user avatar
Richard Haier
@rjhaier
Author, The Neuroscience of Intelligence; The Science of Human Intelligence. Editor: icajournal.scholasticahq.com. Pres. hirefoundation.org
California, USA
Joined June 2017
  • user avatar
    Remember the Google memo?
    Men and women’s preferences differ more in more developed and egalitarian countries, contra idea that diffs arise from “roles.” Hard lives force 2 sexes to focus on necessities; freedom allows diffs to be expressed. science.sciencemag.org/content/362/64…
  • user avatar
    Over the years I have seen a few masters communicate controversial ideas to hostile interviewers & educate listeners at the same time. This is the best I have ever seen. I will try to emulate. Congratulations @jordanbpeterson
  • user avatar
    Education embraces many ideas without solid weight-of-evidence---learning styles, multiple intelligences, mindset, group IQ and many more now called neuro-education while treating scientifically compelling intelligence/learning research like Kryptonite.
  • user avatar
    When 300 professors condemn research from outside their field, apparently without reading it, are they "pseudo-academics"? Academics' Mobbing of a Young Scholar Must be Denounced - Quillette quillette.com/2018/12/07/aca… via @QuilletteM
  • user avatar
    Research w giant Ns show school & teacher variables combined predict 10% of school achieve. Student IQ predicts 65%. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
    Overcrowding doesn't seem to affect student performance in Kentucky schools martin.uky.edu/sites/martin.u…
  • user avatar
    Grit better than IQ?---less than meets the eye. This interview is great. Also click on the link to the Slate article. There is so much misinformation about intelligence--it's refreshing to see accurate media coverage.
  • user avatar
    No surprise to researchers familiar with compelling data back to the Coleman Report (1966) & more recent Deary 2007: school & teacher variables together account for less than 10% of variance in school achievement. Next $575M to research on the single best predictor: intelligence?
    The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation spent $575 million on teacher-effectiveness programs. The results? Ouch. rand.org/pubs/research_…
  • user avatar
    This won't be the final word but it adds to the discussion about how to have reasoned discourse on complex, controversial and often incendiary issues like intelligence & genetics.
  • user avatar
    Attended a university symposium on race where speakers criticized TBC for things never said. I challenged them, asking how many actually read it. Only 1 raised her hand. Seriously. I sent each pdfs of TBC pages that specifically refuted their claims. Only 1 acknowledged receipt.
    They haven’t read it. Won’t read it. Most prescient book of the last quarter century.
  • user avatar
    Worth repeating this warning about the very small apparent effect of education on IQ scores! Hardly negates powerful genetic influences. See also: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
    Very sad to see this is how some folks are interpreting our paper. It says nothing about the (extremely strong evidence for) genetic influence on IQ!
  • user avatar
  • user avatar
    Just as predicted by decades of research showing intelligence predicts about half of school achievement variance but teacher/school variables combined no more than 10%. Hard to believe but that’s the replicated data.
  • user avatar
    Our new paper on intelligence & molecular biology just published:
  • user avatar
    New review. Amazon US & UK keep restocking. Deep THX to students, educators, twitter followers & J. Peterson podcast fans for your interest.