Skip to content

[dynamo] remove unused OptimizeCtx field - export#113901

Closed
jon-chuang wants to merge 7 commits intogh/jon-chuang/39/basefrom
gh/jon-chuang/39/head
Closed

[dynamo] remove unused OptimizeCtx field - export#113901
jon-chuang wants to merge 7 commits intogh/jon-chuang/39/basefrom
gh/jon-chuang/39/head

Conversation

@jon-chuang
Copy link
Collaborator

@jon-chuang jon-chuang commented Nov 16, 2023

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jon-chuang jon-chuang mentioned this pull request Nov 16, 2023
4 tasks
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 16, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/113901

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit b3ae64f with merge base 0ea126e (image):

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@jon-chuang jon-chuang changed the title remove unused - export field [dynamo] remove unused OptimizeCtx field - export Nov 16, 2023
This is only an internal API, so it's not really a BC breaking concern

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

ezyang commented Nov 17, 2023

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Nov 17, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

This is only an internal API, so it's not really a BC breaking concern

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jon-chuang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

This is only an internal API, so it's not really a BC breaking concern

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: New commits were pushed while merging. Please rerun the merge command.

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

This is only an internal API, so it's not really a BC breaking concern

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
This is only an internal API, so it's not really a BC breaking concern

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jon-chuang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

This is only an internal API, so it's not really a BC breaking concern

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jon-chuang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

The merge job was canceled. If you believe this is a mistake, then you can re trigger it through pytorch-bot.

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2023
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2023
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/jon-chuang/39/head branch November 20, 2023 15:28
davidberard98 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2023
davidberard98 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2023
…x` field - export (#113901)""

This reverts commit b62230a.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
davidberard98 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2023
#113901)""

This reverts commit b62230a.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2023
#115401)

This reverts commit b62230a.

Differential Revision: [D52001024](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D52001024)
Pull Request resolved: #115401
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
ghstack dependencies: #115384
dmenig pushed a commit to dmenig/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants