Ceph QA

@Shraddha Agrawal can you review this run? Note that some tests are dying due to https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/74574. I have alerted David about this, but you may need to request/schedule a rerun of the dead jobs in the meantime.

nvmeof run approved:

most of jobs failed at the end (after whole test was executed successfully) due to: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/74501
thrasher test failures (happens on main branch too so unrelated to these PRs): https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/74615

@Shraddha Agrawal any updates?

Hey @Laura Flores, I am through with the analysis (https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/TENTACLE#httpstrackercephcomissues74474), I just have one doubt:

From scrape.log, this one doesn't make sense to me even after looking at its teuthology log:

Failure: 
1 jobs: ['11772']
suites: ['base', 'mem$/{low}', 'mon_election/classic', 'msgr-failures/many', 'msgr/async-v2only', 'objectstore/{bluestore/{alloc$/{bitmap}', 'onode-segment$/{1M}', 'rados', 'rados/singleton/{all/backfill-toofull', 'supported-random-distro$/{centos_latest}}', 'v1}}}}', 'write$/{v1/{compr$/{no$/{no}}']

RADOS approved: https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/TENTACLE#httpstrackercephcomissues74474