debian: require libsnappy-dev for ceph#90
Merged
liewegas merged 1 commit intoceph:masterfrom Mar 6, 2013
grosskur:fix-debian-libsnappy
Merged
debian: require libsnappy-dev for ceph#90liewegas merged 1 commit intoceph:masterfrom grosskur:fix-debian-libsnappy
liewegas merged 1 commit intoceph:masterfrom
grosskur:fix-debian-libsnappy
Conversation
Debian builds are currently broken without this requirement.
liewegas
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2013
debian: require libsnappy-dev for ceph
chamdoo
pushed a commit
to chamdoo/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2015
A few more C API functions.
liewegas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2016
rgw: s/idle_timeout/default_idle_timeout/ Reviewed-by: John Spray <john.spray@redhat.com>
ddiss
pushed a commit
to ddiss/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2017
SES5: update to latest upstream master Reviewed-by: Ricardo Dias <rdias@suse.com>
LenzGr
pushed a commit
to LenzGr/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2018
mgr/dashboard_v2: Easy table cell transformation
rzarzynski
added a commit
to rzarzynski/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2020
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () #1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 ceph#3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 ceph#4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 ceph#5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 ceph#6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 ceph#7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 ceph#8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 ceph#9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 ceph#10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 ceph#11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 ceph#12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 ceph#13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 ceph#14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ceph#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 ceph#7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread ceph#117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread #1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread ceph#119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com>
rzarzynski
added a commit
to rzarzynski/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2020
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () #1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 ceph#3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 ceph#4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 ceph#5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 ceph#6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 ceph#7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 ceph#8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 ceph#9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 ceph#10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 ceph#11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 ceph#12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 ceph#13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 ceph#14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ceph#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 ceph#7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread ceph#117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread #1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread ceph#119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com>
rzarzynski
added a commit
to rzarzynski/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2020
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () #1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 ceph#3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 ceph#4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 ceph#5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 ceph#6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 ceph#7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 ceph#8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 ceph#9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 ceph#10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 ceph#11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 ceph#12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 ceph#13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 ceph#14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ceph#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 ceph#7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread ceph#117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread #1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread ceph#119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com>
dvanders
pushed a commit
to dvanders/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2020
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () #1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 #6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 #8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 #9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 #10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 #11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 #12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 #13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread ceph#117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread #1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread ceph#119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com>
dvanders
pushed a commit
to dvanders/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2020
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () #1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 #6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 #8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 #9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 #10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 #11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 #12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 #13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread ceph#117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread #1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread ceph#119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 80da5f9) Conflicts: src/osd/OSD.cc in bool OSD::asok_command int OSD::shutdown void OSD::maybe_update_heartbeat_peers void OSD::_preboot void OSD::queue_want_up_thru void OSD::send_alive void OSD::send_failures void OSD::send_beacon MPGStats* OSD::collect_pg_stats void OSD::note_down_osd void OSD::consume_map void OSD::activate_map src/osd/OSD.h in private: dispatch_session_waiting - also use the new const OSDMapRef in places that no longer exist in master src/osd/OSD.cc in void OSDService::share_map void OSDService::send_incremental_map int OSD::_do_command void OSD::note_up_osd int OSD::init_op_flags src/osd/OSD.h in void send_incremental_map void share_map
thmour
added a commit
to thmour/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2020
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ceph#1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 ceph#2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 ceph#3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 ceph#4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 ceph#5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 ceph#6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 ceph#7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 ceph#8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 ceph#9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 ceph#10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 ceph#11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 ceph#12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 ceph#13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 ceph#14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ceph#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 ceph#7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 ceph#2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread ceph#117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread ceph#1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread ceph#119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 80da5f9) Conflicts: src/osd/OSD.cc in bool OSD::asok_command int OSD::shutdown void OSD::maybe_update_heartbeat_peers void OSD::_preboot void OSD::queue_want_up_thru void OSD::send_alive void OSD::send_failures void OSD::send_beacon MPGStats* OSD::collect_pg_stats void OSD::note_down_osd void OSD::consume_map void OSD::activate_map src/osd/OSD.h in private: dispatch_session_waiting - also use the new const OSDMapRef in places that no longer exist in master src/osd/OSD.cc in void OSDService::share_map void OSDService::send_incremental_map int OSD::_do_command void OSD::note_up_osd int OSD::init_op_flags src/osd/OSD.h in void send_incremental_map void share_map
Vicente-Cheng
referenced
this pull request
in Vicente-Cheng/ceph
Apr 10, 2020
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () #1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 #6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 #8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 #9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 #10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 #11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 #12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 #13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread #90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread #117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread #1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread #119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread #90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 80da5f9) Conflicts: src/osd/OSD.cc in bool OSD::asok_command int OSD::shutdown void OSD::maybe_update_heartbeat_peers void OSD::_preboot void OSD::queue_want_up_thru void OSD::send_alive void OSD::send_failures void OSD::send_beacon MPGStats* OSD::collect_pg_stats void OSD::note_down_osd void OSD::consume_map void OSD::activate_map src/osd/OSD.h in private: dispatch_session_waiting - also use the new const OSDMapRef in places that no longer exist in master src/osd/OSD.cc in void OSDService::share_map void OSDService::send_incremental_map int OSD::_do_command void OSD::note_up_osd int OSD::init_op_flags src/osd/OSD.h in void send_incremental_map void share_map
votdev
referenced
this pull request
in votdev/ceph
Apr 14, 2020
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () #1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 #6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 #8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 #9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 #10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 #11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 #12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 #13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread #90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread #117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread #1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread #119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread #90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 80da5f9) Conflicts: src/osd/OSD.cc in bool OSD::asok_command int OSD::shutdown void OSD::maybe_update_heartbeat_peers void OSD::_preboot void OSD::queue_want_up_thru void OSD::send_alive void OSD::send_failures void OSD::send_beacon MPGStats* OSD::collect_pg_stats void OSD::note_down_osd void OSD::consume_map void OSD::activate_map src/osd/OSD.h in private: dispatch_session_waiting - also use the new const OSDMapRef in places that no longer exist in master src/osd/OSD.cc in void OSDService::share_map void OSDService::send_incremental_map int OSD::_do_command void OSD::note_up_osd int OSD::init_op_flags src/osd/OSD.h in void send_incremental_map void share_map
votdev
referenced
this pull request
in votdev/ceph
Apr 15, 2020
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () #1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 #6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 #8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 #9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 #10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 #11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 #12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 #13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread #90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread #117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread #1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread #119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread #90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 80da5f9) Conflicts: src/osd/OSD.cc in bool OSD::asok_command int OSD::shutdown void OSD::maybe_update_heartbeat_peers void OSD::_preboot void OSD::queue_want_up_thru void OSD::send_alive void OSD::send_failures void OSD::send_beacon MPGStats* OSD::collect_pg_stats void OSD::note_down_osd void OSD::consume_map void OSD::activate_map src/osd/OSD.h in private: dispatch_session_waiting - also use the new const OSDMapRef in places that no longer exist in master src/osd/OSD.cc in void OSDService::share_map void OSDService::send_incremental_map int OSD::_do_command void OSD::note_up_osd int OSD::init_op_flags src/osd/OSD.h in void send_incremental_map void share_map
liewegas
pushed a commit
to liewegas/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2021
Discover vision layout, implement nested layouts.
galsalomon66
referenced
this pull request
in galsalomon66/ceph
Nov 24, 2021
Signed-off-by: galsalomon66 <gal.salomon@gmail.com>
galsalomon66
referenced
this pull request
in galsalomon66/ceph
Dec 18, 2021
Signed-off-by: galsalomon66 <gal.salomon@gmail.com>
DimitriPapadopoulos
referenced
this pull request
in DimitriPapadopoulos/ceph
Dec 21, 2021
Signed-off-by: galsalomon66 <gal.salomon@gmail.com>
andriytk
pushed a commit
to andriytk/cortx-rgw
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2022
…ackend. (ceph#90) Signed-off-by: Diwakar92 <diwakar.kumar@seagate.com> Co-authored-by: kupranay <66459168+kupranay@users.noreply.github.com>
andriytk
pushed a commit
to andriytk/cortx-rgw
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2022
* Fix for CORTX-28869:Unable to create IAM user with email * Enable create user for same UID under different Tenant with motr as backend. (ceph#90) Signed-off-by: Diwakar92 <diwakar.kumar@seagate.com> Co-authored-by: kupranay <66459168+kupranay@users.noreply.github.com> * rgw_sal_motr: [CORTX-28055] Support custom & multiple access/secret keys (ceph#93) * rgw_sal_motr: [CORTX-28055] Support custom & multiple access/secret keys Added support for multple key creation for a user which can be either custom or auto generated. Signed-off-by: Jeet Jain <jeet.jain@seagate.com> * rgw_sal_motr: [EOS-27516] Handling object overwrite during put-object (ceph#89) * rgw_sal_motr: [EOS-27516] handling object overwrite Deleting existing object data if same object is uploaded again to avoid object leak. Signed-off-by: saurabh jain <saurabh.jain2@seagate.com> * rgw_sal_motr: [EOS-27516] Handle parallel upload During parallel object upload, there are chances of object leak, which can be handled by making use of GC. Since GC is not being use for motr as of now, adding a TODO for the same. Signed-off-by: saurabh jain <saurabh.jain@seagate.com> Co-authored-by: kupranay <66459168+kupranay@users.noreply.github.com> * Rebase (ceph#88) Signed-off-by: Parayya Vastrad <parayya.vastrad@seagate.com> * merge conflicts * merge conflicts * Review comments addressed * Review comments addressed Co-authored-by: root <root@ssc-vm-g4-rhev4-0716.colo.seagate.com> Co-authored-by: Diwakar92 <96409310+Diwakar92@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: kupranay <66459168+kupranay@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jeet Jain <jeet.jain@seagate.com> Co-authored-by: Saurabh Jain <91066893+sjain09@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Parayya Vastrad <56255712+vastradparayya@users.noreply.github.com>
andriytk
pushed a commit
to andriytk/cortx-rgw
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2022
* Fix for CORTX-28869:Unable to create IAM user with email * Enable create user for same UID under different Tenant with motr as backend. (ceph#90)
andriytk
pushed a commit
to andriytk/cortx-rgw
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2022
…ackend. (ceph#90) Signed-off-by: Diwakar92 <diwakar.kumar@seagate.com> Co-authored-by: kupranay <66459168+kupranay@users.noreply.github.com>
andriytk
pushed a commit
to andriytk/cortx-rgw
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2022
* Fix for CORTX-28869:Unable to create IAM user with email * Enable create user for same UID under different Tenant with motr as backend. (ceph#90) Signed-off-by: Diwakar92 <diwakar.kumar@seagate.com> Co-authored-by: kupranay <66459168+kupranay@users.noreply.github.com> * rgw_sal_motr: [CORTX-28055] Support custom & multiple access/secret keys (ceph#93) * rgw_sal_motr: [CORTX-28055] Support custom & multiple access/secret keys Added support for multple key creation for a user which can be either custom or auto generated. Signed-off-by: Jeet Jain <jeet.jain@seagate.com> * rgw_sal_motr: [EOS-27516] Handling object overwrite during put-object (ceph#89) * rgw_sal_motr: [EOS-27516] handling object overwrite Deleting existing object data if same object is uploaded again to avoid object leak. Signed-off-by: saurabh jain <saurabh.jain2@seagate.com> * rgw_sal_motr: [EOS-27516] Handle parallel upload During parallel object upload, there are chances of object leak, which can be handled by making use of GC. Since GC is not being use for motr as of now, adding a TODO for the same. Signed-off-by: saurabh jain <saurabh.jain@seagate.com> Co-authored-by: kupranay <66459168+kupranay@users.noreply.github.com> * Rebase (ceph#88) Signed-off-by: Parayya Vastrad <parayya.vastrad@seagate.com> * merge conflicts * merge conflicts * Review comments addressed * Review comments addressed Co-authored-by: root <root@ssc-vm-g4-rhev4-0716.colo.seagate.com> Co-authored-by: Diwakar92 <96409310+Diwakar92@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: kupranay <66459168+kupranay@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jeet Jain <jeet.jain@seagate.com> Co-authored-by: Saurabh Jain <91066893+sjain09@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Parayya Vastrad <56255712+vastradparayya@users.noreply.github.com>
andriytk
pushed a commit
to andriytk/cortx-rgw
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2022
* Fix for CORTX-28869:Unable to create IAM user with email * Enable create user for same UID under different Tenant with motr as backend. (ceph#90)
andriytk
pushed a commit
to andriytk/cortx-rgw
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2022
…eph#90) Problem: Create User for same uid under different tenant is not working because tenant id was not used in uid creation. Solution: Append UID with tenant(TENANT$UserID) Signed-off-by: Diwakar92 <diwakar.kumar@seagate.com>
galsalomon66
referenced
this pull request
in galsalomon66/ceph
Sep 17, 2022
* adstraction for projection results, a phase before output-serialization, result returns as set of values. missing memory managment for variable and value Signed-off-by: gal salomon <gal.salomon@gmail.com> * s3select: output serialization Enable users to format the result Signed-off-by: Albin Antony <aantony@redhat.com> * fix bug; std::quoted consume large amount of memory upon quot "itself" (to avoid that, need to quot each result-projection) Signed-off-by: galsalomon66 <gal.salomon@gmail.com> * adding runtime-option(using getenv) for CSV output-serialization Signed-off-by: galsalomon66 <gal.salomon@gmail.com> * add presto-alignments test; output-serialization tests; fix bug in quoted-result function; asneeded option is missing(function and test) Signed-off-by: galsalomon66 <gal.salomon@gmail.com> * fix leak cause by star-operation Signed-off-by: gal salomon <gal.salomon@gmail.com> * experimenting valgrind-issue happens only on teuthology Signed-off-by: gal salomon <gal.salomon@gmail.com> * valgrind investigation: separating like-flow to escape and non-escape Signed-off-by: galsalomon66 <gal.salomon@gmail.com> * s3select : modification for investigation of valgrind issue Signed-off-by: galsalomon66 <gal.salomon@gmail.com> * change of std::string allocaton (of __function::name); part of valgrind investigation Signed-off-by: galsalomon66 <gal.salomon@gmail.com> * rollback changes. back to placement-new, no changes to ast-builder, std::string with pool-allocator Signed-off-by: galsalomon66 <gal.salomon@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Albin Antony <aantony@redhat.com>
kshtsk
pushed a commit
to kshtsk/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2024
osd: increase osd_max_pg_per_osd_hard_ratio to 10
Moisi
added a commit
to Moisi/ceph
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2025
Merge in STORAGEENG/ceph from ~OMOISI/ceph:STOROBJ-3482-fix-storequery-404-body to aka_version_18.2.1 * commit '94855605e9c829d30e7fc00a19e39b66e5f4988b': add comment on end_header mod send chunked header and force-no-error when 404
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Debian builds are currently broken without this requirement.