Skip to content

[Merged by Bors] - Remove sync await points#3036

Closed
divagant-martian wants to merge 64 commits intosigp:unstablefrom
divagant-martian:unblock-sync
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - Remove sync await points#3036
divagant-martian wants to merge 64 commits intosigp:unstablefrom
divagant-martian:unblock-sync

Conversation

@divagant-martian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@divagant-martian divagant-martian commented Feb 21, 2022

Issue Addressed

Removes the await points in sync waiting for a processor response for rpc block processing. Built on top of #3029
This also handles a couple of bugs in the previous code and adds a relatively comprehensive test suite.

@divagant-martian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@AgeManning this is running in Toronto to dissuade some doubts I have, but it's otherwise ready. Multiple peers per requests is in the next pr

@divagant-martian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

divagant-martian commented Mar 16, 2022

Let's wait a bit more on this

@divagant-martian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ready again thanks to @pawanjay176

@divagant-martian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@michaelsproul why is this blocked?

@michaelsproul
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

why is this blocked?

was blocked on the v2.1.4 release but should be good to go now I think!

@AgeManning
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2022
## Issue Addressed

Removes the await points in sync waiting for a processor response for rpc block processing. Built on top of #3029 
This also handles a couple of bugs in the previous code and adds a relatively comprehensive test suite.
@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bors bot commented Mar 21, 2022

Build failed:

@michaelsproul
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

looks like the Python versioning issue that @realbigsean recently fixed in #3056. not sure why it would be inconsistent, let's try again

bors retry

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2022
## Issue Addressed

Removes the await points in sync waiting for a processor response for rpc block processing. Built on top of #3029 
This also handles a couple of bugs in the previous code and adds a relatively comprehensive test suite.
@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bors bot commented Mar 21, 2022

Build failed:

@michaelsproul
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Now that #3105 is merged let's try again

bors retry

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2022
## Issue Addressed

Removes the await points in sync waiting for a processor response for rpc block processing. Built on top of #3029 
This also handles a couple of bugs in the previous code and adds a relatively comprehensive test suite.
@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bors bot commented Mar 22, 2022

Build failed:

@michaelsproul
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🙏

bors +

@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bors bot commented Mar 23, 2022

Did you mean "r+"?

@michaelsproul
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
## Issue Addressed

Removes the await points in sync waiting for a processor response for rpc block processing. Built on top of #3029 
This also handles a couple of bugs in the previous code and adds a relatively comprehensive test suite.
@bors bors bot changed the title Remove sync await points [Merged by Bors] - Remove sync await points Mar 23, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Mar 23, 2022
paulhauner pushed a commit to paulhauner/lighthouse that referenced this pull request May 6, 2022
## Issue Addressed

Removes the await points in sync waiting for a processor response for rpc block processing. Built on top of sigp#3029 
This also handles a couple of bugs in the previous code and adds a relatively comprehensive test suite.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants