About Ukraine Using U.S. Long Range Missiles – A Risky Gamble

by Mustang

President Joe Biden now authorizes Ukraine to use the U.S. Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) inside Russia, a decision that follows months of lobbying by Ukrainian officials and is seen by anyone with an ounce of common sense as a United States/NATO escalation in the Russo-Ukrainian War.

When asked for a comment on Biden’s decision, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said simply that Russian President Vladimir Putin “has already spoken on this matter.” Indeed, he has. On September 12, 2024, Putin stated to Russian media, saying, “It is not a question of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries become directly involved in the military conflict or not.” He added, “Moscow will make appropriate decisions in response to threats that are imposed on us.”

Developed in 1991, the missile is a supersonic tactical ballistic missile designed and manufactured by Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV) and Lockheed Martin. It uses a solid propellant, measures 13 feet long and 24 inches in diameter, and has a range of 190 miles. The missile is launched from the M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) and the M142 High-Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS). 

The system was upgraded beginning in 2015 when the Obama administration signed a contract with Lockheed Martin to develop new hardware; the first modernized system was delivered in September 2016.  Additional work commenced almost immediately to enable ATACMS to strike moving targets on land and at sea.  This project was terminated in December 2020 after considerable expenditures had already been made to the developer.

The ship-launched version of this system is called NATACMS.

Beginning in late 2023, Ukraine started to use the earliest (short-range) version of the missile system to threaten the Russian-occupied land corridor to Crimea in southern Ukraine, as well as the Russian air bases in northern Crimea.

Despite recent information about President Biden authorizing these missiles for use in Ukraine, the fact is that Ukraine already used them in February 2024 against the Russian-occupied Dzhankoi Air Base. Presumably, Biden now allows Ukraine to send the missiles into Russia proper, along with the possible use of a NATO system called Storm Shadow (SCALPEG), a cruise missile system.

Note from video:

As Ukraine faces its most devastating winter, President Biden’s decision to allow ATACMS strikes within Russian territory has worsened the situation. this big shift in u.s policy, coming just months before Trump’s return to power, threatens to transform a proxy war into a direct confrontation between nuclear powers.

Although most people are not paying attention to these events or consider them potential threats to the peace and security of the United States, the few who are paying attention correctly note that this exemplifies the true nature of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

In exchange for access to European markets and industries and influence on certain European Union policies and programs, the United States will fight most of NATO’s battles and fund the costs of lethal conflict in both blood and materials.  Sweden, meanwhile, has begun a series of emergency notifications to its citizens to prepare for general war.Image

One of these days, Americans will wake up and stop electing Democrats to any office higher than dog catcher. 

Mustang also has blogs called  Fix Bayonets and Searching History

Biden Humiliated in Peru as he OK’s Ukraine Use of Long Range Missiles in Russia

Nothing like the dementia-ridden, deep state puppet in the White House green lighting a little World War 3 on his way out to the glue factory. Putin warned in September that U.S. approving the use of long range missiles would mean that the U.S. was at war with Russia. Putin stated that using these missiles would require the use of U.S. satellite  technology that Ukraine does not have.

Zero Hedge continues:

In a move straight out of Louis “After me, the flood” XV, the outgoing BIden admin, in a seemingly desperate move to destabilize the global geopolitical picture, has authorized the lifting of some restrictions on Ukraine’s use of western-made weapons to strike military targets inside Russia, according to reports from Bloomberg and the AP. The decision was reportedly shaped by North Korea ramping up support for President Vladimir Putin’s army and an increase in Russian missile and drone attacks on its neighbor. Read more

Zero Hedge does an excellent analysis of the Ukraine situation that is not getting the attention it deserves. Now with North Korea entering the fray with 3000 troops and the potential for 100,000 more, we would be wise to do so.

France 24 reports

Politico Reports:

The Biden administration is planning to rush the last of over $6 billion remaining in Ukraine security assistance out the door by Inauguration Day, as the outgoing team prepares for the weapons flow to end once President-elect Donald Trump takes office.

The plan, described by two administration officials who were granted anonymity to discuss internal matters, is the only option the White House has to keep sending equipment to Ukraine to fight off continued Russian offensives. But the problems are immense. It normally takes months for munitions and equipment to get to Ukraine after an aid package is announced, so anything rolled out in the coming weeks would likely not fully arrive until well into the Trump administration, and the next commander in chief could halt the shipments before they’re on the ground.

As if this doesn’t punctuate the precariousness of the world’s peace,  Biden goes down and allows himself to be a fool. He met with Xi, for what purpose one can only guess.

LIMA, Peru (AP) — President Joe Biden arrived Thursday in Peru to start his six-day visit to Latin America for the final major international summits of his presidency, even as world leaders turn their attention to what Donald Trump’s return to the White House means for their countries.

Biden made other world leaders wait more than five minutes to take the group photo at the APEC Summit in Peru — then stuck him in the back corner when he finally showed up. Xi Jinping was front and center. Although some may claim that standing is alphabetical, prior photos show Trump muscling his way front and center.

His face is doing that weird thing again.

Image

Biden put in the back of the bus.

The next weeks are going to be dangerous times. 

The very worse of the swamp.

Russia Russia Russia… Here we go again with Garland and Wray

There they were. AG Garland and FBI Wray telling us, warning us about Russia disinformation. Wray, almost seemed to have to make an effort not to smile. Sitting there, the pompous fools, us knowing exactly what they intend to do to Trump. Perhaps covering what they already are doing and spying on anyone who might be a threat to therm.

So-called Russian disinformation is anything that the Biden Regime wants to censor.

During the 2020 election, the Democrat-media-Deep State complex labeled Hunter Biden’s laptop story ‘Russian disinformation’ and lobbied Big Tech to censor the blockbuster October surprise.

51 top intel officials also lied about the laptop from hell. The Spies Who Lie:

 NBC NewsBiden administration to hit Russia with sanctions for trying to manipulate U.S. opinion ahead of the election – The administration will announce a series of actions Wednesday, according to two senior officials.

KEN DILANIAN, NBC NEWS: This is being described by our sources as “a whole-of-government action designed to target Russian propaganda and disinformation aimed at interfering in the 2024 election.”

…..

What’s also very interesting, Jose, is that disinformation is not confined to foreign entities. Americans engage in disinformation all the time, but the FBI and the Justice Department are very reluctant to call that out, given First Amendment considerations.

Free speech includes the right to lie, and Americans do that all the time in our political discourse. However, they cannot act as a front for foreign disinformation operations. That’s when laws are violated, and the DOJ takes enforcement action.

OK… Bonus time as I close:

The best of the swamp. P.S. Tell Trump to start using this stuff in his ads!

Havana Syndrome – Our World is Getting Nastier.

         

by Mustang

Five cases of the so-called Havana Syndrome were directed against the United States Embassy in Borgata, Columbia, late in 2021.  The U.S. mission there is one of the largest in the world.  In addition to career diplomats and staff, there are numerous intelligence agents and drug enforcement officials. 

Embassy staff speak of it as an “anomalous health incident.”  It’s a buzzword the State Department uses instead of “Havana Syndrome.”  It first became known to us in 2016, when dozens of cases were detected among U.S. and Canadian diplomats (and their families) in the Cuban capital.  Drowsiness, fatigue, headaches, balance, ear aches, and blurred vision were the effects.  Some victims suffered permanent hearing loss.

Since 2016, similar health complaints have been reported in Russia, China, Vietnam, Austria, and Berlin.  In every case, the symptoms appeared suddenly, giving some the impression that they were suffering from food poisoning.

Experts at the Center for Brain Injury and Repair at the University of Pennsylvania studied some of the U.S. citizens injured in the aforementioned locations.  They published a study in the 2018 Journal of the American Medical Association.  Researchers discovered that the syndrome’s victims were severely impaired in their balance and cognitive, motor, and sensory abilities — as if they had suffered a severe concussion.  Only unlike actual concussions, the symptoms didn’t disappear.  They only subsided before returning with even more disruptive force.

In late 2020, experts at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in the United States opined that the target pulses of radio-frequency energy were behind the symptoms.  Still, U.S. intelligence personnel said they were “unsure” about the cause of abnormal health incidents.

This is a lie, of course.  The U.S. government knows what’s been going on because they helped develop such capabilities.  Scientific researchers claim that the Havana Syndrome is caused by microwave weapons explicitly used to target diplomats, intelligence officials, and their families.  Such weapons already exist within the U.S. arsenal.

