The Heart-Led Way

Authentic Faith emanates from the heart, NOT from the rational mind.

Readership: Christians
Theme: Mystical Awareness
Author’s Note: This article was originally published on Ed Hurst’s discontinued blog, Do What’s Right, on 2020/10/22 [Archive].  Updated and expanded by Jack, based on his correspondence with the author.  Headings and images added by Jack.
Length: 1,300 words
Reading Time: 7 minutes

Intro

I’ve been asked to review the meaning of “Heart-Led” in the context of this blog.

A major element of the Radix Fidem covenant is bouncing off the prevailing American culture and mainstream Christian religion, showing how they are wrong. Thus, we first have to point out what most people believe, and why it’s wrong.

The core problem is Aristotle. Not the man and his teaching so much as the influence he’s had on American thinking. He denied the existence of a Spirit Realm. He insisted that, if there were gods, they were restricted to this realm of existence. This world, as we experience it, is all there can be. Further, he insisted that human capabilities — reason in particular — were sufficient to grasp all that matters. He denied the Fall and insisted that humans were perfectible, at least in terms of logic and reason.

Enlightened Thinking Has Replaced Mystical Awareness

We understand that American culture arose from Anglo-Saxon culture for the most part, with a lot of other minority inputs from all over Europe. The whole mess together is the result of Germanic tribal barbarians colliding with the vestiges of the Greco-Roman Civilization. The existing Roman Church at that time quite intentionally ditched what remained of their almost forgotten understanding of the Hebrew influence in the New Testament teachings, and adopted a bunch of pagan ideas from the Germanic invaders, so as to brew up a brand of Christian religion that would appeal to them. This was a political move; the Church intended on converting the Germanic lords and so retain the Church’s political dominance.

Somewhere later down the road, the resulting civilization rising from the Dark Ages went back and reclaimed the classic literature and lore of the long-dead Greco-Roman Civilization. The result climaxed with the Enlightenment. There was some decent stuff there, but the core problem was the restoration of some elements of Aristotelian assumptions about reality. The details get murky, but the net result was that a lot of Western Christian thinking was unable to shake loose those pagan assumptions. So we have today a long legacy of Christians asserting that there is a Spirit Realm, but then they make it spooky and incomprehensible. They say that man is fallen, but then act like human reason can be trusted to get answers for faith. They assume “faith” means a compartment of the intellect, a matter of rational decision.

In Western mythology, the heart is restricted to serving as a repository of sentiment. Sure, it’s more than mere emotion, but it is still just a matter of feelings, even if they happen to be really strong feelings. Thus, the modern meaning of “follow your heart” is some inexplicable force of really strong feelings that won’t let you rest until you take them into account.

This is radically different from how things were viewed in the Biblical context. In the Bible, your heart is the seat of commitment, AKA faith. The Bible talks about interacting with living beings and hearing the celebration of the Creator. Western minds read that as parabolic, but Scripture treats it as quite literal. Thus, we find Jesus speaking to natural forces and those things obeying Him. And we have Paul solemnly teaching that Creation itself tells us about God and what is moral truth.

Wait…  But isn’t the Heart Wicked?

One of the first objections I often hear from sincere truth seekers inquiring about the Heart-Led Way is from Jeremiah 17:9.

“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; Who can know it?

Jeremiah 17:9 (NKJV)

They assume this verse indicates that the human heart is utterly depraved, and never to be trusted.  Granted, there are scripture passages that appear to confirm this conclusion (e.g., Mark 7:14-23; Romans 1:28-32), but the end result of this belief is them choosing to alienate themselves from their own heart and soul.  This rejection of discernment, resulting in the destruction of the integrity of one’s soul, cannot be the intended application, as Jesus’ work is not to destroy us, but to redeem us.

The Bible talks about how you can build barriers in your soul that darken your heart. It can be corrupted and made wicked. However, if you turn the light of revelation onto your heart, it will commit itself to faithfully serving the Lord of Creation. It’s not mere sentiment; it’s a wholly separate faculty that is able to accurately discern the will of God. And it is superior to the intellect. Meanwhile, the Scripture warns, starting with the Garden of Eden narratives, that human reason is fallen and insufficient to discern moral truth on its own.

The Submission of the Intellect

The next objection I often hear is, “What about the rational mind?”

God gave us brains so that we could organize and implement the moral truth coming out of our hearts. The heart always trumps whatever the brain thinks it knows, and the brain will often object to this (as depicted in the cartoon meme below). God’s will does not have to make sense to your head; it always makes sense to your heart. It’s burned into your convictions. If you make a conscious effort to refer to your convictions — the living fire of imperative in your soul — then you will always have peace with God.

The Heart — A Treasure In Earthen Vessels

So perhaps we should heed the majority of non-Western cultures yet living in our world today when they suggest that your soul is not in your head, but in your heart. Ask any Native American who actually knows their own culture where their soul “lives”, and they’ll point to their heart, whereas the vast majority of non-native Americans will point to their heads. And then we can examine the scholarly research about the Ancient Near East (ANE) and discover that they, too, assumed that the soul was in the heart, not the head — all of them, so far as we can tell.

Lo and behold, even Western science has discovered that the heart has its own sensory field, and that it possesses nerve nodes apparently capable of processing what that sensory field senses. However, science has no idea what kind of data that field senses, only that it most certainly does interact with other living things and the sensory field emitting from those beings. Given the cultural assumptions of the West, we aren’t surprised that the most active efforts to use that limited scientific information result in folks talking about “emotional intelligence” (EQ).

Abraham believed it; Moses believed it; Jesus and His followers taught it. Not the way I’m teaching it here, of course. They were basing their teaching on a shared assumption that had never varied across the entire history encompassed in Scripture. It turns out that the West is just about the only civilization that thinks the heart is just a repository of sentiment, and that the soul is in the head.

Conclusions

The Heart-Led Way means you have moved your conscious awareness from your head to your heart. It means you seek to sense moral truth directly from Creation, because God wove His own DNA in the fabric of reality. It means you strive to read your own convictions, which are awakened when your spirit is touched by the Divine Presence. It means you sense that powerful Divine Presence which lives in your heart as the Holy Spirit. It means you have compelled your reason and intellect to bow the knee to the superior moral wisdom of your heart.

That’s the Heart-Led Way.

By the way, Biblical Law assumes you are taking the Heart-Led path as the means to discerning what the written Law Covenants demand of you. You cannot obey God’s Law with your head — that’s legalism. The Bible expects you to get this Heart-Led Way as a prerequisite for peace with God.  It is required.  That’s the basis of true faith.

Related

Unknown's avatar

About Jack

Jack is a world traveling artist, skilled in trading ideas and information, none of which are considered too holy, too nerdy, nor too profane to hijack and twist into useful fashion. Sigma Frame Mindsets and methods for building and maintaining a masculine Frame
This entry was posted in Agency, Conserving Power, Counterfeit/False Paradigms, Discernment, Wisdom, Fundamental Frame, Gnosticism, Holding Frame, Identity, Introspection, Maturity, Personal Growth and Development, Moral Agency, Mysticism, Paradigms of Religion, Positivism / Scientism, Self-Concept, The Power of God, Therapeutic Moralistic Deism. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to The Heart-Led Way

  1. rontomlinson2's avatar rontomlinson2 says:

    I find this heart-led way convincing; I assume Jesus came to change our hearts. I say that as one who is fairly ignorant of the bible and tends to get carried away with modern ideas. We can’t always explain why we have to do certain things and I take this to be partly what mysticism is. But I do have questions.

    Is spiritual birth a requirement for purifying the heart so that it becomes trustworthy?

    What are some pointers for discovering what one’s convictions are? Is a conviction something you believe to be true whatever state you happen to be in at the time?

    I haven’t read any Aristotle but understand that he was a kind of animist who did believe in spirits, which differed for various creatures, be they plants, animals or humans.

    What is the metaphysical status of software in your scheme: could software be regarded as some kind of animating principle? Or would that also be a form of materialism, denying the existence of a spirit realm.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Tomb Refugee's avatar Tomb Refugee says:

      As a part of the Radix Fidem community, I believe I can answer to some degree. Spiritual birth is necessary, but that raises a host of issues in defining what that term means. We prefer to think of it as the Divine Presence invading and enabling and empowering choices, resurrecting a dead spirit. The heart is seen as the seat of the will, the home of your commitments and convictions.

      You hold your opinions in your head, but your convictions hold you because they are rooted in your identity as a child of God. They are more about purpose and priorities, not thought. A conviction about something is the voice of God, not letting you rest until you do the right thing in regards to some choice. You can fight against conviction, but all that does is numb your awareness of the spiritual realm and how it touches your spirit.

      At best, software would be a parable for your human thoughts and habits of mind. Such could animate you, but it’s not sufficient to deal with spiritual matters. It would lead only to material concerns and anything that relates to fleshly nature. It cannot create anything really new because software has distinct and inviolable boundaries. Even a computer virus can do only what computers can do.

      Religious conversion might be like changing some of the apps installed. A genuine spiritual birth is like upgrading the hardware which results in a necessary change in OS.

      Liked by 2 people

      • rontomlinson2's avatar rontomlinson2 says:

        Thanks very much. I do have some private ideas about what my convictions are: one in particular goes right back to childhood and must have seemed ridiculous to my family! Following from what you said, convictions seem to be overpowering beliefs about one’s purpose. Which may well conflict with the convictions of others. ‘Beliefs’ because they can’t be explained, only acknowledged and enacted.

        Spiritual birth. Nod. I was in a ghost world. Not the spirit realm, but I remember the world itself seemed to have faded almost to black and white. I take it that spiritual birth and baptism used to coincide; in fact I think I probably read that in Radix Fidem somewhere. However nowadays our sense of individuality is too strong for an external ritual such as bathing to produce the change.

        Regarding software you could be right but perhaps it’s the other way around. Maybe only our bodies are in this world but we ourselves are virtual creatures: it’s not that software animates us, it’s that we animate the flesh. Most of us are fiercely looking outwards towards the world, where our bodily and emotional needs are met, so we don’t perceive any different realm. This obviously would have to be different software from that which runs our computers today, more self-organising and agentic.

        I don’t know. Yet it’s notable that the material versus spiritual debate has got stale. Also that neither scientists nor theologians seem to have made philosophical room for software despite using it everyday to write to each other!

        Like

  2. Jackabond's avatar Jackabond says:

    Another difficulty we have in Western Christianity is that it places far too much significance on Paul’s epistles to inform the essence of faith. Paul was a Jewish scholar and an ex-Pharisee, conditioned to legalistic and analytical ways of thinking about matters of faith. One of the most powerful and memorable of his writings is Romans 12:2 where he teaches,

    “Do not be conformed to this age, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may discern what is the good, pleasing, and perfect will of God.”

    Romans 12:2 (HSCB)

    This teaching gives the impression that faith is a brain-led process, that faith is something to be rationalized intellectually in order to accord with the will of God. To a Western Christian mindset the Pauline way would be very compelling, and might even seem like the ‘right’ way to understand faith. But I don’t think that’s what Paul was intending here, as anakainōsei renewing (of the mind) is used elsewhere to refer to the regenerative work of the Holy Spirit. This describes a new way of believing, which is also a heart-led process, a felt conviction that very often precedes rational thought. We see in other parts of Romans that Paul grappled with the apparently conflicting convictions of his heart and mind quite considerably. Yet Pauline intellectualism is well established in the Western Church and much of the missionary work done today exports and spreads the same. Western Christianity is Pauline, even the more esoteric Pentecostalism although one can understand their heart-led appeal.

    It’s notable that Jesus’ focus was much more on the heart than the mind. He didn’t ignore how people thought, but his call to follow him appealed to how the Hebrew people lived and felt in their daily experience of God. The gospel of John gives a deeper spiritual account of Jesus’ heart-led ministry than the other three gospels, and John’s epistles speak more to heart-led faith than Paul’s epistles. I think Bruce Charlton does well to put the Fourth Gospel first, if only for this reason. I would put John’s epistles before Paul’s. Unfortunately Johannine churches are few and far between and the ones I’ve visited are too sketchy and scant in their teaching to satisfy.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Pingback: Summary of Christian / Mystical Awareness (2025/12) | Σ Frame

  4. Pingback: 2025 Sigma Frame Performance Report | Σ Frame

  5. Pingback: Requiem for the Blue Pill | Σ Frame

  6. Pingback: Noteworthy Points from the Christian Mysticism Debate | Σ Frame

  7. Pingback: From Christ to Churchianity — Part 1: Hidden Church History | Σ Frame

  8. Pingback: From Christ to Churchianity — Part 6: The Law as an Expression of Morality | Σ Frame

Leave a comment