Announcing ClusterFree: A cluster headache advocacy and research initiative (and how you can help)

[xposted in EA Forum]

Today we’re announcing a new cluster headache advocacy and research initiative: ClusterFree

Learn more about how you (and anyone) can help.

Our mission

ClusterFree’s mission is to help cluster headache patients globally access safe, effective pain relief treatments as soon as possible through advocacy and research.

Cluster headache (also known as ‘suicide headache’) is considered the most painful condition known to mankind. We believe it is one of the largest sources of preventable extreme suffering in humans today. Every year, about 3 million adults (and an unknown number of minors) suffer from this debilitating condition.

And yet, even in the EU, only 47% of the cluster headache population had unrestricted access to standard treatments (primarily oxygen and triptans) in 2019. Despite affecting a similar number of people as multiple sclerosis, global investment into cluster headache is minuscule.

At the same time, countless patients have reported previously unattainable relief using certain psychedelics, even at low doses. For example, psilocybin, LSD and 5-MeO-DALT can effectively prevent attacks, and N,N-DMT can abort attacks within seconds and also have some preventative effects. However, these life-saving treatments are inaccessible to the vast majority of patients.

We want to tackle these problems by:

  • Publishing open letters demanding that governments, regulatory bodies, and medical associations worldwide take action immediately, with a focus on easing restrictions around psychedelic use.
  • Providing patient groups with high-quality resources and supporting their advocacy efforts.
  • Engaging with policymakers globally to advocate for better access to treatments.
  • Publishing research on cluster headache and supporting other researchers in the field.
  • Collaborating with entrepreneurs and philanthropists motivated to bring new, effective treatments to market.

About us

ClusterFree is a non-profit initiative incubated by the Qualia Research Institute.[1] It is led by Alfredo Parra, with Andrés Gómez Emilsson (President, QRI) as co-founder. Bob Wold (Director, Clusterbusters) and Jonathan Leighton (Executive Director, OPIS) are members of our Advisory Board.

We will be collaborating closely with Clusterbusters, the largest and most well-known cluster headache advocacy organization, led and run by patients. For about 25 years, they have been at the forefront of cluster headache advocacy, especially in the US and the UK. We are excited to bring more capacity and new approaches to tackle other jurisdictions, and to show that patients are not alone in this fight.

How you (and anyone) can help

As our first project, we are publishing one global open letter and 11 country-specific open letters:[2]

Anyone can sign the global open letter. Additionally, if you live in or come from one of the countries above, you can sign that letter as well. Signatories include Prof. Peter Singer, Scott Alexander, Dr. Christopher Gottschalk (Yale), David Pearce, and Dr. Daniel Ingram.

Please share the letters widely within your network![3]

If your organization wants to show its support for ClusterFree’s mission, we can list it as a partner on our website.

A few other ways to help include:

  • Donating or putting us in touch with potential donors. Donations are tax deductible in the US.
  • Volunteering for various tasks (many of which are very simple but high-impact).
  • Connecting us with journalists, podcasters, or influencers.
  • Offering any pro-bono services that could help the cause.
  • Giving us feedback on the website.
  • For patients: Sharing your testimonial (which we can feature here).

You can get in touch any time.

Room for funding

We have been making good progress on a shoestring budget during the past few months. Among others, we:

  • Started an official collaboration with Clusterbusters.
  • Gained the support of a member of a US state legislature.
  • Started conversations with CH advocates in multiple countries (most recently India[4], Denmark, and New Zealand).
  • Are engaging with entrepreneurs and philanthropists interested in bringing DMT to market.
  • Developed a preliminary idea for a new, legal abortive treatment that could be highly effective (potentially also for migraines).
  • Have started developing phenomenology-based, patient-centric surveys to test various hypothesis for the underlying mechanism of action that psychedelics exert on this condition.

We recently raised seed funding from a private donor to cover our core operations for the coming months. Additional funding would allow us to hire a second teammate to work alongside Alfredo at this early stage, particularly on outreach and communications. We could absorb an additional $50k–$150k immediately.

At this very early stage, we are still evaluating different paths to impact, and will likely test various strategies simultaneously to identify the most promising opportunities.

We believe ClusterFree is a great donation opportunity for people who care about relieving the most intense human suffering today. Cluster headaches represent a major health crisis even in developing countries, and we are far from having effective treatments widely available. Help us change that.

Donate

Additionally, you can consider donating to Clusterbusters or OPIS, who have been at the forefront of cluster headache advocacy and research for years.

Work with us

If you’d like to help us reduce the global burden of cluster headache pain (beyond volunteering), we’d love to hear from you. Simply fill out our expression of interest form.

Further information


  1. We are considering incorporating a charity in the UK. In the meantime, ClusterFree is fiscally sponsored by QRI.
  2. We are very grateful to the various volunteers from the EA community who contributed to the translations.
  3. Asking people individually to sign the letters works much better than asking in groups.
  4. Many thanks to Jacob Woessner’s volunteering work on this front.
  5. Website and brand design by Lombaert Studio.

[Many thanks to Alfredo Parra for this writuep]

QRI Presents: Reverse Engineering DMT Phenomenology with Non-Linear Optics

This is more than a presentation. It’s an invitation to join the frontier of consciousness research 🙂

Spatiotemporal Coordinates: Thursday, November 20 – 4:00 PM – 10:00 PM PST – Frontier Tower (San Francisco, California)

Hello Qualia Community!

After a year of heads-down development (with glimpses shared on podcasts including Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal #1  #2) QRI is ready to reveal the full scope of our work mapping the state-space of consciousness, modeling phenomenology, and identifying the computational properties of consciousness. 

What We’ve Recently Accomplished In This Area:

​In 2023, QRI’s High Energy Awareness Research Team conducted two legal psychedelic retreats exploring mushroomsayahuasca and 5-MeO-DMT, by bringing together an interdisciplinary coalition ​of meditators, psychonauts, physicists, and mathematicians and working as a Think Tank for weeks at a time (see heart.qri.org).

Systematic DMT phenomenology reveals repeatable phase transitions and geometric transformations, including hyperbolic curvature, symmetrification effects, and computational properties that demand explanation. The QRI period 2024-2025 has been about developing conceptual frameworks and computational models to make sense of these patterns, and then putting them to empirical test. We’ve discovered how coupling kernels (the rules of interaction between oscillating systems) can simultaneously shape both neural activity and the topological structure of physical fields, providing a potential causal chain from neurochemistry to the structure of conscious experience. It’s a conceptual framework where the pieces of the puzzle finally seem to fit together: how psychedelics modify coupling dynamics at the neural level, how these changes cascade through neural architectures to modulate field topology, and how this field structure feeds back into neural activity, avoiding the trap of epiphenomenalism while grounding phenomenology in processes with computationally meaningful properties.

What’s Next:

​This event is divided into two parts.

  • We’ll present the core outputs of our research from the past year: methods, participants, results, and the theoretical frameworks we’ve developed. You’ll see interactive demonstrations and simulations that bring these concepts to life.​
    • 4:00 PM – Doors open, mingling with snacks and soft drinks​
    • 5:00-5:40 – Introductions and interactive demonstrations​
    • 5:40-6:40 – The Big Reveal: QRI’s psychedelic research over the last two years, including HEART retreat resultsinteractive simulations, and our theoretical breakthroughs
  • We’ll chart our path forward: In Q2 2026, we’re planning a legal psychedelic retreat where mathematicians, physicists, meditators, and visual artists will collaborate to test whether non-linear optics plays a role in psychedelic phenomenology (especially DMT). This generative framework, which we take seriously and can rigorously test with proper funding, will combine physics simulations, psychophysics studies, and rigorous phenomenological mapping to reverse engineer the medium of computation of consciousness itself.​
    • 7:00-8:00 – The Next Chapter: 2026 retreat plans, mathematical modeling of consciousness, and testing our generative frameworks​
    • 8:00-9:00 – Q&A and group discussions​
    • 9:00-10:00 – Mingling and winding down

We anticipate that once we recognize consciousness’s computational role, we will move from cognitive science to consciousness engineering: systematically exploring the state-space of possible experiences and recruiting new qualia varieties to enhance our (conscious) cognitive capabilities.

Presenters at this event:

Andrés Gómez-Emilsson: As QRI’s President and Director of Research, his work at QRI ranges from algorithm design, to psychedelic theory, to neurotechnology development, to mapping and studying the computational properties of consciousness. Andrés blogs at qualiacomputing.com.

Cube Flipper: With a deep understanding of wave dynamics and visual perception, Cube is dedicated to uncovering the intricacies of visual phenomena. In addition to their research at QRI, they also share their insights and findings on their personal blog smoothbrains.net.

What We’re Fundraising For:

To continue this groundbreaking work, we’re seeking support for:

  • Core operations: Salaries to keep QRI’s team intact for another year (and hopefully many more)​
  • Two major retreats: The 2026 DMT phenomenology retreat and a 5-MeO-DMT awakening retreat
  • Research outputs: Publishing papers and studies, including upcoming pain quantification research (currently private, soon to be released)​
  • Technology development: Bringing crowdsourced phenomenology visualization tools to a fully functional state to crowd-source the mapping of the state-space of consciousness​ (first batch to be released on November 20th)
  • Additional initiatives: Cluster Headache relief research and research in digital sentience (we will announce two QRI-incubated initiatives that further these two causes)

Whether you’re a researcher, artist, meditator, potential funder, or simply fascinated by the nature of consciousness, this event offers a rare opportunity to see cutting-edge phenomenological research as it unfolds. We’re also gauging interest for the 2026 retreat: if you have relevant expertise (mathematics, physics, meditation, visual arts), funding capacity, or alignment with this vision of consciousness research, we’d love to connect.

If you’re unable to make it but would still like to contribute to our research efforts, you can donate at qri.org/donate or with crypto on our Endaoment page.

RSVP to the Event

Technical Appendix: Recent Developments


​This year’s QRI-associated essays reveal multiple converging lines of investigation:

Non-Linear Optics Framework: A generative framework exploring how the brain might render world simulations using optical elements. Key metaphors include Laser Chess (where local classical moves set constraints, then holistic standing wave patterns emerge) and Cel Animation (describing how the world simulation is constructed with independent layers controlled by different modules that overlap and interact in a shared perceptual workspace). This includes work on beamsplitter holography to explain Indra’s Net phenomenology.

Fractional Fourier TransformRecent work explores how the brain may *utilize* the fractional Fourier transform, which is a generalization that smoothly interpolates between spatial and frequency domains. This could explain characteristic ringing artifacts in psychedelic visual fields and provide a biologically plausible mechanism for massively parallel pattern recognition.

Coupling Kernels and CDNS and Field Topology: A breakthrough framework showing how systems of coupled oscillators can both tune into resonant modes and control the topological structure of fields. This provides a direct causal chain from molecular interactions (neurotransmitters, psychedelics) to the structure of conscious experience. The coupling kernel acts as a “field-shaping operator”, the same mathematical object simultaneously modulates neural dynamics and field structure, explaining how psychedelics produce such radically different yet structurally consistent effects across participants and experiences. We hypothesize that DMT effectively implements a Mexican-hat coupling profile (strong negative coupling at short distances, positive at medium distances) creating competing clusters of coherence, while 5-MeO-DMT drives systems toward global phase synchronization. This connects to the Consonance-Dissonance-Noise Signature (CDNS) approach, which describes valence in terms of spectral properties such as consonance tracking positive valence, dissonance negative valence, and noise neutral valence. We we will make the case for why this proof-of-concept demonstrations are compelling and point toward testable predictions.

Ongoing Foundational Work: QRI continues to develop frameworks including the CDNS approach, the Topological Solution to the Boundary Problem (explaining how unified experiences emerge with precise boundaries), liquid crystal dynamics as phenomenologically significant, and logarithmic scales of pleasure and pain for rigorous quantification of experiential quality.

Catch up on the latest:

Binding, Minds & the Platonic Realm: Michael Levin, Andres Gomez Emilsson & Elan Barenholtz

How Networks Vibrate: From Oscillators to Eigenmodes

A Salon on Consciousness, Holograms, and Digital Psychedelics

Different Types of Artificial Minds: Digital, Analogue, and Hybrid

The Future of Consciousness: Consciousness and What It Means to Continue to Be

DMT for Cluster Headaches: Aborting and Preventing Extreme Pain with Tryptamines and Other Methods

Learn more:

The Voice in Your Head: Don’t Mind the Inner Monologue

People complain about the “voice in their heads.” Often, advanced meditators say they’ve lost it, and their life is better for it. But more recent research shows a large percentage of the population doesn’t have it anyway (a case where natural variance combined with the typical mind fallacy makes things extra confusing).

But you know what? I think this is a massive red herring. As per usual, the problem with X (having a voice in your head in this case) was never X directly, but… you can guess what I’m about to say: the effect X has on valence. Don’t overindex on X. X IS INCIDENTAL. What matters is that X MAKES YOU FEEL BAD.

Rob Burbea distinguishes between discernment and judgement. Discernment tells you what is helpful. Judgement is an evaluation of the self/other, which relies on false metaphysical assumptions to stand on.

The problem with having a voice in your head is that it is a judgmental voice – it creates a self-view. In particular, it causes moral and social judgments on a fabricated sense of “self and other.” Judgment feels bad; it adds weight to experience. Even judging something as good feels subtly bad in the background, because it entails some level of inner tension and segmentation where you represent a part of you as bad to generate the contrast necessary to highlight the good.

Judgment is self-perpetuating. It stings. It costs energy. And it builds on top of itself. When you’re too far gone in a judgment spiral, you judge yourself for being judgmental.

Burbea calls judgment “the thief of happiness” and explains how it strangles creativity: how many poems die in the waste-basket because “I’m useless” barged in? He also reminds us that sometimes simple mindfulness isn’t enough; you have to challenge the habit by feeling its sting in the body and meeting that pain with kindness.

Things like hangovers and bad psychedelic trips are often bad because of the persistent tracer effect on judgment. A panic attack often involves a kind of judgment tinnitus. Without judgment and its symmetry-breaking effects in the field of awareness, a “voice in your head” would not be a problem. Bring it on! I’m OK having a zany, Bugs Bunny-like commentator on my experience, so long as it doesn’t jitter my attention without consent or cast judgment on my everyday activities or social cognition. It could very well be amusing: might as well have an entire cast of whacky characters putting on a schizophrenic show for me to enjoy. The problem is not the voices, but the bitterness and disenchantment they entail.

Rob, in his lecture on letting go of judgment, explains that not judging is a real, achievable way of life. Freedom from judgment is within grasp for all of us (assuming we put in the time and effort – though please don’t take this as a judgment on your temporal thriftiness or laziness!). Burbea affirms it’s “absolutely possible” for the habit of judgment to end – sometimes large chunks of the “mountain of judgment” crumble suddenly in a matter of weeks. Even when judgment thoughts continue to arise from habit, they arise “completely free of any charge… just like empty words” with no power behind them. Eventually, these empty judgments fade away because they’ve been “sucked dry” of meaning.

This effort, I believe, is far more targeted and beneficial for liberation than the poor proxy of “removing the voice in your head, which already ~50% (?) of people don’t have anyway.” Freedom from judgment and its associated sense of presence, direct experience, thinning of self, and homeostatic regulation is the real prize. Not mental silence.


Presidential Inaugural Address of Andrés Gómez Emilsson

[Epistemic Status: fiction (in most timelines, that is); in my lane, having fun]

Place: The Equatorial Republic (pop. ~190M)

Time: 2032

My fellow citizens of this great Equatorial Republic,

Today, as I stand before you having accepted the solemn responsibility of the presidency, I am humbled by your trust and energized by the possibilities that lie before us. This administration marks not just a change in leadership, but a fundamental paradigm shift in how we approach governance, human welfare, and our collective future.

A New Era of Compassion Through Science

On this first day in office, I am announcing the formation of the National Hedonic Research Initiative. Let me be clear: extreme suffering can be worse than death itself. Nowhere is this more evident than in the case of cluster headaches—aptly named “suicide headaches” by medical professionals, a condition where the pain is rated significantly more severe than childbirth, kidney stones, or even gunshot wounds.

Through Executive Order 001, I am establishing the Cluster Headache Elimination Commission with an initial $2 billion in funding. The data is clear: approximately 3 million people worldwide suffer from this condition, spending nearly 5 million person-days annually in extreme suffering rated 9/10 or higher on pain scales. This Commission will:

  1. Create a nationwide tryptamine research and distribution network, prioritizing low-dose N,N-DMT, psilocybin, and LSD trials based on compelling evidence that these compounds can not only abort attacks but extend remission periods indefinitely for many patients
  2. Establish 200 specialized treatment facilities across the nation within 6 months with mandatory oxygen therapy and other proven abortive treatments
  3. Fund 50 research laboratories dedicated to advancing our understanding of pain relief mechanisms and developing targeted interventions for these conditions based on patient-reported outcomes

Additionally, I am directing the Department of Health to create the Pharmaceutical Innovation Directive focusing on anti-tolerance compounds for chronic pain patients, next-generation flumazenil analogs to reverse benzodiazepine dependence, and targeted solutions for other iatrogenic conditions that have been unconscionably neglected. These extreme forms of suffering represent the deepest moral emergency in our society, and their elimination is our highest priority.

Mapping the Hedonic Landscape: Beyond QALY

For too long, our policies have been guided by economic indicators and inadequate health metrics like Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY). The QALY framework fundamentally fails us by treating all human experiences as linearly equivalent and by capping wellbeing at an arbitrary “perfect health” that ignores the vast territory of heightened human potential.

The empirical evidence is compelling: our current metrics systematically undervalue both the depths of intense human experiences and the heights of human flourishing. As a result, we’ve created policies that address widespread but moderate challenges while neglecting concentrated instances of profound human experiences – both positive and negative.

Today, I am commissioning the first comprehensive Hedonic Landscape Observatory—a scientific assessment of the full spectrum of human experience that will:

  1. Develop more sensitive and accurate measurements of diverse human experiences across the wellbeing spectrum
  2. Map the neurological correlates of resilience and positive states to complement our understanding of health
  3. Create economic feedback loops that systematically reward businesses and institutions that demonstrably enhance quality of life
  4. Develop a new economic indicator—the Consciousness-Weighted Prosperity Index—that will appear alongside GDP in all government reporting

This initiative will ensure that governance decisions are evaluated not just by economic impact, but by their effect on the actual lived quality of conscious experience of our citizens—taking into account the true depth and breadth of human flourishing available to us.

Game Theory and Consciousness: A New Political Framework

We stand at an evolutionary crossroads. The old politics operated on outdated models that failed to recognize the fundamental relationship between consciousness and our collective future. Today, we begin the transition to a political framework that explicitly acknowledges the quality of conscious experience—as central to governance.

By Executive Order 002, I am establishing the Consciousness-Economy Integration Commission tasked with creating explicit feedback loops between consciousness research and economic selection pressures. This commission will:

  1. Develop metrics that quantify the wellbeing-enhancing potential of technologies, enabling investors to select for innovations that genuinely improve quality of life
  2. Create tax incentives for businesses that demonstrably improve the lived experiences of their employees and customers
  3. Establish a public research platform exploring the positive potential of consciousness, ensuring that discoveries about phenomenological wellbeing directly influence market forces

This systematic exploration of consciousness is not merely academic—it will fundamentally reshape our economic landscape by ensuring that technologies and policies that enhance human flourishing systematically outcompete those that merely optimize for shallow metrics. The implications for environmental policy, social welfare, and international relations are profound and far-reaching.

Transcending Tribal Politics Through Psychological Understanding

From this day forward, international diplomacy will operate with a new level of psychological sophistication. Through the newly formed Department of Psychological Architecture Analysis, we will explicitly model the subagent structure of world leaders and political movements, identifying when narcissism, psychopathy, or tribal thinking is driving decision-making.

International coalitions will be formed not just around shared interests, but around shared psychological awareness. This administration will not hesitate to name pathological dynamics when they appear on the world stage, while offering a path forward through a consciousness-centric yet pragmatic approach to governance.

I am also directing our diplomatic corps to explore new modalities for high-stakes negotiations. We will establish a Diplomatic Innovation Laboratory to research the application of empathy-enhancing protocols in negotiation settings where entrenched psychological barriers prevent resolution. When trillions of dollars and millions of lives hang in the balance of international agreements, we cannot afford to have negotiations hijacked by psychological defense mechanisms and tribal identification.

Just as we now understand that the pain of cluster headaches is objectively more severe than a migraine, despite superficially similar descriptions, we must develop precise language and metrics for the psychological architectures that drive international conflict. They are real, distortionary, and far from game-theoretically optimal. Only by seeing these structures clearly—and developing reliable methods to transform them—can we hope to address existential challenges that require genuine cooperation.

Longevity: The Right of Every Citizen

While extreme suffering can be worse than death, unnecessary death itself remains a profound tragedy and represents an incalculable loss of human potential. Today, I announce the formation of the National Longevity Institute with initial funding of $10 billion, coordinating research across public and private sectors to dramatically extend healthy human lifespan.

This institute will prioritize three areas:

  1. Senolytics and cellular reprogramming technologies to reverse biological aging
  2. Neural preservation techniques to maintain cognitive function
  3. Prevention of age-related suffering states through targeted interventions

The benefits of this research will not be reserved for the privileged few, but made available to every citizen as a basic right. Age-related suffering is not inevitable, and this administration will not accept it as such.

The Science of Awakening: Soteriology as a Research Target

Even as we pursue longevity, we must confront a fundamental truth: all things remain impermanent. Today, I am establishing the Institute for Contemplative Sciences with a mission to develop a rigorous scientific understanding of what traditions across time and cultures have called “awakening,” “enlightenment,” or “liberation.”

This research program will:

  1. Systematically study how humans throughout history have made peace with impermanence and transcended existential suffering
  2. Investigate the neurobiological and phenomenological correlates of awakening experiences across contemplative traditions
  3. Develop scalable, secular methods to help citizens process mortality, grief, and existential concerns within our scientific worldview
  4. Create interdisciplinary teams combining neuroscientists, contemplatives, philosophers, and clinicians to bridge ancient wisdom with modern scientific rigor

The ultimate human challenge is not merely to extend life, but to discover how to be fundamentally okay with the impermanent nature of existence. While various religious and philosophical traditions have offered paths to this goal for millennia, we now have the scientific tools to explore these states with unprecedented precision.

By creating a dialogue between contemplative wisdom and scientific method, we can forge new pathways for humanity to face its deepest existential challenges. This is not merely a spiritual pursuit—it is a practical necessity for a civilization grappling with the fundamental questions of meaning and mortality in an age of unprecedented technological power.

Understanding Exceptional States of Consciousness

The most profound states of human consciousness remain largely unexplored territory in scientific research. Today, I am directing the National Institutes of Health to establish the Center for Exceptional States of Consciousness (aka. The Super-Shulgin Academy) with a $5 billion initial investment, tasked with making sense of profoundly positive experiences across the full spectrum of chemically-facilitated and meditation-induced states.

This Center will:

  1. Create standardized protocols for psychedelic research, including 5-MeO-DMT with essential safeguards and contraindication screening, recognizing that while beneficial for many, it can induce challenging experiences in others—understanding these variables is crucial for responsible application
  2. Fund 25 dedicated research facilities specializing in Jhana acceleration techniques and other contemplative practices that achieve similar states without pharmacological intervention
  3. Develop a comprehensive empirical framework mapping the neural correlates of these heightened states while investigating both beneficial outcomes and adverse reactions to create predictive models for personalized approaches
  4. Prioritize sustainable MDMA production and research as a north star intervention, focusing on its potential for treating PTSD and enhancing empathetic connection while minimizing cardiovascular impact and developing protocols to mitigate tolerance and neurotoxicity concerns
  5. Translate findings into scalable interventions for depression, anxiety, and existential distress, ensuring that safety, accessibility, and individual neuropsychological differences guide all protocols

These states represent extraordinary territories of human wellbeing—regions of experience that offer not only therapeutic potential but a scientific window into the furthest reaches of human potential that we have barely begun to understand. Our commitment is to explore these states with both scientific rigor and ethical care, recognizing both their profound potential and the need for responsible stewardship.

Expanding Our Moral Circle: Non-Human Animal Consciousness

Our commitment to understanding consciousness and reducing suffering must extend beyond our own species. Today, I am establishing the Interspecies Consciousness Research Initiative with a dual mandate: rigorous scientific exploration and practical harm reduction.

This Initiative will:

  1. Develop objective metrics to quantify suffering in non-human animals, with immediate focus on factory-farmed animals where the concentration of suffering is most acute
  2. Allocate $3 billion annually to research and implement improved welfare standards for farmed animals while simultaneously investing in cultured meat technologies and plant-based alternatives
  3. Create a roadmap for the gradual, culturally sensitive phasing out of the most harmful animal agriculture practices over the coming decades, aligning economic incentives with ethical progress
  4. Establish the Wild Animal Welfare Research Program to cautiously explore the complex ethical landscape of wild animal suffering, acknowledging the immense scientific and ecological challenges involved

The ethical imperative is clear, but so is the need for careful, evidence-based approaches. We will neither rush interventions that could have unintended consequences nor hide behind complexity as an excuse for inaction when suffering is demonstrable and solutions are feasible. This balanced approach recognizes our ethical responsibilities without compromising scientific rigor or cultural realities.

Transforming Education: Experience, Don’t Memorize

A key pillar of this administration will be fundamentally reimagining education. Today, I announce the Consciousness Education Initiative that will transform how we develop young minds. This initiative rejects both outdated rote learning and any form of ideological indoctrination. Instead, it embraces a “see for yourself” approach where students:

  1. Learn meditation techniques alongside mathematics, building empirical skills for exploring internal states
  2. Study their own consciousness with the same rigor they apply to studying literature, using first-person methods complemented by third-person science
  3. Develop critical thinking by becoming aware of their own cognitive biases and subagent structures
  4. Understand the psychological architectures that drive political beliefs through evidence-based empirical investigations

The goal is not to tell students what to think about consciousness, but to give them the tools to explore their own minds with scientific precision and philosophical depth. This approach builds intellectual independence—teaching students to verify claims through direct experience rather than accepting them on authority, whether in consciousness studies or any other domain.

A Call to Action

My fellow citizens, I do not promise that these ambitious goals will be easy to achieve. They will require not just government action, but a transformation in how we approach science, governance, and our very understanding of what it means to be human.

But the stakes could not be higher. We have the opportunity to eliminate forms of suffering that have plagued humanity throughout history, to extend healthy life, to create social systems that support human flourishing, and to understand the very foundations of consciousness itself.

This is not a partisan agenda, but a human one. In fact, of consciousness itself. It transcends traditional political divisions and speaks to our shared desire for a world with less suffering and more joy, less confusion and more clarity, less conflict and more cooperation.

Let us begin this journey together, guided by compassion, informed by science, and dedicated to the proposition that the quality of conscious experience matters fundamentally—and that we have both the capability and the responsibility to improve it, in ourselves, our loved ones, and in the field at large.

Thank you, and may we move forward with wisdom, courage, and clear-eyed determination.

Infinite bliss!

[The crowd erupts in thunderous applause]

And now, ladies and gentlemen, please welcome the voted ‘most hedonic’ pop sensation of the year, performing their chart-topping anthem inspired by our vision for the future!

[Cue massive flashy fireworks as the stage transforms. Spotlights sweep across a diverse crowd of all ages beginning to dance as the music starts. Children, seniors, and everyone in between move to the rhythm. The singer emerges from beneath the stage on a rising platform surrounded by dancers in colorful neuron-patterned costumes, launching into their hit song about consciousness, wellbeing and the dawning of a new era of understanding…]

Conscious Dawn” – Presidential Lyrics

Ancient wisdom meets the future’s light
Through pain’s darkest valleys, we’ll find the heights
Mapping consciousness beyond what we’ve known
A nation where suffering won’t reign on the throne

Tribal boundaries dissolve in our sight
As senolytics set our cells aright
The hedonic landscape unfolds like a scroll
Where DMT whispers truths to the soul

From cluster headaches to enlightened minds
Transcending metrics that keep us blind
Our moral circle widens beyond human skin
Wild animal welfare, a new dawn begins

Science awakens what sages once taught
Not just to live long, but find what we’ve sought
A republic where bliss is more than a dream
Infinite consciousness—our birthright supreme

Social Anhedonia Considered Selfish

[Epistemic Status: Speculating on personality disorders from the point of view of their valence landscapes – it makes intuitive sense when you think about it, but the theory lacks empirical validation – take it with a grain of salt]

Overeating : Food Anhedonia :: Narcissism : Social Anhedonia

Unreflectively, we may assume that overeating is a result of liking food too much. This makes intuitive sense – people consume more of what they enjoy. But research in eating behavior reveals a counterintuitive pattern: often, overconsumption stems not from heightened pleasure but from its absence. Recent studies on anhedonia in binge eating (spectrum disorders) suggest that palatable foods may substitute for the pleasure typically obtained from day-to-day activities – pointing to a pleasure deficit rather than excess.

People eat, and overeat, for many reasons, each with distinct phenomenological signatures. The interiority of overeating induced by THC (aka. “munchies”) differs markedly from overeating driven by social contexts (imagine the colleague pressured into “just one more slice” at an office party despite feeling full). But particularly interesting is the connection between overeating and food anhedonia – consuming more precisely because one experiences less pleasure from normal eating. This drives individuals toward the most perceptible elements of food – the sugars, fats, and salt that can penetrate a dulled sensory system. Meanwhile, those with intact hedonic tone for food experience a richer valence landscape, allowing them to enjoy subtle flavor notes that others might find imperceptible.

I think one can think about narcissism in a similar light.

The Social Taste Blindness Hypothesis

Consider two people at a wine tasting. Person A experiences complex notes of cherry, tobacco, and oak, with subtle shifts as the wine breathes. Person B tastes… red. Just red. Not unpleasant, but phenomenologically sparse. Who’s more likely to grab the bottle with “WORLD’S STRONGEST FLAVOR!” on the label?

The narcissist isn’t rejecting the subtle beautify of reciprocal attention and vibe attunement in favor of the loud BANG of admiration. They’re living in a world where the BANG is the only sound they can hear. The rest is silence or background noise.

This isn’t a defense of narcissism… someone who can’t taste anything but salt still shouldn’t add a pound of it on your birthday cake (without your consent, that is). But it does suggest that what we’re seeing isn’t an overflow of self-love, but a desperate compensation for what might be called “social taste blindness” or perhaps a kind of “generalized social anhedonia”.

The Flattened Social Reward Landscape

The core hypothesis I want to propose is that narcissists aren’t choosing selfishness over compassion any more than a colorblind person is choosing to ignore the difference between red and green. Their valence landscape simply doesn’t trigger the normal reward response to reciprocal human connection. The opposite of narcissism might be the emotional equivalent of tetrachromacy – that extra dimensionality of experience that makes mutual presence inherently rewarding to the socially attuned – rather than, say, lack of self-esteem.

So they optimize for what they can feel: validation, status, control, dominance. These are the salt, sugar, grease, and even capsaicin of the social world – even very dulled taste buds can pick them up in high enough concentrations. And when you can’t taste vanilla, you reach for hot sauce not because it’s better, but because at least it’s something.

The Valence Mechanics of Narcissistic Subtypes

Three major forms of narcissism map neatly onto three forms of social anhedonia, with the fourth one needing a bit of wiggle room (but bear with me):

  1. Grandiose narcissists, in this framework, might have the equivalent of prosopagnosia (aka. face blindness) for emotional states that don’t relate to them. They need to be the center of attention because they can’t feel the streams of attention going between others. The hedonic tone of mere social presence (“we’re just two consciousnesses existing together”) doesn’t register, so they create a stage where they’re in the spotlight. I.e. the only kind of social interaction that feels real to them.
  2. Vulnerable/covert narcissists have their gain turned up for threats but down for comfort. Like those people who can only hear high-pitched sounds, their affective range picks up potential rejections with clarity but the baseline feeling of secure attachment sounds like quiet static. They oscillate between idealization and devaluation because those extremes are the only stations their emotional radio can tune into.
  3. Communal narcissists experience what researchers call “intrinsic moral motivation” as a phenomenological dead zone. While instruments like the Communal Narcissism Inventory (developed by Gebauer et al.) can identify these individuals, the deeper issue lies in their experiential gaps. The phenomenology of doing good anonymously (that distinctive feeling that makes private virtue self-reinforcing for others) simply doesn’t register in their experience. The internal satisfaction that normally accompanies alignment between values and actions is absent, creating a valence vacuum that can only be filled by external recognition. They’re not performing goodness because they prefer the validation (though they do); they’re performing it because, without the observer, the action lacks any significant hedonic tone. Their sense of virtuous action exists only in the reflecting mirrors of social reality.
  4. Malignant narcissists present the most paradoxical case, and may at first look like a counter-example to our hypothesis. Their apparent pleasure in domination and others’ suffering seems to contradict the anhedonia model entirely. Yet what if this represents not normal social enjoyment but an inversion of the reward system? Think: a sensory system so deprived of normal stimulation that it begins to cross-wire, like taste buds registering bitter as sweet after prolonged deprivation, or the phenomenon of phantom limb pain/sensation triggered by touching parts of the body nearby in homunculi-space (“in some of these patients, a vibrator placed on the jaw or cheek was felt as vibration of the phantom hand” – Ramachandran). The malignant narcissist may experience such profound anhedonia to ordinary social pleasure that their valence architecture has essentially flipped, thus finding stimulation only in the high-amplitude signals of others’ distress. (Note: sometimes energy is better than nothing, even if negative in valence at first, as it can still drive an annealing process). Their social reward system, unable to detect the subtle “notes” of mutuality, recalibrates to extract meaning from the only signals strong enough to make a reading: power differentials and the negative emotional states they can induce in others. We are not talking about sadism tout court; rather, it’s a desperate compensation mechanism within an otherwise dim landscape of interpersonal emotions.

In each case, what looks like “too much self” is actually “not enough experiential world” – a dimensionality collapse in their capacity to experience certain valence gradients involving others.

Items of the Communal Narcissism Inventory (Gebauer et al., 2012)

Dimensionality Collapse: Reduced Social Phase Spaces

Normal social rewards operate in a high-dimensional space with multiple independent variables. We track and respond to dozens of social signals simultaneously: facial expressions, voice tonality, conversational give-and-take, empathic resonance, mutual recognition, and contextual appropriateness. The phase space of healthy social interaction contains many degrees of freedom, allowing for a flush landscape of possible states and trajectories.

The narcissistic reward architecture, by contrast, exhibits a form of dimensional collapse. Rather than tracking the full spectrum of interpersonal variables, their attentional system focuses on a dramatically reduced subset, mainly those that directly import self-evaluation and status. For the narcissist, this is a constraint in what registers as phenomenologically salient and thus what they can *couple with*.

When dimensionality collapses in a dynamic system, the available trajectories through phase space become severely constrained. Even if the underlying system is complex, when you’re only tracking a few variables, the overall dynamics simplify into basic patterns. This explains why narcissists experience social interactions in such a binary, flat way: the attentional system isn’t capturing enough dimensions to represent the full complexity of interpersonal exchange. So the dimensionality of the dynamic interaction collapses: you’re pulled into the only mode of interaction they know how to navigate, i.e. the narcissistic manifold.

Importantly, narcissists aren’t simply choosing to ignore certain aspects of social interaction. Their experiential phase space lacks the dimensionality needed to represent the delicate harmonics that make mutual attunement intrinsically rewarding for others. They’re operating with a reduced-dimensionality model of social reality where most of the valence gradients others navigate simply don’t exist.

The Paradox of Intensity Without Resolution

A seeming contradiction: narcissists often experience powerful emotions. Rage, shame, triumph, exhilaration. How does this square with the social anhedonia hypothesis?

The answer is in distinguishing between emotional amplitude and emotional resolution. Think of an old television with the contrast turned up to maximum but the reception fuzzy. You see the bright parts and the dark parts with blinding clarity, but all the middle grays blur together.

This explains the curious way narcissists can be simultaneously overwhelmed by their own feelings yet oblivious to yours. Their emotional system isn’t registering less – it’s registering differently, with a dynamic range compressed around ego-relevant signals and a blind spot for the subtle melodies of mutual presence and the subtle dynamic control mechanisms they entail.

The Self-Model Resolution Problem

The narcissist’s predicament tells us something deep about the nature of self-knowledge. We gain access to ourselves through a recursive process of modeling others who are modeling us. The resolution of one’s self-model is fundamentally constrained by the resolution of one’s models of others.

If your internal representation of other minds lacks dimensionality, meaning, if it captures only the crude peaks and valleys of social evaluation while missing the subtle dynamics of mutual presence, then the self you construct through these reflections will inherit this dynamic poverty. Your own experiential landscape becomes accessible to you only through the same low-resolution filters you apply to others.

The narcissist isn’t choosing a simplified self-understanding over a more complex one. Rather, they’re operating with the only self-model their attentional architecture can generate given its constrained inputs. They’ve optimized for detecting a narrow band of social signals, and this same narrowness characterizes their self-perception.

This explains why narcissistic self-enhancement isn’t actually self-knowledge at all. The scaffolding required to build a high-resolution self-concept simply isn’t there. What from afar looks as excessive self-focus is actually an unpleasant attempt to compensate for a poorly rendered self-image by amplifying its most detectable features.

Therapeutic Implications: Re-enchanting the Social World

If narcissism results as an adaptation to social anhedonia rather than excessive self-regard, our therapeutic approaches require radical revision. The standard protocols presuppose a motivational defect rather than a perceptual one – like telling an anosmic person to try harder to enjoy Channel No. 5 (EDP).

More promising approaches might look like:

  1. Sustainable empathogens – MDMA temporarily expands social reward perception but isn’t sustainable long-term. Hypothetically, we might develop non-neurotoxic analogues that selectively enhance social valence sensitivity without serotonergic depletion. Such compounds would serve not as treatments themselves, but as phenomenological reference points showing the narcissist an opportunity to tune into the social reward landscapes that exist but they’re blind to.
  2. Biofeedback synchrony training – Systems that visualize interpersonal physiological coherence (heart rate variability, skin conductance) could make non-verbal attunement tangible. By rendering visible what was imperceptible, narcissists might gradually develop direct perception of these signals.
  3. Phase-locked interpersonal dynamics – Structured interactions involving synchronized movement, breathing, and speech provide moments where narcissists might experience multi-level attunement. These experiences, once registered, might create templates for recognizing similar but subtler states in everyday interactions.
  4. Valence-neutral reflective environments – Settings offering neither praise nor criticism but high-fidelity reflection of internal states circumvent both narcissistic supply and defensive contraction. This uncouples self-perception from evaluation while increasing perceptual resolution.

The common thread is treating narcissism as information access impairment rather than moral failing. The goal isn’t condemnation but expanding dimensions of experience – to help them taste vanilla by first establishing that it exists, then building perceptual pathways to it from detectable flavors.

A word of caution: This work would need to be approached with extraordinary care. Particularly with phase-locked dynamics and reflective environments, there’s a bidirectional risk: resonance typically flows both ways. The therapist must avoid phase-locking to the narcissistic manifold while helping the narcissist access the interpersonal valence landscape that most people inhabit. This asymmetric entrainment requires sophisticated safeguards and training, as the narcissistic attractor basin can be surprisingly powerful, especially when amplified through synchronized states.

Beyond a Moral Framing

This model invites us to think beyond simplistic moral framings without also inadvertently excusing harmful behavior. The narcissist isn’t choosing self over other in a world where both options feel equally real. They’re navigating a landscape where certain fundamental human experiences – the quiet joy of mutual recognition, the inherent reward of witnessing another mind – are blunted or dulled.

This doesn’t mean narcissists bear no responsibility for their actions. But understanding the valence landscape underlying their behavior creates space for more effective intervention. You can’t argue someone into tasting a flavor their receptors don’t register. But you might, with patience and precision, help their system remember or discover it.

Conclusion: The Tragedy of Phenomenological Poverty

There’s something deeply sad about this reframing. Rather than creatures of excess, narcissists emerge as beings of deprivation – not deprived of attention, but of the capacity to fully experience the rich valence landscape of human connection.

Rather than delighting in glorious self-love, they might desperately be trying to feel something in a social world that registers as mostly dull.

I hope that this perspective invites compassion without compromising clarity. The narcissist’s social world isn’t too full; it’s too empty. And in that emptiness lies both explanation and, perhaps, a path toward healing.

Team Consciousness: A Philosophy of Truth-Seeking Ethics

I have not settled (and maybe it’s not for me to do it) on the core tenets of Team Consciousness. This would be a kind of philosophy or spirituality that tries to derive ethics from truth and actually get at the truth rather than a convenient approximation of it (or worse, a misrepresentation of it for the sake of memetic reproduction capacity). What I’ve thought for many years and has remained stable, is that we can reduce them to three core principles:

  1. Oneness / Frame Invariance
  2. Valence Realism
  3. Math

First, we must realize that every point in reality is equally real. There are more or less intense experiences, of course, but this is in fact a measure of how much reality is expressed in each. The core idea here is not that every experience is literally equally significant (they’re not) but that the spatiotemporal coordinates of an experience are irrelevant for their significance. Your experiences or the experiences of the members of your tribe or species are not more or less real than those of anyone else, factoring in their degree and intensity of consciousness.

The second core idea is that valence – whether experiences feel good or bad – is the source of value. More so, valence structuralism (an implication of valence realism in light of empirical observations of what feels good or bad in practice) entails that the value of reality is encoded in the geometric and topological basis of consciousness. Indeed, there are better and worse forms of being, and this is not an arbitrary matter, but one that can be investigated directly and devoid of personal prejudice.

And finally: math. It is not the same to suffer for one second versus a million years. It is not the same for one person to suffer as it is for a billion persons in torment. It is not the same for love to exist for a minute versus it being the foundation of a civilization. Amounts matter; qualities matter. This is tautological, of course. But for strange reasons, our empathizing cognitive styles often neglect math. So we ought to correct for this bug.

I think that all of ethics can be reconstructed from these principles. And in fact, they might help solve many moral paradoxes and enigmas. Just apply them diligently and rigorously and see how they allow you to discern between good and evil.

My hope is that the reproductive capacity of these three core principles will come from the fact that (1) they are true (and truth is convergent for those who seek it) and (2) they are highly beneficial and generate excess value. On (2), I’d point out that valence realism and the oneness of consciousness principle have practical implications, ranging from a science of consciousness capable of reducing depression, anxiety, and chronic pain, to future consciousness-altering technologies that will greatly enhance our intelligence and collective coordination capacities. I wish for these tenets to not acquire additional clauses that are there merely for their reproduction capacity at the cost of truth or accuracy; they should stand on their own. But these might not be the final set. I’m open to suggestions and enhancements 🙂

QRI Meetup in Amsterdam on January 25th 2025: The Coupling Kernels Revolution

Dear wonderful community,

Just as a fire uniformly raises the temperature throughout a building, causing diverse but interconnected effects (metal beams expanding, wood supports burning, windows cracking from thermal stress, smoke rising through air currents) psychedelics might work through a single fundamental mechanism that ripples through all neural systems. This isn’t just theoretical elegance without grounding; it’s a powerful explanatory framework that could help us understand why substances like DMT and 5-MeO-DMT produce distinct but internally consistent effects across visual, auditory, cognitive, and somatic domains. A single change in coupling dynamics might explain why these compounds have such distinct but internally consistent effects: DMT creates rapidly alternating color/anti-color visual patterns and oscillating somatic sensations, whereas 5-MeO-DMT tends towards a state of global coherence.

As demonstrated in our work “Towards Computational Simulations of Cessation“, see how a flat “coupling kernel” triggers a global attractor of coherence across the entire system, whereas an alternating negative-positive (Mexican hat-like) kernel produces competing clusters of coherence. This is just a very high-level and abstract demonstration of a change in the dynamic behavior of coupled oscillators by applying a coupling kernel. What we then must do is to see how such a change would impact different systems in the organism as a whole.
Source

The key insight is that psychedelics may modify the coupling kernels between oscillating neural systems throughout the body. Think of coupling kernels as the “rules of interaction” between neighboring neural oscillators. When these rules change, the effects cascade through different neural architectures (from the hierarchical layers of the visual cortex to the branching networks of the peripheral nervous system) producing the kaleidoscopic zoo of psychedelic effects we observe.

DMT, for instance, appears to enhance contrast and create competing clusters of coherence (possibly through 5-HT2A activation), while 5-MeO-DMT tends toward global coherence and boundary dissolution (potentially through 5-HT1A pathways). These changes in coupling dynamics appear to tune into the brain’s natural resonant modes, as described by connectome-specific harmonic waves, modulating their spectral power distribution in predictable and reliable ways.

Simulation comparing coupling kernels across a hierarchical network of feature-selective layers (16×16 to 2×2), showing how different coupling coefficients between and within layers affect pattern formation. The DMT-like kernel (-1.0 near-neighbor coupling) generates competing checkerboard patterns at multiple spatial frequencies, while the 5-MeO-DMT-like kernel (positive coupling coefficients) drives convergence toward larger coherent patches. These distinct coupling dynamics mirror how these compounds might modulate hierarchical neural architectures like the visual cortex.
Source: Internal QRI tool (public release forthcoming)

We’re excited to announce that we’ll be hosting a meeting in Amsterdam to explore this paradigm-shifting framework. This gathering will bring together researchers studying psychedelics from multiple angles – from phenomenology to neuroscience – to discuss how coupling kernels might serve as a bridge between subjective experience and neural mechanisms. Recent work on divisive normalization has shown how local neural responses are regulated by their surrounding activity, providing a potential mechanistic basis for how psychedelics modify these coupling patterns. By understanding psychedelic states through the lens of coupling kernels, we may finally have a mathematical framework that unifies the seemingly disparate effects of these compounds, much like how understanding heat transfer helps us predict how a fire will affect an entire building – from its structural integrity to its airflow patterns.

Simulation comparing different coupling kernels (DMT-like vs 5-MeO-DMT-like) applied to a 1.5D fractal branching network, showing how modified coupling parameters affect phase coherence and signal propagation. The DMT-like kernel produces competing clusters of coherence at bifurcation points, while the 5-MeO-DMT kernel drives the system toward global phase synchronization – patterns that could explain how these compounds differently affect branching biological systems like the vasculature or peripheral nervous system.
Source: Internal QRI tool (public release forthcoming)

Event Details & Amsterdam Visit

The meetup will be held on the 25th of January (location: Generator Amsterdamevent page; time: 1-8PM), featuring presentations from myself and Marco Aqil, whose groundbreaking work on divisive normalization and graph neural fields provides a compelling neuroscientific foundation for the Coupling Kernels paradigm. Marco’s research demonstrates how spatial coupling dynamics can bridge microscopic neural activity and macroscopic brain-wide effects: a perfect complement to our phenomenological investigations.

Additionally, I’ll be in Amsterdam throughout the last third of January and available to meet with academics, artists, recreational metaphysicians, and qualia researchers. If you’re interested in deep discussions about consciousness, psychedelic states, and mathematical frameworks for understanding subjective experience, please reach out.

Much love and may your New Year be filled with awesome and inspiring experiences as well as solid paradigm-building enterprises!

~Metta~

QRI in Germany

Hello dear reader!

I seem to find myself in Berlin. My past self insists that I’m here for a reason, though the Empty Individualist self of the moment finds itself clearly confused about where it is and what it is doing here (realistically, the confusion is probably due to jetlag).

To me, Germany has always been one of those fictional countries used to back-fill the “history of humanity” and make this simulation more realistic. Alas, as I discovered yesterday, Germany is a real country with real people and real buildings (or so it seems from where I stand – it could be some sort of projective trick of course).

I’ve come to this country to meet European Qualia People! A full Europe trip will have to wait, but I’m told Berlin is a hub of sorts. It’s a scene worth visiting on the mission to spread the word for Team Consciousness.

My trip includes a talk at each of three different events, in temporal order: QRI Meetup (May 18), PsyDAO‘s PsyRL-1 (May 20), and Seed Club Ventures‘ and Foresight‘s AI x Hope (May 24). I will also stay in Berlin until the 27th, so there will be more chances to meet up if you are around but can’t make it to any of these (tentatively, we will host a casual QRI picnic on the 26th – location TBD (in Berlin) – check this page again closer to the date for details – we are going to merge the local ACX meetup with the planned QRI meetup, see details below).

QRI x ACX Berlin Meetup on the 26th

Due to serendipitous conditions the QRI picnic date coincides with the Berlin ACX meetup organized by Milli, who graciously accepted to merge the events. We will bring snacks, some drinks, and a fun demo to show 🙂

Details:

Time: May 26th, 2PM-6PM

Location: Big Lawn at the center of Humboldthain (precise location, announcement, group)

Hope to see you there! <3


EVENTS

Berlin QRI Meetup

What: Meetup where QRI collaborator Beata Grobenski (@stalkerofmusik on X) will present the latest version of The Good Annealing Manual she has been working on at the Qualia Research Institute. This manual aims to provide a balanced but forward-looking overview of QRI’s Theory of Neural Annealing and its further developments over the last few years, with an emphasis on pragmatic applications. I will then also personally deliver a presentation on a surprise topic, and then show some of the latest QRI technology. QRI collaborators Alfredo Parra and Libor Burian will also come to this event.

Where: MOOS Space, Moosdorfstraße 7-9, 12435 Berlin

When: May 18th, 2pm – 7pm+

Free entrance but limited spots, so please RSVP to reserve your spot.


The second event I’ll be presenting at is:

PsyDAO’s PsyRL-1

​Brief Description: Enjoy psychedelic art, culture, tokens, and vibes at PsyRL-1, the inaugural in-person gathering for PsyDAO.

Where: The iconic Molecule office – St.Agnes Church/KÖNIG GALERIE, Berlin

When: May 20th, 5:00 PM – 9:00 PM

​PsyRL-1 will feature:

  • ​talks from famous psychedelic luminaries (RSVP to find out their identities)
  • ​artisan botanical beverages with psychoactive ingredients (blue lotus, cacao, and other magic ingredients)
  • ​synesthetic visual projection mapping derived from Shipibo kené and
  • ​resident DJs playing a curated selection of high vibe tunes.

I want to point out that PsyDAO is a really exciting initiative that might very well “cut the Gordian Knot” for how to fund truly promising psychedelic research. As someone who has been working on developing empirical paradigms for visualizing, reverse-engineering, and utilizing exotic states of consciousness for novel information-processing tasks for many years now, it has become clear to me that the cutting-edge in consciousness research is bottlenecked by the lack of a feedback loop that goes from “taking phenomenology seriously” to “deciding what research will likely generate interesting results” and back. Thus, we find ourselves in a timeline where the bulk of high-quality psychedelic phenomenology is not to be found in textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and academic talks. Rather, it is in places like PsychonautWiki, r/replications, and QRI, where a thriving Think Tank model allows smart and dedicated psychonauts to point the way to worthwhile research. Example: Psychedelic tracers are near ubiquitous in psychedelic experiences (cf. “generalized tracer effects”), and yet it took a weird non-profit to figure out how to parametrize them. The truth is that academic culture strongly discourages researchers from openly talking about their own personal psychedelic phenomenology and informing their research methods with these discussions, leaving them no recourse other than silly questionnaires and ancient texts to point the way as a justification for why a given study is worth conducting. I am thus making a big bet that smart-psychonaut-led research paradigms will far outcompete academia’s phenomenology work in the years to come. The problem is: who is going to fund this research? PsyDAO’s decentralized funding schemes might be a key piece of the puzzle here.


AI X Hope

The third event I’ll be talking at is AI x Hope, which follows an exploration of AIxCrypto @ zuzalu.ai, this time co-organized and sponsored by Seed Club Ventures in collaboration with Foresight Institute.

Description: “We stand at a crucial point in shaping how Human-AI cooperation will evolve and are witnessing the birth of a new internet. We aim to approach this flippening with Existential Hope, and foster futures where humans and machines coexist to flourish ✨. Our belief is that a healthy and harmonious development of decentralized artificial general intelligence (AGI) can arise from an enlightened vantage point”.

Where: KÖNIG GALERIE, Berlin

When: May 24th, 2PM – 10PM

Title of my talk: The Nature of Subagentic Structures (cf. Aligning DMT Entities)

Existential Hope “about” page

In light of the rising culture war between “doomers and accelerators” (though, note the sociological complexities here) it is becoming increasingly difficult to articulate compelling visions of positive definite futures to look forward to. But if we are to coordinate to bring about a good future, we first need to visualize it on some level. Thus, I am very encouraging of initiatives that aim to paint positive visions to coordinate around. My personal focus here is on how consciousness research can open up entirely new vistas for a positive definite future. Please join us in this exploration!


Thank You!

I want to express my gratitude to both Existential Hope and PsyDAO for inviting me to these events and for facilitating my trip to this wonderful (still-not-convinced-it’s-not-fictional) country. 🙂


In other news, I wanted to highlight that Scott Alexander just posted yesterday a profile of the Far Out Initiative which I highly encourage you to read: link. It is not every day that the work of David Pearce gets the limelight of attention like this. More so, I know the people who work at the Far Out Initiative and I am deeply impressed with their moral seriousness, long-term vision, and incredibly pragmatic approach to drastically reducing suffering at scale. Please check them out!

Feels good, man! 🙂

Post-Darwinian Paradise, by David Pearce

The Phenomenology of MDMA: Self-Honesty, Authenticity, & the Unraveling of Gnarly Knots in the Field

In this video I discuss in depth the following topics:

1. MDMA is cardiotoxic and likely neurotoxic, with real and significant side-effects when taken often. Don’t do that. Respect and honor this beautiful state and save it for when you really need it.

2. The phenomenology is often described as “removing layers of conditioning and finding your essential, loving, and pure *core*”. It seems to significantly reduce greed, hate, and delusion, for at least a solid 90 minutes.

3. I argue that a good frame would be to think of the effects as drastically reducing both reactance and fear. Then you can assess a situation without the distortions of these two mental factors, which tend to generate rather self-serving thought-forms.

4. The concept of “authenticity” and its operationalization as a good lens with which to see the effects of MDMA. Big up to Matt Baggott, Co-founder and CEO of Tactogen, who is aiming to perfect MDMA and developed and applied the construct of authenticity in the scientific study of MDMA. Also thanks to Thomas S. Ray, who is on a similar path. Well done! Let’s get more people involved!

5. Another frame is to think of the state as clarifying what the “substance of thought” is like. We usually live under the illusion that emotional reactions follow Newtonian physics. They don’t. A better analogy would be corn starch and water, where applying force quickly can solidify (and even tear) the medium. Thus, we get in our own way and cause a lot of sense of solidity without even realizing it, which will take time and effort to soften and return to normal.

6. Discussion about QRI’s Psychedelic Thermodynamics model applied to MDMA.

7. Self-organizing principles, such as “repulsion-based algorithms” to undo knots, might explain what is happening to the field on MDMA.

8. A possible personality factor might be how “hard” someone is. I discuss personality disorders from a “hardness realism” point of view.

9. Emotional processing as a “skill tree” rather than “levels”.

10. High Entropy Alloys (HEA) are materials made of many metals that, in some cases, lead to really surprising effects, such as a new symmetry space group for their molecular organization (where none of the “ingredients” tend to crystalize that way, but as a whole they do). MDMA might be a bit of a unique HEA that balances serotonin (social anxiety reduction), dopamine (motivation and mental clarity), oxytocin (sense of closeness), and endorphins (bodily pleasure). It is more than the sum of the parts.

11. This leads to a speculation where the key high-level effects of MDMA, in addition to reducing fear and reactance, is the presence of courage, love and equanimity. I try to explain these features in terms of MDMA’s “vibratory signature”.

12. Deep discussion about self-honesty and why it develops in the state. I speculate it has to do with the de-modularization of our vascular clusters (or something else, if blood turns out to be a special case).

13. This blending of modules with each other results in an uncomfortable but helpful overlap between contradictory faces that we put in social settings. It is ideal to experience this with equanimity and patience, however difficult it is to acknowledge it to ourselves. The other side of this wall is light and beautiful, I promise.

14. It seems to me that MDMA creates a highly redundant and highly overdetermined Euclidean geometric phenomenal space, where each point “knows” really clearly how far it is from every other point. Psychedelics can sometimes do this for short periods of time, but they usually create complex fractaline phenomenal spaces. MDMA is different – highly “clear and normal” yet unblocked and euphoric.

15. The concept of Gnarliness as it relates to the “field knots” that MDMA can help unwind.

Relevant links:

Qualia Mastery II: Further Develop Your Toolkit for Navigating the State-Space of Consciousness

Explore Part II of the Qualia Mastery Series

Qualia Mastery, in a nutshell:

1) Explore the state-space of consciousness because you want to know it for yourself

2) Study it from many points of view because you want to understand it intellectually at a deep level

3) Intend to apply it for the benefit of all beings

In June of this year, we were proud to launch QRI’s first guided meditation series titled “Qualia Mastery.” Central to this series is the cultivation of a direct experiential understanding of how the mind works, coupled with an epistemological framework that values intellectual clarity. In essence, these guided meditations strive to provide both direct access to and intellectual insight into scientifically and personally significant states of consciousness. Furthermore, we embark on this journey with a sincere desire to serve and uplift others. The initial release features 9 foundational guided meditations. In this next installment, we’re collaborating with QRI associates Wystan Bryant-Scott and Roger Thisdell to go even deeper with another 9 meditations.

We genuinely hope you derive value from this series! We invite any feedback or phenomenological observations. Your perspective is invaluable to us.

Thank you!


Metta – Fabric Softener of Experience

Metta is a Pali word that can be translated as benevolence, friendliness, or good will. It is a key state of mind for meditative practice; it has the capacity to heal, invigorate, and center the mind.

The majority of guided Metta meditations emphasize the ways in which you can trigger this state of mind with semantic content and imagery. For example imagining a loved one, a pet, or even a beautiful scene, and tuning into the feeling of friendliness that such an image sparks.

In this meditation we instead emphasize the phenomenal character of Metta as a way to develop it, establish it, and understand it deeply. For example, we discuss how one can use different varieties of attention in order to kindle this feeling. We also tune into one’s intentions and background mood in order to nudge the mind towards Metta. More so, we carefully study how technical phenomenological features such as rhythm, wave envelope, and energy affect the quality and intensity of Metta.

May this meditation be of benefit to sentient beings!

Relevant Links:


Deeply Letting Go

It is often said that one of the most important meditative skills that one can cultivate is the practice of *letting go*. This means letting go of attachments, of cravings, of a sense of identity, and the need for things to be anything other than what they are. However, in practice doing this is more difficult than it sounds; we have a habit of holding tight to much more than we require for optimal wellbeing.

This guided meditation emphasizes two key aspects of letting go. Namely, (1) tactical methods for letting go, such as the judicious use of unusual varieties of attention, higher order equanimity, imaginal practices, and precise technique (such as rhythm and timing). And (2) the fact that letting go can be practiced in much deeper ways and with a much wider scope than is usually realized. In particular, letting go can take place in the visual, tactile, auditory domains, in addition to the spacious, cognitive, spiritual, and intuitive levels of the mind.

We conclude this meditation by listening to meditative music with the goal of experiencing it with complete equanimity and acceptance and putting our letting go techniques to practice.


Goldilocks Zone of Oneness

In this guided meditation, we delve into the phenomenology of various conceptions of personal identity. Specifically, we observe the experiential nuances of believing that we are individual souls (Closed Individualism), that we are a single universal consciousness (Open Individualism), that we represent ephemeral moments of experience (Empty Individualism), and that we encompass all these identities concurrently (Goldilocks Zone of Oneness).

As with the “The Phenomenology of Ontology” meditation, our objective here is to discern the qualities of experience that shape a specific worldview. In essence, the phenomenology of personal identity is a pivotal subject for any holistic consciousness research initiative, regardless of the metaphysical veracity of these perspectives. The capacity of these conceptions to modify experiential attributes—such as refining internal boundaries or amplifying the choppiness of sensations—underscores the importance of this topic for both phenomenological and scientific exploration.

More so, many exotic states of consciousness involve implicit alterations to our conceptions of personal identity. Therefore knowing how to detect the experiential features that make these beliefs feel more or less plausible is essential to successfully navigate exotic states of consciousness without compromising one’s epistemology.

Relevant Links:


Waves of Ever Becoming

In this meditation, Roger Thisdell guides us in a meditation of somatic scanning up and down the body using concurrent waves of awareness that pass through one another. We are trying to balance both the sense of grounding, stability with the sense of wakeful, levity.

By the end of the meditation, the goal is to isolate and metacognize the sense of ‘becoming’ within experience, and notice that this signal is always presenting itself. We may question, if everything seems like it’s always ‘becoming’ (but never fully become), then what significance does this have with the goal of trying to have ‘arrived’ somewhere?

For more guided meditations by Roger, check out his Patreon page where he releases a new guided meditation, on a variety of techniques, every week: https://www.patreon.com/rogerthis


Don’t Pay Attention

Normally in meditation we are focused on what IS in experience, but to be able to notice the absence of phenomena is key as well! Where there once were qualia, now there aren’t – what does that reveal to us about their nature?

Roger Thisdell guides a meditation starting with a taste session on the major ingredients which make up our experience. Then after paying attention to these components, we deliberately try to not pay attention to them. What we find is the move to let go of paying attention to anything is a universal move – no matter the object of attention – how convenient! 

The ability to take attention off of more and more aspects of experience is an essential skill which eventually culminates in the ability to not pay attention to time, space and consciousness, resulting in cessation.

For more guided meditations by Roger, check out his Patreon page where he releases a new guided meditation, on a variety of techniques, every week: https://www.patreon.com/rogerthis


Co-Arising Expansion and Contraction

Expansion and contraction are the subtlest distinguishing features of experience. This meditation on expansion and contraction, given by Roger Thisdell, is a guide for finding and synchronizing to the oscillatory nature of experience at different levels, and then realising the co-dependence on one another in order to exist. Where there is expansion there is contraction and vice versa. By having sufficient energy in the mind and being able to widen the ‘aperture’ of our present moment perception it is possible to notice contraction within attention, and expansion within awareness (and vice versa) at the same time!

For more guided meditations by Roger, check out his Patreon page where he releases a new guided meditation, on a variety of techniques, every week: https://www.patreon.com/rogerthis


A Clap of Thunder

In this guided meditation, our invited facilitator, Wystan, leads participants through meticulous body scanning techniques designed to cultivate an acute consciousness of the immediate present. Transitioning seamlessly from body scanning to methods of introspection, and further incorporating the nuanced technique of finger-following to “spread out the vision”, Wystan imparts a spectrum of methodologies that promise to augment the meditative practice of individuals across all levels of expertise.

For more content from Wystan Bryant-Scott, see his YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@wystantbs488/videos


Absorption Into Platonic Objects  

This meditation explores the phenomenology of absorption into Platonic objects. We delve into what it feels like to imagine, embody, and generate the sense of knowing of classic geometric and mathematical constructs.

One of the main takeaways from this meditation is that we can attune to the difference between (1) how we render a particular instance of a Platonic object and (2) the sense of knowing and existence of that object that arises as we do so.

That is, (1) emphasizes the specific point of view from which a Platonic object (say, a cube) can be apprehended. Each point of view gives rise to, in a way, a completely different experience (cf. Borges’ Funes the Memorious). Namely, the experience of rendering such an object from that particular point of view, with all of the sensory and qualitative features that come along with it. In contrast (2) points to that which remains the same across all of these points of view. Namely, the ways in which holding these objects in one’s attention keeps aspects of our experience invariant (such as the intuitions and resonances that come with each particular Platonic object).

In addition, we also explore how the geometry of attention affects one’s valence and sense of ease, with the goal of naturalizing “Sacred Geometry” for the cultivation of Qualia Mastery.

Relevant Links:


Self-Organizing Principles

There are many spiritual and yogic practices that utilize “elemental” objects of meditation. For example, the guided meditation by Michael Taft called “Five Elements Meditation” (link below) centers the mind around mental formations evocative of earth, water, fire, air, and space. 

Alas, it is natural to be skeptical of the value of these practices on the basis that science has shown that the universe is made up of particles, forces, and fields, and not the traditional elements of ancient ontologies.

Nevertheless, within the paradigm of Qualia Mastery in meditation, we affirm the significance of specific states of consciousness, irrespective of the techniques used to induce them. Adhering rigidly to a modern scientific worldview might, in fact, impede one’s engagement with such meditative practices. Engaging fully with a meditation that posits, for instance, fire as a fundamental entity, can often yield richer results when one genuinely subscribes to the idea. Continual internal rebuttals, such as “fire isn’t foundational; electrons are!” can inhibit deep immersion into these states.

So how can we rescue what is valuable from this style of meditation without having to buy into an implicit “elemental ontology”? Here is where the relevance of “self-organizing principles” comes into play. Namely, where we realize that the nervous system is capable of instantiating a cornucopia of diverse self-organizing principles that are used to render one’s inner world-simulation. Thus, when you imagine and embody “the element of fire” you are, in a way, instantiating a collection of self-organizing principles that roughly emulate the behavior of fire. 

Therefore, we can use a more generalized conception of “elemental meditation” as a window into these self-organizing principles. This is what this meditation does.

Relevant Links: