Skip to content

[Merged by Bors] - feat: port Algebra.Ring.Regular#795

Closed
rosborn wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
Algebra.Ring.Regular
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - feat: port Algebra.Ring.Regular#795
rosborn wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
Algebra.Ring.Regular

Conversation

@rosborn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rosborn rosborn commented Nov 30, 2022

mathlib SHA: 4e42a9d0a79d151ee359c270e498b1a00cc6fa4e

Porting Notes:

  1. Basically no errors. Only needed to fix some lambdas having implicit arguments.

@rosborn rosborn added mathlib-port This is a port of a theory file from mathlib. awaiting-review labels Nov 30, 2022
@kim-em
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

kim-em commented Nov 30, 2022

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review labels Nov 30, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2022
mathlib SHA: 4e42a9d0a79d151ee359c270e498b1a00cc6fa4e

Porting Notes:
1. Basically no errors. Only needed to fix some lambdas having implicit arguments.
@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bors bot commented Nov 30, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat: port Algebra.Ring.Regular [Merged by Bors] - feat: port Algebra.Ring.Regular Nov 30, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Nov 30, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the Algebra.Ring.Regular branch November 30, 2022 05:17
bors bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib3 that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Regenerated from the [port status wiki page](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/wiki/mathlib4-port-status).
Relates to the following PRs:
* `algebra.field.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#668
* `algebra.group.commute`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#750
* `algebra.group_with_zero.commute`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#762
* `algebra.group_with_zero.semiconj`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#757
* `algebra.group_with_zero.units.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#735
* `algebra.hom.embedding`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#764
* `algebra.order.monoid.cancel.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#774
* `algebra.order.monoid.canonical.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#778
* `algebra.order.monoid.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#771
* `algebra.order.monoid.min_max`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#763
* `algebra.order.monoid.order_dual`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#786
* `algebra.order.sub.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#732
* `algebra.regular.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#758
* `algebra.ring.commute`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#759
* `algebra.ring.regular`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#795
* `algebra.ring.semiconj`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#751
* `control.applicative`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#798
* `control.functor`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#612
* `control.monad.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#752
* `data.countable.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#736
* `data.int.units`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#807
* `data.nat.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#729
* `data.nat.psub`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#806
* `data.nat.units`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#805
* `data.pi.algebra`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#564
* `data.prod.lex`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#783
* `logic.embedding.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#700
* `logic.equiv.option`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#674
* `order.bounded_order`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#697
* `order.with_bot`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#776
* `order.disjoint`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#773
* `order.min_max`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#728
* `order.prop_instances`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#792
* `order.rel_iso.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#772
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

mathlib-port This is a port of a theory file from mathlib. ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants