Skip to content

chore(runway): cherry-pick fix: bump @metamask/keyring-controller to ^19.2.2#14236

Merged
MarioAslau merged 1 commit intorelease/7.43.0from
runway-cherry-pick-7.43.0-1742937355
Mar 25, 2025
Merged

chore(runway): cherry-pick fix: bump @metamask/keyring-controller to ^19.2.2#14236
MarioAslau merged 1 commit intorelease/7.43.0from
runway-cherry-pick-7.43.0-1742937355

Conversation

@runway-github
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@runway-github runway-github bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Description

@metamask/keyring-controller is being updated to 19.2.2 including the
following changes:

## [19.2.2]

### Fixed

- Fixed duplication of unsupported keyrings ([#5535](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5535))
- Enforce keyrings metadata alignment when unlocking existing vault ([#5535](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5535))
- Fixed frozen object mutation attempt when updating metadata ([#5535](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5535))

## [19.2.1]

### Changed

- Bump `@metamask/keyring-api"` from `^17.0.0` to `^17.2.0` ([#5366](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5366))
- Bump `@metamask/keyring-internal-api` from `^4.0.1` to `^4.0.3` ([#5356](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5356)), ([#5366](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5366))

### Fixed

- Ensure authorization contract address is provided ([#5353](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/5353))

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

  1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
    app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
    in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
    as recordings and or screenshots. 99faccf

…o `^19.2.2` (#14229)

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->
`@metamask/keyring-controller` is being updated to 19.2.2 including the
following changes:

```markdown
## [19.2.2]

### Fixed

- Fixed duplication of unsupported keyrings ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535))
- Enforce keyrings metadata alignment when unlocking existing vault ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535))
- Fixed frozen object mutation attempt when updating metadata ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535))

## [19.2.1]

### Changed

- Bump `@metamask/keyring-api"` from `^17.0.0` to `^17.2.0` ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366))
- Bump `@metamask/keyring-internal-api` from `^4.0.1` to `^4.0.3` ([#5356](MetaMask/core#5356)), ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366))

### Fixed

- Ensure authorization contract address is provided ([#5353](MetaMask/core#5353))
```

## **Related issues**

Fixes:

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Go to this page...
2.
3.

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
@runway-github runway-github bot requested a review from a team March 25, 2025 21:14
@runway-github runway-github bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 25, 2025 21:14
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the team-runway-bot-deprecated DEPRECATED: please use "team-bots" instead label Mar 25, 2025
@socket-security
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updated dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@metamask/keyring-controller@19.2.119.2.2 Transitive: environment +3 805 kB gudahtt

View full report↗︎

@socket-security
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert Package NoteSourceCI
New author npm/@metamask/keyring-controller@19.2.2 🚫
Unstable ownership npm/@metamask/keyring-controller@19.2.2 🚫

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is new author?

A new npm collaborator published a version of the package for the first time. New collaborators are usually benign additions to a project, but do indicate a change to the security surface area of a package.

Scrutinize new collaborator additions to packages because they now have the ability to publish code into your dependency tree. Packages should avoid frequent or unnecessary additions or changes to publishing rights.

What is unstable ownership?

A new collaborator has begun publishing package versions. Package stability and security risk may be elevated.

Try to reduce the number of authors you depend on to reduce the risk to malicious actors gaining access to your supply chain. Packages should remove inactive collaborators with publishing rights from packages on npm.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/foo@1.0.0 or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/@metamask/keyring-controller@19.2.2

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 25, 2025

https://bitrise.io/ Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: a49ddec
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/c359b6ef-8e62-4e04-9bbf-ebb0486bbb50

Note

  • You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

  • Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

@MarioAslau MarioAslau merged commit 01e3767 into release/7.43.0 Mar 25, 2025
36 of 39 checks passed
@MarioAslau MarioAslau deleted the runway-cherry-pick-7.43.0-1742937355 branch March 25, 2025 22:56
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 25, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

team-runway-bot-deprecated DEPRECATED: please use "team-bots" instead

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants