Liz Cheney Campaigns With Kamala Harris or How to Make a Total Fool of Oneself

Talk about sour grapes. Liz Cheney, in one last effort to appear relevant, joins Harris in wishing her a win on the campaign trail. Dutifully CNN and MSNBC carried the full screed live. War is her calling card lest we forget.

Let us enjoy the moment of Liz making a total whatever of herself. Sometimes good things happen to the GOP. Wyoming got this one right when they sent her on her way out of Congress. I never could figure what floats her boat. Was it worth her career in D.C over the ousting of Trump? Anyhow, enjoy a bit of a review on a Friday.

Wind up the Cheney’s one more time. Trump endorsements: RFK, Tulsi Gabbard and Elon Musk.

Harris endorsements: Cheney’s, Bush’s and Clinton’s. For Decades the Democrats hated the Cheneys. See how upside down things are now?

Liz. Talk about stepping in it.

Tulsi Gabbard sits down with Tucker Carlson and straightens out the story.

“I have a very simple message for my Democrat friends, my independent friends, and those who may not be sure about who they’re voting for in this election. Dick Cheney has just made the choice very clear.

A vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for Dick Cheney, the architect of everything that has gone wrong in the Middle East for the last few decades.”

“Her response to the Dick Cheney announcement today was that she was honored to have his endorsement, and we got military veterans in the house, got a lot of you who probably served in the Middle East like I did, and so it sickened me, Tucker, to read those words today from Dick Cheney, Liz Cheney, and Kamala Harris because we have people who we care very much about who were killed in those wars because of Dick Cheney.

The finishing touch.

For those who need more of a refresher on how much of a war monger she is, check out this earlier post Bunk did in 2013: She and her “Institute for the Study of War.” Never was there a war she didn’t like.

Liz Cheney, Elizabeth O’Bagy, Military contractors- a toxic brew

 

Other than that, all is well in the swamp.

US Navy Oiler Runs Aground Off Oman Coast, Carrier Strike Group Forced To Scramble For Fuel

Just a note to the Dems who are ready to start WWIII. The Abraham Lincoln carrier group looks good on paper but the Navy needs a fueling ship, and apparently the USN Big Horn is out of commission. Houston we have a problem.

We just gave Zelensky more of our bucks while we don’t take care of business here and maintain our stuff. Well done Democrats.

Image

The US Navy oiler USNS Big Horn ran aground and partially flooded off the coast of Oman, leaving the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group without its primary fuel source.

First reported on the gCaptain forum and by maritime historian Sal Mercogliano, a leaked video and photos show damage to the ship’s rudder post and water flooding into a mechanical space.

The Broader Navy Tanker Crisis and Strategic Implications

The grounding of USNS Big Horn is a stark reminder of the broader tanker crisis facing the U.S. military, as highlighted by Captain Steve Carmel, a former vice president at Maersk, in an editorial for gCaptain last year. The Department of Defense is projected to need more than one hundred tankers of various sizes in the event of a serious conflict in the Pacific. However, current estimates indicate that the DoD has assured access to fewer than ten, a dangerously low number that threatens to cripple U.S. military operations. Without sufficient tanker capacity, even the most advanced naval capabilities—including nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, which still rely on aviation fuel—will be rendered ineffective.

This problem became significantly more accute with the closing of the Navy’s massive Pacific fuel depot – Red Hill – after poor maintence resulted in fuel leaking into the local water supply, poisoning thousands including children, in Hawaii.

The shortage of both oilers and tankers demands urgent action. The United States must build a larger U.S.-flagged fleet capable of replenishing aircraft carriers and support joint wartime operations. Expanding the Tanker Security Program, enforcing cargo preference, and prepositioning fuel-laden tankers are potential solutions, but they require immediate implementation. With the looming threat of conflict in the Pacific, securing a robust tanker fleet is not just a logistical necessity—it’s a strategic imperative.

This crisis—coupled with the equally troubling US Merchant Marine crewing crisis—poses a significant challenge for the US Navy. Encouragingly, Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro has called for a bold new Maritime Statecraft. Moreover, with the leadershipof RepresentativeMichael Waltz and Senator Mark Kelly, Congress is working on a bill to address our maritime dilemmas—a bill this incident makes more compelling than ever. However, major obstacles remain. These solutions take time, and other federal agencies—including the US Coast Guard but most notably the US Maritime Administration under Secretary Pete Buttigieg—are under-resourced and lack motivation to do the heavy lifting required to solve these problems.

Read more Zero Hedge

https://www.zerohedge.com/military/us-navy-oiler-runs-aground-forcing-carrier-strike-group-scramble-fuel

Posted in Military. Tags: , , . 20 Comments »

‘40 Explosions In 15 Minutes…’: Ukraine Fires U.S.-Supplied HIMARS At Russia For First Time Amid War

Kyiv has used US weapons inside Russia just days after President Biden approved the tactic for defending Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city, officials said.

Yehor Chernev – the deputy chairman of the Ukrainian Parliament’s committee on national security, defense and intelligence – said Kyiv used the weapons to destroy Russian missile launchers in the Belgorod region, The New York Times reports. 

It is only fitting on a day we remember D-Day we remind ourselves how war starts. This one is with Russia. Biden has escalated the U.S. involvement by approving Ukraine using our weaponry into Russian territory.

As we concern ourselves with Hunter Biden, this foolishness goes on unchecked with Joe Biden and his reckless behavior. Stumbling and bungling along with his foreign policy.

Now that Biden has pushed Russia and China together, Katie bar the door.

Meanwhile NATO makes plan on how U.S. military men and women could once again save Europe.

“Nato is developing multiple “land corridors” to rush US troops and armor to the front lines in the event of a major European ground war with Russia…”

A reminder of what the whole Ukraine thing is about…. a previous post:

Polish President Revealed That Foreign Companies Own Most Of Ukraine’s Industrial Agriculture

What is left for the Ukrainian people, after the “kinetic action” ends, will merely be a carcass of a country. This after the feasting off of the country by the usual players.

Recall as well Zelensky is a loose cannon. In previous posts:   

and

Ukraine Defies U.S. Order to Stop Attacking Russian Oil Refineries

Here we go, bombs away.

At a NATO meeting in Vilnius last year, NATO leaders agreed to develop new plans to ensure the alliance could provide “300,000 troops at high readiness.”

According to The Telegraph, U.S. troops and armor would land at one of five ports in the Netherlands, Greece, Italy, Turkey or Norway from where they would travel through land corridors to NATO countries bordering Ukraine.

These land corridors would be free of bureaucratic local restrictions which in the past have held up the movement of troops and armor, leaving them stuck at borders.

Previous NATO plans only allowed for U.S. troops to land at Rotterdam in the Netherlands, but Ukraine’s experience of long-range missile attacks since the launch of the full-scale invasion has prompted a rethink.

Expanding the number of ports and having multiple land corridors would mean if one was hit, others would still be available to use.

“Everything is created in a way so the necessary resilience exists – robustness, reserves and also redundancies,” Lt Gen Alexander Sollfrank, the chief of NATO’s Joint Support Enabling Command, told The Telegraph.

But concerns remain about NATO’s air defense capabilities that would be needed to protect troops as they move across Europe.

More than two years into Russia’s full-scale war on Ukraine, the air defense capabilities of NATO’s eastern flank are only at 5% of the amount seen as necessary to deter an attack, the Financial Times (FT) reported on May 29, citing sources.

NATO members located in Central and Eastern Europe have publicized plans in recent weeks to improve their collective air defense in response to the Russian threat.

According to unnamed sources who spoke to the FT, the current air defense capabilities of NATO’s eastern flank are far from sufficient.

Air defense is a “major part of the plan to defend eastern Europe from invasion,” a NATO diplomat told the FT.

“And right now, we don’t have that.”

Read more 

More at the New York Post

The best of the swamp.

War Cry from Macron Over Ukraine – The Coming Conflict

All of a sudden Europe is concerned about Russia and especially Ukraine. The nervous nellies are thinking that their nemesis Trump might just win the election this fall thus the U.S. might not be as willing to step up and bail them out like last century. Just in case Putin decides to go big or go home… Putin threatened Nukes. It doesn’t hurt also, that Congress is making it clear that the U.S. is not the endless piggy bank and we are getting cranky about the whole thing.

It doesn’t hurt that Europe’s farmers are not a bit happy in having their farm confiscated or at the least restrictions that insure their bankruptcy. Attention elsewhere never hurts.

They sure laughed last time around with Trump and his advancing theory that Europe might just be on their own… because as he says, they should be.

At the least, the U.S. not contribute the lion share of their defense.

U.S. Paying 68% Percent of NATO, Increased 6 Percent Since 2021

The U.S. is by far the largest contributor to NATO’s budget. In 2023, the country accounted for $860 billion spent by the organization, representing 68% of the total expenditure. This amount is over 10 times more than that of the second-placed country, Germany.

Country 2023 Defense Spending (USD, Millions)*
🇺🇸 United States $860,000
🇩🇪 Germany $68,080
🇬🇧 United Kingdom $65,763
🇫🇷 France $56,649
🇮🇹 Italy $31,585
🇵🇱 Poland $29,105
🇨🇦 Canada $28,950
🇪🇸 Spain $19,179
🇳🇱 Netherlands $16,741
🇹🇷 Türkiye $15,842
🇳🇴 Norway $8,814
🇷🇴 Romania $8,481
🇫🇮 Finland $7,325
🇬🇷 Greece $7,125
🇧🇪 Belgium $7,076
🇩🇰 Denmark $6,775
🇭🇺 Hungary $5,036
🇨🇿 Czechia $5,033
🇵🇹 Portugal $4,167
🌐 Other $12,400

*Expected spending in 2023, based on July 2023 data from NATO.

Who knew? None of the press here in the States are reporting what’s going on. Only the foreign press.

Here are a couple of clips…

Hindustan Times: March 14, 2024

Then we have DW News- German Public Broadcasting Service

Lithuanian Prime Minister Ingrida Šimonytė was in Berlin Thursday for defense and security talks with Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Support for Ukraine’s war with Russia and German plans to station troops in Lithuania were on the agenda. After the meeting DW News spoke to Prime Minister Lithuanian Šimonytė.

Three weeks ago, The Guardian news out of Great Britain:

Four western leaders – the European Commission president and the prime ministers of Italy, Canada and Belgium, arrived in Kyiv on Saturday to show solidarity with Ukraine on the second anniversary of Russia’s invasion.

Ursula von der Leyen, Giorgia Meloni, Justin Trudeau and Alexander De Croo travelled to the Ukrainian capital together overnight by train from neighbouring Poland, the Italian government said in a statement.

Two weeks ago, – that should do it… Opec watch out . All those Euros can be confiscated anytime politics deem fit. Wreck the Euro..just like Biden wants to do to the dollar here in the States.

Just like Biden wants to do here with confiscating Russia’s stuff too.

Biden’s Plan to Fund Ukraine – Confiscate Russia’s Sovereign Assets

Let me cut to the chase: “There has also been concern among some top American officials that nations around the world would hesitate to keep their funds at the New York Federal Reserve, or in dollars, if the United States established a precedent for seizing the money.”

We are not talking freezing assets, but rather confiscating them. Something third world countries have done. The U.S. has never done this before.

The De-dollarization of the dollar could likely be the result if countries lose faith in the security of their funds. One step closer losing the dollar as the world’s currency.

Well, if all else fails, we have Canada with some good ideas too….this should lower the temperature.

Global News:

By now you have the drift. More countries are considering sending troops, if not to Ukraine, into the surrounding countries.

Well played Orange Man.

War Monger UnderSecretary Victoria Nuland Resigns, an End to Her Bloodthirsty Reign

“One of the most bloodthirsty and psychotic war mongers to occupy high office in Washington resigned today, evidently and hopefully bringing a shameful end to her long and destructive career in Washington.”

A bipartisan fixture in Washington, Victoria Nuland had a hand in countless US foreign policy catastrophes, from the invasion of Iraq to the 2014 coup in Ukraine. She was—truly—one of the most extreme representations of the endless-warmongering ideology that runs the United States. Good riddance. So opines Glen Greenwald.

Like a rat leaving a sinking ship, she knows the end is finally coming to an end of Biden and Trump doesn’t have the same war spirit. The major player in the Iraq war to Libya to the Ukraine where she had her long fingers in it for a decades.

Nothing says more about her than this conversation of her and the U.S. involvement in Ukraine. A lot more meaningful today then it was about ten years ago.  The smoking gun on her involvement in Ukraine:

Notes from the clip:

Glenn isn’t done with her… terrific clip that tells it all. Mandatory listening.

Victoria Nuland RESIGNS, Glenn Greenwald EVISCERATES Leading Neocon: Interview

A picture is worth a thousand words.

Image

Any place that houses biological or chemical weapons is still a weapon lab. The better question is why after 17 years that material wasn’t destroyed.

“Biological Threat Reduction Program” run by the U.S. in Ukraine. So just like the war on drugs, or the ATF running guns into Mexico, or “stop the opium and cocaine production” DEA programs, etc. etc. etc. We really just about had enough of these spooks.

Why did Victoria Nuland decide to spill the beans yesterday at a hearing and what part did Senator Rubio play?

Ukraine has “biological research facilities,” says Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland, when asked by Sen Rubio if Ukraine has biological or chemical weapons, and says she’s worried Russia may get them. But she says she’s 100% sure if there’s a biological attack, it’s Russia.

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists:

The Russian invasion of Ukraine may put at risk a network of US-linked labs in Ukraine that work with dangerous pathogens, said Robert Pope, the director of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, a 30-year-old Defense Department program that has helped secure the former Soviet Union’s weapons of mass destruction and redirect former bioweapons facilities and scientists toward peaceful endeavors.

While the United States isn’t maintaining bioweapons facilities, Pope said, war could put pathogen collections in Ukraine at risk.

All is well in the Deep Swamp. 

 

Biden: “I’m not suggesting that Hamas deliberately did it … [They] gotta learn how to shoot straight” 

Add to Biden’s misadventure in Israel was calling Hamas “the other team.” He embarrassed the U.S. yesterday with his comments.

First his grand entrance out the baggage compartment. Then I have collected a short array of some of the low points.

 

He begins with his remarks, reading his notes.

 

Ah, the old memories starting coming back….

 

 

 

 

This is when it goes south as his staff watches in disbelief. Biden managed to make it to the back of the plane where the press was, amazingly on his own without notice. Now the unthinkable starts.

 

 

Synopsis:

“I’m hopeful we can get some Americans out, as well, of Gaza, and hopefully we will continue to work toward getting other Americans out through other means, as well,” Biden told reporters.

“Do you think it was necessary for you to come here?” a reporter asked.

Biden got snarky with the reporter: “What do you think? I’ll let you answer that.”

“What about getting people out?” another reporter asked of the American hostages held by Hamas.

“The answer is we’re gonna get people out, but I’m not going into any detail with you now—” Biden said before Karine Jean-Pierre jumped in and saved the day.

“Alright, we gotta wrap up,” Karine Jean-Pierre said.

Another reporter asked: “Are Israelis operating within the rules of war that you talked about last week?”

“Good talking to you all,” Biden said as he walked away.

Although it is rarely pointed out, the disrespect shown to Biden by the staff in determining when he is to talk is not lost on the world. If your press secretary corrals you and demands that you hang it up you know he doesn’t run the show. But then again he is stupid enough to go along with his frequent comment “I am not suppose to do that.”

 

Its a wrap

 

The very best of the swamp.

Janet Yellin: We Can ‘Absolutely’ Afford Two More Wars

While we are involved in non-stop T.V. war coverage, life in the U.S. continues. Yellin’s interview was easy to miss as she opines on Joe, inflation and war and more war.

Now that sure is a relief. Because she has always been spot on wrong on most things. Inflation being one of them.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the country can “absolutely” afford to financially support both Israel and Ukraine in their respective war efforts.

Here is how it works.

Image

Asked in an interview with Britain’s Sky News on Monday whether the U.S. could afford to be providing military support to Israel and to Ukraine in its ongoing war with Russia, Yellen said “the answer is absolutely.”

Yellen said the need to release funds for both allies was a “priority” and called for Republicans in the House of Representatives to seat a speaker so that legislation can be passed, following the ousting of former Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

“We stand with Israel. America has also made clear to Israel, we’re working very closely with the Israelis, that they have a right to defend themselves,” Yellen told Sky News’ Wilfred Frost.

“But it’s important to try to spare innocent civilian lives to the maximum extent possible.”

Back in June of 2021 I posted this.

Yellen Concedes Inflation Is About To Surge, Says It Will Be A “Plus For Society”

Why? Because soaring inflation is good for you.

“If we ended up with a slightly higher interest rate environment it would actually be a plus for society’s point of view and the Fed’s point of view,” Yellen said in an interview with Bloomberg. And yes, she really said that.

“We’ve been fighting inflation that’s too low and interest rates that are too low now for a decade,” the former Federal Reserve chair said, adding that “we want them to go back to” a normal interest rate environment, “and if this helps a little bit to alleviate things then that’s not a bad thing — that’s a good thing.”

It wasn’t immediately clear why rising rates, hence inflation and a drop in one’s purchasing power is “a plus for society’s point of view” but needless to say, this is the kind of idiotic drivel that Rudy von Havenstein and his cronies said some time in 1921, just around the time Weimer hyperinflation kicked in.

Restaurant Inflation: How Rising Food Costs Impact the Industry

For those who have forgotten what groceries look like. More of a visual aid.

Inflation has taken its toll on food prices at the grocery store.

Another angle-

Food Prices Rising in 2022: How to Take Control of Costs | On the Line |  Toast POS

So let’s get back to the task at hand. Note she keeps shaking her head no as she says yes.

But of course all is well. Certainly.

Janet Yellen: “The American economy is doing extremely well.”

BONUS TIME from Bunk:

The best of the swamp.

The U.S. Military-Industrial Complex Can Be Sustained No More

We stare down the barrel of more wars. What has the United States been doing these past 247 years? All but 15 years have seen us at war. We now pay for them on our credit card. The methods of waging war have only become more expensive. Our treasury hollow. Our military larders are empty.

A thought provoking piece over at Zero Hedge and worth a read.

“Political parties exist to secure responsible government and to execute the will of the people. From these great staffs, both of the old parties have ganged aside. Instead of instruments to promote the general welfare they have become the tools of corrupt interests which use them in martialling [sic] to serve their selfish purposes. Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.”—Theodore Roosevelt

 
 

President Obama, the antiwar candidate and Nobel Peace Prize winner, waged war longer than any American president. His administration’s targeted-drone killings resulted in at least 1.3 million lives lost to the U.S.-led war on terror.

America has long had a penchant for endless wars that empty our national coffers while fattening those of the military industrial complex.

The United States has been at war for all but 15 years in its 247-year history.

Since 9/11, we’ve spent more than $8 trillion to wage wars abroad, including the lifetime price of health care for disabled veterans and interest on the national debt.

The average American pays over $2300 a year in taxes to support the military, half of which goes to military contractors.

Even with America’s military might spread thin, the war drums continue to sound as the Pentagon polices the rest of the world with counterterror activities in 85 countries.

The American Empire—with its endless wars waged by U.S. military service people who have been reduced to little more than guns for hire: outsourced, stretched too thin, and deployed to far-flung places to police the globe—is approaching a breaking point.

Aided and abetted by the U.S government, the American military-industrial complex has erected an empire unsurpassed in history in its breadth and scope, one dedicated to conducting perpetual warfare throughout the earth.

Although the U.S. constitutes barely 5% of the world’s population, America boasts almost 40% of the world’s total military expenditure, spending more on the military than the next 10 biggest spending nations combined.

Unfortunately, this level of war-mongering doesn’t come cheap to the taxpayers who are forced to foot the bill.

Having been co-opted by greedy defense contractors, corrupt politicians and incompetent government officials, America’s expanding military empire is bleeding the country dry. In fact, the U.S. government is spending money it doesn’t have on a military empire it can’t afford.

The illicit merger of the global armaments industry and the Pentagon that President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us against more than 60 years ago has come to represent perhaps the greatest threat to the nation’s fragile infrastructure today.

The government is destabilizing the economy, destroying the national infrastructure through neglect and a lack of resources, and turning taxpayer dollars into blood money with its endless wars, drone strikes and mounting death tolls.

This is exactly the scenario Eisenhower warned against when he cautioned the citizenry not to let the profit-driven war machine endanger our liberties or democratic processes:

“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This is, I repeat, the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.”

We failed to heed Eisenhower’s warning.

At the height of its power, even the mighty Roman Empire could not stare down a collapsing economy and a burgeoning military. Prolonged periods of war and false economic prosperity largely led to its demise. As historian Chalmers Johnson predicts:

The fate of previous democratic empires suggests that such a conflict is unsustainable and will be resolved in one of two ways. Rome attempted to keep its empire and lost its democracy. Britain chose to remain democratic and in the process let go its empire. Intentionally or not, the people of the United States already are well embarked upon the course of non-democratic empire.

Read the full post at Zero Hedge

War is bad — for everyone

 

“And here we are, again, flirting with nuclear annihilation —

and Americans, whether they like it or not, are deep into it.”

by Mustang

Not everyone supported the war with Great Britain in 1776.  These were primarily people whose loyalty to the Crown followed ideological and commercial interests.  There is money to be made in wartime, but only the war profiteers are much interested in that kind of business.  People with a long view prefer business stability.  The natural ebb and flow of the business cycle are already bad enough without making matters worse by having a war.

 

People who had experienced war firsthand did not favor it much, either.  I’m not talking about Washington, Hamilton, or Benedict Arnold.  Those men had something to gain through participating in the great game.  The lowly rifleman had no interest in giving up his life for a cause he probably didn’t understand.  And if that lowly private stepped forward back in his village when the recruiter was demanding volunteers, it was probably to save face among his peers than for some grandiose notion of liberty and freedom for all.

 

The intelligent citizens opposed the war.  They may have lacked sophistication, but they had an abundance of common sense.  War is the last thing anyone should want to do.  I have little use for men who relish the notion of causing unrelenting tears among parents and widows — or young children who will never again see their fathers (or, in modern times, their mothers).

 

Therefore, war protestors have existed in the United States since the earliest of times.  During the War of 1812, the federalists opposed the war with Great Britain.  We may see a trend developing: conservatives (businessmen) shun war, while leftists can’t seem to get enough of murdering our own people.  What did the British achieve in World War I other than wiping out an entire generation of young men?  That idiocy resulted in another great war.  And here we are, again, flirting with nuclear annihilation — and Americans, whether they like it or not, are deep into it. 

 

This is what happens whenever one supports a president (Biden) who supports another president (Zelensky), who chooses war with another country (Russia), and then threatens a third country (China) with atomic warfare.  Is there any question about the likely result of such foolishness?

 

The largest anti-war demonstrations occurred during the Vietnam fiasco.  Some people derided these protestors as un-American, communists, anarchists, fill in the blank.  I do not doubt that some people were part and partial to all those labels.  But before we condemn them, let’s recall the outcome of the Vietnam War. 

American servicemen won all the battles; Democrats in Congress lost the war.  Those would be the same democrats who took us to war in Vietnam in 1964 — and before that, Korea.  Before that, World War II.  Before that, World War I.  War is part of that now well-established progressive tradition.  So it should come as no surprise that Biden is chomping at the bits to become well-remembered for something other than being a brain-dead racist.

 

The war protestors are back.  On 19 February, people who opposed the Eastern European war assembled at the National Mall in Washington.  It was the largest antiwar rally in two decades.  On that same day, in my little one-horse town in Florida, 30 to 40 people assembled at the post office to protest Biden’s Ukraine policies.  The assemblage did turn a few heads, but as usual, most people did their business with little care about what Washington decides.  Almost everyone knows that “we the people” is a myth.

 

 

In Washington, the protest labeled itself “Rage against the war machine.”  These people have had enough of the nabobs in Washington — taking our children to war where they can be killed or maimed for life.  They are weary of the situation where one nabob takes our children to war, unhesitatingly spending insane amounts of money, only so that a subsequent president can blow a whistle and close down the entire operation — as if the national interest just turned a corner that no one saw coming. 

Playing God is what it is, and none of the nabobs or their children ever go to war themselves.  But those are just the fellows at the top of the pyramid.  There are hundreds (maybe thousands) of others behind the scenes egging the whole thing on — Liz Cheney, for example, who may have invented war industries just so that she could invest in them.  Thar’s gold in them thar hills.

 

Who else is chomping at the bit?  Choose any news outlet — and all of their various parts.  After all, war correspondents have to have something to do, right?  We recently saw an example of the empathy our government hands out to American parents who suffer the loss of their children … such as Biden snickering at a mother who lost her two sons to fentanyl.  There are only two possible explanations for this horrid behavior.  Either Biden is brain-dead or a bona fide terrible person.

 

I have no crystal ball to tell me what is going to happen.  I see the number of war protestors increasing, though, and at this point, I see that as a good thing.  A better thing would be that the American people would take their heads out of their butts and start making better choices of presidential candidates and, ultimately, who becomes President of the United States.

 

Bunk will add this addendum. 

Watch: Vast Expanse Of US Military Hardware Positioned At Polish Port

 

A Baltic monitoring media outlet has published footage of an enormous amount of American military equipment being prepared to move from the Port of Gdynia in Poland

The expanse of military hardware is being described as equipment belonging to the US Army’s 3rd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division. Some Eastern European media reports are claiming that at least a portion of the equipment, which looks multiple football fields in length, are bound for Kiev.

The best of the swamp.

About These Spying Balloons and Such

by Mustang

There is nothing new about spying balloons.  It’s been going on since the late 1700s, with more than a few interesting twists and turns.  More recently, China sent one of its spying balloons across the United States. This event might be the least secret operation China ever mounted against its American opponent. Still, it has everyone on Twitter in a Tizzy and everyone in the Air Force and Space Force scratching their collective derrieres trying to figure out what to do about it.  Apparently, shooting it down never occurred to anyone.  Space Force — dwell on that for a while.

The first balloon used for military purposes occurred in 1794 (we think), during the French Revolution.  Historians claim that the French Committee on Public Safety (a euphemism for state security) used this balloon to observe “the enemy.” The result of the Battle of Fleurus (26 June 1794) was not inconsequential because the French handed the First Coalition (Britain, Hanover, Dutch Republic, and Habsburg monarchy) suffered the loss of the Austrian Netherlands and the destruction of the Dutch Republic.  Thanks to its balloon, the French could see where to best deploy their troops.

First public demonstration in Annonay, 4 June 1783. Public Domain,

Union forces used aerial balloons during the American Civil War, which made balloon-maker Thaddeus Lowe a wealthy man.  Despite becoming a primary target of the Confederate Army, none of Lowe’s balloons were ever shot out of the air.  Civil War balloons weren’t perfect, but it was a start.  The military eventually learned how to communicate from gondolas at 1,000 or more feet with ground commanders, who had to make use of that information.

We next hear of observation balloons in the so-called Great War.  During this war, to end all wars, observation balloons and motorized dirigibles became primary targets for those new-fangled machines called airplanes.  Suddenly, being in a gondola wasn’t all the Army recruiter promised; no one was drawing “flight pay” back then.

The major shift occurred during World War II.  Military forces began to deploy balloons as defense mechanisms against enemy bombers and fighters.  Barrage balloons were much smaller than the earlier observation balloons and were tethered to the ground using thick cable wire.  They didn’t stop bombing campaigns but forced enemy aircraft to drop their bombs from higher elevations (making them less accurate).

Barrage balloons could reach an altitude above 14,000 feet.  By attaching explosives to these balloons, they became lethal to bomber crews.  World War II also saw the beginning of the so-called “Good Idea Office,” which had a “dirty tricks department.” One of their ideas was the so-called Bat Bomb.  In this scheme, high-altitude bombers would release casings containing Mexican Hibernating Bats with incendiary devices attached that ignited on a timer.  It didn’t do much for the bats, but it did play havoc with Japanese houses that were mainly constructed of wood and paper.

The Japanese returned the favor by launching balloons carrying bombs over the U.S. mainland.  Of the 10,000 or so balloons the Japanese sent into the Pacific jet stream, 300 “Fu-Go” balloons landed in the U.S. between 1944 – 1945.  They carried a 26-pound bomb intended to start forest fires over the Pacific Northwest.  The only damage these balloons caused to American citizens happened in May 1945 when one of the balloons fell on an unsuspecting picnic of five or six.  One wonders, what were the odds?

Before the beginning of the Cold War, the United States initiated a series of balloon programs focused on what was going on inside the Soviet Union and what became known as Communist China.  The Americans called these efforts “projects,” such as MOBY DICK, GENETRIX, and MOGUL.  None were resounding successes, but they were good enough to keep the effort going.

To facilitate this technology, the U.S. military turned to private industries for a hand.  The company selected was General Mills Corporation of Minneapolis, Minnesota — known for manufacturing breakfast cereals — was a significant innovator in aerospace technology, particularly in scientific balloons.  The Aeronautical Research Division of General Mills started in 1946, overseen by German scientist Otto Winzen.  Dr. Winzen determined that latex balloons were inadequate for high-altitude missions, so he introduced polyethylene materials.  At the time, General Mills worked closely with the U.S. Navy’s Office of Naval Research (O.N.R.).

The Navy’s project was called SKYHOOK, first launched in 1947 — the first real success of balloons carrying a wide range of scientific instruments to collect data — and this was precisely what the newly created U.S. Air Force was looking for in conducting reconnaissance overflights.  Working with the Rand Corporation, the Air Force called this effort Project MOGUL.  MOGUL allowed the Americans to “listen” for such things as nuclear tests and missile launches.  Later, the Air Force added cameras that were (in time) so powerful that analysts in Washington could read automobile license plate numbers.

Was this always successful?  No.  To disguise the project’s true nature, the Air Force employed unclassified weather balloons, which nevertheless contained sensitive military equipment designed and launched by a research team from the University of New York.  MOGUL Flight No.4 became famous.  Launched in June 1947, this balloon fell out of the sky over a ranch near Roswell, New Mexico.

To allow Air Force monitoring teams to track these balloons, technicians fitted them with a chain of kite-shaped radar reflectors consisting of lightweight balsa wood frames covered in metal foil.  According to Charles Moore, who then worked as an engineer at General Mills, the foil was fixed to the balloon’s brackets using metallic tape.  General Mills purchased this tape from a New York City toy factory.

The packing tape was stamped with a decorative pattern, which included the kinds of designs that appealed most to children — hearts, flowers, sea shells, and so forth.  During the Air Force’s investigation of the material collected from Roswell, U.F.O. “experts” identified these designs as extraterrestrial hieroglyphics.  Of course, there was no other possible explanation.  This incident ignited a project the Air Force called Project BLUE BOOK lasting 75 years.

Near space reconnaissance has been going on for a very long time, as evidenced by the U.S. Air Force’s earliest experiments with high-altitude balloons and the fact that the Soviet Union shot down “Wrong Way” Powers in 1960.  This success was undoubtedly a result of spies having infiltrated the Air Force and/or C.I.A., knowing how high their missiles would need to travel before reaching the U-2 altitude threshold.  Such is life in the fast lane.

But now the chickens have come home to roost.  Despite the Air Force’s unwillingness to speak about the recent Chinese reconnaissance balloon, there are some interesting questions we should demand answers to.  Could China deliver into our atmosphere their latest virus product from the U.S.-financed Wu Han Labs? Are the Chinese keeping an eye on our agricultural production?  Or could foreign agents introduce bacteria affecting our food supplies, milk obtained from America’s dairy operations?

We started it — and I find it interesting that the Air Force/Space Force seems not to know what to do about it.  Maybe we should ask the Russians or Chinese how they responded to our high-altitude balloons.

Mustang has blogs called  Fix Bayonets and Thoughts From Afar