Whodunnit? – Attack on Nord stream Pipelines

 

by Mustang

On September 26, Reuters reported an unexplained gas leak from the Nord Stream Two (Russian) gas pipeline, five miles off the Danish Island of Bornholm.  The news flash that no one in America saw also reported that the German government was working with Danish authorities to discover what suddenly caused the pipeline’s pressure to plummet.  And, of course, the Danish government isn’t talking.  Nord Stream One also reported a reduced capacity.

So, then, what happened?  These two under-sea pipelines are massively constructed with steel-reinforced concrete designed to withstand the impact of anchors from large ships.  The word “indestructible” has been bantered about, but we know that nothing made by man is indestructible.  And we know that ship’s anchors didn’t cause the damage.  Again, what happened?

European leaders and Moscow say they can not rule out sabotage. Map of Nord Stream pipelines and locations of reported leaks

We don’t know.  Journalist Pepe Escobar, writing for The Cradle News, tells us that it is one of those “who done it” mysteries.  Was it Russia who tried to blow up the pipelines?  Why would Russia blow up its own pipeline?  They just turn off the valve if they don’t want Germany to receive Russian gas.  So, it doesn’t look as if Russia would do it.  And neither would Germany, particularly since it has been revealed that Russia and Germany have been engaged in secret negotiations to restart Nord Stream 1 and 2.  Denmark?  Nah.  Why would they?

But Joe Biden did make a public statement, captured by America’s ABC News on 7 February of this year, “If Russia invades … then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2.  We will bring it to an end.”

Who set the explosive charges?  America’s Eastern European puppet: Poland — at least, that’s what the bookies are saying (with CIA supervision, of course).  Plausible deniability is the key.

Russian spokesman Dmitry Peskov observed that the damage to both pipelines poses a big problem for Russia.  He said, “ … this gas is very expensive, and now it is all going up into the air.” Note: Peskov revealed sabotage as the cause of the problem over any other source of damage. Peskov emphasized that neither Russia nor Europe had anything to gain from the sabotage … especially Germany.

Escobar thinks that Paul Gottfried’s explanation is the best, citing Leo Strauss and the Conservative Movement in America: A Critical Appraisal, Cambridge University Press, 2011.  Escobar explains that Leo Strauss, a German-Jew philosopher, and professor at the University of Chicago, is at the root of what became America’s Wolfowitz Doctrine (1992), which defined the United States’ mission in the post-cold war period.  “Any potential competitor to U.S. hegemony, especially ‘advanced industrial nations such as Germany and Japan, must be smashed.”

Fast forward to 2022, U.S. Secretary of State Blinken and Victoria Nuland are staunch advocates of the Strauss/Wolfowitz notion, which has found its way into the Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022.  It establishes Kyiv as a “free lunch” regarding arms control mechanisms.  The U.S. leased costly weapons to the E.U. and sent them to Ukraine.  Whatever happens on the battlefield is an E.U. problem.  Very Machiavellian, eh?

So who is behind this pipeline business?  The bookies in Nevada are betting on Biden and Blinken — with a little help from their friends, Poland — and the America CIA, of course.  Whatever it takes to separate Germany and Russia from making their deal.  Analysts argue that Germany is not the problem and Russia will not be bullied.  For nitwits inside the beltway playing with dynamite sticks, it may serve our long-term interests to realize that Russia still has nuclear teeth.  If Russia and the E.U. conclude that the United States is their “joint enemy,” Ukraine won’t be our only problem.

It might have been better had the American voter not selected Biden as their president.  After all, Biden chose Blinken, and Blinken chose Nuland, and both of those nitwits belong in a rubber room.

My friend Bunkerville predicted that the United States was on the road to war.  I think she’s right about that.  I find no comfort in it, but I think she’s right.  But that’s okay.  We Americans still have Twitter to keep us entertained.

 

Mustang also blogs at Fix Bayonets and Thoughts From Afar

 

Bunk will add a postscript to Mustang’s fine post with this:

Blinken Calls Sabotage Attacks On Nord Stream Pipelines A “Tremendous Opportunity”

Zero Hedge

He at the same time touted that the Untied States has now become “the leading supplier of LNG [liquefied natural gas] to Europe,” stressing too that the Biden administration is helping to enable European leaders to “decrease demand” and “speed up the transition to renewables.”

Tellingly, in that single section of comments while speaking alongside his Canadian counterpart, Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly, Blinken had repeated the word “opportunity” while highlighting the European energy crisis no less than three times.

Finally, we note that China state-affiliated media mouthpiece could not resist commenting on Blinken’s apparently cluelessly ironic comments, saying what much of the rest-of-the-world is perhaps thinking…

New U.N. Report Claims that the United States owes $45 Trillion in “climate debt”

You don’t need to attend the United Nations climate change conference to know what’s really going on.

Ignoring the fallacies behind the “science” of man-made global warming, a new U.N. report on “climate justice” says the U.S. and other countries owe $24 trillion in “climate debt” to the rest of the world.

The report, “Climate Justice for a Changing Planet,” argues that the United States is “historically the largest global emitter” of greenhouse gas emissions and therefore has the biggest “debt” to pay. But another U.N. report puts the figure at $45 trillion. President Obama seems prepared to accept this bogus claim by attending the United Nations conference on December 18.

The U.S. failure to pay, argues leftist Canadian writer Naomi Klein, has already produced “climate rage” and a “global movement for climate justice” led by Bolivia’s socialist President Evo Morales. The implication is that if the U.S. doesn’t pay up, protests and even violence could break out.

In a statement, the Morales regime declared that “What we call for is full payment of the debt owed to us by developed countries for threatening the integrity of the Earth’s climate system, for over-consuming a shared resource that belongs fairly and equally to all people, and for maintaining lifestyles that continue to threaten the lives and livelihoods of the poor majority of the planet’s population.”

In other words, Americans are supposed to feel guilty over having a successful industrial economy. It is a system that has produced more wealth for more people than any in human history.

A detailed proposal from Bolivia says “a wealthy minority,” presumably in the U.S. and other “rich” nations, “has already over‐consumed a considerable amount of environmental space,” thus “denying it to the poorer majority who needs it in the course of their development.”

Naomi Klein describes the proposed payments as “reparations.” ………

 http://www.aim.org/aim-column/socialists-demand-trillions-in-climate-debt/

US Speaks Out Immediately Condemning the Suicide Attack on the Revolutionary Guard Killers???

june15_beating

Have we ever seen anything like this from the leaders of our country. I am beginning to forget what country I live in, who are we??

“Richard Baehr notes that it took days for the Obama administration to condemn the brutalization of democracy demonstrators in Iran, but that condemnation of attacks on the brutalizers was nearly immediate.

Ed Lasky asks:

Did the US condemn Iranians’ role in the Khobar Towers bombing; the support given to Hezbollah that led to the massacre of hundreds of American and French soldiers– and the continuing killing of Lebanese and Israelis, the lies and broken agreements that have followed the building of its nuclear weapons program?

So whose side is Obama on?”


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/10/us_condemns_suicide_bombing_at.html