote Timestamp
ToddSegal In favor 2026-01-20 17:12:22.0 +00:00:00
geneknit In favor 2026-01-20 19:55:38.0 +00:00:00
muscariello In favor 2026-01-22 10:45:47.0 +00:00:00
spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller Pending
@hughesthe1st Pending
@000-000-000-000-000 Pending
@SivaNSAP Pending

Non-binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
Tehsmash In favor 2026-01-20 9:37:52.0 +00:00:00

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@muscariello muscariello left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@muscariello muscariello linked an issue Jan 26, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
@git-vote
Copy link
Copy Markdown

git-vote bot commented Jan 26, 2026

Vote closed

The vote passed! 🎉

62.50% of the users with binding vote were in favor and 0.00% were against (passing threshold: 51%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
5 0 0 3

Binding votes (5)

User Vote Timestamp
@ToddSegal In favor 2026-01-20 17:12:22.0 +00:00:00
@darrelmiller In favor 2026-01-26 3:20:43.0 +00:00:00
@geneknit In favor 2026-01-20 19:55:38.0 +00:00:00
@muscariello In favor 2026-01-22 10:45:47.0 +00:00:00
@spetschulatSFDC In favor 2026-01-15 23:55:38.0 +00:00:00

Non-binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
@Tehsmash In favor 2026-01-20 9:37:52.0 +00:00:00

@amye amye merged commit 5b101cc into a2aproject:main Jan 27, 2026
7 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Done in TSC Review Jan 27, 2026
darrelmiller pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2026
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [1.0.0](v0.3.0...v1.0.0)
(2026-03-12)


### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* **spec:** Combine `TaskPushNotificationConfig` and
`PushNotificationConfig`
([#1500](#1500))
* **spec:** remove duplicated ID from the create task push config
request ([#1487](#1487))
* **spec:** pluralize configs in `ListTaskPushNotificationConfigs`
([#1486](#1486))
* **spec:** Add LF prefix to the package.
([#1474](#1474))
* **spec:** Switch to non-complex IDs in requests
([#1389](#1389))
* **spec:** Standardize spelling of "canceled" to use American Spelling
throughout ([#1283](#1283))
* **spec:** Align enum format with ADR-001 ProtoJSON specification
([#1384](#1384))
* **spec:** Remove redundant `final` field from `TaskStatusUpdateEvent`
([#1308](#1308))
* **spec:** Move `extendedAgentCard` field to `AgentCapabilities`
([#1307](#1307))
* **spec:** Fixes for the last_updated_after field
([#1358](#1358))
* **spec:** modernize oauth 2.0 flows - remove implicit/password, add
device code / pkce
([#1303](#1303))
* **spec:** Make "message" field name consistent between protocol
bindings ([#1302](#1302))
* **spec:** Remove deprecated fields from a2a.proto for v1.0 release
([#1301](#1301))
* **spec:** Rename `supportsAuthenticatedExtendedCard` to
`supportsExtendedAgentCard`
([#1222](#1222))
* **spec:** Remove v1s from a2a url http bindings
* **spec:** Large refactor of specification to separate application
protocol definition from mapping to transports

### Features

* **spec:** Add `tasks/list` method with filtering and pagination to the
specification
([0a9f629](0a9f629))
* **spec:** modernize oauth 2.0 flows - remove implicit/password, add
device code / pkce
([#1303](#1303))
([525ff38](525ff38))
* **spec:** Natively Support Multi-tenancy on gRPC through an additional
scope field on the request.
([#1195](#1195))
([cfbce32](cfbce32)),
closes [#1148](#1148)
* **spec:** Provide ability for SDKs to be backwards compatible.
([#1401](#1401))
([227e249](227e249))
* **spec:** Remove v1s from a2a url http bindings
([1bd263f](1bd263f))


### Bug Fixes

* Add missing metadata field to Part message in gRPC specification
([#1019](#1019))
([b3b266d](b3b266d)),
closes [#1005](#1005)
* Add name field to FilePart protobuf message
([#983](#983))
([2b7cb6f](2b7cb6f)),
closes [#984](#984)
* Clarify blocking calls return on interrupted states
([#1403](#1403))
([0655ff3](0655ff3))
* **doc:** Makes JSON-RPC SendMessage response clearer
([#1241](#1241))
([5792804](5792804))
* **docs:** Clearer wording around context id.
([#1588](#1588))
([dec790a](dec790a))
* **grpc:** Fix inconsistent property name between gRPC and JSON-RPC in
Message object ([#1100](#1100))
([2a1f819](2a1f819))
* **grpc:** missing field in gRPC spec - state_transition_history
([#1138](#1138))
([a2de798](a2de798)),
closes [#1139](#1139)
* **grpc:** Update `CreateTaskPushNotificationConfig` endpoint to
`/v1/{parent=tasks/*/pushNotificationConfigs}`
([#979](#979))
([911f9b0](911f9b0))
* **proto:** Add icon_url to a2a.proto
([#986](#986))
([17e7f62](17e7f62))
* **proto:** Adds metadata field to A2A DataPart proto
([#1004](#1004))
([a8b45dc](a8b45dc))
* Remove unimplemented state_transition_history capability field
([#1396](#1396))
([c768a44](c768a44)),
closes [#1228](#1228)
* Restore CreateTaskPushNotificationConfig method naming
([#1402](#1402))
([d14f410](d14f410))
* Revert "chore(gRPC): Update a2a.proto to include metadata on
GetTaskRequest" ([#1000](#1000))
([e6b8c65](e6b8c65))
* Simplify Part message structure by flattening FilePart and DataPart
([#1411](#1411))
([bfae8f7](bfae8f7))
* **spec:** Add LF prefix to the package.
([#1474](#1474))
([a54e809](a54e809))
* **spec:** add metadata to `CancelTaskRequest`
([#1485](#1485))
([c441b91](c441b91)),
closes [#1484](#1484)
* **spec:** Added clarification on timestamps in HTTP query params
([#1425](#1425))
([6292104](6292104))
* **spec:** Added clarifying text around messages and artifacts
([#1424](#1424))
([b03d141](b03d141))
* **spec:** Adjust field number for `ListTasksRequest.tenant` to prevent
missing number ([#1470](#1470))
([cd16c52](cd16c52))
* **spec:** Clarify contextId behavior when message is sent with taskId
but without contextId
([#1309](#1309))
([a336a5a](a336a5a))
* **spec:** Clarify versioning strategy and client responsibilities in
protocol specification
([#1259](#1259))
([a4afeea](a4afeea))
* **spec:** Fix/1251 clarify authentication scheme
([#1256](#1256))
([3e6c7db](3e6c7db))
* **spec:** Fixes for the last_updated_after field
([#1358](#1358))
([0e204bf](0e204bf))
* **spec:** Make "message" field name consistent between protocol
bindings ([#1302](#1302))
([1e5f462](1e5f462)),
closes [#1230](#1230)
* **spec:** make `history_length` optional
([#1071](#1071))
([0572953](0572953))
* **spec:** pluralize configs in `ListTaskPushNotificationConfigs`
([#1486](#1486))
([cf735cb](cf735cb))
* **spec:** Remove config from binding.
([#1587](#1587))
([010b9cc](010b9cc))
* **spec:** Remove deprecated fields from a2a.proto for v1.0 release
([#1301](#1301))
([60f83c3](60f83c3)),
closes [#1227](#1227)
* **spec:** remove duplicated ID from the create task push config
request ([#1487](#1487))
([393898d](393898d))
* **spec:** Remove metadata field from ListTasksRequest
([#1235](#1235))
([b6ef9ee](b6ef9ee))
* **spec:** Remove reserved and fix tags ordering
([#1494](#1494))
([1997c9d](1997c9d))
* **spec:** Rename `supportsAuthenticatedExtendedCard` to
`supportsExtendedAgentCard`
([#1222](#1222))
([c196824](c196824)),
closes [#1215](#1215)
* **spec:** Standardize spelling of "canceled" to use American Spelling
throughout ([#1283](#1283))
([4dd980f](4dd980f))
* **spec:** Suggest Unique Identifier fields to be UUID
([#966](#966))
([00cf76e](00cf76e))
* **spec:** Switch to non-complex IDs in requests
([#1389](#1389))
([2596c1c](2596c1c)),
closes [#1390](#1390)
* **spec:** Update security schemes example
([#1364](#1364))
([f9a8f5b](f9a8f5b))
* Update the Java tutorials and descriptions
([#1181](#1181))
([202aa06](202aa06))


### Documentation

* **spec:** Align enum format with ADR-001 ProtoJSON specification
([#1384](#1384))
([810eaa1](810eaa1)),
closes [#1344](#1344)


### Code Refactoring

* **spec:** Combine `TaskPushNotificationConfig` and
`PushNotificationConfig`
([#1500](#1500))
([d1ed0da](d1ed0da))
* **spec:** Large refactor of specification to separate application
protocol definition from mapping to transports
([b078419](b078419))
* **spec:** Move `extendedAgentCard` field to `AgentCapabilities`
([#1307](#1307))
([40d6286](40d6286))
* **spec:** Remove redundant `final` field from `TaskStatusUpdateEvent`
([#1308](#1308))
([5b101cc](5b101cc))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: Amye Scavarda Perrin <amye@amye.org>
Co-authored-by: Holt Skinner <13262395+holtskinner@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Archived in project

6 participants