Impeachment: Schiff 1 to Trump’s 0 – what were Trump’s attorneys thinking?

 

No, they never wanted Donald J. Trump to be President.

We know that. No news there. It was a disappointing beginning regarding the impeachment hearing on Trump’s side. More than disappointing. It was a walk away for the Democrats. They were locked and loaded with a full blown Case in Chief with Trump’s  attorneys caught flat footed. Apparently they thought two hours of arguments for each witness amendment didn’t include them for the most part.

What did they think was going to happen when the Democrats were given this time? Wise old crusty McConnell had to know what the Dems would do with the time. Schiff came with the requisite audio-visuals straight from the House proceedings. Of course not the statements that had been disproven by Trump’s attorneys. The most Trump’s attorney could muster at times was “can’t we get the trial started?’ Hate to tell them but it was well underway. First impressions mean everything. Those who may not have followed the House hearing got the full bore evidence as they determined it to be.

Even stalwart conservative commenters last night had to ask how did the Lev Parnas and other information presented ever allowed that was not even in the House proceedings.

Where was the fire and brimstone? The righteous indignation?

No surprise here. I was no doubt one of about a dozen who managed to sit through the entire House hearing. I knew what was coming. I knew the counter arguments to these witnesses. Did not Trump’s attorneys listen as well?

No question there will be witnesses.

OK….that’s my opinion. What’s yours?

Here is something to help us buck up!

Everything swell in the swamp, Super swampy today.

 

Just who in the world is Lev Parnas?

 

In the news …

by Mustang

The House of Representative’s ace in the hole is everything we’ve come to expect of the Democratic Party.  Lev Parnas is that ace Democrats have been placing all their hopes on for a conviction of Donald J. Trump in the United States Senate, Mr. Trump and his legal team must be celebrating his acquittal even before the trial begins.

Lev Parnas is a Ukrainian-American “businessman” who has said that he’s got the goods on President Trump’s misconduct, which Democrats contend involves a conspiracy with Ukrainian officials to derail the presidential candidacy of Joe Biden.  Lev Parnas claims that he participated with the Trump administration in the search for detrimental information concerning Trump’s political opponents.

Parnas claims that he has proof against Trump/Giuliani, including a photograph taken with Trump.  The photograph was taken in 2006, which in case anyone is paying attention, was a full ten years ahead of the 2016 presidential elections.

So then, who is this guy?

Lev Parnas was born in Odessa, Ukraine, when Ukraine was still a satellite of the Soviet Union.  He migrated to the United States when he was about 3-years old.  He grew up in Detroit, Michigan and then later in Brooklyn, New York.  As a recent graduate from Baruch College, he worked for Kings Highway Realty, where he sold Trump Organization co-op apartments.

 

Parnas and Giuliani

In 1996, Parnas moved to Florida where he worked in several businesses involving real estate, securities, precious metals, and then ended up starting his own company, which he named Parnas Holdings.  After failing in a film project, he partnered with Igor Fruman in an energy venture.

According to the Miami Herald, Parnas owes more debt than he has net worth.  Igor Fruman was born in Belarus, migrated to the United States, and lived in Detroit, Michigan before migrating to South Florida.

His business interests have been an import/export company, a beach bar in Ukraine, and fund-raising for Jewish charities.  He is also an associate of Ihor Kolomoyskyi, a wealthy Ukrainian who is under investigation by the Department of Justice for money laundering.

At this point, one might wonder what benefit Democrats think Parnas could offer their case against Trump, but it gets worse.

 

Democrats contend that Lev and Igor are (or have been) associates of Rudy Giuliani and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee.  According to CNN, the two men were recently arrested because of their involvement in an effort to influence US politics and policy through foreign funds paid to members of congress.

So far in the investigation, however, all we know for certain is that Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman had lunch with Giuliani a few hours before they were arrested by the FBI.  Then, according to journalist Peter Weber, Giuliani is guilty of taking Igor to the state funeral of George H. W. Bush.

Grasping at straws comes to mind.

Lev Parnas is the founder and CEO of a company called Fraud Guarantee.  Fraud Guarantee hired Giuliani Partners to provide legal advice, allegedly paying Giuliani’s firm a half-million dollars for their services.

Another allegation is that Florida officials may have dissolved Fraud Guarantee before it hired Giuliani’s consulting firm because Fraud Guarantee failed to file an annual report.  When did the state of Florida take this action?  In 2014.  Whether any of this is true may not matter, because unless someone alleges that Giuliani accepted the half-million dollars as a bribe, there is no crime in accepting money in exchange for services rendered so long as the services are legal.

To the best of my knowledge, offering legal advice is still a lawful enterprise.  More to the point, Mr. Giuliani’s status of Mr. Trump’s personal attorney does not preclude Giuliani from having other clients.  No one alleges any wrongdoing by Giuliani Partners, but everyone with a progressive agenda is happy to imply that Giuliani is somehow guilty by association.

According to Parnas’ story, Giuliani sent he and Igor to Ukraine in late 2018 to look for damaging information about President Trump’s political opponent, Joe Biden —I suppose in a somewhat similar fashion to the DNC’s concoction of the Steele Dossier. In November 2019, Parnas told CNN that he would be willing to testify to Congress regarding these activities, which also involved Representative Devin Nunes.  Soon after, everyone in the Democratic Party wet themselves.

Maybe Parnas’ testimony will work out for House Democrats, but Parnas and Fruman were arrested by the FBI on 9 Oct 2019 and charged with planning to transfer funds from a foreign government to US officials.  So, this actually may not go in the direction House Democrats hoped.

In 2018, Parnas and Fruman donated funds and pledge further additional money to an unnamed member of Congress, who was “recruited” for the campaign to oust US Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch.  These were donations that not only violated campaign limits but were also funneled to the congress-critter through a shell company.  Former Representative Pete Sessions is believed to be the “officially unnamed” member of congress.

As my good friend Bunkerville keeps reminding us, all is well in the swamp.

____________

That which is not good for the beehive cannot be good for the bees.  —Marcus Aurelius

 

Mustang also blogs at Fix Bayonets and Thoughts From Afar

 

Nancy Pelosi says she has to miss Saturday’s 49ers-Viking because of Trump

 

Anyone who happened upon Nancy Pelosi’s presser yesterday has learned that what was thought is now true. She has now succumbed to Trump derangement syndrome.

She supports Iran over the U.S regarding the taking out of one bad actor.

Impeachment? Now that is one big joke.

Most importantly she will miss the  Saturday’s 49ers-Viking. Saving us from Trump comes first. I give you the important point first.

 

 

She will clutch those impeachment documents and we will have to pry them from her cold dead hands.

 

The internet can be such a challenge for the old war horses now. Their previous positions so easily come back to life.

 

That’s it folks. The best I can muster on a crazy bizarro week.

For the best in news

 

John Dingell now moves to Sainthood after Trump’s comment

 

92-year-old John Dingell dunked on celebrities, ridiculed Trump and became a Twitter favorite

John Dingell

Headline of the Washington Post announcing the death of John Dingell February 8, 2019. Now with the Kerfuffle over Trump’s comment regarding whether Dingell is looking up or down from whence he reposes presently, the likes of the ghost of McCain’s past and his memory is conjured once again. Of course, both heralded for their military service. First step met.

We are to forget that Trump’s response to Dingell’s death was this:

Trump hails longest-serving congressman in history John Dingell as ‘smart’ and ‘respected’ following his death –

‘Deepest sympathies to Congresswoman Debbie Dingell and the entire family of John Dingell. Longest serving Congressman in Country’s history which, if people understand politics, means he was very smart. A great reputation and highly respected man,’ he tweeted.

It looked like it was going to be forgive and forget time.

But the day after that, we learn what Dingell had to say on his death bed about Trump as a parting gesture similar to McCain.

 

  • He passed away on Thursday, dictating an op-ed that ran in the Washington Post the next day as one of his last acts
  • Piece that took a dig at Donald Trump ran shortly after the president tweeted his condolences to Dingell’s widow

 

Dingell’s Farewell Message to America Includes Dig at Trump …

Feb 8, 2019 DEARBORN, Mich. (AP) — On the day of his death, longtime Rep. John Dingell dictated a farewell message to America and used some of his final words to criticize President Donald Trump:
In the piece she (Mrs Dingell) said he composed on Thursday, Dingell slammed Trump and reflected on his own political rise, in an environment he remembered as being much kinder.

‘In our modern political age, the presidential bully pulpit seems dedicated to sowing division and denigrating, often in the most irrelevant and infantile personal terms, the political opposition,’ he charged.

This after Trump’s kind words in spite of Dingell ragging on him all through Trump’s presidency. Dingell skewering him in his book,The Dean: The Best Seat in the House 

John Dingell on Trump | One Detroit clip

 

So easy to forget. Say it again.

On Friday, Trump ordered flags at the White House and other federal facilities lowered to half-staff in Dingell’s memory. The president also used Twitter to extend sympathies to Debbie Dingell and other family members.

 

Dingell’s opinion article was similar to a letter penned by former Arizona Sen. John McCain before his death in August from brain cancer.

