Closes #5356

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->
Bumping `@metamask/keyring-controller` to 19.2.2

```markdown
## [19.2.2]

### Fixed

- Fixed duplication of unsupported keyrings ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535))
- Enforce keyrings metadata alignment when unlocking existing vault ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535))
- Fixed frozen object mutation attempt when updating metadata ([#5535](MetaMask/core#5535))

## [19.2.1]

### Changed

- Bump `@metamask/keyring-api"` from `^17.0.0` to `^17.2.0` ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366))
- Bump `@metamask/keyring-internal-api` from `^4.0.1` to `^4.0.3` ([#5356](MetaMask/core#5356)), ([#5366](MetaMask/core#5366))

### Fixed

- Ensure authorization contract address is provided ([#5353](MetaMask/core#5353))
```

[![Open in GitHub
Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/31293?quickstart=1)

## **Related issues**

Related: #31200

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Start with an installation from before we introduced
keyringsMetadata, proceed past onboarding so that you have a vault setup
(e.g. v12.12.0)
2. Upgrade to this branch
3. Start the extension (without logging in)
4. Leave the window open a while to give it time to initialize all
controllers
5. Reload the extension before unlocking
6. Try to unlock the wallet

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask
Extension Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

---------

Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com>