Skip to content

Fix for dismiss braille message issue of remove redundant braille.BrailleHandler.update executions#16501

Merged
seanbudd merged 1 commit into
nvaccess:masterfrom
burmancomp:fixBrailleRedundantUpdates
May 8, 2024
Merged

Fix for dismiss braille message issue of remove redundant braille.BrailleHandler.update executions#16501
seanbudd merged 1 commit into
nvaccess:masterfrom
burmancomp:fixBrailleRedundantUpdates

Conversation

@burmancomp

@burmancomp burmancomp commented May 7, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Link to issue number:

fixes #16463

Summary of the issue:

Fix for issue of #16463
where braille message was not dismissed.

Description of user facing changes

Braille message should be dismissed when moving cursor.

Description of development approach

if buffer is message buffer BrailleHandler._dismissMessage is executed before BrailleHandler.scrollToCursorOrSelection.

Testing strategy:

message dismissed

Known issues with pull request:

none at this moment

Code Review Checklist:

  • Documentation:
    • Change log entry
    • User Documentation
    • Developer / Technical Documentation
    • Context sensitive help for GUI changes
  • Testing:
    • Unit tests
    • System (end to end) tests
    • Manual testing
  • UX of all users considered:
    • Speech
    • Braille
    • Low Vision
    • Different web browsers
    • Localization in other languages / culture than English
  • API is compatible with existing add-ons.
  • Security precautions taken.

@burmancomp burmancomp marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2024 15:45
@burmancomp burmancomp requested a review from a team as a code owner May 7, 2024 15:45
@burmancomp burmancomp requested a review from seanbudd May 7, 2024 15:45
@seanbudd seanbudd merged commit c30ef08 into nvaccess:master May 8, 2024
@nvaccessAuto nvaccessAuto added this to the 2024.3 milestone May 8, 2024
@burmancomp burmancomp deleted the fixBrailleRedundantUpdates branch May 8, 2024 06:29
burmancomp added a commit to burmancomp/nvda that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
seanbudd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
Reverts #16463 and #16501

Issues fixed
Issues reopened
Reopens #16456

Reason for revert
complexity

Can this PR be reimplemented? If so, what is required for the next attempt
at least execution of scrollToCursorOrSelection in _doNewObject
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants