fix: less promises for scanning and await with allSettled#11245
Merged
patak-cat merged 2 commits intovitejs:mainfrom Dec 7, 2022
Merged
fix: less promises for scanning and await with allSettled#11245patak-cat merged 2 commits intovitejs:mainfrom
patak-cat merged 2 commits intovitejs:mainfrom
Conversation
9 tasks
patak-cat
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2022
Member
patak-cat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should go with this one for v4. Let's check the canceling with more time, and actually, see how much we win perf wise for the extra complexity.
Member
|
/ecosystem-ci run |
|
📝 Ran ecosystem CI: Open
|
Member
|
/ecosystem-ci run sveltekit |
9 tasks
futurGH
pushed a commit
to futurGH/vite
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
alternative to #11243
doesn't add
cancel()function to as that may have performance implications and the way the function has to be passed around isn't nice.Description
Additional context
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following
fixes #123).