The MSM is going nuts over the Trump defamation settlement made by ABC and George Stephanopoulos. It was agreed to pay Trump $15 million smackeroos plus $1 million in his attorney fees. Depositions were set to take place this week.
It been a year since Bunk posted about it, so how about a refresher on just how egregious the claim was against Trump to start with? No one has talked about the scene of the crime and the damage made to the store where the alleged incident was to have taken place. Here is a portion of the post:
Trump’s $83 Million Judgement & the Scene of the Crime – a Store Called Bergdorf Goodman.
Keep in mind this is not the jury that convicted him of the sexual assault – no, it’s over a charge he maligned her in statements. The man is not allowed to defend himself.
It’s hard to find on Google, so here’s what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed “inadmissible” by the judge:
– She couldn’t recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened – She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality
– The dress she claims to have been wearing didn’t exist at the time – Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible
– Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman
– Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed
– Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her “favorite shows”) – Trump’s Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows – She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves
– She told Anderson Cooper, “most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies.”
– She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vagina.
– How many other high profile trials are you aware of where the defendant is not allowed to present exculpable evidence or testimony?
The Store.
Anyone who has been to Bergdorf Goodman knows you don’t wander around the store for long on you own. This store is for the rich, actually for the very rich and the rich like to be well attended. And so they are. The store? A setting for numerous films where glamor reigns.
If there is any argument as to why the sexual assault charges against Trump, given by someone who is selling a book, is not true, the scene of the crime may reveal it all.
The Ultimate Party | Bergdorf Goodman. This is not Walmart.
The idea that some male, as well known as Trump, even back in the day, would be wandering around, by himself, on his own in area of the the ladies dressing room is simply absurd. There would be other salespeople, salespeople attending customers, attending the so called victim. Salespeople in attendance, exchanging clothes tried on. As if Bergdorf would ever leave the women’s dressing area unattended for the very CHI CHI “The Ladies Who Lunch.” titled women.
No salesperson witnessed nor heard anything, no complaints at the time made to anyone associated with the store by the victim. Nothing to the police, then, 25 to 35 years later when she couldn’t remember the exact year or month the incident took place, only then she claims it took place.
For more of the details of Bunks earlier post on this absurdity – Read more
So much winning.
BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades! 