Skip to content

Rewrite of Connectivity01 (UDP connectivity)#1097

Merged
matsduf merged 7 commits into
zonemaster:developfrom
matsduf:update-connectivity01
Oct 7, 2022
Merged

Rewrite of Connectivity01 (UDP connectivity)#1097
matsduf merged 7 commits into
zonemaster:developfrom
matsduf:update-connectivity01

Conversation

@matsduf

@matsduf matsduf commented Sep 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Purpose

This PR is a complete rewrite of the test case. The main body of the the specification is copied from current Basic04, but TCP related parts have been removed. The plan is to remove Basic04 and let this test case be the only test case the completely reports errors of reaching the name servers over UDP.

Connectivity over TCP is covered by Connectivity02, that is updated by #1098.

Updates of references and removal of Basic04 is found in #1099.

Due to lack better alternative, the reporting, on NOTICE level, that IPv4 or IPv6 has been disabled, when applicable, has been included in this test case.

How to test this PR

This documentation only. Testing is done by reviewing and manual running the test case.

@matsduf matsduf added the A-TestCase Area: Test case specification or implementation of test case label Sep 14, 2022
@matsduf matsduf added this to the v2022.2 milestone Sep 14, 2022
@matsduf matsduf requested review from a user, mattias-p and tgreenx September 14, 2022 11:58
@matsduf matsduf changed the title Rewrite of Connectivity01 Rewrite of Connectivity01 (UDP connectivity) Sep 14, 2022
@matsduf matsduf force-pushed the update-connectivity01 branch from 5dfd796 to e9f4bc6 Compare September 14, 2022 15:58

@tgreenx tgreenx left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Just a few comments.

Comment thread docs/specifications/tests/Connectivity-TP/connectivity01.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/specifications/tests/Connectivity-TP/connectivity01.md
Comment thread docs/specifications/tests/Connectivity-TP/connectivity01.md
Comment thread docs/specifications/tests/Connectivity-TP/connectivity01.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/specifications/tests/Connectivity-TP/connectivity01.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/specifications/tests/Connectivity-TP/connectivity01.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/specifications/tests/Connectivity-TP/connectivity01.md Outdated
@matsduf matsduf requested a review from tgreenx September 16, 2022 08:04
@matsduf

matsduf commented Sep 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tgreenx, please re-review.

@matsduf matsduf mentioned this pull request Sep 20, 2022

@tgreenx tgreenx left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ready to approve after this last change.

Comment thread docs/specifications/tests/Connectivity-TP/connectivity01.md Outdated
@matsduf

matsduf commented Sep 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Removed "A message will be outputted reporting that the transport protocol has been skipped."

See #1098 (review)

@matsduf matsduf requested a review from tgreenx September 22, 2022 13:31
@matsduf

matsduf commented Sep 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tgreenx, added text to "objective" that message is outputted if IPv4/6 is disabled.

tgreenx
tgreenx previously approved these changes Sep 22, 2022

@ghost ghost left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

beside a small comment this is fine to me

Comment thread docs/specifications/tests/Connectivity-TP/connectivity01.md Outdated
ghost
ghost previously approved these changes Sep 26, 2022
Comment thread docs/specifications/tests/Connectivity-TP/connectivity01.md Outdated
@matsduf matsduf dismissed stale reviews from ghost and tgreenx via b0210f8 September 26, 2022 16:24
@matsduf matsduf requested a review from a user September 26, 2022 16:24
@matsduf matsduf requested a review from tgreenx September 26, 2022 16:24
@matsduf

matsduf commented Nov 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Implemented by zonemaster/zonemaster-engine#1143

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-TestCase Area: Test case specification or implementation of test case

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants