user avatar
Ric Fulop 🇺🇸/acc 🗽
@ricfulop
Double 🦄, physical sciences founder (General Flash, @DesktopMetal, @Lumafield, A123Systems). Seed in @Onshape, @Hadrian, @HighArc, @Dyn, @Salsify...
FL450, MIT or Cambridge MA
Joined August 2008
Posts
  • user avatar
    1/ “During WWII, Navy tried to determine where they needed armor in planes. They ran an analysis of where planes had been shot up, and came up with this. The places that needed to be up-armored are wingtips, central body, and elevators. That’s where the planes were getting shot
  • user avatar
    1/ New chemistry breakthrough just published by Jeff Dahn. @Tesla lead battery researcher. 1M vehicle miles, 795Wh/L, with fast charge and subsequent 20yr durability projected in grid. The data is amazing. jes.ecsdl.org/content/166/13…
  • user avatar
    Replying to @ricfulop
    3/ The Navy thought it was analyzing where aircraft were suffering most. What they did was analyze where aircraft could suffer the most damage without catastrophic failure. All of the places that weren’t hit? They weren’t looking at the whole sample set, only the survivors”
  • user avatar
    Request For Startup: a Netflix like subscription startup that gives people $12/no access to all scientific papers out there. Most scientists, doctors, entrepreneurs would pay for it and it would open up knowledge everywhere! I bet publishers would make more $ this way
  • user avatar
    Replying to @ricfulop
    2/ Wald (statistician) disagreed. He thought they should armor nose, engines, mid-body, which was crazy, of course. That’s not where the planes were getting shot. Except Mr. Wald realized what the others didn’t. The planes were getting shot there too, but weren’t making it home.
  • user avatar
    "10 things that take 0 talent but will get you 100% respect: 1) Being on time 2) Work ethic 3) Effort 4) Body language 5) Energy 6) Attitude 7) Passion 8) Being coachable 9) Doing extra 10) Being prepared"
  • user avatar
    Replying to @ricfulop
    5/ I am shocked they are open sourcing it as a model chemistry! It means they probably have an improved version and even if they don't it gives @tesla a MASSIVE battery price performance edge over all EV competitors. I am not BS'ing when I say this ❤️
  • user avatar
    Prediction. Masks will be fashionable. Folks like @Nike will make them 😷
  • user avatar
    The way metal parts will look in the 2020’s. Achieved through metal 3DP and generative design.30-50% lighter, greener and using less parts and materials. Mass customized to ea local market and built without tooling and inventory of 1. This is the 4th industrial revolution 🕶🚀
  • user avatar
  • user avatar
    Replying to @ricfulop
    4/ This chemistry eliminates most of the cobalt, improves energy, charge rate and more importantly allows a larger SOC swing (much lower cost & weight) and does this with a 5X life improvement!
  • user avatar
    Replying to @ricfulop
    3/ Second life of these packs will change the nature of the grid in the future. As a former battery exec this data is very, very impressive. Thanks @BrianTHeligman for pointing me to the paper! And huge kudos to Jeff and the Dallhausie team for pulling this off.
  • user avatar
    Replying to @ricfulop
    2/ This means @tesla will be able to expand the SOC swing of the battery to go to 400 miles or reduce its cost!
  • user avatar
    ‘10 Gamification ‘12 Content marketing ‘14 Growth hacking ‘16 Conversational marketing ‘18 Growth loops... This is all noise... Just focus on making differentiated products that lots of people want