DOC: Improve the docsting of Series.iteritems#24879
DOC: Improve the docsting of Series.iteritems#24879WillAyd merged 8 commits intopandas-dev:masterfrom
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #24879 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.39% 92.39%
=======================================
Files 166 166
Lines 52410 52410
=======================================
Hits 48422 48422
Misses 3988 3988
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #24879 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.25% 91.25% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 172 172
Lines 52977 52977
==========================================
- Hits 48343 48342 -1
- Misses 4634 4635 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
TomAugspurger
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks nice overall.
I'm not entirely sure about the focus on "creating a new series". I think the thing to focus on is other functions that can only take scalar inputs (are not vectorized). You can do many things with the output of the non-vectorized method (including creating a new series).
pandas/core/series.py
Outdated
| """ | ||
| Lazily iterate over (index, value) tuples. | ||
|
|
||
| This method returns a zip of tuples (index, value). This is useful When |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about "iterable" instead of "zip"?
pandas/core/series.py
Outdated
| Lazily iterate over (index, value) tuples. | ||
|
|
||
| This method returns a zip of tuples (index, value). This is useful When | ||
| one want to create new series from the values of an old one. Be aware |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"one wants" (but "you want" probably sounds better)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure about creating a new series using itertuples. I'd rather say something about lazily iterating over the index, value pairs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure to perfectly get what you mean. I tried to add an example where vectorization is not possible (as far as I know maybe I am wrong)
pandas/core/series.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| Returns | ||
| ------- | ||
| zip |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if people have thoughts here. I guess zip is technically a type... But I think Iterable is probably better-known.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree. I think iterable would be more user-friendly.
pandas/core/series.py
Outdated
| Returns | ||
| ------- | ||
| zip | ||
| Iterable tuples (index, value) of the Series. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Iterable of tuples containing the (index, value) pairs from a Series.
|
Thanks for those comments, I tried to improve the docstring accordingly to your remarks. |
pandas/core/series.py
Outdated
| Lazily iterate over (index, value) tuples. | ||
|
|
||
| This method returns an iterable tuple (index, value). This is | ||
| convienient if you want to create a a Lazy iterator. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are 2 as on this line. Lowercase l on Lazy
pandas/core/series.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| See Also | ||
| -------- | ||
| Series.apply : Invoke function on values of Series. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure if Series.apply and Series.map are too related to this method. I would instead reference Series.items
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unless I am mistaken, it seems to me that Series.iteritems and Series.items are the same method. The docstring of items and iteritems will be the same I don't think that this is a good idea.
I will mention it in the description instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree that apply and map aren't closely enough related to include here - can you remove?
pandas/core/series.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| See Also | ||
| -------- | ||
| Series.apply : Invoke function on values of Series. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree that apply and map aren't closely enough related to include here - can you remove?
|
@HubertKl can you update, removing Series.apply and Series.map in the See Also? |
|
@HubertKl can you update to comments |
|
Sorry for the delay. I modified the PR accordingly to the requests. |
|
Thanks @HubertKl ! |
* origin/master: DOC: clean bug fix section in whatsnew (pandas-dev#25792) DOC: Fixed PeriodArray api ref (pandas-dev#25526) Move locale code out of tm, into _config (pandas-dev#25757) Unpin pycodestyle (pandas-dev#25789) Add test for rdivmod on EA array (GH23287) (pandas-dev#24047) ENH: Support datetime.timezone objects (pandas-dev#25065) Cython language level 3 (pandas-dev#24538) API: concat on sparse values (pandas-dev#25719) TST: assert_produces_warning works with filterwarnings (pandas-dev#25721) make core.config self-contained (pandas-dev#25613) CLN: replace %s syntax with .format in pandas.io.parsers (pandas-dev#24721) TST: Check pytables<3.5.1 when skipping (pandas-dev#25773) DOC: Fix typo in docstring of DataFrame.memory_usage (pandas-dev#25770) Replace dicts with OrderedDicts in groupby aggregation functions (pandas-dev#25693) TST: Fixturize tests/frame/test_missing.py (pandas-dev#25640) DOC: Improve the docsting of Series.iteritems (pandas-dev#24879) DOC: Fix function name. (pandas-dev#25751) Implementing iso_week_year support for to_datetime (pandas-dev#25541) DOC: clarify corr behaviour when using a callable (pandas-dev#25732) remove unnecessary check_output (pandas-dev#25755) # Conflicts: # doc/source/whatsnew/v0.25.0.rst
git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff