Skip to content

refactor: run clippy with --all-targets#333

Merged
Boshen merged 1 commit intomainfrom
12-11-refactor_run_clippy_with_--all-targets_
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

refactor: run clippy with --all-targets#333
Boshen merged 1 commit intomainfrom
12-11-refactor_run_clippy_with_--all-targets_

Conversation

@Boshen
Copy link
Member

@Boshen Boshen commented Dec 11, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Member Author

Boshen commented Dec 11, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.94%. Comparing base (8844add) to head (53a2df0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #333   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.94%   96.94%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines        2458     2458           
=======================================
  Hits         2383     2383           
  Misses         75       75           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 11, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #333 will degrade performances by 10.57%

Comparing 12-11-refactor_run_clippy_with_--all-targets_ (53a2df0) with main (8844add)

Summary

❌ 1 regressions
✅ 2 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark main 12-11-refactor_run_clippy_with_--all-targets_ Change
resolver[multi-thread] 476.1 µs 532.3 µs -10.57%

@Boshen Boshen merged commit b00b2b8 into main Dec 11, 2024
Copy link
Member Author

Boshen commented Dec 11, 2024

Merge activity

  • Dec 11, 7:19 AM EST: A user merged this pull request with Graphite.

@Boshen Boshen deleted the 12-11-refactor_run_clippy_with_--all-targets_ branch December 11, 2024 12:19
@Boshen Boshen mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2024
Boshen added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
## 🤖 New release
* `oxc_resolver`: 2.1.1 -> 3.0.0 (⚠️ API breaking changes)

### ⚠️ `oxc_resolver` breaking changes

```
--- failure trait_method_added: pub trait method added ---

Description:
A non-sealed public trait added a new method without a default implementation, which breaks downstream implementations of the trait
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/semver.html#trait-new-item-no-default
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.37.0/src/lints/trait_method_added.ron

Failed in:
  trait method oxc_resolver::FileSystem::read_link in file /tmp/.tmptmsXac/oxc-resolver/src/file_system.rs:52

--- failure trait_method_missing: pub trait method removed or renamed ---

Description:
A trait method is no longer callable, and may have been renamed or removed entirely.
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/semver.html#major-any-change-to-trait-item-signatures
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.37.0/src/lints/trait_method_missing.ron

Failed in:
  method canonicalize of trait FileSystem, previously in file /tmp/.tmpa9nJqt/oxc_resolver/src/file_system.rs:62
```

<details><summary><i><b>Changelog</b></i></summary><p>

<blockquote>

##
[3.0.0](oxc_resolver-v2.1.1...oxc_resolver-v3.0.0)
- 2024-12-12

### Added

- [**breaking**] replace `FileSystem::canonicalize` with
`FileSystem::read_link` (#331)
- faster and stable path hash for the cache (#328)

### Other

- guard `load_alias` on hot path (#339)
- use `as_os_str` for `Hash` and `PartialEq` operations (#338)
- run clippy with `--all-targets` (#333)
- increase hash size (#329)
- add dprint (#326)
- update dependencies
- *(deps)* update rust crates
- update README logo
</blockquote>


</p></details>

---
This PR was generated with
[release-plz](https://github.com/release-plz/release-plz/).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant