Skip to content

[CI] Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G#260423

Merged
delanni merged 2 commits intoelastic:mainfrom
delanni:investigations-disk-110
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

[CI] Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G#260423
delanni merged 2 commits intoelastic:mainfrom
delanni:investigations-disk-110

Conversation

@delanni
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@delanni delanni commented Mar 31, 2026

Summary

Increase investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board. We're on the brink of breaching the current 100g limits.

@delanni delanni requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2026 10:01
@delanni delanni added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes backport:all-open Backport to all branches that could still receive a release reviewer:skip-ai Team:Operations Kibana-Operations Team labels Mar 31, 2026
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

@macroscopeapp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

macroscopeapp bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Approvability

Verdict: Would Approve

This PR adds disk size configuration (110GB) to several Buildkite CI pipeline files for cypress tests. The changes are purely CI infrastructure resource allocation with no impact on production runtime behavior.

Macroscope would have approved this PR. Enable approvability here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TamerlanG TamerlanG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@delanni delanni merged commit f22bb09 into elastic:main Mar 31, 2026
18 checks passed
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Starting backport for target branches: 8.19, 9.2, 9.3

https://github.com/elastic/kibana/actions/runs/23798069613

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💔 All backports failed

Status Branch Result
8.19 Backport failed because of merge conflicts
9.2 Backport failed because of merge conflicts
9.3 Backport failed because of merge conflicts

Manual backport

To create the backport manually run:

node scripts/backport --pr 260423

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

delanni added a commit to delanni/kibana that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2026
## Summary
Increase investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board. We're on
the brink of breaching the current 100g limits.

(cherry picked from commit f22bb09)

# Conflicts:
#	.buildkite/pipelines/chrome_forward_testing.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/node_glibc_217.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/on_merge_fanout.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/pointer_compression.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/pull_request/security_solution/investigations.yml
delanni added a commit to delanni/kibana that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2026
## Summary
Increase investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board. We're on
the brink of breaching the current 100g limits.

(cherry picked from commit f22bb09)

# Conflicts:
#	.buildkite/pipelines/chrome_forward_testing.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/node_glibc_217.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/on_merge_fanout.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/pointer_compression.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/pull_request/security_solution/investigations.yml
mbondyra added a commit to mbondyra/kibana that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2026
…hanges

* commit 'd0e62a657916e84694a93983e513ce9e34e0b635': (27 commits)
  [Agent Builder] Agent overview page design updates (elastic#260468)
  [Inference UI] Add model detail flyout with endpoint management (elastic#260307)
  [Fleet] Update doc links in agent policy settings (elastic#260245)
  [Security Solution] show risk score in new flyout header (elastic#260187)
  Replace deprecated EUI icons in files owned by @elastic/kibana-security (elastic#255636)
  [Cases][Templates] Add DATE_PICKER field control type (elastic#260209)
  [SharedUX] Get spaces callout on each solution nav (elastic#259723)
  [SharedUX] Preserve feature visibility on solution change (elastic#259316)
  [CI] Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G (elastic#260423)
  [Agent Builder] Expose read-only conversations on plugin start contract (elastic#260435)
  [dasboards as code] drop panels with server errors (elastic#260073)
  [One Workflow] Add force-delete (hard delete) option for workflows (elastic#260391)
  [Agent Builder] Fix sidebar error handling error (elastic#260446)
  [Agent Builder] Add attachment origin to Converse API (elastic#259043)
  [Alerting v2] Fix rule results preview chart responsiveness (elastic#260444)
  [Streams] Processing error panel UI improvements (elastic#260028)
  fix flaky test: alert details error page timeout (elastic#260302)
  [Agent Builder] Add attachment origin to Converse API (elastic#259043)
  [One Workflow] Add more unit tests to workflows_extensions plugin (elastic#260384)
  [ResponseOps] Split alerting security_and_spaces group8 FTR config to fix CI timeout (elastic#260029)
  ...
delanni added a commit to delanni/kibana that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2026
## Summary
Increase investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board. We're on
the brink of breaching the current 100g limits.

(cherry picked from commit f22bb09)

# Conflicts:
#	.buildkite/pipelines/chrome_forward_testing.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/node_pointer_compression.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/on_merge_fanout.yml
#	.buildkite/pipelines/pull_request/security_solution/investigations.yml
@delanni
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

delanni commented Apr 1, 2026

💚 All backports created successfully

Status Branch Result
9.3
9.2
8.19

Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI.

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

delanni added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2026
…260492)

# Backport

This will backport the following commits from `main` to `9.3`:
- [[CI] Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G
(#260423)](#260423)

<!--- Backport version: 11.0.1 -->

### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sorenlouv/backport)

<!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Alex
Szabo","email":"alex.szabo@elastic.co"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2026-03-31T12:47:34Z","message":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G (#260423)\n\n##
Summary\nIncrease investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board.
We're on\nthe brink of breaching the current 100g
limits.","sha":"f22bb09c0d04905038ca1e6afabb975d805e9fca","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.4.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["Team:Operations","release_note:skip","backport:all-open","v9.4.0","reviewer:skip-ai"],"title":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to
110G","number":260423,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/260423","mergeCommit":{"message":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G (#260423)\n\n##
Summary\nIncrease investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board.
We're on\nthe brink of breaching the current 100g
limits.","sha":"f22bb09c0d04905038ca1e6afabb975d805e9fca"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.4.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.4.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/260423","number":260423,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G (#260423)\n\n##
Summary\nIncrease investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board.
We're on\nthe brink of breaching the current 100g
limits.","sha":"f22bb09c0d04905038ca1e6afabb975d805e9fca"}}]}]
BACKPORT-->
delanni added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2026
…260495)

# Backport

This will backport the following commits from `main` to `9.2`:
- [[CI] Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G
(#260423)](#260423)

<!--- Backport version: 11.0.1 -->

### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sorenlouv/backport)

<!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Alex
Szabo","email":"alex.szabo@elastic.co"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2026-03-31T12:47:34Z","message":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G (#260423)\n\n##
Summary\nIncrease investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board.
We're on\nthe brink of breaching the current 100g
limits.","sha":"f22bb09c0d04905038ca1e6afabb975d805e9fca","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.4.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["Team:Operations","release_note:skip","backport:all-open","v9.4.0","reviewer:skip-ai"],"title":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to
110G","number":260423,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/260423","mergeCommit":{"message":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G (#260423)\n\n##
Summary\nIncrease investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board.
We're on\nthe brink of breaching the current 100g
limits.","sha":"f22bb09c0d04905038ca1e6afabb975d805e9fca"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.4.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.4.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/260423","number":260423,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G (#260423)\n\n##
Summary\nIncrease investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board.
We're on\nthe brink of breaching the current 100g
limits.","sha":"f22bb09c0d04905038ca1e6afabb975d805e9fca"}}]}]
BACKPORT-->
delanni added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2026
…260625)

# Backport

This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.19`:
- [[CI] Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G
(#260423)](#260423)

<!--- Backport version: 11.0.1 -->

### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sorenlouv/backport)

<!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Alex
Szabo","email":"alex.szabo@elastic.co"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2026-03-31T12:47:34Z","message":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G (#260423)\n\n##
Summary\nIncrease investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board.
We're on\nthe brink of breaching the current 100g
limits.","sha":"f22bb09c0d04905038ca1e6afabb975d805e9fca","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.4.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["Team:Operations","release_note:skip","backport:all-open","v9.4.0","reviewer:skip-ai"],"title":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to
110G","number":260423,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/260423","mergeCommit":{"message":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G (#260423)\n\n##
Summary\nIncrease investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board.
We're on\nthe brink of breaching the current 100g
limits.","sha":"f22bb09c0d04905038ca1e6afabb975d805e9fca"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.4.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.4.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/260423","number":260423,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[CI]
Increase investigations cypress disks to 110G (#260423)\n\n##
Summary\nIncrease investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board.
We're on\nthe brink of breaching the current 100g
limits.","sha":"f22bb09c0d04905038ca1e6afabb975d805e9fca"}}]}]
BACKPORT-->
jeramysoucy pushed a commit to jeramysoucy/kibana that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2026
## Summary
Increase investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board. We're on
the brink of breaching the current 100g limits.
paulinashakirova pushed a commit to paulinashakirova/kibana that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2026
## Summary
Increase investigations disk sizes to 110Gb across the board. We're on
the brink of breaching the current 100g limits.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport:all-open Backport to all branches that could still receive a release release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes reviewer:skip-ai Team:Operations Kibana-Operations Team v8.19.14 v9.2.8 v9.3.3 v9.4.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants