CircleCI build failures summary

As of commit 26b760b:

• 1/2 broken upstream at merge base 20a2e52 (see grid view)
  • You may want to rebase on the viable/strict branch (see its recency history):
    • If your commit is newer than viable/strict, you can try basing on an older, stable commit:

      git fetch viable/strict
      git rebase --onto viable/strict $(git merge-base origin/master HEAD)
      

    • If your commit is older than viable/strict:

      git fetch viable/strict
      git rebase viable/strict
      

• 1/2 failures introduced in this PR

Detailed failure analysis

One may explore the probable reasons each build failed interactively on the Dr. CI website.

1 new failure recognized by patterns

The following build failures don't appear to be due to upstream breakage:

pytorch_xla_linux_xenial_py3_6_clang7_test (1/1)

Step: "Test" (details)

Dec 13 02:24:25 +++ eval 'extract_trap_cmd ' 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++++ extract_trap_cmd 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++++ printf '%s\n' '' 
Dec 13 02:24:25 +++ printf '%s\n' cleanup 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++ trap -- ' 
Dec 13 02:24:25 cleanup' EXIT 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++ which sccache 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++ sccache --stop-server 
Dec 13 02:24:25 Stopping sccache server... 
Dec 13 02:24:25 error: couldn't connect to server 
Dec 13 02:24:25 caused by: Connection refused (os error 111) 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++ true 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++ rm /var/lib/jenkins/sccache_error.log 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++ SCCACHE_ERROR_LOG=/var/lib/jenkins/sccache_error.log 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++ SCCACHE_IDLE_TIMEOUT=1200 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++ RUST_LOG=sccache::server=error 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++ sccache --start-server 
Dec 13 02:24:25 Starting sccache server... 
Dec 13 02:24:25 ++ sccache --zero-stats 
Dec 13 02:24:25 Compile requests                 0 
Dec 13 02:24:25 Compile requests executed        0 

1 failure not recognized by patterns:

Job	Step	Status
pytorch_linux_xenial_cuda9_cudnn7_py3_build	Build	🛑 Broken upstream

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI.
Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker.

This comment has been revised 5 times.

@VitalyFedyunin merged this pull request in c35cddb.

This may qualify as a BC-breaking change since we have some code that implicitly assumes the result of some op is contiguous. Might be better to mention it in release notes.