Questions remain about who is behind these activities, with the U.S. claiming the Russian GRU (a military intelligence agency).  So far, the White House hasn’t commented on it, but in 2021, the U.S. Congress passed the Havana Act, which authorized government agencies to pay staff and their families affected by the syndrome.

More recently, in 2023, U.S. intelligence agencies downplayed the involvement of foreign agents, saying that there is no “credible evidence” that an adversary is behind the incidents.  However, on April 1, 2024, Deutsche Welle reported that Havana Syndrome IS linked to Russian intelligence, according to a joint media investigation released on Monday.

The Der Spiegel report says, “Diplomats may have been targeted by sonic weapons,” uncovering evidence suggesting that unexplained anomalous health incidents may have their origin in the use of directed energy weapons known to be in the possession of GRU Unit 29155.

Russia denied the report, of course, and while the National Institutes for Health (NIH) found no evidence of MRI-detectible brain injury or biological abnormalities, they did determine that the symptoms of Havana Syndrome are “severe.”

Mar 31, 2024

60 Minutes producers Michael Rey and Oriana Zill de Granados discuss the evolution of their 5-year investigation into “Havana Syndrome,” which led them to what one source calls “a receipt” for acoustic weapon testing done by a Russian intelligence unit.

 

 

 

Tucker Carlson Interview with the Best Four Minutes on Russia

Tucker Carlson for some reason, found it noteworthy to interview Chris Cuomo. The interview took a turn of merit when Tucker got into his visit with Russia and Chris wanting to turn the tables by getting into the old “Russia, Russia, Russia” thing and seemingly wanting Tucker to take a loyalty oath to America.

Sundance over at Conservative Tree House caught the best minutes of the interview and I got hooked on the interview. One of the best segments was when Tucker digresses into the significance of architecture of all things Russia.

His post:

An Important 4 Minutes Within Tucker Carlson Interview

Quoting Sundance:

Chris Cuomo is either intellectually incapable of understanding the Russia dynamic and how the U.S Intelligence Community (USIC) conducts propaganda efforts against American citizens, or Chris Cuomo is a paid actor within the system he describes as “the game.”  From my perspective the former is more likely than the latter.

That said, please pay attention to the prompted segment about Russia, as outlined by Tucker Carlson, that begins at 34:18 and runs through 37:55.  If you stay with it until 46:00 it’s worth it; however, the important part is the key four minutes outlined above.  Carlson frames the “western” or U.S-led sanction regime against Russia very accurately, and the consequences he describes for the rest of the world is accurate.   WATCH FIRST:  

 

Sundance continues:

After watching this specific segment, I am left with a few takeaways.

First, Tucker is the only person -beside myself- who I have seen accurately outline the cause and consequence of the Russia sanction regime.  Why hasn’t Tucker expanded on this in granular detail?   The issue is much, much larger, than just simple sanctions.  There is a global agenda afoot, an intentional global cleaving, which was predicated by that specific sanction regime.

Second, he knows.  You can tell by the way Tucker frames the “I don’t know what’s really going on” aspect, that he really does know…. but he’s scared.  Tucker is scared of the consequences if he outlines in detail how the USIC and by extension the entire USA governmental system, is using Russia as a tool toward a larger corporate/globalist agenda.

He continues with his post, and adds this thread reader- an excellent refresher:

READ THIS from 2022 !!!

For the rest of his post:

More at Conservative Tree House

Just thinking out loud here. Two posts from Bunk that come to mind:

Biden’s Plan to Fund Ukraine – Confiscate Russia’s Sovereign Assets

There has also been concern among some top American officials that nations around the world would hesitate to keep their funds at the New York Federal Reserve, or in dollars, if the United States established a precedent for seizing the money.”

We are not talking freezing assets, but rather confiscating them. Something third world countries have done. The U.S. has never done this before.

The De-dollarization of the dollar could likely be the result if countries lose faith in the security of their funds. One step closer losing the dollar as the world’s currency.

The “Proposed Plan for Victory in Ukraine” was drafted by the Republican Chairmen of the House Foreign Affairs Committee (Michael McCaul), the House Armed Services Committee (Mike Rogers), and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (Mike Turner), three men with numerous combined years in foreign policy and intelligence matters. It outlines three very reasonable steps to defeating Russia: “(1) providing critical weapons to Ukraine at the speed of relevance, (2) tightening sanctions on the Putin regime, and (3) transferring frozen Russian sovereign assets to Ukraine.” 

…..

…..

An FT editorial warns of the disintegration of the international rules-based order if the West proceeds to seize €260bn of Russian central bank assets and give them to Ukraine.

And Yale academic Robert Shiller warns “If America does this to Russia today… tomorrow it can do this to anyone…This will destroy the halo of security that surrounds the dollar and will be the first step towards de-dollarisation.”

Seizing Russian Property at the Cost of Trashing the Constitution

We witnessed last week the questionable case Ex-president of Honduras extradited to US on drugs charges

It seems the end justifies the means to get the desired result with this Department of Justice.

….

…As if to run even further away from constitutional norms, a group of legal academics began arguing last week that the property seized from Russians is not really owned by human beings, but by the Russian government. And, this crazy argument goes, since the Russian government is not a person, there is no warrant or due process requirement; therefore, the feds can convert the assets they have seized and frozen to their own use.

To these academics — who reject property ownership as a moral right and exalt government aggression as a moral good — the argument devolves around the meaning of the word “person.” The Fourth and Fifth Amendments protect every “person” and all “people,” not just Americans…

The very best of the swamp today.

China and the E.U. – Why the Sudden Interest?

by Mustang

In late 2023, China signaled that it had no interest in participating in the peace talks proposed by Ukraine and the West, arguing that it has only limited influence on the two antagonists.  But in late February 2024, we suddenly find a Chinese envoy engaging Ukraine, Russia, Germany, Poland, France, and Brussels in shuttle diplomacy.  China’s involvement with the European Union is at least curious, particularly because several of these nations are members of the E.U. and NATO.

The experts tell us that China’s renewed interest in brokering peace between Ukraine and Russia has more to do with China’s worsening economy than any other factor.  President Xi needs the E.U. to open its profitable markets to Chinese goods.  Consequently, the E.U. is very high on President Xi’s wish list.  None of this will come as a surprise to Russia’s president.  There is little doubt that Putin and Xi have crafted this diplomatic plan.  Still, whether China will succeed in its efforts will likely hinge on the competence of U.S. diplomats (or lack of it).

Complete denial': Europe largely blind to Chinese influence, says EU  adviser – POLITICO

We do not know the future of Russo-Chinese relations, and we can only guess how the international situation will develop, but I believe that the U.S. presidential elections will be a factor.  Some are playing the “what if” game, but I won’t engage in it because there are too many variables and unknowns.  But that doesn’t inhibit some people from forming conclusions about U.S. presidential candidates — and one in particular.

Of interest to me is that E.U. officials appear quite nervous about the upcoming U.S. elections and the possibility that Donald J. Trump could be re-elected to the presidency.  Why should E.U. officials be anxious?  The answer is that Mr. Trump previously called into question the necessity of NATO and its cost.  In 2024, the NATO budget in each area of the charter is €438.1 million for civil matters and €2.03 billion for military readiness.  These numbers represent increases of 18.2% and 12%, respectively, over NATO’s 2023 budget — the largest obligation to implement this budget belongs to the United States at 22%.

As we know, China is not alone in experiencing a worsening economy; the E.U. also faces serious problems, not the least of which is deepening economic difficulties and political instability.  How does one stabilize political discontent within the E.U.?  One way to achieve that would be through the use of NATO’s military.  It would not be the first time a Western military alliance marched into Italy, Germany, Czechoslovakia, and Bulgaria. 

Suppose E.U. officials are concerned about a second Trump presidency.  In that case, it may be because Trump is likely to move forward with disentangling the United States from NATO and its grossly disproportionate share of the NATO budget.

I pause now to ask: Has there ever been a greater conspiracy against one man?

America’s talking heads tell us that while American politics has left our society badly divided, the government’s machinery continues to drone on.  The talking heads tell us that America’s isolationist temptations are tamed through its mechanism rather than political policy.  The U.S. continues to fund Ukraine, but the amount has been significantly reduced.  This is not a win-win situation for those of us who see no role for the United States in Eastern European affairs.

Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, the E.U. manages to address energy problems, tackle inflation, and destroy its agricultural output by significant levels.  And they also continue to manufacture ammunition in astounding quantities — no doubt for use in Ukraine paid for through coercive taxation.

In China, two factions continue to vie for influence.  Xi’s majority supports Vladimir Putin, but there is a minority (pro-Western European) group of the Chinese Communist Party.  This is why President Xi directed his foreign ministry to see what could be done to de-escalate the Russo-Ukraine conflict.  Putin stands a better chance of winning the conflict through a negotiated settlement than through brute force — which is why Putin has offered peace negotiations on six occasions.

Nevertheless, China will be the real winner in a negotiated peace between Russia and Ukraine.  China will benefit from a closer relationship with Russia (several joint projects are on the table at this very moment), and the E.U. will come to view China as a more stabilizing influence than the United States.  In any case, Europeans much prefer Chinese noodles to America’s Donald Trump.

Putin – the Man Behind the Former Iron Curtain

by Mustang

Tucker Carlson began his interesting interview with President Putin with several questions, among them — Why is Russia fighting a war with Ukraine, and why is no one interested in finding a peaceful solution to this conflict?  On the surface, these questions might be asked by any college sophomore, but they weren’t sophomoric.  Wisely, Carlson asked the questions and allowed Mr. Putin to answer them his way.

Vladimir Putin is a well-educated man who became a leading reform politician during Russia’s Perestroika period.  He was a former intelligence officer within the Committee for State Security (KGB), from which he retired in 1990 and took up work at Leningrad State University.

He later served as an advisor to the mayor of St. Petersburg, Russia, with subsequent advancement to the position of first deputy mayor.  He has served variously as President and Prime Minister of Russia since 1999.  In effect, Putin had a front-row seat to the events that led up to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the creation of the Russian Federation.

Within the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), the Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic (RSFSR) was but one of fifteen socialist republics.  Russians did not always control the USSR.  Khrushchev was Ukrainian; Stalin was from Georgia.  During the Second World War, the United States and USSR were allies.

The United States’ decision to use the atomic bomb to end the war with Japan shocked the world.  Never before had anyone witnessed such power in a single bomb.  It also prompted the beginning of the Cold War (a term invented by English writer George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair) in his 1945 essay titled “You and the Atomic Bomb.”  After the Moscow Conference in December 1945, the USSR transitioned from ally to enemy.

The first phase of the Cold War began when the United States and its Western European allies sought to strengthen their relationships and used the policy of containment against emerging Soviet influence.

For his part, Soviet leader Joseph Stalin was determined never to allow the invasion of a foreign power again.  After the United States and its allies established NATO, directed against Soviet expansion, Stalin began to assemble a collection of buffer states around the Soviet Union.  Stalin referred to these states as Warsaw Pact Member States.  Winston Churchill called it the Iron Curtain.

For forty-four years, the U.S. and NATO alliance members confronted the USSR and Warsaw Block at every turn.  Both the US and USSR engaged in proxy wars, notably throughout Eastern Europe and the Far East.  Ultimately, however, the communist state proved economically inadequate.

The USSR could not keep pace with the United States industrially or technologically.  Note: I recall speaking with a tourist from Russia, a man claiming to be a retired Russian Army colonel (c. 2008), who told me that after observing the United States in action against Iraq in 2003/2004, he and his contemporaries realized that the USSR could never have won in an all-out war with the United States.  It was an interesting acknowledgment, but one I took with a grain of salt.

The point is that the USSR was moving toward collapse long before 1992.

Two developments dominated the politics in the USSR between 1979 – 1989: the crumbling of economic and political structures and patchwork attempts at reforms to reverse that process.  After the rapid succession of Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Chernenko, Chairman Mikhail Gorbachev implemented perestroika to modernize Soviet communism and make substantial changes in the party’s leadership.  Mr. Gorbachev’s reforms led to unintended consequences.  His policy of glasnost facilitated public access to information that undermined the authority of the communist party.

Glasnost allowed ethnic and nationalist disaffection to reach the public stage, and many constituent republics (particularly the Baltic Republics, Georgian SSR, and Moldavia) sought greater autonomy, which Moscow initially rejected.

This led to the revolution of 1989, and the USSR began losing allies in Eastern Europe.  Suffering from low prices of petroleum and natural gas, the ongoing war in Afghanistan, outdated industry, and pervasive corruption, the USSR’s planned economy became an epic disaster.  Shortages in commodities were prevalent and noted on Western television — although my exchange student from Moscow (1994) told me that neither she nor her family ever experienced such televised shortages.

Meanwhile, tensions between the USSR and RSFSR were personified as a power struggle between USSR Chairman Gorbachev and RSFSR Chairman Boris Yeltsin.  Yeltsin presented a formidable opposition to Gorbachev and ultimately replaced Gorbachev as USSR Chairman and, in 1990, became chairman of the Supreme Soviet.  A month later, Yeltsin produced legislation prioritizing Russian laws over Soviet laws — and withholding two-thirds of the USSR’s budget.  In its first-ever free election, Boris Yeltsin became the President of the Russian SFSR in 1991.

On August 19, 1991, Russian dissidents launched a coup d’état against Gorbachev, but the effort faced overwhelming popular opposition and collapsed in three days.  At this point, the disintegration of the USSR was imminent, and the icing on that cake was Russia’s assumption of authority over all USSR institutions.

At this point, the United States government, faced with the opportunity to end the quest for global communism, showed the world its true colors.  All the language used by U.S. Presidents, from Harry Truman through George H. W. Bush (and beyond), about seeking global peace was pure political rhetoric.

At this stage, the United States had the opportunity to welcome a new country into the world of free nations.  The disintegration of the old USSR was a complex matter, made more so by oligarchs who were intensely trying to obtain control of the entire Soviet military infrastructure — from nuclear delivery systems to the weapons themselves.

Stated hopes and ambitions aside, it wasn’t enough to watch the disintegration of the Soviet Union; the United States then embarked upon a program to stamp as much of it out as possible.  They did this by manipulating weak sisters in Ukraine, a breakaway republic, and offering former soviet republics access to membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.  The incentives were both military and economic.

During his interview with Mr. Carlson, President Putin (as did Gorbachev during his address to the American people on January 2, 1986) provided a (somewhat) lengthy overview of Russian history.  He believed that doing so was necessary as an explanation of the importance of Russian sovereignty.  His lecture began around A.D. 900 — about the same time King Alfred the Great tried solidifying his hold over southern and central England.

After that, Mr. Putin began to ask a series of questions about the motives of the United States.  For example, if the United States understood how the Russians felt about sovereign territory, particularly in light of the Mongol invasion (1223 – 1440), struggles involving the Polish-Lithuanian Empire (1547 – 1764), invasion of the German Army (1914 – 1917) (1942 – 1944), a bloody civil war (1917 – 1922), and the Cold War.

Until around twenty years ago, I always viewed the U.S. government as the guys in white hats, the good guys, the people you could trust to do the right thing.  Much of that attitude concerned me not knowing all the facts.

This attitude changed when I observed what the U.S. government was doing to people who value their Bibles and Constitutional Rights to live free from invasive government policies.  If the federal government can treat its citizens like “an enemy,” then let’s look at how it treats competitive nations.  My conclusion is that we never wore white hats.

There are many examples to discuss, and I think President Putin did a fair job bringing them to Mr. Carlson’s attention.  I would be interested to hear Tucker Carlson’s “takeaways.”  Putin did ask how it is possible, of all the countries in the world, for the United States to provide financial support to Ukraine’s neo-Nazis — the valuable idiots under the direct control of Ukraine’s President Zelensky.

It is also a fact, as stated by President Putin that following the 2022 Ukrainian Eastern counteroffensive, Russia renewed calls for peace for the fifth or sixth time, and Ukrainian leaders refused to reopen discussions, claiming that the Russian government was not fully committed to peace.  And why should Zelensky be interested in peace talks with Russia?  The United States has become a cash cow for the Ukrainian comedian … and he must be thinking that life can’t get any better than this.

It should not be lost on anyone that the entire progressive apparatus views with deep disdain anyone associated with Mr. Carlson’s meeting with President Putin.  American media put Hillary Clinton on camera, who announced on at least two occasions that Carlson was no more than a useful idiot.  From a former Secretary of State whose ambition was always imagined to be world peace, Clinton’s performance was dismal.

Moreover, the American media, which has become little more than the propaganda arm of the Progressive (Neo-Marxist) Movement, dismissed Tucker Carlson as a “Gonzo Journalist” and Mr. Putin as a “petty dictator.”  Putin may be a dictator, but there’s nothing petty about the man.  Facts tell us otherwise.

I have to add here that the American left’s efforts to keep this nation in a perpetual state of war leave me nearly speechless.  Do the American people realize that this country has been at war more-or-less constantly since 1940?  Why is that?  It isn’t something we can blame on only one party if anyone thinks of George H. W. Bush and his not-so-bright son as conservative.

Since 1940, this country has given up hundreds of thousands of our precious young people to war — men and women who might have found a cure to cancer, and in the process, the government has squandered trillions of working America’s tax dollars.  To what end?  How is the world in better shape today than it was in 1933?

The interview was a good one; I hope something worthwhile comes from it.  I’m not holding my breath.  Too many people in this country are heavily invested in global war and discontent.
 
 
Korean War (1950 – 53)

Vietnam War (1953 – 64, 1965 – 77, 1974 – 75)

Laotian Civil War (1959 – 75)

Permesta Rebellion (1958 – 61) (Indonesia)

Lebanon Crisis (1958)

Bay of Pigs (1961)

Dominican Civil War (1965 – 1966)

Korean DMZ Conflict (1966 – 69)

Cambodian Civil War (1967 – 75)

Lebanon Intervention (1982 – 84)

Invasion of Grenada (1983)

Bombing of Libya (1986)

Tanker War (1987 – 88) (Iran-Iraq War)

Invasion of Panama (1989 – 1990)

Gulf War (1990 – 1991)

Iraqi No-Fly Enforcement (1991 – 2003)

Somali Intervention (1992 – 95)

Bosnia-Croatian War (1992 – 95)

Haitian Intervention (1994 – 95)

Kosovo War (1998 – 99)

Afghan War (2001 – 21)

Yemen Intervention (2002 – Present)

Iraqi War (2003 – 11)

Pakistan Intervention (2004 – 18)

Second Somali Intervention (2007 – Present)

Indian Ocean Intervention (2009 – 16)

Libyan Intervention (2011)

Ugandan Intervention (2011 – 17)

Niger Intervention (2013 – Present)

Iraq Intervention (2014 – 21)

Syrian Intervention (2014 – Present)

Libyan Intervention (2015 – 19)

Houthi Intervention (2023 – Present)

Total estimated costs: $10 Trillion (1950 – Present)
 
Putin was right … U.S. diplomats are stupid.
 

 

Hillary Clinton Unleashes on Tucker Carlson; the Rage and Meltdown Over His Putin Interview Gets Crazier

Hillary Clinton stops drinking her Chardonnay long enough to come out of the woods and opine on “the useful idiot” which sure is saying something coming from her. How many died on her watch? Russia Russia Russia. Tucker Carlson has made the left very very unhappy. One wonders what it is that they are so afraid of.

CNN: “Tucker Carlson’s interview with Vladimir Putin hasn’t been posted online yet, but he is already doing the Russian authoritarian’s bidding.”

Anyone who follows twitter for the last couple of days knows Tucker has pinched the beast. He has been trending for days. Add that Tucker has an interview with Julian Assange waiting to unleash. We may only see State approved interviews apparently.

Just in:

Image

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton talks with Alex Wagner about the strange attraction some Americans feel toward authoritarian leaders like Vladimir Putin, describing it as “absolutely gobsmacking terrifying.” MSNBC’s Ali Velshi joins for analysis.

 

Tucker Carlson, the man himself.

 

 

 

 

The Best of the Swamp today.

U.S. Support for Ukraine Withers Away – Funding Will End in Three Weeks..

There is a new war in town. Israel now grabs the war headlines as the U.S. casts Ukraine adrift. Barely a ripple in the news as the former wonder boy Zelensky no longer casts about looking for our dimes. Europe seems to believe in “game on” and dishing out some cash for Zelensky.

As for Zelensky? The blame game starts. The Washington Post prepare its readers for the obvious. It starts with the “Looks like he may have not been following orders” more later on in the post:

By the end of the year, “we will run out of resources to procure more weapons and equipment for Ukraine and to provide equipment from U.S. military stocks,” Office of Management and Budget Director Shalanda Young wrote in a letter to Congress. Going without that funding will “kneecap” Ukraine and increase the likelihood of Russian victories, she warned.

Zero Hedge picks up the story:

President Biden has been seeking a whopping $106 billion aid package chiefly for Ukraine and Israel. But budget director Young says the proverbial writing is on the wall amid GOP resistance.

….Young wrote. “There is no magical pot of funding available to meet this moment. We are out of money — and nearly out of time,” she said.

At a moment of soaring food and cost of living prices, amid a continually weaking US dollar under the Biden administration, taxpaying Americans might not be too pleased with the White House referencing a “magical pot” of funding… as if tens of billions handed to Kiev thus far merely ‘magically’ materialized out of nowhere.

“Cutting off the flow of US weapons and equipment will kneecap Ukraine on the battlefield, not only putting at risk the gains Ukraine has made, but increasing the likelihood of Russian military victories,” Young continued.

“Already, our packages of security assistance have become smaller and the deliveries of aid have become more limited . . . while our allies around the world have stepped up to do more, US support is critical and cannot be replicated by others.”

Image

A recent article in The Economist has summarized the recent compounding setbacks for Kiev as follows:

For more than 600 days of full-scale war, America has been Ukraine’s greatest savior as it marshalled arms, money and more to help repel Russia’s invasion. Now America has become one of Ukraine’s greatest worries. Its aid for Ukraine is fast running out, and dysfunction in Congress is blocking new assistance. Nobody is sure when—or whether—it will be restored.

The effect is being felt at the front as America tries to stretch its dwindling funds. “In the spring the flow of military supplies was a broad river. In the summer it was a stream. Now it is a few drops of tears,” says one informed Ukrainian source. Ukraine faces a bleak winter amid great uncertainty: its counter-offensive has failed to break through Russian lines; its enemy is increasing its arms production; and its vital ally is paralyzed by political turmoil and distracted by Israel’s war in Gaza.

One wonders what the status will be one year from now… will a negotiated settlement finally happen by then? There are already behind-the-scenes moves being made, according to reports stretching back several months.

The blame game starts –

The U.S. and Ukraine are involved in a blame-game for the failed counteroffensive against Russia. A Washington Post report reveals that The U.S. and British offiers help Ukraine plan the campaign against Russia. However, the report claims the U.S. and Ukraine had their differences over the counteroffensive strategy.

The best of the swamp.

Delusional Granholm Invites Russia and China to Nuclear Weapons Test

“Inviting Communist China and Russia to have a front row seat for our sensitive nuclear weapons tests will give them invaluable information on how to defeat our nuclear capabilities and improve their own.”

It was Joe Biden’s energy secretary, Jennifer Granholm, who issued the invitation to China and Russia to have “unprecedented access” to the Nevada National Security Site, run by the Department of Energy.

Stefanik led a coalition of 18 House Republicans to offer pushback to Granholm over access to the nuclear testing site.

Fox reported a letter to Granhalm blasted Biden’s appointee for her actions.

Stefanik continued, “At a time when our adversaries are growing their nuclear stockpiles to undermine America’s leadership, allowing them access to one of our nuclear test sites will only advance this pursuit and lead to our own destruction.

Read more

 

Not enough Granholm?

Department of Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm doubled down on her praise of China for being the world’s largest “clean energy” technology investor, despite it also being the world’s largest emitter of CO2.

During a House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing, Chief Deputy Whip Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA) grilled Granholm about her comments on March 10, 2023, that “We can all learn from what China is doing” on the environment, and another remark saying that the U.S. did not have the moral authority to criticize China.

Reschenthaler asked Granholm if she was aware at that time that 30 percent of the world’s CO2 emissions came from China. Granholm responded, “Oh, yes.”

 

Let’s round it out with comments from Maria and her crew. One of the best take downs.

FOX Business’ Maria Bartiromo, Solus Alternative Asset Management strategist Dan Greenhaus and Fox News contributor Liz Peek discuss Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm for praising China’s ‘encouraging’ investment in clean energy.

 

This isn’t the first clue we had that Granholm was off the chart…

Senator Joni Ernst asks, “Do you support support the military adopting that EV fleet by 2030?”

Granholm, ” I do.  And I think we can get there as well.”

 

 

While the GOP wants to strip our Secretary of Transportation salary down to a buck, how about we throw in Granholm? Now this one can get us all killed. Buttigieg only wants Ten for the big guy.

The best of the swamp.

The very best of the swamp.