In McCain’s letter, the late Arizona Republican appeared to repudiate Trump’s politics one last time, saying, “We weaken our greatness when we confuse our patriotism with tribal rivalries that have sown resentment and hatred and violence in all the corners of the globe.”

During his retirement years, Dingell regularly turned to Twitter to express his outrage with President Trump and the Republican Party. “Burn this entire administration down,” he tweeted in January, after Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said that he didn’t understand why furloughed federal workers needed to visit food banks during the government shutdown.

Sure the Washington Post is so kind:

But rather than hurl shrill, impassioned invective at Trump and his associates, Dingell typically preferred to crack jokes at their expense. When Melania Trump showed up to tour a shelter for migrant children in her now-infamous Zara jacket, his response was to tweet, “Boy did I pick an awkward day to wear my jacket with ‘Be Best’ scribbled on the back.”

“Safe to say @realDonaldTrump has had the least productive first 100 days in office,” he wrote in April 2017. “Except maybe Harrison, who died of pneumonia on Day 31.”

The Book: The Dean: The Best Seat in the House 

by John Dingell
Review by Kirkus Reviews
He also witnessed the rise of the tea party, which populated the House of Representatives with Republicans who had run “against the very idea of the federal government.” Now retired, he watches in frustration as “Republi-cons work overtime to destroy all we’ve achieved and more,” apparently intent “on driving things backward, to return to an America that was less clean, less safe, less fair.” To counter the “rogue president” and his supporters who, “like lemmings, will follow him over any cliff,” Dingell advises “courage and constant vigilance.”
Speaking to WDIV in Detroit last August, Dingell said that the wry commentary reflected his serious concerns about the direction that the country was heading. “I’m scared to death,” he said. And yes, he confirmed, it was really him tweeting.

Sources:  Washington Post & Daily Mail & US News

Of course this is not the first in revisionist history of a political figure. Anyone of a certain age recall this one? Democrat Vice Presidential candidate. Sainthood bestowed upon her death as well.

Geraldine Ferraro -Revisionist History and Mob ties

The very best of the swamp.

Welcome readers from What finger News.

For the best in conservative news push the button

 

 

IG Horowitz testifies Wednesday at Senate hearing

 

Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee holds hearing on “DOJ OIG FISA Report: Methodology, Scope, and Findings.” Dept. of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz testifies.

So goes the notes to the clip. I just happened to hear about it, other than that who knows anything about it. Clever these Dems don’t you think? Managed to deep six this story swell.

Pelosi Wrap up smear: FBI leaked the Dossier to Buzzfeed then used it to get a FISA warrant. Then the FBI(Comey, McCabe) leaked to the MSM the FISA information and did a double wrap up smear. Then all the little rats like Louise tweeted about it for months as truth.

Hillary downloaded SAPS to an open home-brewed server, then destroyed the evidence while it was under subpoena, and also lied under oath about it multiple times, and she’s still walking around free as a bird. What did they do about that? Absolutely nothing. They gave her a free pass on all counts. Now, they want you to believe they actually care about these crimes.

Fox removed the original clip go figure – great, Daily Caller has it.

 

– here is Rand Paul. Even a better clip.

 

Here we go with two hours.

 

Hawley ultimately asked why the members of the FBI would commit such failures to mislead a court multiple times.

“That was precisely the concern we had,” Horowitz said. The inspector general made clear that he did not reach any conclusions regarding intent, but he did not necessarily accept the reasons people gave him during his investigation.

“There are so many errors, we couldn’t reach a conclusion or make a determination on what motivated those failures other than we did not credit what we lay out here were the explanations we got,” Horowitz said.

This echoed what Horowitz said in his opening statement, where he made clear that “although we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct, we also did not receive satisfactory explanations for the errors or the missing information and the failures that occurred.”

More at Fox

Other than that all is well in the swamp.

 

 

 

Democrats you finally did it. You blew it all to hell

 

“.. We finally, really, did it.”

 

You finally really did do it.

Extremely rough language.

 

 

 

George Washington comes back from the dead several hundred years after the founding of our Republic and discovers what the Democrats have done.

From the film “The Planet of the Apes.”

For the best in conservative news click below.

 

The Democrats Impeachment. The end to our Constitutional Republic

 

Money buys you a table at the impeachment hearing. At least for the Democrats.

Yes, I did watch the whole impeachment hearing. I will put this down as one of the best moments of the hearing. Mr. Daniel Goldman turns a whiter shade of pale at the hands of Rep Matt Gaetz.

After all history was made. Anyone else care that our Constitutional Republic was ripped asunder?

Yes, things are doing very well in the swamp.

 

 

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., questioned House Judiciary and Intelligence committee lawyers on Dec. 9. The questioning of Republican counsel Stephen Castor and Democratic counsel Daniel Goldman came during a House Judiciary Committee hearing that is part of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.

Bonus:

 

 
For the best in conservative news push the button.

 

 

Conway: “Witness Karlan who the hell are you lady to look down on half the country?”

 

Kellynne Conway on impeachment witness Karlan:

She thinks that you are less than her. And I’ve had it… who the hell are you lady, to look down on half the country?”

“She’s the star witness, she didn’t educate us. She spent her life lecturing people, she hobnobs with the elite,” 

“I took out six figures worth of student loans to put myself through law school and college with my single mother working her tail off to supplement that. I resent someone like that looking down on half of America. She sounds like Hillary Clinton with the ‘deplorables.'”

Conway accused Karlan of “look[ing] her nose down” at average Americans and blue-collar workers ”

The Stanford law professor was quoted as saying, “Liberals tend to cluster more. Conservatives, especially very conservative people, tend to spread out more, perhaps because they don’t even want to be around themselves.”

She also acknowledged being a Democratic donor who gave to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

“Let’s stop pretending it has a damn thing to do with the 15 witnesses over two committees, the Democrats have called over the last couple of weeks,” Conway told Fox News. “One, out of those 15 witnesses, has said that he or she has ever talked to the president about Ukraine.

Yep, Kellyanne. That about sums it up.

Conway cuts to the chase in this interview on Fox.

Read more

 

And so the impeachment starts. What comes to mind is the ending of the film “Planet of the Apes.” “So you finally did it’

Other than that, all is well in the swamp.

For the best in conservative news push the button.

 

 

 

 

Impeachment Hearing witness Noah Feldman Guilty of Perjury

This is supposedly one of the best and brightest attorneys who was to lay waste to Trump. Instead there should be a criminal referral. Feldman was at this since 2017 if not before. Even more disturbing is his opinion that a President does not have to commit a crime to be impeached.

Because Feldman is a Democrat nothing will happen to him for lying under oath. Full stop

May 17 2017:

Noah Feldman, a Harvard legal historian who’s written extensively about Trump and the law.

Did the president commit a crime when he had that conversation with Comey?
What the president did is an outrage. It’s impeachable, and obstruction of justice in the sense of being a “high crime and misdemeanor.” But it’s almost certainly not a crime of obstruction of justice.

So the distinction you’re making is between what would be a crime for you or me to commit versus a guy who lives in the White House?
Exactly. The word “high”—people have just lost track of this—in “high crimes and misdemeanors” does all the work. It does not mean ordinary statutory violations. It mean acts by the president in the exercise of his office that abuse power, are corrupt, or undermine the rule of law. That’s the essence of what high crimes and misdemeanors have always been—they meant that before the founding, they’ve meant that ever since. You can impeach someone who hasn’t committed any demonstrable federal crime, or state crime for that matter.

So just to clarify, this looks like obstruction of justice in the high crimes and misdemeanors sense but not in the Jeff Sessions–led Justice Department will do anything about it sense?
Correct. And frankly, breaking the norm of politicizing law enforcement—it’s a great basis for impeachment. It’s not a crime, and in fact it’s in the president’s constitutional authority, but it’s still impeachable. That’s the whole point—the president can do things within his legal constitutional authority where the only sanction available under our system is impeachment.

Read more

Other than that all is well in the swamp.

For the best in conservative news click on

Whatfinger News

Chairman Nadler preview of another absurd hearing – video

 

The Democrats might want to review just how Nadler and his henchmen did last time around with this impeachment thing. Lest we forget how bizarre it was how about a warm up before tomorrow? Recall back in May – hard to believe – it was Russia Russia Russia. Now we really don’t know the “crime” but one thing we know is the Dems did not fare well. Hard to believe it has been that long ago we went through the Nadler extravaganza. Like the ghosts of Christmas past, why not trot out John Dean as an example how badly this went?

A great example is the attempt to conjure the old war horses of the Nixon impeachment.

Chairman Jerry Nadler Running The House Judiciary Committee Chaos Breaks Out!

It got so bad, even the audience laughed. Of course what CNN found of merit in the short clip was titled:

“Nadler Shuts down Jordan during hearing: “I’m speaking.”

 

Jim Jordan

 

Next best was this takedown of John Dean by Congressman Gaetz

“Gaetz and John Dean Spar Over Mueller Report”

 

 

All is well in the swamp. The Democrats are in for a treatment.

Welcome readers from whatfinger news.

For the best in conservative news push the button.