The Holiday Overlap

This is specifically for my private-school students:

I’m sorry that there is such an enormous gap between the various schools’ holidays this year.  To compensate for this discrepancy and prevent lost lessons, here is my plan:

Option 1

Please note that I’ll be at the school the following times / dates to compensate for the holiday overlap between state and private schools.  One lesson still belongs to the 3rd term and one to the 4th term.

  • Tue 23 Sept: 9h – 12h
  • Thu 25 Sept: 9h – 12h
  • Tue 30 Sept: 15h[taken] 16h-17h
  • Wed 1 Oct: 9h – 12h

Please book your lesson time with me (thank you to the mom who was so fast to already book her child’s time, minutes after the email went out).  If you don’t book I won’t know to be there at a specific time.  On days that find no taker at all I will not drive out.

Option 2:

If you find that you can’t make it during any of the above times, please let me know; then you are entitled to 2 catch-up lessons in the 4th term that need to be arranged separately.

Please also keep in mind that the Studio is closed the week of 4 – 10 October, as this is when public schools are closed.  (This is why you need to book 2 adjustment lessons, one for term 3 and one for term 4.  Term 3 for the public schools has 11 weeks which balances out the 9-week fourth term.)

I’m looking forward to seeing you there!

Violin Studio: Moving to Memberships

violingroupWHC Ruthven and Lawrence Frylinck

(Please note: As this is a key policy post, it has been edited for clarity.) 

We are changing the system.

As a result of erratic, overlapping, non-congruent public vs private school holidays this year, we have had to rethink the way we do things in the Studio.

In 16 years of well-structured, successful running, the Studio has never had such a challenge to its teaching times, and drawn in its wake, discussions about fees (which are non-negotiable) and catch-up lessons (which are offered but not always accepted).

Traditionally we have always aligned with public school terms (as this is where the majority of our students hail from).  However, it is not enough any longer.  Public school terms were erratic and badly defined this year (especially in the second term which was nightmarish); private schools base their holidays on three vastly different systems plus random long weekends and mid-term breaks, and it is not possible to accommodate everyone’s school holidays any longer.

For the Violin Studio, there is only one remaining option:  To modernize.

Please speak to the guitar teacher to discuss what changes / stays unchanged in the Guitar Studio.

As from next year, the violin lesson fee will become a Violin Studio Membership fee instead.

You will receive a structured fees sheet explaining how this works; but essentially:

By paying a membership fee, you become a member of the Studio and, depending on the type of membership you buy, you are then entitled to a specific lesson schedule.  Two studio concerts per year plus an unspecified number of social functions, exam prep and support, are included in the membership.

The studio concerts form a part of the teaching schedule and are, as they are now, mandatory; the rest is optional.

I will archive the current studio rules and link them on the website so that people can refer back.

What does the change in structure mean for you?

You cannot learn violin in one lesson.  This is why we don’t charge per lesson.

It takes being a part of a studio and fairly diligently following an intelligent, interactive program to move ahead on an instrument as complex as the violin.  This year alone, three self-taught individuals approached me for lessons, realizing that despite the best internet packages and DVDs, the interaction on 1:1 basis with an experienced teacher is what gets the results.

Unlike the Grapevine selling slices of a cake, what we “sell” is not individual slices of anything.

Unlike course work, where you can get the notes from a colleague if you miss a session or two, you cannot fill in the “gaps” of a violin course on your own.  The other half of the equation consists of fine muscles, nerves, increasing stamina, learning to hear certain things, eye-hand-ear coordination, memory, certain movements which have to be exactly right or they never get up to speed; and a host of other things that lie within the student’s body and brain.

You cannot learn violin in one lesson.  Or in three, or six, or even ten.  You cannot become a champion swimmer by going to one swimming lesson.  This is why we sell the whole program, in 1:1 personal undivided attention customized lessons, interactive intelligent development of the whole young musician.  And because it is an interactive, ever-changing developmental program rather than a course, a membership is the most practical format for it.

Here are the main points of the membership model (effective from next year):

You buy a membership by paying ahead for the term, the semester or even the year.

The membership includes:

  • Your weekly or bi-weekly lessons (according to membership type) at a fixed recurring time.
  • Two studio concerts a year.
  • A number of social studio functions per year – the number varying from year to year.
  • Exam preparation and support.

It does not include:

However, extra lessons can be added as needed for at a specific one-off fee.

The Studio Year will remain the same:
EDIT: The Studio Year will be independent of either public or private schools!

We will adopt the following guidelines when defining our Studio year:

The Studio Year: Guidelines

  • There will be 4 terms. An attempt will be made to be largely active in school term.  Overlaps are inevitable though; the Studio terms will not be aligning with any specific school system. Expect plans and work-arounds.
  • A minimum of 40 lessons a year is offered.  Usually, the actual lesson count comes to 42 or even 43, but those extra lessons are regarded as your smiles bonus.  They come free with the membership when they come.
  • On public holidays (such as Youth Day and Heritage Day), the Studio is closed (this remains the same).
  • Holidays will be scheduled as blocks.  This also makes it clear when one term ends and another starts.
  • While public holidays will be observed, long weekends resulting from these will not.  Lessons continue where the Studio has demarcated active term.
  • Mid-term breaks, holiday overlaps etc etc:  You have 3 options concerning your lessons.
    1. Lessons are offered, as long as the time falls into active studio term.  You can observe your lesson even though the school may be closed.  If the school grounds are inaccessible, an alternative venue may be organized.
    2. If you are away, consider rescheduling; it is part of the Studio Policy to offer rescheduling (within reason – I’ll bring out the detailed missed-lesson policy soon).  This policy stands even if the reason you are away is not a long weekend.  This is purely between you and the Studio; the school’s schedule has no impact.
    3. Or you may forfeit the lesson.  This is your choice.  However forfeited lessons don’t carry a refund and cannot be deducted from the next fees payment.  It is usually the better choice to reschedule.

Lessons that are offered but not observed, still have to be paid for, according to the current studio rules.  The teacher’s time was booked; the teacher can do nothing else with this time.  To ride an old metaphor to death, if you buy a MacDonalds burger but throw half of it away, does MacDonalds owe you the money back for half a burger?  Do they owe you another half-a-burger?  Even catch-up lessons are already a concession by the teacher; according to the current Studio Rules a lesson missed by the student can in general not be caught up.  Nevertheless, we are consistently trying to catch up each and every last missed lesson.  However if a catch-up lesson is offered but rejected in principle, there is nothing further we can do to help.  The missed lesson cannot be refunded anyway.

Following this, it is advisable to mark the active studio term (or alternatively the studio holidays) with highlighter in your year planner.  

Concerning lessons you miss:

Essentially, as with any membership, if you don’t utilize the benefits you lose them.  However fair-mindedness dictates that if you lost a lesson due to something you couldn’t prevent, we offer you a rescheduling.  It is up to you to take it or leave it.  (This does not include forgotten instruments or sports practices. If you have a consistent problem with interfering sports schedules, come to me for a different lesson slot.)

If a lesson was missed because the Studio had a problem (such as the day my steering wheel came off as I started my car), such a lesson is always rescheduled.

At no point do lessons missed or lost, influence the membership fee.

Lessons expected and not received outside of Studio Term are not missed lessons.  It is ludicrous that this even needs to be mentioned.  If I buy a burger at MacDonalds and expect a pineapple slice in it, though they never offer one, that doesn’t mean they now owe me a pineapple slice.  I’m hoping that the membership model will make this easier to comprehend.

What changes financially?

For existing students, essentially nothing changes.  If you are paying x amount per month for your lessons now, you’ll be paying x (with inflation-based annual adjustment) per month next year.  It is not about the price tag, at all.

You can contact me if you want to discuss this, at this email: violinlyz@gmail.com.

Critting a Studio Concert

performers
All performers onstage please. (Except those who left early?)

IMG_0138

Our Studio Concerts are for the benefit of our students.

With the next Studio Concert imminent on the 24th of October, I’d like to address some post-concert crit I received on the way things were drawn up at the last concert, from various people who were present.

Usually the most comment we get for our concerts are that it went very well, usually from relieved parents and students.  However it is interesting and relevant to get guests and audience to voice their concerns, along with students and parents.  This usually only happens after a very well-attended and successful concert.  The smaller concerts don’t draw much comment.

Firstly let me reiterate that we are very proud of our students.  Everyone performed to the best of their abilities and current standard at the time.  I’m also especially impressed that so many of our students made it.  There are some concerts during which we sit with only a half-hour of program, because of all sorts of reasons. 

 

“It was too long.”

A studio concert can range in time from 30 minutes to 3 hours.  This depends on the performers, the quality and length of the pieces, but to the largest extent on how many attend.  It also depends on how long the interval is stretched, whether there are inconsistencies etc.   Though the stage direction went smoothly, this concert was exceptionally well attended, adding length. 

A classical symphony concert will usually take 2 – 3 hours, with interval.  Forget escaping an opera under 3 hours.  And a common school concert, with every class performing something, can draw on interminably.  

However a lot of us are not used to this culture.  I know that the short snippets that get performed during school assemblies most certainly can’t be called a “concert”. Also, most movies on the circuits are not longer than 90 minutes (take note, there is no interval).   The definition of a concert is an evening or afternoon dedicated to music.

But I have to admit, there was one factor that did lengthen our studio concert beyond its normal duration; this was the act of inviting a friend to let three of her students perform numbers too.  

 

“It wasn’t the singers (the guest artists) that lengthened the show; it was the violins.”

Pardon me, but this is the concert for the violins and guitars.  The Studio Concert, let me hammer this point home, is for the benefit of our students.  We organize it, book the hall, draw up the program etc.  The purpose of the concert is that each of our students, no matter how raw, gets the benefit of stage experience.  It is part of our teaching program.

Yes, it was the inclusion of three external numbers for the purpose of bringing in more variety, that lengthened the concert by another 15 minutes.  I still feel it was a good move.  Relatively, the concert was not overly long; it started around 20 past 6 and was finished around 9h, which time included an interval.

On a related note, seeing that the visiting studio of course put forward its three best singers (as opposed to all our violinists and guitarists, from raw beginners to advanced), it gives a skewed impression of the quality of our studio.  On my list is to organize a concert at some point in which only our best students perform, along with the best from other studios.  However that will not be our studio concert which will always include our beginners.

 

“Your beginners shouldn’t play so many pieces.”

Let me remind you:  The concert is for the benefit of our students.  Not of the audience which consists of parents and supporters.  

When a performer stands on stage facing an audience that is well-dressed and listening with all ears, the performer experiences a certain level of intimidation.  This is commonly known as “stage fright”.  The act of lifting one’s violin and playing anyway, takes courage; but beyond that it takes skill controlling the bow and fingers in the presence of all that adrenaline (it makes the bow shake and the hands sweat, which makes your left hand pretty slippery and uncontrollable).

Once you’ve been playing for a minute or two, the adrenaline subsides.  If you are a raw beginner, you’ve just begun to feel a bit more familiar with the audience when your song is over.  This is why it is important that each (even the raw beginner) plays two songs at least.

 

“Why did that one little girl who played so well only get to play one song, and the other one who didn’t do well at all, play three?”

An intelligent question with an unexpected answer.  The little girl that played so well, had prepared three pieces but had forgotten her sheet music at another place.  So she literally only played the song for which she could source the music from a friend.  It was her first time onstage and it served to bring home the lesson that you need to remember your music and preferably, know your pieces by heart.

The other little girl was also onstage for the first time.  She plays better in a private setting and was terribly frightened of the audience; however, she courageously pushed through and performed each of her pieces.  This made me very proud.  She also learnt something:  You need to practice a lot more than you think you need to, because technique vanishes in the presence of fear.

 

 “The pieces the advanced duo performed, were very long, and also the pieces your son played.”

Classical music works like this:  You start at “I’m a little Teapot” and progress to Bach’s Double Concerto.  Performing longer pieces is also part of our teaching program.  It prepares the students for exams and recitals, for gigs, performances and a career in music.  For those who don’t intend to study music:  As someone pointed out years in the past, our studio stage might be the only opportunity they get in their lives to perform properly before a real audience.  These are memories that are kept forever.

Besides, consider this:  If my advanced students played longer, it’s because they deserved it (with many years of diligent practice).  Also, proportionally the quality of the music is so much better on the higher level that it fully justifies giving it a “disproportional” amount of air space.

The advanced students are the audience’s reward for listening to the raw beginners.  Don’t shorten the enjoyable parts.

 

“The advanced students shouldn’t play so many pieces.”

Yes they should.  See the point above.  They have deserved it.

 

“You should hold a separate concert for beginners and advanced.”

No I shouldn’t. How many beginners, do you believe, would come to the concert of the advanced?  Yet it is important that the beginners can see where they are heading.  They need to hear the advanced students and all the phases inbetween, so that they can mentally map their path and set goals.  It serves to inspire them to practice.

Also, if the beginners were to hold their own concert and half the parents had something on that day, how sad would that concert be?  It would certainly not be worth renting that beautiful concert hall.  The beginners are benefiting from the advanced students playing in the same concert.

There are however, on occasion, house concerts to which the best of our students are invited to perform.  Come to these and see how many of the beginners you spot in the audience.

 

“Your students should play with backing tracks.”

If that is the case, you find yourself in the wrong studio.  Yes, the guest artists performed with backing tracks, and so did one of the guitarists.  This is to remind people that there is such an option (and of course the guest artists were singers, so they needed accompaniment – in the absence of a good pianist, a backing track is a good option).

But the spirit of classical music that we teach is not a funky backing track but live accompaniment, and sometimes unaccompanied performance.  It is the spirit of musicians performing together, not of tinned music.  If you want tinned music, why come to a concert at all?

 

“We had to sit for very long.”

I’m sorry if this caused some people backache.  The chairs at the Tauromenium aren’t of the worst quality; yet if you find you can’t sit long enough to go through a concert without pain, please feel free to stand up or walk around outside at intervals.  This is not an ultra-formal Gala event; just a studio concert.  Even at a Gala event nobody should be forced to sit to the point of pain.

However let me repeat, the concerts are not abnormally long.  There is only an abnormally high proportion of people whose backs are wrecked from too many hours in the car, from accidents and from overwork.  This is regrettable and we are working hard to fix that situation.  Shortening a concert that gives youngsters a chance to perform in a high-class setting, is not the answer to this.

 

So we’ll see you at the concert in October!

If the October concert can be as well-attended as the previous one was, this will be a major cause for celebration.  I would like to call on all our students, violin or guitar, to come and participate.  There is a party after the concert, always; it’s called a “reception” and has the most delicious treats and sweets.  

Moms with small toddlers:  It’s a tough call, I know.  If your tiny children (the ones that are younger than 4 or 5 and will not enjoy the music) can be left in the care of a kindly grandmother or babysitter, you will have so much more energy and get so much more enjoyment out of the achievement of your young performer, as well as her reactions to the more advanced numbers.

All these objections make it sound as though it wasn’t a good concert.  On the contrary, it was a great concert, and everyone enjoyed it tremendously. It will be interesting to see how much our young ones who were raw beginners last time, have progressed in 6 months.  (I’ll give you a clue:  You’ll be amazed.)

Third Term starts on 21st July

2 Studio Rules explained

 

As per our Studio Rules, the Violin Studio bases its terms on the Gauteng public school terms.

This means that we are restarting with lessons, Violin Club and the whole lot on the 21st of July.

It came as a surprise to me that Woodhill is already restarting school this week; however this does not affect the Studio’s terms as we are a private teaching studio contracted out by WHC.  You will also occasionally find that there are still lessons when you have a mid-term break or your holiday starts early.

We had to standardize this.  Standardizing a schedule is one of the worst nightmares in running a music, arts or drama studio.  For this same reason, we have the rule that if a lesson is missed, it is not caught up unless the student 1) suddenly got ill or had a sudden injury, or 2) gives 24 hours notice of missing the lesson.

Woodhill has an exciting schedule with an upcoming talent evening on the 24th of July.  Of our violin kids, 3 who started this year are already participating in the orchestra.  This is an exceptional achievement.  Well done to Merissa, Kaylyn and Megan.

See you all on Tuesday.

Studio Concert, 16 May, Taurominium

The Studio Concert was a beautiful success.

Violin Club in the Taurominium Foyer.
My little Sweeties from the Violin Club, Woodhill College. The lovely lady in the back (left) is my friend Vivienne, and the weirdo is yours truly.

 

 

Guitar performance
Hubbs with a student.

 

Meggi Performance
With my Mini-Meg.

 

Ray Performance
Playing Davy Jones’ Theme with Ray

 

Stars
Star Performers Dominique and Marguerite
guitarist
Brave and good. Haven’t heard the Asturias played at such a pace in a while.

 

food
How they spoil us…

 

performers
All performers onstage please. (Except those who left early?)

 

The mother of our two Stars (D and M) surprised me by giving us an orchid as a thankyou.

My dear sweets!  The pleasure is all mine – I adore playing music with your children.  What a concert it was!  Our performers really outdid themselves.  I’m also very impressed with our studio parents:  Hardly anyone missing!

There was a guest teacher who brought three of her singers along as a treat, for all of us to enjoy.  Thanks for coming, Christie!  I’ll post pics of her and her singers once I have them (these snaps were taken by my oldest daughter and are very selective – I think she was enjoying the singing too much to remember to snap.)

I am elated and exhausted.  The last concert that was this good was in 2010.  (Though we had excellent performances inbetween.)

Meggi’s comment on the Violin Club (Twinklers):  “They’re so cute, they’re fluffy!”

Megs, can you remember when you were a twinkler?

Twinklers in 2010.  Recognize 2 of them?
Twinklers in 2010. Recognize 2 of them?

 

 

Studio Concert, 16 May

We’re all pretty excited about the Studio Concert that is scheduled for the 16th of May, at the usual venue, the beautiful small theatre in Waterkloof.

(It is a studio concert, not an open concert, hence no address.  Enquire with your teacher.)

The performances promise to bring a lot of variety, from the ever-present “Twinkles” (for which we haven’t had such a strong ensemble since 2010), to pieces by Rameau, Glaszunov and, with luck, Monti.

I’m pretty curious what the guitarists will bring to the table.

With luck, too, we will be hearing a vocal duet and also some performances of instruments from outside the studio:  Piano, and ukulele.

This will be a concert well worth attending.

(And yes, music does make you smarter.)  😉

Surely you are kidding??

An article in 24.com claims that evidence has been found that music does not make children smarter.
This is the answer, from someone who holds degrees in research and psychology.

In an article from December last year, 24.com (our foremost Scientific Journal) categorically states that

Music does not make your child smarter.

http://www.health24.com/Parenting/Child/News/Music-lessons-dont-make-kids-smarter-20131212

 

The article cites 2 studies, done in total on 2 separate groups of preschoolers (and their parents).  The one study compared IQ of 15 toddlers doing “musical activities” with their parents and in class, with another group of 14 toddlers doing visual arts “activities” and found no significant differences.

The second study spanned a total of a whopping 45 more children (no ages specified, nor is the length of the study specified) where some of them got some sort of musical instruction and the others did not.  Once again, no changes noted.

The conclusion drawn from this is that the well-established observation that musical instruction improves a child’s (and adult’s) mental abilities, is wrong.  Not only this, but the article suggests that there is “very little evidence” to support this widely held “belief”.

Dear Masters of Research.

If ever I saw pseudoscience, this is it!

1) You did not do your research concerning the actual effect you are trying to challenge.  (I copy references from a well-researched summary into this blog post as I link to it:  “The Benefits of Music” by Iain Rossouw.  This is only because I’m too lazy to find all 36 references myself again).  There is plenty of very solid evidence!  You need not reinvent the wheel.

2) To draw any conclusions from a sample less than 30 is biostatistically incorrect.  Biostatistics has defined a sample of 30 as the minimum sample size for any kind of statistic conclusion.  Therefore, your study with 15 vs 14 falls out of the picture.

3) There is so little information about the second study in the 24.com article that I can’t draw any conclusions from it.  What kind of musical tuition?  For how long?  How old were these children?  So I’ll disregard that study entirely until someone can bring me more details so that I can discuss it intelligently.

4) But let’s look closer at the first study.

Firstly:  I quote directly:

“We wanted to test the effects of the type of music education that actually happens in the real world, and we wanted to study the effect in young children, so we implemented a parent-child music enrichment programme with preschoolers,” Mehr explained. “The goal is to encourage musical play between parents and children in a classroom environment, which gives parents a strong repertoire of musical activities they can continue to use at home with their kids.”

A “parent-child music enrichment programme” ??  “Musical play between parents and children in a classroom environment” -?

 

Let’s draw an obvious parallel:

It’s a widely held belief that swimming is an activity that can benefit asthma sufferers.

I personally have not researched this topic beyond hearsay; so I’ll simply say there is very little evidence supporting this view.

Then I go and put a whole bunch of toddlers with asthma into a splashpool, and take an equal number and put them onto a playground, and conclude that no, swimming had absolutely no effect on these toddlers.

This is the comparison that is drawn here.  You see it?

 

The “control” group did art.

Art also benefits children’s mental processes!  Who said that just because music does, art doesn’t?

 

A toddler’s splashpool vs Olympic training:

Learning an instrument such as the violin takes focus, persistence, and it trains several abilities out of necessity.  This does not happen overnight.  You cannot conduct such a study for 2 weeks or even 3 months.  You’d have to go for at least a year – and then, what you see is indeed impressive.

You cannot compare a school-aged child seriously studying the violin, with a toddler doing “parent-child musical enrichment activities”.  Honestly??

 

Of course music makes your child smarter!  In particular, learning a complex musical instrument over a timespan is what makes your child smarter, not the incidental exposure to “activities”.  

Playing chess will also make your child smarter, as will solving math sums.  There are many learning modules that actually make your child smarter, by the very act of learning!  Learning a complex musical instrument is one of the best.

 

Then what is the agenda behind this obviously misleading article?

Other than to further dismantle what remnants of European culture there may be in South Africa?

I am horrified that such blatant untruths get spread so thickly in our very best media service!  Where is the editor, did he/she not see this?

 

Here are the promised references to support the “widespread belief”:

(thought I’d add this:

Google search for “The Benefits of Music” – knock yourself out!)

 

References:

1— Nature Neuroscience, April 2007

2Journal for Research in Music Education, June 2007; Dr. Christopher Johnson, Jenny Memmott

3— From Empathy, Arts and Social Studies, 2000; Konrad, R.R.

4— Dr. Laurel Trainor, Prof. of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behavior at McMaster University, 2006

5—NELS:88 First Follow-up, 1990, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington DC

6—The Midland Chemist (American Chemical Society) Vol. 42, No.1, Feb. 2005

7—From Nature, May 23, 1996; Gardiner, Fox, Jeffrey and Knowles

8— From Critical Links: Learning in the Arts and Student Academic and Social Development, Arts Education Partnership, 2002

9—Academic Preparation for College: What Students Need to Know and Be Able to Do, 1983 [still in use], The College Board, New York

10Catterall, James S., Richard Chapleau, and John Iwanaga. “Involvement in the Arts and Human Development: General Involvement and Intensive Involvement in Music and Theater Arts.” Los Angeles, CA: The Imagination Project at UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, 1999.

11—Shaw, Rauscher, Levine, Wright, Dennis and Newcomb, “Music training causes long-term enhancement of preschool children’s spatial-temporal reasoning,” Neurological Research, Vol. 19, February 1997

12— From “The Music in Our Minds,” Educational Leadership, Vol. 56, #3; Norman M. Weinberger

13Sergent, J., Zuck, E., Tenial, S., and MacDonall, B. (1992). Distributed neural network underlying musical sight reading and keyboard performance. Science, 257, 106-109.

14—Schlaug, G., Jancke, L., Huang, Y., and Steinmetz, H. (1994). In vivo morphometry of interhem ispheric assymetry and connectivity in musicians. In I. Deliege (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3d international conference for music perception and cognition (pp. 417-418). Liege, Belgium.

15—From Nature, April 23, 1998; Christian Pantev, et al

16—From The Role of the Fine and Performing Arts in High School Dropout Prevention, 2002; Barry, N., J. Taylor, and K. Walls

17—Gardiner, Fox, Jeffrey and Knowles, as reported in Nature, May 23, 1996

18( Debby Mitchell, University of Central Florida.)

19TCAMS Professional Resource Center, 2000.

20Dynamic Presentations Unlimited Research; Band Director Focus Groups, December 2001. As referenced in “Discover the Power of Music Education,” Yamaha Advocacy Report, 2002, pg. 2.

21 http://www.childrensmusicworkshop.com/advocacy/12benefits.html

23 Rauscher, Shaw & Ky, 1993

 

25 CaseForMusicEducation.pdf (Lang Lang International Foundation)

26 University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh; NAMM 1997 publication: “Making Music Makes You Smarter.”

27 The Arts Education Partnership, 1999

28— From Houston Chronicle, January 11, 1998

29— Commission on Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report. Reported in Houston Chronicle, January, 1998

30— The Associated Press, October, 1999

31— As reported in “The Case for Music in the Schools,” Phi Delta Kappan, February 1994

32— Those with More Education and Higher Household Incomes are More Likely to Have Had Music Education: Music education Influences Level of Personal Fulfillment for Many U.S. Adults.” The Harris Poll® #112, November 12, 2007

33—Grant Venerable, “The Paradox of the Silicon Savior,” as reported in “The Case for Sequential Music Education in the Core Curriculum of the Public Schools,” The Center for the Arts in the Basic Curriculum, New York, 1989

34—.– CaseForMusicEducation (Lang Lang International Foundation)

(I took two references out that no longer link – apparently johnmastro’s blog was either edited or removed by its author.  Could be he got tired of blogging.  Sorry – not 36 refs, only 32 now.  Supplement with the new ones you find on Google.)

 

You can read the review here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/109130987/The-Benefits-of-Music-A-Review

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started