Welcome to the Uganda Legal Information Institute

ULII is a free legal information service provided by the Law Reporting Unit of the Uganda Judiciary and a member of the global Free Access to Law community.

ULII logo

ULII is part of the Library, Research, Law Reporting Committee of the Judiciary of Uganda.

africanlii-logo laws-logo judiciary_of_uganda_logo

My ULII

Your personal research space — save documents, add notes, and get updates when the law changes.

Recent Judgments

Application for substituted service dismissed as premature for failure to exhaust the three‑day personal service period.
Election petitions – service – substituted service – Rule 6(1),(3),(4) – requirement to attempt personal service for three days before substituted service – computation of time – public holidays – Interpretation Act s.34(1)(b); Order 51 Rule 3 CPR
2 April 2026
Applicant's inability to effect personal service warranted substituted service and extension due to special circumstances.
Parliamentary elections — service of petition — strict timelines — Rule 19 enlargement of time for special circumstances — Rule 6(4)-(5) substituted service — publication, affixation, electronic transmission permitted
2 April 2026
A bank’s monitoring obligations do not absolve the respondent’s gross negligence in exposing her card and PIN, making her liable for fraud losses.
Banking law — digital infrastructure and fraud monitoring; Quincecare duty — threshold of reasonable grounds to suspect fraud; customer duty — safeguarding debit card and PIN; circumstantial evidence and gross negligence in unauthorised card transactions; liability for unauthorised electronic payments
1 April 2026
Court allowed anonymous, in-camera civil proceedings and sealed records to protect plaintiffs' sensitive medical privacy.
Civil Procedure Act s98; inherent powers of the court; open justice vs right to privacy (Articles 28, 27, 29); strict-necessity and proportionality test for in-camera hearings; pseudonyms and confidentiality orders in sensitive medical negligence proceedings
1 April 2026
Registrar precluded from hearing the applicant's oppression petition because identical proceedings are pending in the High Court.
Companies Act – Registrar’s jurisdiction – minority oppression and rectification of register; Companies (Powers of the Registrar) Regulations SI No. 71/2016 – Regulation 4 (pendency in Court) – preclusion where identical High Court proceedings exist; injunctive relief and certain remedies fall outside Registrar’s powers; avoidance of inconsistent decisions and abuse of process
1 April 2026
Registrar barred from adjudicating oppression and rectification petition due to substantially similar High Court proceedings; petition dismissed.
Companies Act – Registrar jurisdiction – member oppression petitions and rectification of register; Regulation 4 preclusion where parallel High Court proceedings; overlap of remedies; risk of inconsistent decisions and abuse of process
1 April 2026
The court ruled there was no sufficient evidence; the accused were acquitted of murder and aggravated robbery.
Criminal law — No-case to answer — sufficiency of evidence under s.74 Trial on Indictments Act — last-seen doctrine; recent possession; aggravated robbery requirements; proof of participation; forensic and chain-of-custody reliability; misjoinder of counts/persons
31 March 2026
Medical evidence proved a sexual act, but unsafe identification meant the appellant's conviction could not stand.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Proof of sexual act: slight penetration sufficient; medical evidence and contemporaneous observations as corroboration
Identification – Single witness, fleeting observation, youth and lack of familiarity: risk of mistaken identity; absence of corroboration (identification parade, arresting officers, forensic evidence) renders conviction unsafe. Appeal review under Rule 30(1)(a)
31 March 2026
Failure to determine age rendered the adult sentence unlawful; appellant, found a child, must be released unless held on other charges.
Children Act — age determination and court's duty; burden on prosecution to prove majority; identification evidence and identification parade; right to interpreter and fair trial; sentencing limits for child offenders; illegal sentence and release
31 March 2026
Second appellate court upheld convictions for soliciting/receiving gratification, finding evidence sufficient and hearsay/contradictions immaterial.
Anti-Corruption Act — solicitation and receipt of gratification — sufficiency of evidence; Criminal Procedure Code Act s.45 — limits of second appeals; hearsay evidence — not decisive where independent evidence exists; production of phone call printouts — not mandatory
31 March 2026
View more judgments

Collections

Void for Vagueness Doctrine Webinar