Skip to content

Disable offline entitlements if active inapp purchases exist#983

Merged
tonidero merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
toniricodiez/sdk-3087-android-disable-offline-entitlements-if
May 3, 2023
Merged

Disable offline entitlements if active inapp purchases exist#983
tonidero merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
toniricodiez/sdk-3087-android-disable-offline-entitlements-if

Conversation

@tonidero

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

SDK-3087

We don't want to enter offline entitlements mode if there are active inapp purchases. Main reason is that we don't have the purchase id generated by the backend so we would be missing information. More details in the ticket.

@tonidero tonidero marked this pull request as ready for review April 26, 2023 11:52
@tonidero tonidero requested a review from a team April 26, 2023 11:52
@tonidero tonidero mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2023
5 tasks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for adding this

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was thinking what happens if there's also an active subscription. But I guess the main use case for this is that after a successful purchase of an iapp, the app will be unconsumed and this should fail since we don't want to support consumables.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, if they purchase a subscription first, they will gain access, and then, purchase a consumable, they will lose access until the backend is back up. I think the cases of this happening in a short time frame will be small though.

@tonidero tonidero force-pushed the toniricodiez/sdk-3087-android-disable-offline-entitlements-if branch from 8d6af32 to 2e34066 Compare May 3, 2023 09:44
@tonidero tonidero enabled auto-merge (squash) May 3, 2023 09:44
@tonidero tonidero merged commit 1cc76d6 into main May 3, 2023
@tonidero tonidero deleted the toniricodiez/sdk-3087-android-disable-offline-entitlements-if branch May 3, 2023 10:22
pablo-guardiola added a commit to pablo-guardiola/purchases-android that referenced this pull request May 4, 2023
tonidero added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2023
**This is an automatic release.**

### New Features
* CAT-859 Expose whether or not a SubscriptionOption is Prepaid in the
SDK (#1005) via Deema AlShamaa (@dalshamaa)
### Bugfixes
* [CF-1324] Fix personalizedPrice defaulting to false (#952) via beylmk
(@beylmk)
### Performance Improvements
* Store and return ETag last refresh time header (#978) via Toni Rico
(@tonidero)
### Dependency Updates
* Bump fastlane-plugin-revenuecat_internal from `3b03efa` to `fe45299`
(#991) via dependabot[bot] (@dependabot[bot])
* Bump danger from 9.2.0 to 9.3.0 (#981) via dependabot[bot]
(@dependabot[bot])
* Bump fastlane-plugin-revenuecat_internal from `8482a43` to `3b03efa`
(#974) via dependabot[bot] (@dependabot[bot])
* Bump fastlane from 2.212.1 to 2.212.2 (#973) via dependabot[bot]
(@dependabot[bot])
* Bump fastlane-plugin-revenuecat_internal from `9255366` to `8482a43`
(#961) via dependabot[bot] (@dependabot[bot])
### Other Changes
* Add proration modes to post to backend (#977) via swehner (@swehner)
* Added ENTITLEMENTS_COMPUTED_ON_DEVICE (#939) via Cesar de la Vega
(@vegaro)
* Fix flaky test in OfflineCustomerInfoCalculatorTest (#997) via Cesar
de la Vega (@vegaro)
* Fix `OfflineCustomerInfoCalculatorTest` `Unresolved reference:
ProducType` (#995) via Cesar de la Vega (@vegaro)
* Add support for product_plan_identifier for offline customer info
(#959) via Cesar de la Vega (@vegaro)
* Add non-subscriptions support to offline customer info (#958) via
Cesar de la Vega (@vegaro)
* Query only active purchases when generating offline entitlements
customer info (#1003) via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Fix `PurchasesIntegrationTest` building issue (#996 into main) (#998)
via Cesar de la Vega (@vegaro)
* Fail offline entitlements computation if product entitlement mapping
not available (#999) via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Fix  build_magic_weather lane (#993) via Cesar de la Vega (@vegaro)
* Add backend integration tests and test product entitlement mapping
endpoint (#988) via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Fix purchases integration tests (#980) via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Disable offline entitlements if active inapp purchases exist (#983)
via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Clear cached customer info upon entering offline entitlements mode
(#989) via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Update product entitlement mapping request to new format (#976) via
Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Support enabling/disabling offline entitlements (#964) via Toni Rico
(@tonidero)
* Add back integration tests automation (#972) via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Upgrade to AGP 8.0 (#975) via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Extract post receipt logic to PostReceiptHelper (#967) via Toni Rico
(@tonidero)
* Add isServerDown to error callback for postReceipt and getCustomerInfo
requests (#963) via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Add back integration test flavors (#962) via Toni Rico (@tonidero)
* Fix storing test results (#966) via Cesar de la Vega (@vegaro)
* Extract detekt job from test job (#965) via Cesar de la Vega (@vegaro)


[CF-1324]:
https://revenuecats.atlassian.net/browse/CF-1324?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ

---------

Co-authored-by: revenuecat-ops <ops@revenuecat.com>
Co-authored-by: Toni Rico <antonio.rico.diez@revenuecat.com>
tonidero added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2023
### Description
This removes the flag that was disabling offline entitlements, so we
actually start using offline entitlements

#### TODO
- [x] Hold until making sure it all works correctly
- [x] Hold until #983 is merged
- [x] Hold until #959 is merged
- [x] Hold until
#999 is merged
- [x] Hold until #1003 is merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants