Replying to @0xdoug
Imagine thinking the problem of over leveraging is the AMM's fault and not the leveraging
C2tP
511 posts
- Replying to @OuroborosCap8 and @coinbaseLast I checked Frax has this thing called frxEth happening soon and also owns a shit ton of cvx
- Replying to @haydenzadams and @UniswapThis seems like some pretty big data cherry picking. What's the opposite trade look like?
- Replying to @poordartMoved from mim to cream. Didn't bother to check though did ya?
- Replying to @wavey0x and @fraxfinance"couldn't find in the docs" ...clearly in the docs. Also it's clearly not a fee. Why are we just making up stuff now?
- Replying to @ConvexFinancesigning to confirm new domains etherscan.io/verifySig/7610
- Replying to @0xRamenUmaiJust to be clear .... Me, stakedao, and yearn all permanently locked into vecrv by locking into wrappers (did not swap).
- Replying to @ImperiumPaper and @MakerDAOSounds terrible to be honest. Maker should hold them itself and pass revenue to holders.
- Replying to @river0x and @DefiSafetyWhat's the point of your platform if you just repeat what's on their docs? You've stated you know oracles aren't an issue but give bad marks because the docs don't say so? So you're basically lying to all your users cause you're publishing something you know is false.
- That's why you could just drop the flat rate airdrop to each cvxFxs holder. This is the solution to a non-weighted drop that doesn't skip fxs locking users. We arent asking for weighted, you can do as you please. Just want you to consider all the users that will be skipped